Skip to main content
Log in

Intelligent modular design with holonic fuzzy agents

  • Published:
Advances in Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presently, modular designs use various technologies accompanied by multiple models. Although no integral solution is known, a plethora of approaches is used to resolve this trans disciplinary challenge, often by using local intelligence. However, the effective utilization of multiple models requires proper integration for them to work together as a cohesive system. This requirement calls for the development of intelligent models and tools that can be used for the development of intelligent modular products. Modular design based on these intelligent models and tools is called intelligent modular design. Intelligent modular design requires to be considered both dynamically and holistically by combining customer requirements, product functions, solutions, service specifications, and their fuzziness in order to structure a product into intelligent modules. This paper proposes the use of holonic fuzzy agents to fulfill both the properties of intelligent models and the requirements of intelligent modular design. The set of fuzzy function agents and their corresponding fuzzy solution agents are found from customization of the product-service system in the fuzzy function agent-fuzzy solution agent sub-network. On the basis of attractor agent recognition, the fuzzy function and fuzzy solution agents interact to form the holonic fuzzy module agents. Self-embedding of holonic fuzzy module agents, which is the fundamental property of the holonic structure, is also characterized by vertical and horizontal communication. The flexibility and agility of the software agent make the holonic structure of intelligent modules adaptable. An application illustrates the proposed intelligent modular design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fodor JA (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salvador F (2007) Toward a product system modularity construct: literature review and reconceptualization. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 54:219–240

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2007) A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products. J Mech Des 129:1118–1129

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonvoisin J, Halstenberg F, Buchert T et al (2016) A systematic literature review on modular product design. J Eng Des 27:488–514

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kashkoush M, El Maraghy H (2017) Designing modular product architecture for optimal overall product modularity. J Eng Des 28:293–316

    Google Scholar 

  6. Issa H, Ostrosi E, Lenczner M et al (2017) Fuzzy holons for intelligent multi-scale design in cloud-based design for configurations. J Intell Manuf 28:1219–1247

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ong SK, Xu QL, Nee AYC (2008) Design reuse in product development modeling, analysis and optimization. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fogliatto FS, da Silveira GJ (eds) (2011) Mass customization: engineering and managing global operations. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Stone RB, Wood KL (2000) Development of a functional basis for design. J Mech Des 122:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design: advances and applications. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48:292–306

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lange MW, Imsdahl A (2014) Modular function deployment: using module drivers to impart strategies to a product architecture. In: Siddique Z, Hölttä-Otto K, Simpson TW et al (eds) Advances in product family and product platform design. Springer, New York, pp 91–118

  13. Fischer JO (2008) Cost-conscious design: proven methods and information systems for the design process. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schuh G, Arnoscht J, Aleksic S (2012) Systematic design of communalities in products and processes. ZWF Z Für Wirtsch Fabr 107:322–326

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ostrosi E, Stjepandić J, Fukuda S et al (2014) Modularity: new trends for product platform strategy support in concurrent engineering. Adv Transdiscipl Eng. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-440-4-414

  16. Zhuo L, Yoke SW, Kim SL (2008) Integrated approach to modularize the conceptual product family architecture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:83–96

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baylis K, Zhang G, McAdams DA (2018) Product family platform selection using a Pareto front of maximum commonality and strategic modularity. Res Eng Des 29:547–563

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raudberget D, Elgh F, Stolt R et al (2019) Developing agile platform assets—exploring ways to reach beyond modularisation at five product development companies. Int J Agile Syst Manag 12:311–331

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiao J, Simpson TW, Siddique Z (2007) Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. J Intell Manuf 18:5–29

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stjepandić J, Ostrosi E, Fougères AJ et al (2015) Modularity and supporting tools and methods. In: Stjepandić J, Wognum N, Verhagen JCW (eds) Concurrent engineering in the 21st century. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 389–420

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bruun HPL, Mortensen NH, Harlou U et al (2015) PLM system support for modular product development. Comput Ind 67:97–111

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sun J, Chai N, Pi G et al (2017) Modularization of product service system based on functional requirement. Procedia CIRP 64:301–305

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tinnilä M, Lipponen M, Rajahonka M et al (2010) The concept of modularity: diffusion from manufacturing to service production. J Manuf Technol Manag 21:355–375

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jung M (2005) Controlling of modular product families in the automotive industry. Dissertation, Deutscher University, Wiesbaden

  25. Piller FT, Tseng MM (2010) Handbook of research in mass customization and personalization. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  26. Custódio DT, Roehe VGL, Nunes FL et al (2018) Variant product configuration of industrial air handling units in a MTO environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:1025–1037

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kreng VB, Lee TP (2004) Modular product design with grouping genetic algorithm—a case study. Comput Ind Eng 46:443–460

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sinha K, Suh ES (2018) Pareto-optimization of complex system architecture for structural complexity and modularity. Res Eng Des 29:123–141

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu X, Zhang W, Ding X (2018) Modular design method for filament winding process equipment based on GGA and NSGA-II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:2057–2076

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yu S, Yang Q, Tao J et al (2011) Product modular design incorporating life cycle issues - group genetic algorithm (GGA) based method. J Clean Prod 19:1016–1032

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee MJ, Case K, Marshall R (2016) Product lifecycle optimisation of car climate controls using analytical hierarchical process (AHP) analysis and a multi-objective grouping genetic algorithm (MOGGA). J Eng Sci Technol 11:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pandremenos J, Chryssolouris G (2011) A neural network approach for the development of modular product architectures. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24:879–887

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fougères AJ, Ostrosi E (2013) Fuzzy agent-based approach for consensual design synthesis in product configuration. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 20:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  34. Albrecht SV, Stone P (2018) Autonomous agents modelling other agents: a comprehensive survey and open problems. Artif Intell 258:66–95

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Valckenaers P, Van Brussel H, Hadeli BO et al (2003) On the design of emergent systems: an investigation of integration and interoperability issues. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:377–393

    Google Scholar 

  36. Deciu ER, Ostrosi E, Ferney M et al (2005) Configurable product design using multiple fuzzy models. J Eng Des 16:209–233

    Google Scholar 

  37. He B, Pan Q, Deng Z (2018) Product carbon footprint for product life cycle under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 187:459–472

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ostrosi E, Fougères AJ (2011) Optimization of product configuration assisted by fuzzy agents. Int J Interact Des Manuf 5:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ostrosi E, Haxhiaj L, Ferney M (2008) Configuration grammars: powerful tools for product modelling in CAD systems. In: Curran R, Chou SY, Trappey A (eds) Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world. Springer, London, pp 469–481

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ostrosi E, Fougères AJ, Ferney M et al (2012) A fuzzy configuration multi-agent approach for product family modelling in conceptual design. J Intell Manuf 23:2565–2586

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huang CC (2004) A multi-agent approach to collaborative design of modular products. Concurr Eng 12:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  42. Issa H, Ostrosi E, Lenczner M et al (2013) Influence of functional knowledge structuring for modular design. Adv Mater Res 651:595–600

    Google Scholar 

  43. Overmeyer L, Bentlage A (2014) Small-scaled modular design for aircraft wings. In: Denkena B (ed) New production technologies in aerospace industry. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 55–62

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kim S, Moon SK (2019) Eco-modular product architecture identification and assessment for product recovery. J Intell Manuf 30:383–403

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Z, Chai N, Ostrosi E et al (2019) Extraction of association rules in the schematic design of product service system based on Pareto-MODGDFA. Comput Ind Eng 129:392–403

    Google Scholar 

  46. Elgh F (2014) Automated engineer-to-order systems—a task-oriented approach to enable traceability of design rationale. Int J Agile Syst Manag 7:324

    Google Scholar 

  47. André S, Elgh F (2018) Modeling of transdisciplinary engineering assets using the design platform approach for improved customization ability. Adv Eng Inform 38:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stjepandic J, Wognum N, Verhagen WJC (eds) (2019) Systems engineering in research and industrial practice: foundations, developments and challenges. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33312-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Krstic D (2004) Computing with analyzed shapes. In: Design computing and cognition. Springer, pp 397–416

  50. Valckenaers P, Van Brussel H (2005) Fundamental insights into holonic systems design. In: International conference on industrial applications of holonic and multi-agent systems. Springer, pp 11–22

  51. Valckenaers P, Van Brussel H, Wyns J et al (1998) Designing holonic manufacturing systems. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 14:455–464

  52. Van Brussel H, Bongaerts L, Wyns J et al (1999) A conceptual framework for holonic manufacturing: Identification of manufacturing holons. J Manuf Syst 18:35

  53. Van Brussel H, Wyns J, Valckenaers P et al (1998) Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Comput Ind 37:255–274

  54. Leitão P, Restivo F (2008) A holonic approach to dynamic manufacturing scheduling. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 24:625–634

    Google Scholar 

  55. Leitão P, Restivo F (2006) ADACOR: a holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing control. Comput Ind 57:121–130

    Google Scholar 

  56. Arai T, Aiyama Y, Sugi M et al (2001) Holonic assembly system with plug and produce. Comput Ind 46:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hsieh FS (2008) Robustness analysis of holonic assembly/disassembly processes with Petri nets. Automatica 44:2538–2548

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Hashemian M (2005) Design for adaptability. Dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

  59. Ostrosi E, Fougères AJ, Ferney M (2012) Fuzzy agents for product configuration in collaborative and distributed design process. Appl Soft Comput 12:2091–2105

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51205242), and Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan (Grant No. 16111106402).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Egon Ostrosi.

Appendix: Fuzzy module holon based on fuzzy function holon

Appendix: Fuzzy module holon based on fuzzy function holon

figure e
figure f
figure g

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ostrosi, E., Fougères, AJ., Zhang, ZF. et al. Intelligent modular design with holonic fuzzy agents. Adv. Manuf. 9, 81–103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00331-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00331-0

Keywords

Navigation