Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-load AGVs scheduling by application of modified memetic particle swarm optimization algorithm

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The automated guided vehicles (AGVs) are extensively applied for material handling operations in the flexible manufacturing system (FMS) facilities. The scheduling decisions for the multi-load AGVs serving in the FMS with minimum travel time, waiting time and time to serve jobs are highly significant from the sustainable profits point of view. The present study proposes a combination of particle swarm optimization (PSO) for global search and memetic algorithm (MA) for local search termed as the modified memetic particle swarm optimization algorithm (MMPSO) for scheduling of multi-load AGVs in FMS. The newly proposed algorithm is applied for the generation of initial feasible solutions for scheduling of multi-load AGVs with minimum travel and minimum waiting time in the FMS. From the computational experiments, it is observed that the proposed MMPSO algorithm performs an effective and efficient exploration and exploitation process and further yields promising results for the multi-load AGVs scheduling problem in the FMS facility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mantel RJ, Landeweerd HR (1995) Design and operational control of an AGV system. Int J Prod Econ 41(1–3):257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akturk MS, Yilmaz H (1996) Scheduling of automated guided vehicles in a decision making hierarchy. Int J Prod Res 34(2):577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Veeravalli B, Rajesh G, Viswanadham N (2002) Design and analysis of optimal material distribution policies in flexible manufacturing systems using a single AGV. Int J Prod Res 40(12):2937–2954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaskins RJ, Tanchoco JM (1987) Flow path design for automated guided vehicle systems. Int J Prod Res 25(5):667–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Egbelu PJ, Tanchoco JMA (1986) Potentials for bi-directional guide-path for automated guided vehicle based systems. Int J Prod Res 24(5):1075–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaskins RJ, Tanchoco JMA, Taghaboni F (1989) Virtual flow paths for free-ranging automated guided vehicle systems. Int J Prod Res 27(1):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilge U, Tanchoco JM (1997) AGV systems with multi-load carriers: basic issues and potential benefits. J Manuf Syst 16(3):159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulusoy G, Sivrikaya-Şerifoǧlu F, Bilge Ü (1997) A genetic algorithm approach to the simultaneous scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles. Comput Oper Res 24(4):335–351

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Meer R (2000) Operational control of internal transport (no. TTS; T2000/5)

  10. Chawla V, Chanda A, Angra S (2018) Scheduling of multi-load AGVs in FMS by modified memetic particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Proj Manag 3(1):39–54

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chawla V, Chanda A, Angra S (2018) Automatic guided vehicles fleet size optimization for flexible manufacturing system by grey wolf optimization algorithm. Manag Sci Lett 8(2):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qiu L, Hsu WJ, Huang SY, Wang H (2002) Scheduling and routing algorithms for AGVs: a survey. Int J Prod Res 40(3):745–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang CH, Choi YS, Ha TY (2004) Simulation-based performance evaluation of transport vehicles at automated container terminals. OR Spectrum 26(2):149–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meersmans PJM (2002) Optimization of container handling systems (no. 271)

  15. Fleischmann B, Gnutzmann S, Sandvoß E (2004) Dynamic vehicle routing based on online traffic information. Transp Sci 38(4):420–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Powell WB, Towns MT, Marar A (2000) On the value of optimal myopic solutions for dynamic routing and scheduling problems in the presence of user noncompliance. Transp Sci 34(1):67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jerald J, Asokan P, Saravanan R, Rani ADC (2006) Simultaneous scheduling of parts and automated guided vehicles in an FMS environment using adaptive genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(5–6):584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar NS, Sridharan R (2010) Simulation-based metamodels for the analysis of scheduling decisions in a flexible manufacturing system operating in a tool-sharing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1–4):341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadrabadi MR, Sadjadi SJ (2009) A new approach to solve multiple objective programming problems. Int J Ind Eng Prod Res 20(1):41–51

    Google Scholar 

  20. Niu Q, Jiao B, Gu X (2008) Particle swarm optimization combined with genetic operators for job shop scheduling problem with fuzzy processing time. Appl Math Comput 205(1):148–158

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Petalas YG, Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN (2007) Memetic particle swarm optimization. Ann Oper Res 156(1):99–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Umar UA, Ariffin MKA, Ismail N, Tang SH (2015) Hybrid multiobjective genetic algorithms for integrated dynamic scheduling and routing of jobs and automated-guided vehicle (AGV) in flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9–12):2123–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fazlollahtabar H, Saidi-Mehrabad M, Balakrishnan J (2015) Mathematical optimization for earliness/tardiness minimization in a multiple automated guided vehicle manufacturing system via integrated heuristic algorithms. Robot Auton Syst 72:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levitin G, Abezgaouz R (2003) Optimal routing of multiple-load AGV subject to LIFO loading constraints. Comput Oper Res 30(3):397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu B, Wang L, Jin YH (2007) An effective PSO-based memetic algorithm for flow shop scheduling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 37(1):18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ho YC, Liao TW (2009) Zone design and control for vehicle collision prevention and load balancing in a zone control AGV system. Comput Ind Eng 56(1):417–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rashidi H (2010) Scheduling in container terminals using Network Simplex Algorithm. J Optim Ind Eng 1:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rashidi H, Tsang E (2015) Vehicle scheduling in port automation: advanced algorithms for minimum cost flow problems. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his sincere thanks to the editorial team and to the anonymous reviewers for their significant constructive comments for the earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. K. Chawla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Victor Juliano De Negri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chawla, V.K., Chanda, A.K. & Angra, S. Multi-load AGVs scheduling by application of modified memetic particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1357-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1357-4

Keywords

Navigation