Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-invasive molecular diagnosis in gliomas with advanced imaging

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J et al (2015) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008–2012. Neuro-Oncol 17(Suppl4):iv1–iv62. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov189

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23(8):1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pafundi DH, Laack NN, Youland RS et al (2013) Biopsy validation of 18F-DOPA PET and biodistribution in gliomas for neurosurgical planning and radiotherapy target delineation: results of a prospective pilot study. Neuro Oncol 15(8):1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ullrich R, Backes H, Li H et al (2008) Glioma proliferation as assessed by 3’-fluoro-3’-deoxy-L-thymidine positron emission tomography in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma. Clin Cancer Res 14(7):2049–2055. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Backes H, Ullrich R, Neumaier B, Kracht L, Wienhard K, Jacobs AH (2009) Noninvasive quantification of 18F-FLT human brain PET for the assessment of tumour proliferation in patients with high-grade glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36(12):1960–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1244-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Berzero G, Bellu L, Baldini C et al (2021) Sustained tumor control with MAPK inhibition in BRAF v600-mutant adult glial and glioneuronal tumors. Neurology 97(7):e673–e683. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galldiks N, Niyazi M, Grosu AL et al (2021) Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients—a report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 23(6):881–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Law I, Albert NL, Arbizu J et al (2019) Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46(3):540–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4207-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Niemeijer AN, Leung D, Huisman MC et al (2018) Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Commun 9(1):4664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07131-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Herhaus P, Lipkova J, Lammer F et al (2020) CXCR4-targeted PET imaging of central nervous system B-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med 61(12):1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.241703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nowosielski M, Galldiks N, Iglseder S et al (2017) Diagnostic challenges in meningioma. Neuro Oncol 19(12):1588–1598. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalinina J, Carroll A, Wang L et al (2012) Detection of “oncometabolite” 2-hydroxyglutarate by magnetic resonance analysis as a biomarker of IDH1/2 mutations in glioma. J Mol Med 90(10):1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-012-0888-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andronesi OC, Kim GS, Gerstner E et al (2012) Detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated glioma patients by in vivo spectral-editing and 2D correlation magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci Transl Med 4(116):116ra4. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ et al (2012) 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nat Med 18(4):624–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi C, Raisanen JM, Ganji SK et al (2016) Prospective longitudinal analysis of 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies broad clinical utility for the management of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. J Clin Oncol 34(33):4030–4039. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Branzoli F, Di Stefano AL, Capelle L et al (2018) Highly specific determination of IDH status using edited in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuro Oncol 20(7):907–916. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de la Fuente MI, Young RJ, Rubel J et al (2016) Integration of 2-hydroxyglutarate-proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy into clinical practice for disease monitoring in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma. Neuro Oncol 18(2):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aerts HJWL, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RTH et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S et al (2012) Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9):1234–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou M, Scott J, Chaudhury B et al (2018) Radiomics in brain tumor: image assessment, quantitative feature descriptors, and machine-learning approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(2):208–216. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kickingereder P, Bonekamp D, Nowosielski M et al (2016) Radiogenomics of glioblastoma: machine learning-based classification of molecular characteristics by using multiparametric and multiregional MR imaging features. Radiology 281(3):907–918. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016161382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiwari P, Prasanna P, Wolansky L et al (2016) Computer-extracted texture features to distinguish cerebral radionecrosis from recurrent brain tumors on multiparametric MRI: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(12):2231–2236. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Akbari H, Macyszyn L, Da X et al (2016) Imaging surrogates of infiltration obtained via multiparametric imaging pattern analysis predict subsequent location of recurrence of glioblastoma. Neurosurgery 78(4):572–580. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bakas S, Akbari H, Pisapia J et al (2017) In vivo detection of EGFRvIII in glioblastoma via perfusion magnetic resonance imaging signature consistent with deep peritumoral infiltration: the φ-index. Clin Cancer Res 23(16):4724–4734. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Han L, Wang S, Miao Y et al (2019) MRI texture analysis based on 3D tumor measurement reflects the IDH1 mutations in gliomas—a preliminary study. Eur J Radiol 112:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Stefano AL, Picca A, Saragoussi E et al (2020) Clinical, molecular and radiomic profile of gliomas with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa121 (Published online May 15)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheller MJ, Edwards B, Reina GA et al (2020) Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Sci Rep 10(1):12598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded. Dr. Anna Luisa Di Stefano was supported by Premio Carla Russo 2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Luisa Di Stefano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Di Stefano reports no disclosures. Pr Mansi reports no disclosures. Pr. Sanson reports no disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Stefano, A.L., Mansi, L. & Sanson, M. Non-invasive molecular diagnosis in gliomas with advanced imaging. Clin Transl Imaging 10, 567–569 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-022-00501-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-022-00501-z

Navigation