Abstract
Introduction
New safety issues concerning US FDA-approved drugs are commonly communicated through safety-related labeling changes. Therefore, to optimize and refine postmarket safety surveillance strategies, it is important to comprehensively characterize the sources of data giving rise to safety-related labeling changes.
Objectives
Our objective was to characterize the sources of data triggering and supporting the identification of new safety risks of FDA-approved drugs communicated through safety-related labeling changes.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study with a 10-year observation period using FDA’s internal electronic data repositories for all prescription new molecular entities (NME) approved in 2008. We collected and analyzed information on new safety issues, the section of the full prescribing information updated, initiators (FDA, drug manufacturer), and triggering and supporting sources of evidence.
Results
Among 22 NMEs approved in 2008, 189 new safety issues for 18 NMEs were identified. Compared to drug manufacturer, FDA initiated safety-related labeling changes in nine of the ten changes to the Boxed Warnings, 28 of the 52 changes to the Warnings and Precautions, and 43 of the 134 changes to the Adverse Reactions sections of the full prescribing information. The most frequent triggering sources of evidence included the drug manufacturer safety database (32.3%) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) safety reports (15.3%) for all relevant sections of the full prescribing information, and class-labeling changes (17.5%) for Boxed Warnings and the Warnings and Precautions sections. The most frequent triggering source of evidence was FAERS safety reports (69%) in the first year after drug approval and the drug manufacturer safety database in subsequent years.
Conclusions
Our findings emphasize the continued importance of safety reports from FAERS and drug manufacturer safety databases and a comprehensive drug safety surveillance program throughout a drug’s lifecycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woodcock J, Behrman RE, Dal Pan GJ. Role of postmarketing surveillance in contemporary medicine. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-060309-164311.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Section 314.70. Supplements and other changes to an approved NDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=314.70. Accessed 16 Nov 2021
Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Section 201.56(a)(1). Requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=201.56. Accessed 16 Nov 2021
Warnings and Precautions, Contraindications, and Boxed Warning Sections of Labeling. FDA Guidance Document. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/warnings-and-precautions-contraindications-and-boxed-warning-sections-labeling-human-prescription. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.
Adverse Reactions Section of Labeling. FDA Guidance Document. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/adverse-reactions-section-labeling-human-prescription-drug-and-biological-products-content-and. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.
Lester J, Neyarapally GA, Lipowski E, Graham CF, Hall M, Dal Pan G. Evaluation of FDA safety-related drug label changes in 2010. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:302–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3395.
Pinnow E, Amr S, Bentzen SM, Brajovic S, Hungerford L, St. George DM, Dal Pan G. Postmarket safety outcomes for new molecular entity (NME) drugs approved by the food and drug administration between 2002 and 2014. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.944.
Cherkaoui S, Pinnow E, Bulatao I, Day B, Kalaria M, Brajovic S, Dal Pan G. The impact of variability in patient exposure during premarket clinical development on postmarket safety outcomes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(6):1512–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2320.
US Food and Drug Administration. Medical product safety. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/default.htm. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.
US Food and Drug Administration. Drug safety‐related labeling changes (SrLC) https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/safetylabelingchanges/. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.
US Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: FDA‐approved drugs https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.
Question and Answers on FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/surveillance/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.
Best Practices in Drug and Biological Product Postmarket Safety Surveillance for FDA Staff. https://www.fda.gov/media/130216/download. Accessed 16 Nov 2021.
Berlin RJ. Examination of the relationship between oncology drug labeling revision frequency and FDA product categorization. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1693–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.141010.
Goldman SA. Limitations and strengths of spontaneous reports data. Clin Ther. 1998;20(Suppl C):C40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80007-6.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Karen Long for her invaluable assistance with artwork.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
David Croteau, Ellen Pinnow, Eileen Wu, Monica Muñoz, Ilynn Bulatao, and Gerald Dal Pan have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Data availability
In addition to the data found on the public FDA websites referred to in this article, the analytic data sets, redacted for drug manufacturer proprietary information, can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
The authors contributed sufficiently to the manuscript, with individual contributions as follows: concept and planning of the work described (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB, GDP); acquisition (EP), analysis (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB), and interpretation of the data (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB, GDP); drafting and/or critical revision of the manuscript (DC); and approval of the final submitted version of the manuscript (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB, GDP). Therefore, all authors share collective responsibility and accountability for the manuscript.
Additional information
The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the US FDA.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Croteau, D., Pinnow, E., Wu, E. et al. Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration. Drug Saf 45, 169–180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3