Skip to main content
Log in

Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

New safety issues concerning US FDA-approved drugs are commonly communicated through safety-related labeling changes. Therefore, to optimize and refine postmarket safety surveillance strategies, it is important to comprehensively characterize the sources of data giving rise to safety-related labeling changes.

Objectives

Our objective was to characterize the sources of data triggering and supporting the identification of new safety risks of FDA-approved drugs communicated through safety-related labeling changes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study with a 10-year observation period using FDA’s internal electronic data repositories for all prescription new molecular entities (NME) approved in 2008. We collected and analyzed information on new safety issues, the section of the full prescribing information updated, initiators (FDA, drug manufacturer), and triggering and supporting sources of evidence.

Results

Among 22 NMEs approved in 2008, 189 new safety issues for 18 NMEs were identified. Compared to drug manufacturer, FDA initiated safety-related labeling changes in nine of the ten changes to the Boxed Warnings, 28 of the 52 changes to the Warnings and Precautions, and 43 of the 134 changes to the Adverse Reactions sections of the full prescribing information. The most frequent triggering sources of evidence included the drug manufacturer safety database (32.3%) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) safety reports (15.3%) for all relevant sections of the full prescribing information, and class-labeling changes (17.5%) for Boxed Warnings and the Warnings and Precautions sections. The most frequent triggering source of evidence was FAERS safety reports (69%) in the first year after drug approval and the drug manufacturer safety database in subsequent years.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasize the continued importance of safety reports from FAERS and drug manufacturer safety databases and a comprehensive drug safety surveillance program throughout a drug’s lifecycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

source by full prescribing information section updated. FAERS FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, NOS not otherwise specified, PMC postmarketing commitment, PMR postmarketing requirement

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodcock J, Behrman RE, Dal Pan GJ. Role of postmarketing surveillance in contemporary medicine. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-060309-164311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Section 314.70. Supplements and other changes to an approved NDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=314.70. Accessed 16 Nov 2021

  3. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Section 201.56(a)(1). Requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=201.56. Accessed 16 Nov 2021

  4. Warnings and Precautions, Contraindications, and Boxed Warning Sections of Labeling. FDA Guidance Document. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/warnings-and-precautions-contraindications-and-boxed-warning-sections-labeling-human-prescription. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  5. Adverse Reactions Section of Labeling. FDA Guidance Document. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/adverse-reactions-section-labeling-human-prescription-drug-and-biological-products-content-and. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  6. Lester J, Neyarapally GA, Lipowski E, Graham CF, Hall M, Dal Pan G. Evaluation of FDA safety-related drug label changes in 2010. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:302–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinnow E, Amr S, Bentzen SM, Brajovic S, Hungerford L, St. George DM, Dal Pan G. Postmarket safety outcomes for new molecular entity (NME) drugs approved by the food and drug administration between 2002 and 2014. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherkaoui S, Pinnow E, Bulatao I, Day B, Kalaria M, Brajovic S, Dal Pan G. The impact of variability in patient exposure during premarket clinical development on postmarket safety outcomes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(6):1512–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. US Food and Drug Administration. Medical product safety. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/default.htm. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  10. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug safety‐related labeling changes (SrLC) https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/safetylabelingchanges/. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  11. US Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: FDA‐approved drugs https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  12. Question and Answers on FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/surveillance/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  13. Best Practices in Drug and Biological Product Postmarket Safety Surveillance for FDA Staff. https://www.fda.gov/media/130216/download. Accessed 16 Nov 2021.

  14. Berlin RJ. Examination of the relationship between oncology drug labeling revision frequency and FDA product categorization. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1693–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.141010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldman SA. Limitations and strengths of spontaneous reports data. Clin Ther. 1998;20(Suppl C):C40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80007-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Karen Long for her invaluable assistance with artwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Croteau.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

David Croteau, Ellen Pinnow, Eileen Wu, Monica Muñoz, Ilynn Bulatao, and Gerald Dal Pan have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Data availability

In addition to the data found on the public FDA websites referred to in this article, the analytic data sets, redacted for drug manufacturer proprietary information, can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

The authors contributed sufficiently to the manuscript, with individual contributions as follows: concept and planning of the work described (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB, GDP); acquisition (EP), analysis (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB), and interpretation of the data (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB, GDP); drafting and/or critical revision of the manuscript (DC); and approval of the final submitted version of the manuscript (DC, EP, EW, MM, IB, GDP). Therefore, all authors share collective responsibility and accountability for the manuscript.

Additional information

The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the US FDA.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Croteau, D., Pinnow, E., Wu, E. et al. Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration. Drug Saf 45, 169–180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3

Navigation