Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cannabinoid Oromucosal Spray Use for the Management of Spasticity in Subjects with Multiple Sclerosis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly symptomatic disease, with a wide range of disabilities affecting many bodily functions, even in younger persons with a short disease history. The availability of a cannabinoid oromucosal spray (Sativex) for the management of treatment-resistant MS spasticity has provided a new opportunity for many patients.

Objective

Our study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of Sativex in Italian patients with treatment-resistant MS spasticity. The analysis was based on the real-world data of a large registry of Italian patients.

Methods

A cost-utility analysis was conducted using data collected prospectively from an electronic registry of all patients who began to use Sativex for MS-resistant spasticity between January 2014 and February 2015 in 30 specialized MS units across Italy and were followed up for ≤ 6 months. Data on drug consumption and spasticity/utility were used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Sativex, as compared with no intervention. No costs or spasticity/utility changes were assumed for no treatment intervention. The ICER was expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, using the Italian NHS perspective and a 6-month time horizon.

Results

Sativex effectiveness and consumption was estimated analyzing data of 1350 patients from the registry. These patients reported a mean (SD) utility increment of 0.087 (0.069) after 1 month of treatment, 0.118 (0.073) after 3 months’ treatment and 0.127 (0.080) after 6 months’ treatment. The 6-month cost of treating the entire population with Sativex was €1,361,266, with a €1008 cost and 0.0284 QALYs gained per patient. The estimated ICER was €35,516 per QALY gained, with little variability around the central estimate of cost-effectiveness, as shown by the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Conclusion

The use of Sativex could improve the quality of life of patients with a reasonable incremental cost resulting as a cost-effective option for patients with MS-resistant spasticity. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved management strategies for spasticity in patients with MS, optimizing the use of available resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2002;359(9313):1221–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feinstein A, Freeman J, Lo AC. Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: what works, what does not, and what is needed. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stevenson VL, Gras A, Bárdos JI, Broughton J. The high cost of spasticity in multiple sclerosis to individuals and society. Mult Scler. 2015;21(12):1583–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Messina S, Solaro C, Righini I, Bergamaschi R, Bonavita S, Bossio RB, Brescia Morra V, Costantino G, Cavalla P, Centonze D, Comi G, Cottone S, Danni MC, Francia A, Gajofatto A, Gasperini C, Zaffaroni M, Petrucci L, Signoriello E, Maniscalco GT, Spinicci G, Matta M, Mirabella M, Pedà G, Castelli L, Rovaris M, Sessa E, Spitaleri D, Paolicelli D, Granata A, Zappia M, Patti F, S. F. s. group. Sativex in resistant multiple sclerosis spasticity: discontinuation study in a large population of Italian patients (Sa.Fe. study). PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0180651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobelt G, Thompson A, Berg J, Gannedahl M, Eriksson J, M. S. Group and E. M. S. Platform. New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Mult Scler. 2017;23(8):1123–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Battaglia M, Kobelt G, Ponzio M, Berg J, Capsa D, Dalén J, E. M. S. Platform. New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe: results for Italy. Mult Scler. 2017;23(2):104–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salter AR, Cutter GR, Tyry T, Marrie RA, Vollmer T. Impact of loss of mobility on instrumental activities of daily living and socioeconomic status in patients with Ms. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(2):493–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Capra R, Cordioli C, Rasia S, Gallo F, Signori A, Sormani MP. Assessing long-term prognosis improvement as a consequence of treatment pattern changes in Ms. Mult Scler. 2017;23(13):1757–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, Correale J, Fazekas F, Filippi M, Freedman MS, Fujihara K, Galetta SL, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Marrie RA, Miller AE, Miller DH, Montalban X, Mowry EM, Sorensen PS, Tintoré M, Traboulsee AL, Trojano M, Uitdehaag BMJ, Vukusic S, Waubant E, Weinshenker BG, Reingold SC, Cohen JA. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the Mcdonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rønning OM, Tornes KD. Need for symptomatic management in advanced multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(5):529–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Skierlo S, Rommer PS, Zettl UK. Symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis-interim analysis of a Nationwide Registry. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(4):394–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heesen C, Böhm J, Reich C, Kasper J, Goebel M, Gold SM. Patient perception of bodily functions in multiple sclerosis: gait and visual function are the most valuable. Mult Scler. 2008;14(7):988–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patti F, Vila C. Symptoms, prevalence and impact of multiple sclerosis in younger patients: a multinational survey. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42(4):211–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arroyo R, Massana M, Vila C. Correlation between spasticity and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the candle study. Int J Neurosci. 2013;123(12):850–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Novotna A, Mares J, Ratcliffe S, Novakova I, Vachova M, Zapletalova O, Gasperini C, Pozzilli C, Cefaro L, Comi G, Rossi P, Ambler Z, Stelmasiak Z, Erdmann A, Montalban X, Klimek A, Davies P. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, enriched-design study of nabiximols* (Sativex(®)), as add-on therapy, in subjects with refractory spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(9):1122–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patti F, Messina S, Solaro C, Amato MP, Bergamaschi R, Bonavita S, Bruno Bossio R, Brescia Morra V, Costantino GF, Cavalla P, Centonze D, Comi G, Cottone S, Danni M, Francia A, Gajofatto A, Gasperini C, Ghezzi A, Iudice A, Lus G, Maniscalco GT, Marrosu MG, Matta M, Mirabella M, Montanari E, Pozzilli C, Rovaris M, Sessa E, Spitaleri D, Trojano M, Valentino P, Zappia M. Efficacy and safety of cannabinoid oromucosal spray for multiple sclerosis spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(9):944–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vermersch P, Trojano M. Tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol oromucosal spray for multiple sclerosis-related resistant spasticity in daily practice. Eur Neurol. 2016;76(5–6):216–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Svensson J, Borg S, Nilsson P. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;129(1):13–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(2):215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Longworth L, Rowen D. Mapping to obtain Eq-5d utility values for use in nice health technology assessments. Value Health. 2013;16(1):202–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wailoo AJ, Hernandez-Alava M, Manca A, Mejia A, Ray J, Crawford B, Botteman M, Busschbach J. Mapping to estimate health-state utility from non-preference-based outcome measures: an ISPOR good practices for outcomes research task force report. Value Health. 2017;20(1):18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolowacz S. New ISPOR recommendations—mapping methods for estimation of health state utility. Value Health. 2017;20(1):28–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. AIFA. Procedura Di Applicazione, Managed Entry Agreement - Medicinale Sativex. 2017. https://www.aifa.gov.it/-/procedura-di-applicazione-managed-entry-agreement-medicinale-sativex-01-03-2017-. Accessed 24 Feb 2020.

  24. Fenwick E, O’Brien BJ, Briggs A. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves-facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions. Health Econ. 2004;13(5):405–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Olivieri I, de Portu S, Salvarani C, Cauli A, Lubrano E, Spadaro A, Cantini F, Cutro MS, Mathieu A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Pappone N, Punzi L, Scarpa R, Mantovani LG. The psoriatic arthritis cost evaluation study: a cost-of-illness study on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy. Rheumatology. 2008;47(11):1664–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Berger T. Multiple sclerosis spasticity daily management: retrospective data from Europe. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013;13(3 Suppl 1):3–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zettl UK, Henze T, Essner U, Flachenecker P. Burden of disease in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity in Germany: mobility improvement study (Move I). Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(9):953–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pozzilli C. Advances in the management of multiple sclerosis spasticity: experiences from recent studies and everyday clinical practice. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013;13(12 Suppl):49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cortesi PA, Mantovani LG, Ciaccio A, Rota M, Mazzarelli C, Cesana G, Strazzabosco M, Belli LS. Cost-effectiveness of new direct-acting antivirals to prevent post-liver transplant recurrent hepatitis. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(7):1817–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cortesi PA, D’Angiolella LS, Vellucci R, Allegri M, Casale G, Favaretti C, Kheiraoui F, Cesana G, Mantovani LG. Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral fentanyl formulations for breakthrough cancer pain treatment. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Herzog S, Shanahan M, Grimison P, Tran A, Wong N, Lintzeris N, Simes J, Stockler M, Morton RL. Systematic review of the costs and benefits of prescribed cannabis-based medicines for the management of chronic illness: lessons from multiple sclerosis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(1):67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Slof J, Gras A. Sativex® in multiple sclerosis spasticity: a cost-effectiveness model. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(4):439–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Slof J, Ruiz L, Vila C. Cost-effectiveness of Sativex in multiple sclerosis spasticity: new data and application to Italy. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(3):379–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gras A, Broughton J. A cost-effectiveness model for the use of a cannabis-derived oromucosal spray for the treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(6):771–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu L, Pearce H, Roome C, Shearer J, Lang IA, Stein K. Cost effectiveness of oromucosal cannabis-based medicine (Sativex®) for spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(12):1157–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oreja-Guevara C, Casanova B, Ordás CM, Vila C, et al. Observational safety study of Thc: Cbd Oromucosal Spray (Sativex) in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity. Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2015;5:184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank BioMed Proofreading® for the support in copyediting the manuscript. The Members of the SA.FE. study group: Patti F, Messina S, Solaro C, Amato MP, Bergamaschi R, Bonavita S, Bruno Bossio R, Brescia Morra V, Costantino GF, Cavalla P, Centonze D, Comi G, Cottone S, Danni M, Francia A, Gajofatto A, Gasperini C, Ghezzi A, Iudice A, Lus G, Maniscalco GT, Marrosu MG, Matta M, Mirabella M, Montanari E, Pozzilli C, Rovaris M, Sessa E, Spitaleri D, Trojano M, Valentino P, Zappia M, Benedetti MD, Bertolotto A, Berra E, Bianco A, Buttari F, Cerqua R, Florio C, Fuiani A, Guareschi A, Ippolito D, Nuara A, Palmieri V, Paolicelli D, Petrucci L, Pontecorvo S, Saccà F, Salomone G, Signoriello E, Spinicci G, Russo M, Tavazzi E, Trabucco E, Trotta M, Zaffaroni M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Conceptualization, LGM and FP; methodology, LGM, PC, and PAC; data curation: PC; formal analysis, PC and PAC; writing Sativex original draft preparation, PAC and PC; writing Sativex review and editing, LGM and FP; funding acquisition: LGM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo A. Cortesi.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Almirall S.p.A.

Conflict of interest

PAC received a research grant from Baxalta now part of Shire and speaking honoraria from Pfizer and Roche in areas other than Multiple Sclerosis; L.G.M. has received grants from MSD and Janssen and honoraria from Bayer in areas other than Multiple Sclerosis. F.P. received honoraria for speaking activities and/or serving as advisor board member by Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Myalin, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. He was also granted for research projects by MIUR, University of Catania, FISM and ISS. P.C. have nothing to declare.

Additional information

The Members of the SA.FE. study group are listed in acknowledgements section.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 483 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mantovani, L.G., Cozzolino, P., Cortesi, P.A. et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cannabinoid Oromucosal Spray Use for the Management of Spasticity in Subjects with Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Drug Investig 40, 319–326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-020-00895-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-020-00895-6

Navigation