Skip to main content
Log in

Adverse Event Profiles of Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies Alone or in Combination: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to FAERS

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)—cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)—either as single agents or in combination have become the standard of care for an increasing number of indications. Understanding both the ICI-associated adverse events (AEs) and the possible rank-order of these drugs in terms of susceptibility is essential if we are to improve the curative effect and reduce toxicity.

Methods

We detected signals of the AEs of ICIs by data mining using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) AEs Reporting System (FAERS) database. The definition relied on the preferred terms (PTs) and the standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) provided by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Adverse effects of CTLA-4 and PD-1 mAbs were most commonly observed in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine systems, liver, and lung, and they included rash, diarrhea, colitis, and thyroid dysfunction. Thyroid dysfunction, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and pneumonitis were more closely associated with the use of anti-PD-1, whereas colitis, diarrhea, hypophysitis, and adrenal insufficiency were more closely associated with anti-CTLA-4; rash and hepatitis occurred similarly in both. Disproportionality signals for less common AEs in other organ systems, including the renal, neurological, cardiac, ocular, musculoskeletal, and hematologic systems, were also detected. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have very similar safety profiles, but the signal strength of AEs increased when combined with ipilimumab.

Conclusions

The results of this study are in agreement with clinical observations, suggesting the usefulness of pharmacovigilance in “real-world” safety monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(4):119–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sibaud V, Meyer N, Lamant L, et al. Dermatologic complications of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Curr Opin Oncol. 2016;28(4):254–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta A, De Felice KM, Loftus EV Jr, et al. Systematic review: colitis associated with anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(4):406–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei W, Luo Z. Risk of gastrointestinal toxicities with PD-1 inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(48):e8931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Lie P, Guo M, et al. Risk of hepatotoxicity in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(5):1018–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Min. Immune-related endocrine disorders in novel immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. Genes Dis. 2016;3(4):252–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sznol M, Postow MA, Davies MJ, et al. Endocrine-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade and expert insights on their management. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;58:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, LePendu P, et al. Performance of pharmacovigilance signal-detection algorithms for the FDA adverse event reporting system. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(6):539–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poluzzi E, Raschi E, Piccinni C, et al. Data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance: analysis of the publicly accessible FDA adverse event reporting system (AERS). In: Karahoca A, et al., editors. Data mining applications in engineering and medicine. Croatia: InTech; 2012. p. 265–302.

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Puijenbroek EP, Bate A, Leufkens HG, et al. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002;11(1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bate A, Evans SJ. Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):427–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Garrido-Castro AC, et al. Incidence of endocrine dysfunction following the use of different immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(2):173–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Osorio JC, Ni A, Chaft JE, et al. Antibody-mediated thyroid dysfunction during T-cell checkpoint blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(3):583–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morganstein DL, Lai Z, Spain L, et al. Thyroid abnormalities following the use of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed death receptor protein-1 inhibitors in the treatment of melanoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;86(4):614–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Corsello SM, Barnabei A, Marchetti P, et al. Endocrine side effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1361–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mellati M, Eaton KD, Brooks-Worrell BM, et al. Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PDL-1 monoclonal antibodies causing type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(9):e137–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang DY, Ye F, Zhao S, et al. Incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis in solid tumor patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(10):e1344805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang X, Ran Y, Wang Y, et al. Incidence and risk of hepatic toxicities with PD-1 inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:3153–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chuzi S, Tavora F, Cruz M, et al. Clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies in checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis. Cancer Manag Res. 2017;9:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu J, Hong D, Zhang X, et al. PD-1 inhibitors increase the incidence and risk of pneumonitis in cancer patients in a dose-independent manner: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sibaud V. Dermatologic reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors: skin toxicities and immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:345–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Belum VR, Benhuri B, Postow MA, et al. Characterisation and management of dermatologic adverse events to agents targeting the PD-1 receptor. Eur J Cancer. 2016;60:12–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boutros C, Tarhini A, Routier E, et al. Safety profiles of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone and in combination. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(8):473–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hua C, Boussemart L, Mateus C, et al. Association of vitiligo with tumor response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murakami N, MotwaniL S, Riella V. Renal complications of immune checkpoint blockade. Curr Probl Cancer. 2017;41(2):100–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, et al. Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1749–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Rahman O, Oweira H, Petrausch U, et al. Immune-related ocular toxicities in solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17(4):387–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cappelli LC, Gutierrez AK, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. Rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events due to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69(11):1751–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmer L, Goldinger SM, Hofmann L, et al. Neurological, respiratory, musculoskeletal, cardiac and ocular side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2016;60:210–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Rahman O, Eltobgy M, Oweira H, et al. Immune-related musculoskeletal toxicities among cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Immunotherapy. 2017;9(14):1175–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Voskens CJ, Goldinger SM, Loquai C, et al. The price of tumor control: an analysis of rare side effects of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in metastatic melanoma from the ipilimumab network. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53745.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Spain L, Walls G, Julve M, et al. Neurotoxicity from immune-checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of melanoma: a single centre experience and review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(2):377–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cuzzubbo S, Javeri F, Tissier M, et al. Neurological adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2017;73:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cortes J, Mauro M, Steegmann JL, et al. Cardiovascular and pulmonary adverse events in patients treated with BCR-ABL inhibitors: data from the FDA adverse event reporting system. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(4):E66–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JHH and TXW planned this study’s content, extracted data, performed statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JYT, SL and DZ participated in the design of the study and helped to write the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lin Song or Yun-tao Jia.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by the Health and Family Planning Commission of Chongqing grants (2016ZDXM017), Chongqing Science and Technology Commission grants (cstc2016shmszx130048).

Conflict of interest

Huan-huan JI, Xue-wen TANG, Zhi DONG, Lin SONG, and Yun-tao JIA declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, Hh., Tang, Xw., Dong, Z. et al. Adverse Event Profiles of Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies Alone or in Combination: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to FAERS. Clin Drug Investig 39, 319–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-018-0735-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-018-0735-0

Navigation