Skip to main content
Log in

Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing ozone-assisted process parameters for formaldehyde removal

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formaldehyde, a volatile organic compound (VOC), is one of the main gaseous pollutants from commercial cooking. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a laboratory-scale ozone-assisted indirect plasma method for formaldehyde removal using response surface methodology (RSM). A dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor was used for ozone generation. Inlet HCHO concentration, ozone concentration, and residence time were considered the design parameters, and formaldehyde removal efficiency (response 1) and energy yield (response 2) were considered response parameters. The optimized models showed a positive correlation between the predicted and experimental outcomes. Inlet ozone concentration, the most significant parameter in the removal efficiency model, represented a positive correlation with this response in most parts of the operating region. The optimal point with the highest desirability (i.e., D1 point) was obtained at the inlet HCHO concentration of 120 ppm, inlet ozone concentration of 40 ppm, and reaction time of 11.35 s within the parameter ranges studied, resulting in 64% removal efficiency and 2.64 g/kWh energy yield. At the point with the second highest desirability (D2), 100% removal efficiency along with 0.7 g/kWh energy yield was achieved indicating the very good performance of the process. The indirect plasma approach used in this study presented a successful performance in terms of removal efficiency along with acceptable energy yield compared to other plasma-assisted processes reported in the literature. The results suggested that ozone-assisted indirect plasma treatment can be utilized as an efficient alternative method for formaldehyde removal in commercial kitchens, while efficiency or energy yield should be prioritized for optimizing operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sofuoglu SC, Toprak M, Inal F, Cimrin AH. Indoor air quality in a restaurant kitchen using margarine for deep-frying. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(20):15703–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao X, Zhang M, Zou H, Zhou Z, Yuan W, Quan C, Cao Y. Characteristics and risk assessment of occupational exposure to ultrafine particles generated from cooking in the Chinese restaurant. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li J. Synergetic effect of N/P/B coordinated Fe/Co on carbon support catalysts for removing odor-chemicals of cooking source. SN Applied Sciences. 2020;2(12):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma Y, Deng L, Ma P, Wu Y, Yang X, Xiao F, Deng Q. In vivo respiratory toxicology of cooking oil fumes: Evidence, mechanisms and prevention. J Hazard Mater. 2021;402:123455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Rao L, Liu Q, Yang Q. Meta-analysis of associations between cooking oil fumes exposure and lung cancer risk. Indoor and Built Environment. 2022;31(3):820–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang L, Xiang Z, Stevanovic S, Ristovski Z, Salimi F, Gao J, Wang H, Li L. Role of Chinese cooking emissions on ambient air quality and human health. Sci Total Environ. 2017;589:173–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao D, You Xy. Cooking grease particles purification review and technology combination strategy evaluation for commercial kitchens. Build Simul. 2021;14:1597–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0767-x.

  8. Ho YA, Wang SY, Chiang WH, Nguyen VH, Chiu JL, Wu JC. Moderate-temperature catalytic incineration of cooking oil fumes using hydrophobic honeycomb supported Pt/CNT catalyst. J Hazard Mater. 2019;379:120750.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao J, You X. Health risk assessment of formaldehyde released from several Chinese dishes cooking activities. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2019;371:032062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/371/3/032062.

  10. Höllbacher E, Ters T, Rieder-Gradinger C, Srebotnik E. Emissions of indoor air pollutants from six user scenarios in a model room. Atmos Environ. 2017;150:389–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qi Q, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Bai G, Wang S, Liang P. Formaldehyde oxidation at room temperature over layered MnO2. Catal Commun. 2021;153:106293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou P, Zhu X, Yu J, Xiao W. Effects of adsorbed F, OH, and Cl ions on formaldehyde adsorption performance and mechanism of anatase TiO2 nanosheets with exposed 001 facets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(16):8165–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jose J, Philip L. Comparative study of degradation of toluene and methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) in aqueous solution by pulsed corona discharge plasma. J Environ Sci. 2021;101:382–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang B, Zheng J, Qiu S, Wu M, Zhang Q, Yan Z, Xue Q. Review on electrical discharge plasma technology for wastewater remediation. Chem Eng J. 2014;236:348–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Asilevi PJ, Yi CW, Li J, Nawaz MI, Wang HJ, Yin L, Junli Z. Decomposition of formaldehyde in strong ionization non-thermal plasma at atmospheric pressure. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(2):765–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Asilevi PJ, Boakye P, Oduro-Kwarteng S, Fei-Baffoe B, Sokama-Neuyam YA. Indoor air quality improvement and purification by atmospheric pressure Non-Thermal Plasma (NTP). Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou XF, Wang WC, Yang DZ, Liang JP, Zhao ZL, Yuan H. Controlling of reactive species in atmospheric Ar bubble discharge by adding N2/O2a. Plasma Processes Polym. 2019;16(3):1800124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vandenbroucke AM, Morent R, De Geyter N, Leys C. Non-thermal plasmas for non-catalytic and catalytic VOC abatement. J Hazard Mater. 2011;195:30–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang R, Li X, Feng Y, Tariq F, Li K, Wei Y, Chen J, Jiang C, Tian L, Geng Y, Miao E, Zhang C, Chen LR. Removal of formaldehyde from the air with a suspended growth bioreactor formaldehyde. Biores Technol. 2019;102(2):942–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bloshenko AV, Roshchin AV, Kumpanenko IV, Ivanova NA. An Analysis of Absorption-Desorption of Volatile Organic Compounds by Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Films. Russ J Phys Chem. 2011;5:332–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vinodh R, Jung EM, Ganesh M, Peng MM, Abidov A, Palanichamy M, Cha WS, Jang HT. Novel Microporous Hypercross-Linked Polymers as Sorbent for Volatile Organic Compounds and CO2 Adsorption. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;21:1231–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wanga C, Zou X, Liu H, Chena T, Suibd SL, Chena D, Xie J, Li M, Fuwei Su. A highly efficient catalyst of palygorskite-supported manganese oxide for formaldehyde oxidation at ambient and low temperature: Performance, mechanism and reaction kinetics. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;486:420–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tamar AN, Hamzehlouyan T, Khani MR, Alihoseini M, Shokri B. Synergistic effects of plasma and catalyst in formaldehyde conversion over a Ni/α-Al2O3 catalyst in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor. Results Eng. 2023;17:100997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Esswein EJ, Boeniger MF. Effect of an Ozone-Generating Air-Purifying Device on Reducing Concentrations of Formaldehyde in Air. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1994;9(2):139–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kogelschatz U. Dielectric-barrier discharges: Their history, discharge physics, and industrial applications. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2003;23(1):1–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu X, Tu X, Mei D, Zheng C, Zhou J, Gao X, Luo Z, Ni M, Cen K. Investigation of hybrid plasma-catalytic removal of acetone over CuO/γ-Al2O3 catalysts using response surface method. Chemosphere. 2016;155:9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang N, Zhao Y, Qiu C, Shang K, Lu N, Li J, Wu Y, Zhang Y. Enhanced catalytic performance of CoOx-CeO2 for synergetic degradation of toluene in multistage sliding plasma system through response surface methodology (RSM). Appl Catal B. 2019;259:118061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 10th ed. New York: Wiley; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ding H-X, Zhu A-M, Yang X-F, Li C-H, Yong Xu. Removal of formaldehyde from gas streams via packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge plasmas. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2005;38:4160–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ding H-X, Zhu A-M, Fu-Gong Lu, Yong Xu, Zhang J, Yang X-F. Low-temperature plasma-catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde in atmospheric pressure gas streams Hui-Xian. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2006;39:3603–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Harling AM, Glover DJ, Whitehead JC, Zhang K. The role of ozone in the plasma-catalytic destruction of environmental pollutants. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental. 2009;90:157–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu X, Gao X, Qin R, Zeng Y, Qu R, Zheng C, Tu X. Plasma-catalytic removal of formaldehyde over Cu–Ce catalysts in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor. Appl Catal B. 2015;170:293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang WJ, Li J, Li JX, Zhu T, Jin YQ. Formaldehyde removal from gas streams by means of NaNO2 dielectric barrier discharge plasma. J Hazard Mater. 2010;175(1–3):1090–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Blin-Simiand N, Pasquiers S, Jorand F, Postel C, Vacher JR. Removal of formaldehyde in nitrogen and in dry air by a DBD: importance of temperature and role of nitrogen metastable states. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2009;42(12):122003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hongxiang O et al. Study on formaldehyde degradation using strong ionization discharge. In: 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering. 2010. pp. 2094–2097. https://doi.org/10.1109/MACE.2010.5536203.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Khani or Tayebeh Hamzehlouyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamar, A.N., Karbasi, M., Khani, M.R. et al. Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing ozone-assisted process parameters for formaldehyde removal. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 21, 475–484 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00873-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00873-y

Keywords

Navigation