Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characteristics and health effects of potentially pathogenic bacterial aerosols from a municipal solid waste landfill site in Hamadan, Iran

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential pathogenic bacterial aerosols produced from the municipal solid waste landfill site and its health risk assessment in the Hamadan city at west of Iran. In this study, air samples were collected every month during spring and summer at six locations including the active zone, leachate collection pond, infectious waste landfill, upwind, closure landfill, and downwind using the Andersen impactor. Spatial and seasonal variations of the potential pathogenic bacterial aerosols were detected. Also, Health risk associated were estimated based on the average daily dose rates (ADD) of exposure by inhalation. The mean concentration of potentially pathogenic bacterial aerosols were 468.7 ± 140 CFU m− 3 1108.5 ± 136.9 CFU m− 3 detected in the active zone in spring and summer, respectively. Also, there was a significant relationship between meteorological parameters and bacterial concentration (p < 0.05). The predominant potential pathogenic bacterial identified in the spring were Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus sp., and Pseudomonas sp., while in summer were Pseudomonas sp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. The hazard quotient (HQ) in both seasons were less of 1. Bacteria were spread throughout the landfill space, but their maximum density was observed around the active zone and leachate collection pond. This study highlights the importance of exposure to potential pathogenic bacterial aerosols in the summer and its adverse effects, especially in the MSW landfill site active zone. Finally, controlled exposure can reduce the health hazard caused by the potential pathogenic bacterial aerosols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hosseini S, Yaghmaeian K, Yousefi N, Mahvi A. Estimation of landfill gas generation in a municipal solid waste disposal site by LandGEM mathematical model. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 2018;4(4):493–506.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazaheri Tehrani A, Bahrami A, Leili M, Poorolajal J, Zafari D, Samadi M, et al. Investigation of seasonal variation and probabilistic risk assessment of BTEX emission in municipal solid waste transfer station. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2020:1–14.

  3. Chen DM-C, Bodirsky BL, Krueger T, Mishra A, Popp A. The world’s growing municipal solid waste: Trends and impacts. Environmental Research Letters. 2020;15(7):07402

  4. Ghanbarian M, Ghanbarian M, Ghanbarian M, Mahvi AH, Hosseini M. Determination of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in municipal solid-waste processing facilities of Tehran. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2020:18(2):865–72.

  5. Madhwal S, Prabhu V, Sundriyal S, Shridhar V. Distribution, characterization and health risk assessment of size fractionated bioaerosols at an open landfill site in Dehradun, India. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2020;11(1):156–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dehghani M, Fazlzadeh M, Sorooshian A, Tabatabaee HR, Miri M, Baghani AN, et al. Characteristics and health effects of BTEX in a hot spot for urban pollution. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;155:133–43.

  7. Sarkhosh M, Mahvi AH, Yunesian M, Nabizadeh R, Borji SH, Bajgirani AG. Source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Tehran. Iran Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;90(4):440–5.

  8. Samadi MT, Shakerkhatibi M, Poorolajal J, Rahmani A, Rafieemehr H, Hesam M. Association of long term exposure to outdoor volatile organic compounds (BTXS) with pro-inflammatory biomarkers and hematologic parameters in urban adults: a cross-sectional study in Tabriz, Iran. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;180:152–9.

  9. Zarandi SM, Alimohammadi M, Moghaddam VK, Hasanvand MS, Miranzadeh MB, Rabbani D, et al. Long-term trends of Nitrogen oxides and surface ozone concentrations in Tehran city, 2002–2011. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2015;13(1):63.

  10. Dobaradaran S, Fazelinia F, Mahvi AH, Hosseini SS. Particulate airborne fluoride from an aluminium production plant in Arak, Iran. Fluoride. 2009;42(3):228.

  11. Niazi S, Hassanvand MS, Mahvi AH, Nabizadeh R, Alimohammadi M, Nabavi S, et al. Assessment of bioaerosol contamination (bacteria and fungi) in the largest urban wastewater treatment plant in the Middle East. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(20):16014–21.

  12. Franchitti E, Pascale E, Fea E, Anedda E, Traversi D. Methods for bioaerosol characterization: limits and perspectives for human health risk assessment in organic waste treatment. Atmosphere. 2020;11(5):452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pahari AK, Dasgupta D, Patil RS, Mukherji S. Emission of bacterial bioaerosols from a composting facility in Maharashtra, India. Waste Manag. 2016;53:22–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiayu C, Qiaoqiao R, Feilong C, Chen L, Jiguo W, Zhendong W, et al. Microbiology community structure in bioaerosols and the respiratory diseases. J Environ Sci. 2019;3(3):347–57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, Heederik D. Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47(3):187–200.

  16. Swan J, Kelsey A, Crook B, Gilbert E. Occupational and environmental exposure to bioaerosols from composts and potential health effects: a critical review of published data. Sudbury: HSE Books; 2003.

  17. Nikaeen M, Hatamzadeh M, Hasanzadeh A, Sahami E, Joodan I. Bioaerosol emissions arising during application of municipal solid-waste compost. Aerobiologia. 2009;25(1):1–6.

  18. Frączek K, Różycki H, Ropek D. Statistical analyses of bioaerosol concentration at municipal landfill site. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2014;21(2):229–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patil NS, Kakde UB. Assessment of fungal bioaerosol emission in the vicinity of a landfill site in Mumbai, India. Int J Environ Waste Manag. 2017;20(1):75–91.

  20. Qu Y, Wang W, Liu Y, Zhu Q. Understanding residents’ preferences for e-waste collection in China-A case study of waste mobile phones. J Clean Prod. 2019;228:52–62.

  21. Njoku PO, Edokpayi JN, Odiyo JO. Health and environmental risks of residents living close to a landfill: A case study of Thohoyandou Landfill, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(12):2125.

  22. Norsa’adah B, Salinah O, Naing NN, Sarimah A. Community health survey of residents living near a solid waste open dumpsite in Sabak, Kelantan, Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1):311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vahabian M, Hassanzadeh Y, Marofi S. Assessment of landfill leachate in semi-arid climate and its impact on the groundwater quality case study: Hamedan, Iran. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191(2):109.

  24. Breza-Boruta B. The assessment of airborne bacterial and fungal contamination emitted by a municipal landfill site in Northern Poland. Atmos Pollut Res. 2016;7(6):1043–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taha M, Drew GH, Longhurst P, Smith R, Pollard SJ. Bioaerosol releases from compost facilities: Evaluating passive and active source terms at a green waste facility for improved risk assessments. Atmos Environ. 2006;40(6):1159–69.

  26. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA. Medical Microbiology E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020.

  27. (NRC). NRC. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington: National Academies Press.; 2009.

  28. National Research Council (NRC). Review of EPA’s integrated risk information system (IRIS) process. Washington: National Academies Press; 2014.

  29. United American Environmen Protection Agency (USEPA). Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part F, supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment): Final. Washington, DC: EPA Report; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sexton K. Cumulative risk assessment: an overview of methodological approaches for evaluating combined health effects from exposure to multiple environmental stressors. Int J Env Res Public Heal. 2012;9(2):370–90.

  31. Kalogerakis N, Paschali D, Lekaditis V, Pantidou A, Eleftheriadis K, Lazaridis M. Indoor air quality—bioaerosol measurements in domestic and office premises. J Aerosol Sci. 2005;36(5–6):751–61.

  32. Yassin M, Almouqatea S. Assessment of airborne bacteria and fungi in an indoor and outdoor environment. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2010;7(3):535–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang K, Li L, Wang Y, Xue S, Han Y, Liu J. Airborne bacteria in a wastewater treatment plant: Emission characterization, source analysis and health risk assessment. Water Res. 2019;149:596–606.

  34. Xu P, Zhang C, Mou X, Wang XC. Bioaerosol in a typical municipal wastewater treatment plant: concentration, size distribution, and health risk assessment. Water Sci Technol. 2020;82(8):1547–59.

  35. Yan X, Qiu D, Zheng S, Yang J, Sun H, Wei Y, et al. Distribution characteristics and noncarcinogenic risk assessment of culturable airborne bacteria and fungi during winter in Xinxiang, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(36):36698–709.

  36. Liang Z, Yu Y, Ye Z, Li G, Wang W, An T. Pollution profiles of antibiotic resistance genes associated with airborne opportunistic pathogens from typical area, Pearl River Estuary and their exposure risk to human. Environ Int. 2020;143:105934.

  37. Lu R, Frederiksen MW, Uhrbrand K, Li Y, Østergaard C, Madsen AM. Wastewater treatment plant workers’ exposure and methods for risk evaluation of their exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;205:111365.

  38. Yang K, Li L, Xue S, Wang Y, Liu J, Yang T. Influence factors and health risk assessment of bioaerosols emitted from an industrial-scale thermophilic biofilter for off gas treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;129:55–62.

  39. Stellman SD, Muscat JE, Thompson S, Hoffmann D, Wynder EL. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung in relation to lifetime filter cigarette smoking. Cancer. 1997;80(3):382–8.

  40. Bell ML. The use of ambient air quality modeling to estimate individual and population exposure for human health research: a case study of ozone in the Northern Georgia Region of the United States. Environ Int. 2006;32(5):586–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Xie Y, Chen T-b, Lei M, Yang J, Guo Q-j, Song B, et al. Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: Accuracy and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere. 2011;82(3):468–76.

  42. Paz A, Costa-Trigo I, de Souza Oliveira RP, Domínguez JM. Ligninolytic enzymes of endospore-forming Bacillus aryabhattai BA03. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77(5):702–9.

  43. Van Leuken J, Swart A, Havelaar A, Van Pul A, Van der Hoek W, Heederik D. Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock–A review to inform risk assessment studies. Microbial Risk Anal. 2016;1:19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Małecka-Adamowicz M, Kaczanowska J, Donderski W. The Impact of a Landfill Site in Żółwin–Wypaleniska on the Microbiological Quality of the Air. Pol J Environ Stud. 2007;16(1).

  45. Garaga R, Avinash C, Kota SH. Seasonal variation of airborne allergenic fungal spores in ambient PM 10—a study in Guwahati, the largest city of north-east India. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2019;12(1):11–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Frączek K, Ropek D. Municipal waste dumps as the microbiological threat to the natural environment. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2011;18(1):93–110.

  47. Cyprowski M, Ławniczek-Wałczyk A, Gołofit-Szymczak M, Frączek K, Kozdrój J, Górny RL. Bacterial aerosols in a municipal landfill environment. Sci Total Environ. 2019;660:288–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zucker B-A, Müller W. Airborne endotoxins and airborne gram-negative bacteria in a residential neighborhood. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2004;158(1):67–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lawniczek-Walczyk A, Górny RL. Endotoxins and beta-glucans as markers of microbiological contamination-characteristics, detection, and environmental exposure. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2010;17(2):193–208.

  50. Mbareche H, Morawska L, Duchaine C. On the interpretation of bioaerosol exposure measurements and impacts on health. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019;69(7):789–804.

  51. Abbasi F, Samaei MR, Manoochehri Z, Jalili M, Yazdani E. The effect of incubation temperature and growth media on index microbial fungi of indoor air in a hospital building in Shiraz, Iran. J Build Eng. 2020;31:101294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Akpeimeh G, Fletcher L, Evans B. Exposure to bioaerosols at open dumpsites: A case study of bioaerosols exposure from activities at Olusosun open dumpsite, Lagos Nigeria. Waste Manag. 2019;89:37–47.

  53. Khatebasreh M, Ebrahimi AA, Mokhtari M. Investigating the effect of waste process of halva ardeh production on vermicompost quality. J Environ Health Sustain Dev. 2017;2(4):399–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Abbasi F, Mokhtari M, Jalili M. The impact of agricultural and green waste treatments on compost quality of dewatered sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(35):35757–66.

  55. Ma J-W, Yang K-X, Chai F-G, Wang Y, Guo X-S, Li L. Particle size distribution and population characteristics of airborne bacteria emitted from a sanitary landfill site. Huan Jing Ke Xue = Huanjing Kexue. 2019;40(8):3470–6.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was a Ph.D. thesis in Environmental health engineering and was conducted with the approval of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Medical Ethics Committee: Code: IR.UMSHA.REC.1398.512. Thanks are owed to the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, for their help in conducting this study.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences under Grant [9807235430] and Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Institute for Environmental Research) under Grant [48964].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashraf Mazaheri Tehrani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samadi, M.T., Mahvi, A.H., Leili, M. et al. Characteristics and health effects of potentially pathogenic bacterial aerosols from a municipal solid waste landfill site in Hamadan, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 19, 1057–1067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00672-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00672-3

Keywords

Navigation