Abstract
Purpose of Review
In this paper, current approaches to pediatric aortic valve surgery are discussed.
Recent Findings
While many pediatric aortic valve operations are palliative until an adult-sized prosthetic can fit, some recent advances in adult aortic valve repair techniques can be applied to the pediatric population yielding more definitive repair. Systematic analysis of the valve pathology is necessary to decide on the appropriate operation and refer patients to surgeons with the appropriate expertise.
Summary
The Ross operation remains an ideal operation for pediatric patients with significant aortic valve disease and a competent pulmonic valve, given that it allows the autograft to grow with the child. Depending on aortic valve pathology, those with regurgitation secondary to aneurysmal dilation of the aorta may be candidates for various valve-sparing techniques. Critical congenital aortic stenosis may be managed via balloon valvuloplasty or surgical valvotomy depending on the specific scenario. Valve replacement is not ideal in the pediatric population, particularly if the patient is not full-grown, but can be necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Sundt TM, Moon MR, Xu H. Reoperation for dilatation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1249–52.
Leyh RG, Kofidis T, Fischer S, Kallenbach K, Harringer W, Haverich A. Aortic root reimplantation for successful repair of an insufficient pulmonary autograft valve after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:1048–9.
Masetti P, Davila-Roman VA, Kouchoukos NT. Valve-sparing procedure for dilatation of the autologous pulmonary artery and ascending aorta after the Ross operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:915–6.
El-Essawi A, Sanger J, Ulrich S, Kutschka I, Harringer W. Aortic valve-sparing operation for autograft failure after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1215–6.
Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet. 1967;2:956–8.
Woods RK, et al. Aortic valve replacement in neonates and infants: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1084–9.
El-Hamamsy I, Yacoub MH. Repair, replacement, Ross: how I approach the older child with mixed aortic stenosis/aortic insufficiency. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: Pediatric cardiac surgery annual. 2009:133–8.
•• David TE, David C, Woo A, Manlhiot C. The Ross procedure: outcomes at 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:85–93. Excellent summary of Ross operation in an expert’s hands.
Sievers HH, et al. Fourteen years’ experience with 501 subcoronary Ross procedures: surgical details and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:816–22. 822 e1-5
Elkins RC, Knott-Craig CJ, Ward KE, Lane MM. The Ross operation in children: 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:496–502.
Lupinetti FM, Duncan BW, Lewin M, Dyamenahalli U, Rosenthal GL. Comparison of autograft and allograft aortic valve replacement in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:240–6.
Laudito A, et al. The Ross procedure in children and young adults: a word of caution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:147–53.
Turrentine MW, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Bills RG, Brown JW. Biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S356–60.
Hraska V, et al. Ross and Ross-Konno procedure in children and adolescents: mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:742–7.
El-Hamamsy I, et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:524–31.
Andreas M, et al. The Ross procedure offers excellent survival compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement in a real-world setting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:409–13. discussion 413-4
Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Rodefeld MD, Mahomed Y, Turrentine MW. Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary autograft dilation after Ross aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1781–7. discussion 1787-9
Simon-Kupilik N, et al. Dilatation of the autograft root after the Ross operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:470–3.
Sievers HH, et al. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after the Ross procedure: a report from the German-Dutch Ross Registry. Circulation. 2010;122:S216–23.
Slater M, Shen I, Welke K, Komanapalli C and Ungerleider R. Modification to the Ross procedure to prevent autograft dilatation. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: Pediatric cardiac surgery annual. 2005;181–4.
Ungerleider RM, Ootaki Y, Shen I, Welke KF. Modified Ross procedure to prevent autograft dilatation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1035–7. discussion 1037
Juthier F, et al. Modified Ross operation with reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft: six-year results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1420–3.
Gebauer R, Cerny S. A modification of the Ross procedure to prevent pulmonary autograft dilatation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:195–7.
Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Shahriari AP, Rodefeld MD, Mahomed Y, Turrentine MW. Modification of the Ross aortic valve replacement to prevent late autograft dilatation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:1002–7.
Al Rashidi F, Bhat M, Hoglund P, Meurling C, Roijer A, Koul B. The modified Ross operation using a Dacron prosthetic vascular jacket does prevent pulmonary autograft dilatation at 4.5-year follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:928–33.
David TE, Woo A, Armstrong S, Maganti M. When is the Ross operation a good option to treat aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:68–75.
Gillespie MJ, et al. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement for right ventricular outflow tract conduit dysfunction after the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:996–1003.
El Khoury G, et al. Functional classification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005;20:115–21.
Boodhwani M, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–94.
Kunihara T, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1389–95.
Pethig K, Milz A, Hagl C, Harringer W, Haverich A. Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:29–33.
Grinda JM, et al. Aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty for rheumatic aortic valve disease: midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:438–43.
Al Halees Z, Al Shahid M, Al Sanei A, Sallehuddin A, Duran C. Up to 16 years follow-up of aortic valve reconstruction with pericardium: a stentless readily available cheap valve? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:200–5. discussion 205
McCrindle BW, et al. Are outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter balloon valvotomy equivalent in neonatal critical aortic stenosis? Circulation. 2001;104:I152–8.
Brown JW, Rodefeld MD, Ruzmetov M, Eltayeb O, Yurdakok O, Turrentine MW. Surgical valvuloplasty versus balloon aortic dilation for congenital aortic stenosis: are evidence-based outcomes relevant? Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:146–53. discussion 153-5
Karamlou T, et al. The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30-year results from a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:81–5.
Balmer C, Beghetti M, Fasnacht M, Friedli B, Arbenz U. Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common. Heart. 2004;90:77–81.
Keane JF, et al. Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Results of treatment of patients with aortic valvar stenosis. Circulation. 1993;87:I16–27.
Maskatia SA, et al. Twenty-five year experience with balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1024–8.
Brown DW, Dipilato AE, Chong EC, Lock JE, McElhinney DB. Aortic valve reinterventions after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis intermediate and late follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1740–9.
• Torres A, et al. Balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis: multi-center safety and efficacy outcome assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:808–20. Excellent study of results of balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis
Hraska V, et al. The long-term outcome of open valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in neonates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1519–26.
Alexiou C, et al. Open commissurotomy for critical isolated aortic stenosis in neonates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:489–93.
Reich O, et al. Long term results of percutaneous balloon valvoplasty of congenital aortic stenosis: independent predictors of outcome. Heart. 2004;90:70–6.
Thomson JD. Management of valvar aortic stenosis in children. Heart. 2004;90:5–6.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114:e84–231.
Hiratzka LF, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010;121:e266–369.
Nishimura RA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:e1–e132.
Erbel R, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–926.
Girdauskas E, Disha K, Raisin HH, Secknus MA, Borger MA, Kuntze T. Risk of late aortic events after an isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant ascending aortic dilation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:832–7. discussion 837-8
Girdauskas E, Disha K, Secknus M, Borger M, Kuntze T. Increased risk of late aortic events after isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve insufficiency versus stenosis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;54:653–9.
Kadri MA, Hovaguimian H, Starr A. Commissurotomy and bileaflet pericardial augmentation-resuspension for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:548–50.
Tolan MJ, Daubeney PE, Slavik Z, Keeton BR, Salmon AP, Monro JL. Aortic valve repair of congenital stenosis with bovine pericardium. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:465–9.
Tweddell JS, et al. Aortic valve repair. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: Pediatric cardiac surgery annual. 2005:112–21.
Ozaki S, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium for aortic stenosis. Circ J. 2015;79:1504–10.
Lubiszewska B, et al. Mechanical valve replacement in congenital heart disease in children. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:74–9.
Alexiou C, McDonald A, Langley SM, Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Haw MP, Monro JL. Aortic valve replacement in children: are mechanical prostheses a good option? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:125–33.
Champsaur G, et al. Mechanical valve in aortic position is a valid option in children and adolescents. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:117–22.
Shanmugam G, MacArthur K, Pollock J. Mechanical aortic valve replacement: long-term outcomes in children. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005;14:166–71.
Fioretta ES, Dijkman PE, Emmert MY, Hoerstrup SP. The future of heart valve replacement: recent developments and translational challenges for heart valve tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Elizabeth H. Stephens and Paul Chai each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephens, E.H., Chai, P. Aortic Valve Surgery in the Pediatric Population. Curr Pediatr Rep 5, 64–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-017-0128-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-017-0128-5