Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Participatory Soil Quality Assessment Using Low-Cost Tools under Contrasting Management Practices in a Vertisol

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess soil health in a participatory mode whereby farmers were sensitized, involved, trained, and provided with low-cost tools for assessing the soil health of their fields. The study was carried out in two selected villages in the districts of Bhopal and Sehore. Management practices consisted of different nutrient management practices, namely organic manure-based farming, integrated (organic + inorganic) nutrient-based farming, and inorganic fertilizer-based farming. In this approach, both qualitative and quantitative assessments of soil parameters were done to characterize soil quality and enhance soil health and productivity. It helped farmers to assess their soil health periodically and prepare a Soil Health Card for their farm. About 12 soil parameters comprising of physical, chemical, and biological health indicators were selected for the study. Results revealed that different nutrient management-based farming systems significantly affected soil pH, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon, aggregate stability, mean weight diameter, soil moisture retention, soil penetration resistance, and crop yield. In addition, results indicated that organic-based farming recorded ‘good’ Soil Health Card values compared to integrated and inorganic fertilizer-based farming, regardless of location. In Parwalia village, results indicated that high soil quality index (SQI) was observed under organic nutrient management (0.61), followed by integrated (0.52) and inorganic nutrient (0.34) management. In Vaidakhedi village, the corresponding values were 0.63, 0.50, and 0.33, respectively. The improvement in soil quality also influenced the crop yield significantly. Moreover, a significant relationship was observed between field assessed values to the laboratory values in this study. Thus, adopting either organic or integrated nutrient-based farming helps sustain soil health and improve crop yield compared to the application of inorganic fertilizers. Results also highlight the importance of low-cost tools for assessing soil health in a participatory mode, which helps in the efficient allocation of manures and fertilizer nutrients as per requirement. This study reinforces the importance of soil physical (i.e. MWD, aggregate stability and penetration resistance) and biological (macro-life diversity and earthworm counts) indicators for inclusions in Soil Health Card for making it a comprehensive assessment of soil health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acharya CL, Bishnoi SK, Yaduvanshi HS (1988) Effect of long-term application of fertilizers and organic and inorganic amendments under continuous cropping on soil physical and chemical properties in an Alfisol. Indian J Agric Sci 58:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anwar M, Patra DD, Chand S, Alpesh K, Naqvi AA, Khanuja SPS (2005) Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth, herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation, and oil quality of French basil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36(13–14):1737–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumhardt RL (2003) Dust Bowl Era. In: Stewart BA, Howell TA (eds) Encyclopedia of Water Science. Marcel-Dekker, New York, pp 187–191

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benbi DK, Biswas CR, Bawa SS, Kumar K (1998) Influence of farmyard manure, inorganic fertilizers and weed control practices on some soil physical properties in a long-term experiment. Soil Use Manage 14:52–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhary RS, Lakaria BL, Somasundaram J, Mohanty SR, Singh AB, SubbaRao A (2012) ‘Akikrit Mruda Swasthaya Ankalan Digdarshika'’. Hindi Bulletin, ICAR-IISS publication, pp 1–24

  6. Chaudhary RS, Somasundaram J, Mandal KG, Hati KM (2018) Enhancing water and phosphorus use efficiency through moisture conservation practices and optimum phosphorus application in rainfed maize-chickpea system in vertisols of central India. Agric Res 7:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0316-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diack M, Stott DE (2001) Development of a soil quality index for the Chalmers Silty Clay Loam from the Midwest USA. 10th International Soil Conservation Organisation Meeting 2001 May. Purdue University, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, pp 550–555

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (1994) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication Soil Sci Soc Am Inc and the Am Soc Agron Inc, Madison

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Doran JW, Jones AJ (1996) Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA Special Publication Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication Soil Science Society of America Inc and the American Society of Agronomy Inc, Madison, pp 3–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Erkossa T, Stahr K, Gaiser T (2004) Participatory soil quality assessment: the case of smallholder farmers in Ethiopian highlands. Soil Res 42(7):793–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Franzlubbers AJ, Haney RL (2006) Assessing soil quality in organic agriculture. In: Critical issue report: soil quality, October 2006, USDA Agriculture Research Services

  13. Food and Agriculture (2015). http://www.fao.org/soils-2015/en/

  14. Ghimire R, Basnet RK, Bista P, Ranabhat B (2009) Soil quality cards for participatory soil quality assessment in organic and smallholder agriculture. In: Forum geografic 2009, No. 8. University of Craiova, Department of Geography, p 72

  15. Gregorich EG, Carter MR, Angers DA, Monreal CM, Ellert BH (1994) Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils. Can J Soil Sci 74:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gugino BK, Idowu OJ, Schindelbeck RR, van Es HM, Wolfe DW, Moebius-Clune BN, Thies JE, Abawi GS (2009) Cornell soil health assessment training manual. Cornell University, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hati KM, Chaudhary RS, Mandal KG, Bandyopadhyay KK, Singh RK, Sinha NK, Mohanty M, Somasundaram J, Saha R (2015) Effects of tillage, residue and fertilizer nitrogen on crop yields, and soil physical properties under soybean–wheat potation in Vertisols of Central India. Agric Res 4(1):48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. https://soilhealth.dac.gov.in

  19. Karlen DL, Andrews SS, Wienhold BJ, Doran JW (2003) Soil quality: humankind’s foundation for survival. J Soil Water Cons 58:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karlen DL, Andrews SS, Wienhold BJ, Zobeck TM (2008) Soil quality assessment: past, present and future. J Integrat Biosci 6(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karlen DL, MausbachMJ DoranJW, Cline RG, Harris RF (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Manna MC, Swarup A, Wanjari RH, Ravankar HN (2007) Long-term effects of NPK fertilizer and manure on soil fertility and a sorghum-wheat farming system. Aus J Expt Agri 47:700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohanty M, Painuli DK, Misra AK, Ghosh PK (2007) Soil quality effects of tillage and residue under rice-wheat cropping on a vertisol in India. Soil Till Res 92(1–2):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peigné J, Ball BC, Roger-Estrade J, David C (2007) Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use Manag 23:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peigné J, Vian JF, Payet V, Saby NP (2018) Soil fertility after 10 years of conservation tillage in organic farming. Soil Till Res 175:194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasool R, Kukal SS, Hira GS (2008) Soil organic carbon and physical properties as affected by long-term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizers in maize-wheat system. Soil Till Res 101:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarkar S, Singh SR, Singh RP (2003) The effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil physical condition and productivity of a rice–lentil cropping sequence in India. J Agric Sci 140:419–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seybold CA, Herrick JE, Brejda JJ (1999) Soil resilience: a fundamental component of soil quality. Soil Sci 164(4):224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma KL, SrinivasaRao C, Chandrika DS, Lal M, Indoria AK, Reddy KS, Ravindrachary G, Amrutsagar V, Kathmale DK, More NB, Srinivas K (2018) Effect of predominant integrated nutrient management practices on soil quality indicators and soil quality indices under post-monsoon (rabi) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in rainfed black soils (Vertisols) of western India. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anals 49(13):1629–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinha NK, Chopra UK, Singh AK (2014) Cropping system effects on soil quality for three agro-ecosystems in India. Exp Agric 50(3):321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sinha NK, Chopra UK, Singh AK, Mohanty M, Somasundaram J, Chaudhary RS (2014) Soil physical quality as affected by management practices under maize–wheat system. Nat Acad Sci Let 37(1):13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh M, Wanjari RH, Kumar U, Chaudhari SK (2019) AICRP on long-term fertilizer experiments: salient achievements and future directions. Indian J Fert 15(4):356–372

    Google Scholar 

  33. Somasundaram J, Chaudhary RS, Awanish Kumar D, Biswas AK, Sinha NK, Mohanty M, Hati KM, Jha P, Sankar M, Patra AK, Dalal R (2018) Effect of contrasting tillage and cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and aggregate-associated carbon in rainfed Vertisols. Eur J Soil Sci 69(5):879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Somasundaram J, Singh RK, Prasad SN et al (2018) Effect of soil amendments and land use systems on surface cracks, soil properties and crop yield in a vertisol. Agric Res 7:443–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0334-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Somasundaram J, Singh RK, Prasad SN, Kumar A, Ali S, Sinha NK, Mohanty M, Saha R, Mishra DM, Mandal D, Sharda VN (2016) Management of surface cracks in black Vertisols (Typic chromusterts) by soil amendments and land uses in Chambal region. India Indian J Soil Cons 44(3):276–283

    Google Scholar 

  36. Somasundaram J, Singh RK, Prasad SN, Sethy BK, Kumar A, Ramesh K, Lakaria BL (2011) Management of black Vertisols characterized by pot-holes in the Chambal region. India, Soil Use Manag 27:124–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00321.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Venkateswarlu B, Srinivasarao C, Ramesh G, Venkateswarlu S, Katyal JC (2007) Effects of long-term legume cover crop incorporation on soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, nutrient build-up and grain yields of sorghum/sunflower under rain-fed conditions. Soil Use Manage 23(1):100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.2007.23.issue-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Somasundaram Jayaraman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1501 kb)

Supplementary Plate 1 (DOCX 153 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaudhary, R.S., Jayaraman, S., K.Sinha, N. et al. Participatory Soil Quality Assessment Using Low-Cost Tools under Contrasting Management Practices in a Vertisol. Agric Res 11, 642–651 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00598-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00598-0

Keywords

Navigation