Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An overview of effect of process parameters for removal of CO2 using biomass-derived adsorbents

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) gas emissions in the atmosphere has been contributing to the global warming, leading to climate change. CO2 capture and conversion technologies have received attention for removal of CO2. Several technologies, such as cryogenic separation, absorption, membrane separation, and adsorption, are being researched to encourage CO2 mitigation. Among others, adsorption technology is considered as environmentally friendly and economical. In the recent past, the waste biomass–derived adsorbents have emerged as potential materials for CO2 separation. This review attempts to report and critically analyze the work conducted on the synthesis of biomass-derived adsorbents from various biomasses. Parametric evaluation on the synthesis of adsorbents and their application is an important aspect to fully understand the applicability and limits of these materials. So, in this study, emphasis is given on the parameters, which affect the development and performance of the biomass-derived adsorbents for CO2 separation. Some of the major parameters include biomass feedstocks, methods related to the synthesis of activated carbons, carbonization, and physical as well as chemical activation. The sub-parameters such as gas flow rate, temperature, activating agent, heating rate, and residence time on carbonization and activation parameters have also been reviewed and critically analyzed. Furthermore, the influence of different factors including porosity, initial concentration of adsorbate, particle size distribution, adsorbent dosage, total surface area, temperature, pressure, and pH are reviewed and discussed for the removal of CO2 through adsorption.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis SJ, Caldeira K, Matthews HD (2010) Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science 329:1330–1333

  2. Stocker TF et al (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 1535

  3. Abu Hassan MH, Sher F, Zarren G, Suleiman N, Tahir AA, Snape CE (2020) Kinetic and thermodynamic evaluation of effective combined promoters for CO2 hydrate formation. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 78:103313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Retallack GJ, Conde GD (2020) Deep time perspective on rising atmospheric CO2. Glob Planet Chang 189:103177

  5. Ritchie H, Roser M (2017) Fossil fuels Our world in data

  6. Razmjoo A, Qolipour M, Shirmohammadi R, Heibati SM, IJEp F (2017) Techno-economic evaluation of standalone hybrid solar-wind systems for small residential districts in the central desert of Iran. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36:1194–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hausfather Z, Peters GP (2020) Emissions–the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature Publishing Group

  8. González A, Plaza M, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2013a) Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 230:456–465

  9. Khzouz M, Gkanas EI, Shao J, Sher F, Beherskyi D, El-Kharouf A, Al Qubeissi M (2020) Life cycle costing analysis: tools and applications for determining hydrogen production cost for fuel cell vehicle technology. Energies 13:3783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rissman J, Bataille C, Masanet E, Aden N, Morrow WR III, Zhou N, Elliott N, Dell R, Heeren N, Huckestein B, Cresko J, Miller SA, Roy J, Fennell P, Cremmins B, Koch Blank T, Hone D, Williams ED, de la Rue du Can S, Sisson B, Williams M, Katzenberger J, Burtraw D, Sethi G, Ping H, Danielson D, Lu H, Lorber T, Dinkel J, Helseth J (2020) Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Appl Energy 266:114848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sher F, Yaqoob A, Saeed F, Zhang S, Jahan Z, Klemeš JJ (2020c) Torrefied biomass fuels as a renewable alternative to coal in co-firing for power generation. Energy 209:118444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato E, Kurosawa A (2021) Role of negative emissions technologies (NETs) and innovative technologies in transition of Japan’s energy systems toward net-zero CO2 emissions. Sustain Sci 16:463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00908-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee H (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  14. Wang Y, Zhao L, Otto A, Robinius M, Stolten D (2017) A review of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies from coal-fired power plants. Energy Procedia 114:650–665

  15. Gouedard C, Picq D, Launay F, Carrette P-L (2012) Amine degradation in CO2 capture. I A review. Int J Greenh Gas Con 10:244–270

  16. Mazari SA, Abro R, Bhutto AW, Saeed IM, Ali BS, Jan BM, Ghalib L, Ahmed M, Mubarak NM (2020a) Thermal degradation kinetics of morpholine for carbon dioxide capture. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 8:103814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saeed IM, Lee VS, Mazari SA, Si Ali B, Basirun WJ, Asghar A, Ghalib L, Jan BM (2017) Thermal degradation of aqueous 2-aminoethylethanolamine in CO2 capture; identification of degradation products, reaction mechanisms and computational studies. Chem Cent J 11:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-016-0231-7

  18. Saeed IM, Alaba P, Mazari SA, Basirun WJ, Lee VS, Sabzoi N (2018) Opportunities and challenges in the development of monoethanolamine and its blends for post-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Con 79:212–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.002

  19. Ghalib L, Abdulkareem A, Ali BS, Mazari SA (2020) Modeling the rate of corrosion of carbon steel using activated diethanolamine solutions for CO2 absorption. Chin J Chem Eng 28:2099–2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.03.006

  20. Mazari SA, Ghalib L, Sattar A, Bozdar MM, Qayoom A, Ahmed I, Muhammad A, Abro R, Abdulkareem A, Nizamuddin S, Baloch H, Mubarak NM (2020b) Review of modelling and simulation strategies for evaluating corrosive behavior of aqueous amine systems for CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Con 96:103010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103010

  21. Mazari SA, Alaba P, Saeed IM (2019) Formation and elimination of nitrosamines and nitramines in freshwaters involved in post-combustion carbon capture process. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7:103111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kentish SE, Scholes CA, Stevens GW (2008) Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering 1:52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kanniche M, Bouallou C (2007) CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 27:2693–2702

  24. Al-Juboori O, Sher F, Hazafa A, Khan MK, Chen GZ (2020) The effect of variable operating parameters for hydrocarbon fuel formation from CO2 by molten salts electrolysis. J CO2 Util 40:101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101193

  25. Al-Shara NK, Sher F, Iqbal SZ, Sajid Z, Chen GZ (2020) Electrochemical study of different membrane materials for the fabrication of stable, reproducible and reusable reference electrode. Journal of Energy Chemistry 49:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.01.008

  26. Kumaravel V, Bartlett J, Pillai SC (2020) Photoelectrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) into fuels and value-added products. ACS Energy Lett 5:486–519

  27. Mazari SA, Hossain N, Basirun WJ, Mubarak NM, Abro R, Sabzoi N, Shah A (2021) An overview of catalytic conversion of CO2 into fuels and chemicals using metal organic frameworks. Process Saf Environ Prot 149:67–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.025

  28. Sher F, Al-Shara NK, Iqbal SZ, Jahan Z, Chen GZ (2020a) Enhancing hydrogen production from steam electrolysis in molten hydroxides via selection of non-precious metal electrodes. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:28260–28271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Talapaneni SN et al (2020) Nanostructured carbon nitrides for CO2 capture and conversion. Adv Mater 32:1904635

  30. Li P, Chen L, Xia S, Zhang L (2019b) Maximum hydrogen production rate optimization for tubular steam methane reforming reactor. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 17

  31. Pérez S, Del Molino E, Barrio V (2019) Modeling and testing of a milli-structured reactor for carbon dioxide methanation International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 17

  32. Samanta A, Zhao A, Shimizu GK, Sarkar P, Gupta R (2012) Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:1438–1463

  33. Calvo-Munoz EM, Garcia-Mateos FJ, Rosas JM, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, Cordero TJFiM (2016) Biomass waste carbon materials as adsorbents for CO2 capture under post-combustion conditions 3:23

  34. Plaza M et al (2009a) Development of low-cost biomass-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture 88:2442–2447

  35. Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2011) Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture. Energy Environ Sci 4:1765–1771

  36. Millward AR, Yaghi OM (2005) Metal−organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc 127:17998–17999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang C, Luo H, De J, Li H, Dai S (2010) Carbon dioxide capture by superbase-derived protic ionic liquids. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:5978–5981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Siriwardane RV, Shen M-S, Fisher EP, Poston JA (2001) Adsorption of CO2 on molecular sieves and activated carbon. Energy Fuel 15:279–284

  39. Ben T, Pei C, Zhang D, Xu J, Deng F, Jing X, Qiu S (2011) Gas storage in porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs). Energy Environ Sci 4:3991–3999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rashidi NA, Yusup S (2016) An overview of activated carbons utilization for the post-combustion carbon dioxide capture. J CO2 Util 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.11.002

  41. Sher F, Iqbal SZ, Albazzaz S, Ali U, Mortari DA, Rashid T (2020b) Development of biomass derived highly porous fast adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Fuel 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118506

  42. Mohamed AR, Mohammadi M, Darzi GN (2010) Preparation of carbon molecular sieve from lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:1591–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dissanayake PD, You S, Igalavithana AD, Xia Y, Bhatnagar A, Gupta S, Kua HW, Kim S, Kwon JH, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2020) Biochar-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture: a critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 119:109582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ogungbenro AE, Quang DV, Al-Ali K, Abu-Zahra MR (2017) Activated carbon from date seeds for CO2 capture applications. Energy Procedia 114:2313–2321

  45. Singh G, Lakhi KS, Sil S, Bhosale SV, Kim I, Albahily K, Vinu AJC (2019c) Biomass derived porous carbon for CO2 capture. Carbon 148:164–186

  46. Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2011) A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:3269–3282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Huff MD, Kumar S, Lee JW (2014) Comparative analysis of pinewood, peanut shell, and bamboo biomass derived biochars produced via hydrothermal conversion and pyrolysis. J Environ Manag 146:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Singh G, Kim IY, Lakhi KS, Srivastava P, Naidu R, Vinu A (2017) Single step synthesis of activated bio-carbons with a high surface area and their excellent CO2 adsorption capacity. Carbon 116:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu M, Hadi P, Chen G, McKay G (2014) Removal of cadmium ions from wastewater using innovative electronic waste-derived material. J Hazard Mater 273:118–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hadjittofi L, Prodromou M, Pashalidis I (2014) Activated biochar derived from cactus fibres–preparation, characterization and application on Cu (II) removal from aqueous solutions. Bioresour Technol 159:460–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Prauchner MJ, Sapag K, Rodríguez-Reinoso F (2016) Tailoring biomass-based activated carbon for CH4 storage by combining chemical activation with H3PO4 or ZnCl2 and physical activation with CO2. Carbon 110:138–147

  52. Hadi P, Barford J, McKay G (2013b) Toxic heavy metal capture using a novel electronic waste-based material Mechanism. Modeling and Comparison Environmental science & technology 47:8248–8255

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hadi P, Barford J, McKay G (2013a) Electronic waste as a new precursor for adsorbent production. SIJ Trans Ind Financ Bus Manag 1:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hadi P, Ning C, Ouyang W, Lin CSK, Hui C-W, McKay G (2014) Conversion of an aluminosilicate-based waste material to high-value efficient adsorbent. Chem Eng J 256:415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Foo K, Hameed B (2011) Preparation of activated carbon from date stones by microwave induced chemical activation: application for methylene blue adsorption. Chem Eng J 170:338–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gao Y, Yue Q, Gao B (2015) High surface area and oxygen-enriched activated carbon synthesized from animal cellulose and evaluated in electric double-layer capacitors. RSC Adv 5:31375–31383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Guo Y, Tan C, Sun J, Li W, Zhang J, Zhao C (2020b) Porous activated carbons derived from waste sugarcane bagasse for CO2 adsorption. Chem Eng J 381:122736

  58. Olivares-Marín M, Fernández-González C, Macías-García A, Gómez-Serrano V (2006) Preparation of activated carbon from cherry stones by chemical activation with ZnCl2. Appl Surf Sci 252:5967–5971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Song J, Shen W, Wang J, Fan W (2014) Superior carbon-based CO2 adsorbents prepared from poplar anthers. Carbon 69:255–263

  60. Yang J, Qiu K (2010) Preparation of activated carbons from walnut shells via vacuum chemical activation and their application for methylene blue removal. Chem Eng J 165:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang X et al (2015) High temperature ammonia modification of rice husk char to enhance CO2 adsorption: influence of pre-deashing. RSC Adv 5:106280–106288

  62. Benedetti V, Cordioli E, Patuzzi F, Baratieri M (2019) CO2 Adsorption study on pure and chemically activated chars derived from commercial biomass gasifiers. J CO2 Util 33:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.008

  63. Razzaq L et al (2020) Modeling viscosity and density of ethanol-diesel-biodiesel ternary blends for sustainable environment. Sustainability 12:5186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Azmi AA, Aziz MAA (2019) Mesoporous adsorbent for CO2 capture application under mild condition: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 7:103022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103022

  65. Ochedi FO, Liu Y, Adewuyi YG (2020) State-of-the-art review on capture of CO2 using adsorbents prepared from waste materials. Process Saf Environ Prot 139:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.036

  66. Olivares-Marín M, Maroto-Valer MM (2012) Development of adsorbents for CO2 capture from waste materials: a review. GREENH GASES 2:20–35

  67. Creamer AE, Gao B (2016) Carbon-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 50:7276–7289. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00627

  68. Cagnon B, Py X, Guillot A, Stoeckli F, Chambat G (2009) Contributions of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin to the mass and the porous properties of chars and steam activated carbons from various lignocellulosic precursors. Bioresour Technol 100:292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lua AC, Lau FY, Guo J (2006) Influence of pyrolysis conditions on pore development of oil-palm-shell activated carbons. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 76:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sun K, Chun Jiang J (2010) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from rubber-seed shell by physical activation with steam. Biomass Bioenergy 34:539–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tsai W-T, Chang C, Lee S (1998) A low cost adsorbent from agricultural waste corn cob by zinc chloride activation. Bioresour Technol 64:211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wan Daud WMA, Ali WSW, Sulaiman MZ (2003) Effect of activation temperature on pore development in activated carbon produced from palm shell Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process. Environmental & Clean Technology 78:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  73. Reza MS et al (2020) Preparation of activated carbon from biomass and its’ applications in water and gas purification, a review. Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 27:208–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Singh G, Lakhi KS, Sil S, Bhosale SV, Kim I, Albahily K, Vinu A (2019b) Biomass derived porous carbon for CO2 capture. Carbon 148:164–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.050

  75. Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A (2007) Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:1966–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Pütün AE, Özbay N, Önal EP, Pütün E (2005) Fixed-bed pyrolysis of cotton stalk for liquid and solid products. Fuel Process Technol 86:1207–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Carrott P, Carrott MR (2007) Lignin–from natural adsorbent to activated carbon: a review. Bioresour Technol 98:2301–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Plaza M, Pevida C, Martín CF, Fermoso J, Pis J, Rubiera F (2010) Developing almond shell-derived activated carbons as CO2 adsorbents. Sep Purif Technol 71:102–106

  79. Lee H-M, An K-H, Kim B-J (2014) Effects of carbonization temperature on pore development in polyacrylonitrile-based activated carbon nanofibers. Carbon Lett 15:146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Nowicki P, Wachowska H, Pietrzak R (2010b) Active carbons prepared by chemical activation of plum stones and their application in removal of NO2. J Hazard Mater 181:1088–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Fernández RG, García CP, Lavín AG, JLB d l H (2012) Study of main combustion characteristics for biomass fuels used in boilers. Fuel Process Technol 103:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Meraz L, Domınguez A, Kornhauser I, Rojas F (2003) A thermochemical concept-based equation to estimate waste combustion enthalpy from elemental composition☆. Fuel 82:1499–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wilson DL (1972) Prediction of heat of combustion of solid wastes from ultimate analysis. Environ Sci Technol 6:1119–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Garcia-Perez M, Chaala A, Pakdel H, Kretschmer D, Roy C (2007) Vacuum pyrolysis of softwood and hardwood biomass: comparison between product yields and bio-oil properties. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 78:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Cho KW, Park HS, Kim KH, Lee YK, Lee K-H (1995) Estimation of the heating value of oily mill sludges from steel plant. Fuel 74:1918–1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Qian C, Li Q, Zhang Z, Wang X, Hu J, Cao W (2020) Prediction of higher heating values of biochar from proximate and ultimate analysis. Fuel 265:116925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Mott R, Spooner C (1940) The calorific value of carbon in coal: the Dulong relationship. Fuel 19:242

    Google Scholar 

  88. Demirbas AJES, Part A (2007) Mathematical modeling the relations of biomass fuels based on proximate analysis. Energy Sources, Part A 29:1017–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Demirbaş AJF (1997) Calculation of higher heating values of biomass. Fuel 76:431–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Jenkins B, Ebeling J (1985) Correlation of physical and chemical properties of terrestrial biomass with conversion

  91. Rossi A (1984) Fuel characteristics of wood and nonwood biomass fuels. In: Progress in biomass conversion, vol 5. Elsevier, pp 69-99

  92. Jiménez L, FJF G (1991) Study of the physical and chemical properties of lignocellulosic residues with a view to the production of fuels. Fuel 70:947–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Parikh J, Channiwala S, Ghosal GJF (2005) A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels 84:487-494

  94. Bansal RC, Donnet J-B, Stoeckli F (1988) Marcel Dekker, A review of: active carbon Inc, New York 482

  95. Cuhadar C (2005) Production and characterization of activated carbon from hazelnut shell and hazelnut husk Unpublished Master Thesis. Middle East Technical University Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  96. Arami-Niya A, Daud WMAW, Mjalli FS (2010) Using granular activated carbon prepared from oil palm shell by ZnCl2 and physical activation for methane adsorption. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 89:197–203

  97. Budinova T, Ekinci E, Yardim F, Grimm A, Björnbom E, Minkova V, Goranova M (2006) Characterization and application of activated carbon produced by H3PO4 and water vapor activation. Fuel Process Technol 87:899–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Mahapatra K, Ramteke D, Paliwal L (2012) Production of activated carbon from sludge of food processing industry under controlled pyrolysis and its application for methylene blue removal. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 95:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Song M, Jin B, Xiao R, Yang L, Wu Y, Zhong Z, Huang Y (2013) The comparison of two activation techniques to prepare activated carbon from corn cob. Biomass Bioenergy 48:250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Katesa J, Junpirom S, Tangsathitkulchai C (2011) Effects of carbonization temperature on porous properties of coconut shell based activated carbon. In: TICHE International Conference.

  101. Loredo-Cancino M, Soto-Regalado E, Cerino-Córdova F, García-Reyes R, García-León A, Garza-González M (2013) Determining optimal conditions to produce activated carbon from barley husks using single or dual optimization. J Environ Manag 125:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Bouchelta C, Medjram MS, Bertrand O, Bellat J-P (2008) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation with steam. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 82:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2007.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Rashidi NA, Yusup S, Borhan A (2014a) Development of novel low-cost activated carbon for carbon dioxide capture. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications 5:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Rashidi NA, Yusup S, Borhan A (2014b) Novel low-cost activated carbon from coconut shell and its adsorptive characteristics for carbon dioxide. Trans Tech Publ 594:240–244

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rashidi NA, Yusup S, Borhan A, Loong LH (2014c) Experimental and modelling studies of carbon dioxide adsorption by porous biomass derived activated carbon. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:1353–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Gonzalez JF, Roman S, González-García CM, Nabais JV, Ortiz AL (2009) Porosity development in activated carbons prepared from walnut shells by carbon dioxide or steam activation. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:7474–7481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Román S, González J, González-García C, Zamora F (2008) Control of pore development during CO2 and steam activation of olive stones. Fuel Process Technol 89:715–720

  108. Wei X et al (2012b) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by solar irradiation of cell-free Bacillus amyloliquefaciens extracts and AgNO3. Bioresour Technol 103:273–278

  109. Lim WC, Srinivasakannan C, Balasubramanian N (2010) Activation of palm shells by phosphoric acid impregnation for high yielding activated carbon. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 88:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Plaza M, Garcia S, Rubiera F, Pis J, Pevida C (2011) Evaluation of ammonia modified and conventionally activated biomass based carbons as CO2 adsorbents in postcombustion conditions. Sep Purif Technol 80:96–104

  111. Ello AS, de Souza LK, Trokourey A, Jaroniec M (2013a) Coconut shell-based microporous carbons for CO2 capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 180:280–283

  112. González Plaza M, González García AS, Pevida García C, Pis Martínez JJ, Rubiera González F (2012) Valorisation of spent coffee grounds as CO2 adsorbents for postcombustion capture applications

  113. Bae J-S, Su S (2013) Macadamia nut shell-derived carbon composites for post combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Con 19:174–182

  114. Xiong Z, Shihong Z, Haiping Y, Tao S, Yingquan C, Hanping C (2013) Influence of NH3/CO2 modification on the characteristic of biochar and the CO2 capture. Bioenergy Res 6:1147–1153

  115. Plaza M, González A, Pis J, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2014) Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture. Appl Energy 114:551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Yang T, Lua AC (2003) Characteristics of activated carbons prepared from pistachio-nut shells by physical activation. J Colloid Interface Sci 267:408–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Sumathi S, Bhatia S, Lee K, Mohamed A (2010) SO2 and NO simultaneous removal from simulated flue Gas over cerium-supported palm shell activated at lower temperatures− role of cerium on NO removal. Energy Fuel 24:427–431

  118. Macías-Pérez MC, Bueno-López A, Lillo-Rodenas MA, de Lecea CS-M, Linares-Solano A (2007) SO2 retention on CaO/activated carbon sorbents. Part I: Importance of calcium loading and dispersion. Fuel 86:677–683

  119. Lu GM, Lau D (1996) Characterisation of sewage sludge-derived adsorbents for H2S removal. Part 2: surface and pore structural evolution in chemical activation. Gas separation & purification 10:103–111

  120. Smith K, Fowler G, Pullket S, Graham NJD (2009) Sewage sludge-based adsorbents: a review of their production, properties and use in water treatment applications. Water Res 43:2569–2594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Bhadusha N, Ananthabaskaran T (2011) Adsorptive removal of methylene blue onto ZnCl2 activated carbon from wood apple outer shell: kinetics and equilibrium studies E-Journal of Chemistry 8:1696-1707

  122. Nowicki P, Pietrzak R, Wachowska H (2010a) Sorption properties of active carbons obtained from walnut shells by chemical and physical activation. Catal Today 150:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Sayan E (2014) An optimization study on removal of Zn from aqueous solution by ultrasound assisted preparation of activated carbon from alkaline impregnated hazelnut shell. J Chem Soc Pak 36:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  124. Hwang H-R, Choi W-J, Kim T-J, Kim J-S, Oh K-J (2008) The preparation of an adsorbent from mixtures of sewage sludge and coal-tar pitch using an alkaline hydroxide activation agent. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 83:220–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Sudaryanto Y, Hartono S, Irawaty W, Hindarso H, Ismadji S (2006) High surface area activated carbon prepared from cassava peel by chemical activation. Bioresour Technol 97:734–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Bagheri N, Abedi J (2009) Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from corn by chemical activation using potassium hydroxide. Chem Eng Res Des 7:1059–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Huang Y, Peng L, Liu Y, Zhao G, Chen JY, Yu G (2016) Biobased nano porous active carbon fibers for high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:15205–15215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Park SH, Cho HJ, Ryu C, Park Y-K (2016) Removal of copper (II) in aqueous solution using pyrolytic biochars derived from red macroalga. Porphyra tenera Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 36:314–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Wu F-C, Tseng R-L (2006) Preparation of highly porous carbon from fir wood by KOH etching and CO2 gasification for adsorption of dyes and phenols from water. J Colloid Interface Sci 294:21–30

  130. Ji Y, Li T, Zhu L, Wang X, Lin Q (2007) Preparation of activated carbons by microwave heating KOH activation. Appl Surf Sci 254:506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Wang J, Kaskel S (2012) KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage. J Mater Chem 22:23710–23725

  132. 持田勲, 尹聖昊, 林成〓, 洪聖和 (2004) 炭素構造モデルの進化と効用 炭素 2004:274-284

  133. El-Hendawy A (2008) 47 An insight into KOH activation mechanism via production of microporous activated carbon for heavy metal removal. Egypt J Chem 51:681

    Google Scholar 

  134. Armandi M, Bonelli B, Geobaldo F, Garrone E (2010) Nanoporous carbon materials obtained by sucrose carbonization in the presence of KOH. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 132:414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Lozano-Castello D, Calo J, Cazorla-Amorós D, Linares-Solano A (2007) Carbon activation with KOH as explored by temperature programmed techniques, and the effects of hydrogen. Carbon 45:2529–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Ozdemir I S ahin M, Orhan R, Erdem M 2014 Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from grape stalk by zinc chloride activation Fuel Process Technol 125

  137. Idrees M, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2018) Sustainable packaging waste-derived activated carbon for carbon dioxide capture. J CO2 Util 26:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.05.016

  138. Yang P, Rao L, Zhu W, Wang L, Ma R, Chen F, Lin G, Hu X (2020) Porous carbons derived from sustainable biomass via a facile one-step synthesis strategy as efficient CO2 adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 59:6194–6201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Lu Q, Wang Z, Dong C-q, Zhang Z-f, Zhang Y, Yang Y-p, Zhu X-f (2011) Selective fast pyrolysis of biomass impregnated with ZnCl2: furfural production together with acetic acid and activated carbon as by-products. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 91:273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Hulicova-Jurcakova D, Puziy AM, Poddubnaya OI, Suárez-García F, Tascón JM, Lu GQ (2009) Highly stable performance of supercapacitors from phosphorus-enriched carbons. J Am Chem Soc 131:5026–5027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Quesada-Plata F, Ruiz-Rosas R, Morallón E, Cazorla-Amorós D (2016) Activated carbons prepared through H3PO4-assisted hydrothermal carbonisation from biomass wastes: porous texture and electrochemical performance. ChemPlusChem 81:1349–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Deng S, Hu B, Chen T, Wang B, Huang J, Wang Y, Yu G (2015) Activated carbons prepared from peanut shell and sunflower seed shell for high CO2 adsorption. Adsorption 21:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Chen J et al (2016) Enhanced CO2 capture capacity of nitrogen-doped biomass-derived porous carbons. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:1439–1445

  144. Zhu B, Shang C, Guo Z (2016) Naturally nitrogen and calcium-doped nanoporous carbon from pine cone with superior CO2 capture capacities. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:1050–1057

  145. Wei H, Deng S, Hu B, Chen Z, Wang B, Huang J, Yu G (2012a) Granular bamboo-derived activated carbon for high CO2 adsorption: the dominant role of narrow micropores. ChemSusChem 5:2354–2360

  146. Boonpoke A, Chiarakorn S, Laosiripojana N, Towprayoon S, Chidthaisong A (2011) Synthesis of activated carbon and MCM-41 from bagasse and rice husk and their carbon dioxide adsorption capacity. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment 2:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  147. Zhang C, Song W, Ma Q, Xie L, Zhang X, Guo H (2016) Enhancement of CO2 capture on biomass-based carbon from black locust by KOH activation and ammonia modification. Energy Fuel 30:4181–4190

  148. Ello AS, de Souza LK, Trokourey A, Jaroniec M (2013b) Development of microporous carbons for CO2 capture by KOH activation of African palm shells. J CO2 Util 2:35–38

  149. Chen T, Deng S, Wang B, Huang J, Wang Y, Yu G (2015) CO2 adsorption on crab shell derived activated carbons: contribution of micropores and nitrogen-containing groups. RSC Adv 5:48323–48330

  150. Deng S, Wei H, Chen T, Wang B, Huang J, Yu G (2014) Superior CO2 adsorption on pine nut shell-derived activated carbons and the effective micropores at different temperatures. Chem Eng J 253:46–54

  151. Nelson KM et al (2016) Preparation and CO2 adsorption properties of soft-templated mesoporous carbons derived from chestnut tannin precursors. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 222:94–103

  152. Wang R, Wang P, Yan X, Lang J, Peng C, Xue Q (2012) Promising porous carbon derived from celtuce leaves with outstanding supercapacitance and CO2 capture performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:5800–5806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Li Q, Liu S, Peng W, Zhu W, Wang L, Chen F, Shao J, Hu X (2020) Preparation of biomass-derived porous carbons by a facile method and application to CO2 adsorption. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 116:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Li Q, Liu S, Wang L, Chen F, Shao J, XJJoES H (2021) Efficient nitrogen doped porous carbonaceous CO2 adsorbents based on lotus leaf. J Environ Sci 103:268–278

  155. Liu S, Yang P, Wang L, Li Y, Wu Z, Ma R, Wu J, Hu X (2019c) Nitrogen-doped porous carbons from lotus leaf for CO2 capture and supercapacitor electrodes. Energy Fuel 33:6568–6576

  156. Liu S et al (2019b) CO2 adsorption on hazelnut-shell-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbons synthesized by single-step sodium amide activation. Ind Eng Chem Res 59:7046–7053

  157. Rao L, Ma R, Liu S, Wang L, Wu Z, Yang J, Hu XJCEJ (2019) Nitrogen enriched porous carbons from d-glucose with excellent CO2 capture performance. Chem Eng J 362:794–801

  158. Pang R et al (2020) Highly efficient nitrogen-doped porous carbonaceous CO2 adsorbents derived from biomass. Energy Fuel 35:1620–1628

  159. Zhao Z, Ma C, Chen F, Xu G, Pang R, Qian X, Shao J, Hu X (2021) Water caltrop shell-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbons with high CO2 adsorption capacity. Biomass Bioenergy 145:105969

  160. Guo Y, Tan C, Sun J, Li W, Zhang J, Zhao C (2020a) Biomass ash stabilized MgO adsorbents for CO2 capture application. Fuel 259:116298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116298

  161. Balou S, Babak SE, Priye A (2020) Synergistic effect of nitrogen doping and ultra-microporosity on the performance of biomass and microalgae-derived activated carbons for CO2 capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:42711–42722. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c10218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Bansal RC, Goyal M (2005) Activated carbon adsorption. CRC press

  163. Menendez-Diaz J, Martín-Gullón I (2006) Types of carbon adsorbents and their production. In: Interface science and technology, vol 7. Elsevier, pp 1-47

  164. Adib F, Bagreev A, Bandosz TJ (2000) On the possibility of water regeneration of unimpregnated activated carbons used as hydrogen sulfide adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2439–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Bashkova S, Bagreev A, Bandosz TJ (2002) Effect of surface characteristics on adsorption of methyl mercaptan on activated carbons. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4346–4352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Ma X, Yang Y, Wu Q, Liu B, Li D, Chen R, Wang C, Li H, Zeng Z, Li L (2020) Underlying mechanism of CO2 uptake onto biomass-based porous carbons: do adsorbents capture CO2 chiefly through narrow micropores? Fuel 282:118727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118727

  167. Aksu Z, Akın AB (2010) Comparison of Remazol Black B biosorptive properties of live and treated activated sludge. Chem Eng J 165:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Boujibar O, Souikny A, Ghamouss F, Achak O, Dahbi M, Chafik T (2018) CO2 capture using N-containing nanoporous activated carbon obtained from argan fruit shells. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 6:1995–2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.005

  169. Le Leuch L, Subrenat A, Le Cloirec P (2005) Hydrogen sulfide and ammonia removal on activated carbon fiber cloth-supported metal oxides. Environ Technol 26:1243–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Shammay A, Sivret EC, Le-Minh N, Fernandez RL, Evanson I, Stuetz RM (2016) Review of odour abatement in sewer networks. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4:3866–3881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Duan L, Yu Z, Erans M, Li Y, Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2016) Attrition study of cement-supported biomass-activated calcium sorbents for CO2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:9476–9484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b02393

  172. González AS, Plaza MG, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2013b) Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 230:456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.118

  173. Parshetti GK, Chowdhury S, Balasubramanian R (2015) Biomass derived low-cost microporous adsorbents for efficient CO2 capture. Fuel 148:246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.032

  174. Plaza MG, Pevida C, Arias B, Fermoso J, Casal MD, Martín CF, Rubiera F, Pis JJ (2009b) Development of low-cost biomass-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture. Fuel 88:2442–2447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.02.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Nasrullah A, Khan AS, Bhat AH, Din IU, Inayat A, Muhammad N, Bakhsh EM, Khan SB (2021) Effect of short time ball milling on physicochemical and adsorption performance of activated carbon prepared from mangosteen peel waste. Renew Energy 168:723–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Pal A, Thu K, Mitra S, el-Sharkawy II, Saha BB, Kil HS, Yoon SH, Miyawaki J (2017) Study on biomass derived activated carbons for adsorptive heat pump application. Int J Heat Mass Transf 110:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.02.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Azari A, Nabizadeh R, Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Mesdaghinia AR (2020) Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of dyes adsorption by carbon-based adsorbent materials: classification and analysis of last decade studies Chemosphere:126238

  178. Salleh M, Khalid Mahmoud D, Abdul Karim WW, Idris A (2011) Cationic and anionic dye adsorption by agricultural solid wastes: a comprehensive review. Desalination 280:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Yagub M, Sen T, Afroze S, Ang H (2014) Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption: a review. Adv Colloid Interfac 209:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Nadeem R, Hanif MA, Shaheen F, Perveen S, Zafar MN, Iqbal T (2008) Physical and chemical modification of distillery sludge for Pb (II) biosorption. J Hazard Mater 150:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Ozmihci S, Kargi F (2006) Utilization of powdered waste sludge (PWS) for removal of textile dyestuffs from wastewater by adsorption. J Environ Manag 81:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Liu Q et al (2019a) CO2 Adsorption over carbon aerogels: the effect of pore and surface properties. ChemistrySelect 4:3161–3168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Le-Minh N, Sivret EC, Shammay A, Stuetz RM (2018) Factors affecting the adsorption of gaseous environmental odors by activated carbon: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 48:341–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Maceiras R, Alvarez E, Cancela MA (2008) Effect of temperature on carbon dioxide absorption in monoethanolamine solutions. Chem Eng J 138:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Pal A, Dey S, Sukul D (2016) Effect of temperature on adsorption and corrosion inhibition characteristics of gelatin on mild steel in hydrochloric acid medium. Res Chem Intermed 42:4531–4549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Souders M, Selheimer C, Brown GG (1932) III.-Equilibria between liquid and vapor solutions of paraffin hydrocarbons. Ind Eng Chem 24:517–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  187. W John Thomas F, Crittenden B (1998) Adsorption technology and design. Butterworth-Heinemann

  188. Martin MJ, Artola A, Balaguer MD, Rigola M (2003) Activated carbons developed from surplus sewage sludge for the removal of dyes from dilute aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 94:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Wang X, Zhu N, Yin B (2008) Preparation of sludge-based activated carbon and its application in dye wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 153:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Xi X, Guo X (2013) Preparation of bio-charcoal from sewage sludge and its performance on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions. J Mol Liq 183:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Auta M, Hameed B (2014) Optimized and functionalized paper sludge activated with potassium fluoride for single and binary adsorption of reactive dyes. J Ind Eng Chem 20:830–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Li J et al (2019a) Selective preparation of biomass-derived porous carbon with controllable pore sizes toward highly efficient CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 360:250–259

  193. Rattanaphan S, Rungrotmongkol T, Kongsune P (2020) Biogas improving by adsorption of CO2 on modified waste tea activated carbon. Renew Energy 145:622–631

  194. Huang GG, Y-f L, Wu X-x, Cai J-j (2019a) Activated carbons prepared by the KOH activation of a hydrochar from garlic peel and their CO2 adsorption performance. New Carbon Mater 34:247–257

  195. Asadi-Sangachini Z, Galangash MM, Younesi H, Nowrouzi M (2019) The feasibility of cost-effective manufacturing activated carbon derived from walnut shells for large-scale CO2 capture. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:26542–26552

  196. Ding S, Liu Y (2020) Adsorption of CO2 from flue gas by novel seaweed-based KOH-activated porous biochars. Fuel 260:116382

  197. Singh G, Lakhi KS, Ramadass K, Sathish C, Vinu A (2019a) High-performance biomass-derived activated porous biocarbons for combined pre-and post-combustion CO2 capture. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:7412–7420

  198. Quan C, Jia X, Gao N (2020) Nitrogen-doping activated biomass carbon from tea seed shell for CO2 capture and supercapacitor. Int J Energy Res 44:1218–1232

  199. Yan X, Li Y, Ma X, Zhao J, Wang Z, Liu H (2019) CO2 capture by a novel CaO/MgO sorbent fabricated from industrial waste and dolomite under calcium looping conditions. New J Chem 43:5116–5125

  200. Lima GL, Oliveira RW, de Jesus Neto RM, Gomes AMdS, Junior RAF, Andrade HM, Mascarenhas AJ (2020) Single step synthesis of magnetic materials derived from biomass residues waste and biomass Valorization:1-12

  201. Szymańska A, Skoczek A, Przepiórski J (2019) Activated carbons from common nettle as potential adsorbents for CO2 capture. Pol J Chem Technol 21:59–66

  202. Xu X, Zheng Y, Gao B, Cao X (2019) N-doped biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of CO2 and reactive red. Chem Eng J 368:564–572

  203. Huang Y-F, Chiueh P-T, Lo S-L (2019b) CO2 adsorption on biochar from co-torrefaction of sewage sludge and Leucaena wood using microwave heating. Energy Procedia 158:4435–4440

  204. Yahia MB, Vergnet J, Saubanère M, Doublet M-L (2019) Unified picture of anionic redox in Li/Na-ion batteries. Nat Mater 18:496–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. Sun H, Yang B, Li A (2019) Biomass derived porous carbon for efficient capture of carbon dioxide, organic contaminants and volatile iodine with exceptionally high uptake. Chem Eng J 372:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Elkhalifa S, Al-Ansari T, Mackey HR, McKay G (2019) Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: a review Resources. Conservation and Recycling 144:310–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Serafin J, Baca M, Biegun M, Mijowska E, Kaleńczuk RJ, Sreńscek-Nazzal J, Michalkiewicz B (2019) Direct conversion of biomass to nanoporous activated biocarbons for high CO2 adsorption and supercapacitor applications. Appl Surf Sci 497:143722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Zhao S, Wang C-Y, Chen M-M, Wang J, Shi Z-Q (2009) Potato starch-based activated carbon spheres as electrode material for electrochemical capacitor. J Phys Chem Solids 70:1256–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Zou Z, Lei Y, Li Y, Zhang Y, Xiao W (2019) Nitrogen-doped hierarchical meso/microporous carbon from bamboo fungus for symmetric supercapacitor applications. Molecules 24:3677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Li K, Tian S, Jiang J, Wang J, Chen X, Yan F (2016) Pine cone shell-based activated carbon used for CO2 adsorption. J Mater Chem A 4:5223–5234

  211. Liu Y, Jia X, Liu J, Fan X, Zhang B, Zhang A, Zhang Q (2019d) Synthesis and evaluation of N, O-doped hypercrosslinked polymers and their performance in CO2 capture. Appl Organomet Chem 33:e5025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  212. Choi SW, Tang J, Pol VG, Lee KB (2019) Pollen-derived porous carbon by KOH activation: effect of physicochemical structure on CO2 adsorption. J CO2 Util 29:146–155

  213. Ramlee NA, Jawaid M, Zainudin ES, SAK Y (2019) Modification of oil palm empty fruit bunch and sugarcane bagasse biomass as potential reinforcement for composites panel and thermal insulation materials. Journal of Bionic Engineering 16:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. Wu D et al (2019) Improved lignocellulose degradation efficiency based on Fenton pretreatment during rice straw composting. Bioresour Technol 294:122132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Mahvi A, Maleki A, Eslami A (2004) Potential of rice husk and rice husk ash for phenol removal in aqueous systems

  216. Van Soest P (2006) Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 130:137–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  217. Roukas T, Kotzekidou P (2020) Pomegranate peel waste: a new substrate for citric acid production by Aspergillus niger in solid-state fermentation under non-aseptic conditions Environmental Science and Pollution Research:1-9

  218. Zhang N et al (2018) High capacity hard carbon derived from lotus stem as anode for sodium ion batteries. J Power Sources 378:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  219. Chen Q, Sun JQ, Song L, Liu WY, Yu FH, Li S, Gong HD, Lu HZ (2019) Trait acclimation of the clonal fern Selliguea griffithiana to forest epiphytic and terrestrial habitats. Ecol Res 34:406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  220. Boyjoo Y et al (2017) From waste Coca Cola® to activated carbons with impressive capabilities for CO2 adsorption and supercapacitors. Carbon 116:490–499

  221. Liao MJ, Wang YL, Li SS, Li JF, Chen P (2019) Electrocatalyst derived from abundant biomass and its excellent activity for in situ H O production. ChemElectroChem 6:4877–4884

  222. Skelton J, Jusino MA, Carlson PS, Smith K, Banik MT, Lindner DL, Palmer JM, Hulcr J (2019) Relationships among wood-boring beetles, fungi, and the decomposition of forest biomass. Mol Ecol 28:4971–4986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. Galina NR, Luna CMR, Arce GL, Ávila I (2019) Comparative study on combustion and oxy-fuel combustion environments using mixtures of coal with sugarcane bagasse and biomass sorghum bagasse by the thermogravimetric analysis. J Energy Inst 92:741–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  224. Méndez A, Gascó G, Ruiz B, Fuente E (2019) Hydrochars from industrial macroalgae “Gelidium Sesquipedale” biomass wastes. Bioresour Technol 275:386–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  225. Awais M, Li W, Munir A, Omar MM, Ajmal M (2020) Experimental investigation of downdraft biomass gasifier fed by sugarcane bagasse and coconut shells Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery:1-16

  226. Zhang C et al (2020) Converting pomelo peel into Eco-friendly and Low-consumption photothermic biomass sponge toward multifunctioal solar-to-heat conversion. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:5328–5337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  227. Nithya K, Sathish A, Pradeep K, Baalaji SK (2019) Algal biomass waste residues of Spirulina platensis for chromium adsorption and modeling studies. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7:103273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan

    Mahnoor Javed & Muhammad Zahoor

  2. Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia

    Muhammad Zahoor & Nizamuddin Sabzoi

  3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan

    Shaukat Ali Mazari & Abdul Sattar Jatoi

  4. Institute of Environmental Engineering & Management, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Sindh, 76062, Pakistan

    Sundus Saeed Qureshi

  5. Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University, 98009, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Nabisab Mujawar Mubarak

Authors
  1. Mahnoor Javed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Zahoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaukat Ali Mazari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sundus Saeed Qureshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nizamuddin Sabzoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Abdul Sattar Jatoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nabisab Mujawar Mubarak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaukat Ali Mazari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mahnoor Javed and Muhammad Zahoor are the joint first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javed, M., Zahoor, M., Mazari, S.A. et al. An overview of effect of process parameters for removal of CO2 using biomass-derived adsorbents. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 4495–4513 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01548-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01548-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation