Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Well Annulus Cleaning While Using Stabilizer with an Experimental Flow Loop and its CFD Model

  • Research Article-Petroleum Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main targets of hole cleaning is increasing drilling efficiency. Insufficient hole cleaning causes several problems. In this paper, the effects of stabilizer application on hole cleaning have been investigated. Some experimental tests were performed by a closed flow loop to analyze the effect of the presence of a drilling stabilizer at different positions in the Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) and different hole inclinations. To achieve this goal, a stabilizer with four straight blades was designed and conducted in various experiments and simulations. Some experiments were performed by installing the stabilizer in two different positions of BHA “Near Bit” (NB) and “Far From Bit” (FFB) in different hole inclinations. Finally, a prediction model in FLUENT software is proposed to study the behavior of cuttings along the annulus in the presence of a stabilizer for the conditions that cannot be investigated by the experimental setup. According to the comparison between the experimental and simulation data, the presence of a drilling stabilizer has a significant effect on improving the cutting transport and subsequently hole cleaning rate. The results show that stabilizer application assists the hole cleaning at all inclinations except 0° (vertical well). At vertical annuluses, the rotational movement of the stabilizer decreases the cuttings lift force. Moreover, the FFB condition increases the rate of hole cleaning considerably more than NB. Thus, stabilizers by raising the fluid flow turbulency increase the capability of removing the cuttings from the system in most annulus inclinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BHA:

Bottom hole assembly

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

FFB:

Far from bit

F d :

Drag force

F g :

Weight force

F b :

Buoyancy force

F l :

Lift force

F f :

Friction force

F ga :

Weight force component opposite of flow direction

F gva :

Weight force component perpendicular to flow direction

LPLT:

Low pressure low temperature

NB:

Near bit

PDC:

Polycrystalline diamond compacts

WOB:

Weight on bit

WOS:

Without stabilizer condition

STB:

With stabilizer condition

References

  1. RS Carden R. D. 2007 Horizontal and Directional Drilling Petroskills, LLC. AN OGCI Company Tulsa, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith. 1982 Drillind Assembly Handbook DrilCo Houston, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  3. X Sun Y Tie L Wei W Yanze 2013 Study on cuttings transport efficiency affected by stabilizer’s blade shape in vertical wells Open Petrol. Eng. J. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874834101306010007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dehvedar, M., & Moarefvand, P. (2019). Detecting and drilling in critical inclination window in slant wells by means of a two phase liquid-solid CFD model and experimental study. Kuwait Journal of Science, 46(2).

  5. L Yeo Y Feng A Seibi A Temani N Liu 2021 Optimization of hole cleaning in horizontal and inclined wellbores: a study with computational fluid dynamics J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 205 108993 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Azar, J. J., & Sanchez, R. A. (1997). Important issues in cuttings transport for drilling directional wells. In: Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/39020-MS

  7. M Duan SZ Miska M Yu NE Takach RM Ahmed CM Zettner 2009 Critical conditions for effective sand-sized solids transport in horizontal and high-angle wells SPE Drill. Complet. 24 02 229 238 https://doi.org/10.2118/106707-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bilgesu, H. I., Mishra, N., & Ameri, S. (2007). Understanding the effect of drilling parameters on hole cleaning in horizontal and deviated wellbores using computational fluid dynamics. In: Eastern Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/111208-MS

  9. MS Khaled MS Khan H Ferroudji A Barooah MA Rahman I Hassan AR Hasan 2021 Dimensionless data-driven model for optimizing hole cleaning efficiency in daily drilling operations J. Natural Gas Sci. Eng. 96 104315 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S Akhshik M Behzad M Rajabi 2015 CFD–DEM approach to investigate the effect of drill pipe rotation on cuttings transport behavior J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 127 229 244 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E GhasemiKafrudi SH Hashemabadi 2016 Numerical study on cuttings transport in vertical wells with eccentric drillpipe J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 140 85 96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pastusek, P. E. (2018). Stabilizer Selection Based on Physics and Lessons Learned. In: IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/189649-MS

  13. Egenti, N. B. (2014). Understanding drill-cuttings transportation in deviated and horizontal wells. In: SPE Nigeria annual international conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/172835-MS

  14. Wiley, C. (1965). The Use of Near-bit Stabilizer-sub Assemblies for the Control of Hole Deviation. In Drilling and Production Practice. American Petroleum Institute.

  15. O'Bryan, P. L., & Huston, C. W. (1990). A study of the effects of bit gauge length and stabilizer placement on the build and drop tendencies of PDC bits. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/20411-MS

  16. Radford, S. R., Jenkins, M. A., & Li, T. (2009). Novel concentric expandable stabilizer results in increased penetration rates and drilling efficiency with reduced vibration. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/119534-MS

  17. McCormick, J. E., Osorio, G., Andachi, J. H., & Barth, M. E. (2011). Adjustable gauge stabilizer and torque reduction tools reduce overall drilling times by 20%: a case study. In: SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/141673-MS

  18. J TaheriShakib H Jalalifar M Fatehirad 2012 Design of continuous gauge near-bit stabilizer, using optimized hydraulics and gauge geometry in Mishan andAghajari formation J. Chem. Petrol. Eng. 46 1 31 39

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uddin, H., Choudhury, N. R., & Ansari, U. (2016). A Computational Study of Packoff Using a Combined Drill Bit Stabilizer Particle Tracking Simulation. In: SPE Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/180380-MS

  20. M Dehvedar P Moarefvand AR Kiyani 2019 A liquid-solid two-phase flow computational fluid dynamic modelling of the operational characteristics effects on the cleaning time of a circulating flow loop South African J. Chem. 72 67 79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. SM Han NS Woo YJ Kim 2016 A study of the particle transport in the non-newtonian fluid with inclined annulus Asia-Pacific J. Model. Simulation for Mech. Syst. Design Anal. 1 1 23 28 https://doi.org/10.21742/ajmsm.2016.1.1.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. JL Vieira Neto AL Martins CH Ataide MA Barrozo 2012 Non-Newtonian flows in annuli with variable eccentric motion of the inner tube Chem. Eng. Technol. 35 11 1981 1988 https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201200239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M Kamyab V Rasouli 2016 Experimental and numerical simulation of cuttings transportation in coiled tubing drilling J. Natural Gas Sci. Eng. 29 284 302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M Dehvedar P Moarefvand AR Kiyani AR Mansouri 2019 Using an experimental drilling simulator to study operational parameters in drilled-cutting transport efficiency J. Mining and Environ. 10 2 417 428 https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2019.7665.1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. JT Cornelissen F Taghipour R Escudié N Ellis JR Grace 2007 CFD modelling of a liquid–solid fluidized bed Chem. Eng. Sci. 62 22 6334 6348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. X Huang 2011 CFD modeling of liquid–solid fluidization: effect of drag correlation and added mass force Particuology 9 4 441 445 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J Riera S Zeppieri S Derjani-Bayeh 2014 Hydrodynamic study of a multiphase spouted column Fuel 138 183 192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A Tripathy S Bagchi SK Biswal BC Meikap 2017 Study of particle hydrodynamics and misplacement in liquid–solid fluidized bed separator Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 117 520 532 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K Zhang G Wu S Brandani H Chen Y Yang 2012 CFD simulation of dynamic characteristics in liquid–solid fluidized beds Powder Technol. 227 104 110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Master of Science in Petroleum Engineering (Drilling Facilities), Department of Petroleum Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Mansoury & Alireza Kiani

  2. PhD. in Petroleum Engineering, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Mohsen Dehvedar

  3. Master of Science in Petroleum Engineering (Drilling), Department of Petroleum Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology, Ahwaz, Iran

    Hossein Ameri

Authors
  1. Alireza Mansoury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alireza Kiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohsen Dehvedar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hossein Ameri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Dehvedar.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansoury, A., Kiani, A., Dehvedar, M. et al. Well Annulus Cleaning While Using Stabilizer with an Experimental Flow Loop and its CFD Model. Arab J Sci Eng 48, 9413–9427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07526-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07526-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation