Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the surgical volume for clinical outcomes in VATS lobectomy for lung cancer: a national large database multicenter analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving the quality of lung cancer care at a cost that can be sustained is a hotly debated issue. High-risk, low-volume procedures (such as lung resections) are believed to improve significantly when centralised in high-volume centres. However, limited evidence exists to support volume requirements in lung cancer surgery. On the other hand, there was no evidence that the number of lung resections affected either the short-term perioperative results or the long-term cost. Using data from an extensive nationwide registry, this study investigated the correlations between surgical volumes and selected perioperative outcomes. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively filled national registry that follows stringent quality assurance and security procedures was conducted to ensure data accuracy and security. Patients who underwent VATS lobectomy from 2014 to 2019 at the participating centres were included. Selected perioperative outcomes were reported. Total direct hospital cost is measured at discharge for hospitalisations with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer, hospital stay costs, and postoperative length of hospital stay after lobectomy. After the propensity score matched, centres were divided into three groups according to the surgical volume of the unit where VATS lobectomies were performed (high-volume centre: > 500 lobectomies; medium-volume centre: 200–500 lobectomies; low-volume centre: < 200 lobectomies). 11,347 patients were included and matched (low-volume center = 2890; medium-volume center = 3147; high-volume center = 2907). The mean operative time density plot (Fig. 1A) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.67). In contrast, the density plot of the harvested lymph nodes (Fig. 1B) showed significantly higher values in the high-volume centres (p = 0.045), albeit without being clinically significant. The adjusted rates of any and significant complications were higher in the low-volume centre (p = 0.034) without significantly affecting the length of hospital stay (p = 0.57). VATS lobectomies for lung cancer in higher-volume centres seem associated with a statistically significantly higher number of harvested lymph nodes and lower perioperative complications, yet without any significant impact in terms of costs and resource consumption. These findings may advise the investigation of the learning curve effect in a complete economic evaluation of VATS lobectomy in lung cancer.

The mean operative time density plot showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.67)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao J, Xu J, Yu H, Qian P, Lv W, He T et al (2022) The extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection correlates with survival of small cell lung cancer patients after resection: a propensity score-matched cohort study analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res 11(7):1453–1467

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, Lee PC, Harpole DH, Onaitis MW et al (2010) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(2):366–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP (1990) Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates. JAMA 264(21):2768–2774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346(15):1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw AL, Finlayson SRG, Grove MR, Tosteson ANA (1999) Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 126(2):178–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rea F, Ieva F, Pastorino U, Apolone G, Barni S, Merlino L et al (2020) Number of lung resections performed and long-term mortality rates of patients after lung cancer surgery: evidence from an Italian investigation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 58(1):70–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertani A, Gonfiotti A, Nosotti M, Ferrari PA, De Monte L, Russo E et al (2017) Nodal management and upstaging of disease: initial results from the Italian VATS Lobectomy Registry. J Thorac Dis 9(7):2061–2070

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertolaccini L, Crisci R (2018) The state of the art of the minimally invasive thoracic surgery in Italy. J Vis Surg 4:89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertolaccini L, Davoli F, Pardolesi A, Brandolini J, Argnani D, Bertani A et al (2019) Conversion due to vascular injury during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: a multicentre retrospective analysis from the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group registry. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(5):857–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Crisci R, Solli P (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomies: the best is yet still to come? J Thorac Dis 10(Suppl 4):S493–S496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bongiolatti S, Gonfiotti A, Viggiano D, Borgianni S, Politi L, Crisci R et al (2019) Risk factors and impact of conversion from VATS to open lobectomy: analysis from a national database. Surg Endosc 33(12):3953–3962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Infante MV, Benato C, Silva R, Rocco G, Bertani A, Bertolaccini L et al (2019) What counts more: the patient, the surgical technique, or the hospital? A multivariable analysis of factors affecting perioperative complications of pulmonary lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery from a large nationwide registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 56(6):1097–1103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE et al (2016) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 11(1):39–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, Dowlut N, Iosifidis C, Mathew G, Group S (2019) STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 72:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Team R (2021) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Team RC (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  20. Falcoz PE, Puyraveau M, Thomas PA, Decaluwe H, Hurtgen M, Petersen RH et al (2016) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European society of thoracic surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49(2):602–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, Gaissert HA, Harpole DH, Wright CD (2008) Data from the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(2):247–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brunelli A, Salati M, Rocco G, Varela G, Van Raemdonck D, Decaluwe H et al (2017) European risk models for morbidity (EuroLung1) and mortality (EuroLung2) to predict outcome following anatomic lung resections: an analysis from the European society of thoracic surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 51(3):490–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Toale C, O’Byrne A, Morris M, Kavanagh DO (2022) Defining operative experience targets in surgical training: a systematic review. Surgery 172(5):1364–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente and 5 × 1000 funds.

Members of the VATS group: Marco Alloisio (IRCCS Humanitas, Milano); Dario Amore (Monaldi Hospital, Napoli); Luca Ampollini (University Hospital, Parma); Claudio Andreetti (S. Andrea Hospital, Roma); Desideria Argnani (AUSL Romagna Teaching Hospital, Forlì); Guido Baietto (Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara); Alessandro Bandiera (S. Raffaele Hospital, Milano); Cristiano Benato (Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona); Mauro Roberto Benvenuti (Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia); Alessandro Bertani (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Luca Bertolaccini (IEO Hospital, Milano); Luigi Bortolotti (Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo); Edoardo Bottoni (IRCCS Humanitas, Milano); Cristiano Breda (Ospedale dell’Angelo, Mestre); Pierpaolo Camplese (S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Chieti); Paolo Carbognani (University Hospital, Parma); Giuseppe Cardillo (Forlanini Hospital, Roma); Caterina Casadio (Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara); Giorgio Cavallesco (University Hospital, Ferrara); Roberto Cherchi (Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari); Roberto Crisci (Università dell’Aquila, L’Aquila); Carlo Curcio (Monaldi Hospital, Napoli); Andrea Dell’Amore (University Hospital, Padua); Vittorio Della Beffa (S. Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Torino); Giampiero Dolci (S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna); Andrea Droghetti (ASST Mantova-Cremona, Mantova); Paolo A. Ferrari (Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari); Diego Fontana (S. Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Torino); Gaetano Gargiulo (S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna); Roberto Gasparri (IEO Hospital, Milano); Diego Gavezzoli (Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia); Marco Ghisalberti (University Hospital, Siena); Michele Giovanardi (ASST Mantova-Cremona, Mantova); Alessandro Gonfiotti (Careggi University Hospital, Firenze); Francesco Guerrera (Molinette University Hospital, Torino); Andrea Imperatori (University Hospital, Varese); Maurizio Infante (Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona); Luciano Iurilli (ASL3 Liguria); Paolo Lausi (Molinette University Hospital, Torino); Fabio Lo Giudice (Ospedale dell’Angelo, Mestre); Francesco Londero (S. Maria delle Misericordia Hospital, Udine); Camillo Lopez (Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce); Luca Luzzi (University Hospital, Siena); Maurizio Mancuso (S. Antonio Hospital, Alessandria); Pio Maniscalco (University Hospital, Ferrara); Stefano Margaritora (University Hospital Gemelli, Roma); Elisa Meacci (University Hospital Gemelli, Roma); Giulio Melloni (Santa Croce Hospital, Cuneo); Angelo Morelli (S. Maria delle Misericordia Hospital, Udine); Felice Mucilli (S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Chieti); Pamela Natali (Ospedale Policlinico, Modena); Giampiero Negri (S. Raffaele Hospital, Milano); Samuele Nicotra (University Hospital Padua); Mario Nosotti (Policlinico University Hospital Milano); Gianluca Pariscenti (S. Martino Hospital, Genova); Reinhold Perkmann (Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano); Fausto Pernazza (S. Antonio Hospital, Alessandria); Emanuele Pirondini (San Gerardo Hospital, Monza); Camilla Poggi (S. Andrea Hospital, Roma); Francesco Puma (University Hospital, Perugia); Majed Refai (Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona); Alessandro Rinaldo (Niguarda Hospital, Milano); Giovanna Rizzardi (Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo); Lorenzo Rosso (Policlinico University Hospital, Milano); Nicola Rotolo (University Hospital, Varese); Emanuele Russo (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Armando Sabbatini (Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona); Marco Scarci (San Gerardo Hospital, Monza); Lorenzo Spaggiari (IEO Hospital, Milano); Alessandro Stefani (Ospedale Policlinico, Modena); Piergiorgio Solli (Maggiore Hospital, Bologna); Corrado Surrente (Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce); Alberto Terzi (Negrar Hospital, Verona); Massimo Torre (Niguarda Hospital, Milano); Dami-ano Vinci (University Hospital, Perugia); Andrea Viti (Negrar Hospital, Verona); Luca Voltolini (Careggi University Hospital, Firenze); Gino Zaccagna (Mazzini Hospital, Teramo); Francesco Zaraca (Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano).

Marco Alloisio, Dario Amore, Luca Ampollini, Claudio Andreetti, Desideria Argnani, Guido Baietto, Alessandro Bandiera, Cristiano Benato, Mauro Roberto Benvenuti, Alessandro Bertani, Luca Bertolaccini, Luigi Bortolotti, Edoardo Bottoni, Cristiano Breda, Pierpaolo Camplese, Paolo Carbognani, Giuseppe Cardillo, Caterina Casadio, Giorgio Cavallesco, Roberto Cherchi, Roberto Crisci, Carlo Curcio, Andrea Dell’Amore, Vittorio Della Beffa, Giampiero Dolci, Andrea Droghetti, Paolo A. Ferrari, Diego Fontana, Gaetano Gargiulo, Roberto Gasparri, Diego Gavezzoli, Marco Ghisalberti, Michele Giovanardi, Alessandro Gonfiotti, Francesco Guerrera, Andrea Imperatori, Maurizio Infante, Luciano Iurilli, Paolo Lausi, Fabio Lo Giudice, Francesco Londero, Camillo Lopez, Luca Luzzi, Maurizio Mancuso, Pio Maniscalco, Stefano Margaritora, Elisa Meacci, Giulio Melloni, Angelo Morelli, Felice Mucilli, Pamela Natali, Giampiero Negri, Samuele Nicotra, Mario Nosotti, Gianluca Pariscenti, Reinhold Perkmann, Fausto Pernazza, Emanuele Pirondini, Camilla Poggi, Francesco Puma, Majed Refai, Alessandro Rinaldo, Giovanna Rizzardi, Lorenzo Rosso, Nicola Rotolo, Emanuele Russo, Armando Sabbatini, Marco Scarci, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Alessandro Stefani, Piergiorgio Solli, Corrado Surrente, Alberto Terzi, Massimo Torre, Dami-ano Vinci, Andrea Viti, Luca Voltolini, Gino Zaccagna, Francesco Zaraca

Funding

This article is funded by Ministero della Salute, 5 × 1000, Ricerca Corrente.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Bertolaccini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

According to the International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, the data were collected anonymously. The ethical committee approved the registry (81/2014/O/Oss). The Institutional Review Board, informed of the database extraction, did not require approval because of the study’s retrospective nature.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain studies involving human participants, as it reviews data already collected in the database.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

VATS Group member names are listed at the Acknowledgement section.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bertolaccini, L., Prisciandaro, E., Uslenghi, C. et al. The role of the surgical volume for clinical outcomes in VATS lobectomy for lung cancer: a national large database multicenter analysis. Updates Surg (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01723-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01723-0

Keywords

Navigation