Abstract
Background
The epigenetic mechanisms play critical roles in a vast diversity of biological processes of plants, including development and response to environmental challenges. Particularly, DNA methylation is a stable epigenetic signature that supplements the genetics-based view of complex life phenomena. In crop breeding, the decrease in genetic diversity due to artificial selection of conventional breeding methods has been a long-standing concern. Therefore, the epigenetic diversity has been proposed as a new resource for future crop breeding, which will be hereinafter referred to as epibreeding.
Discussion
The induction of methylome changes has been performed in plants by several methods including chemical drugs treatment and tissue culture. Target-specific epigenetic engineering has been also attempted by exogenous RNAi mediated by virus-induced gene silencing and grafting. Importantly, the new and innovative techniques including the CRISPR–Cas9 system have recently been adopted in epigenetic engineering of plant genomes, facilitating the efforts for epibreeding.
Conclusion
In this review, we introduce several examples of natural and induced epigenetic changes impacting on agronomic traits and discuss the methods for generating epigenomic diversity and site-specific epigenetic engineering.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akimoto K, Katakami H, Kim H-J et al (2007) Epigenetic inheritance in rice plants. Ann Bot 100:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm110
Avramidou E, Kapazoglou A, Aravanopoulos FA et al (2015) Global DNA methylation changes in Cucurbitaceae inter-species grafting. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 15:112–116. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332015v15n2n20
Azizi P, Hanafi MM, Sahebi M et al (2020) Epigenetic changes and their relationship to somaclonal variation: a need to monitor the micropropagation of plantation crops. Funct Plant Biol 47:508. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP19077
Baubec T, Pecinka A, Rozhon W, Mittelsten Scheid O (2009) Effective, homogeneous and transient interference with cytosine methylation in plant genomic DNA by zebularine. Plant J 57:542–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03699.x
Baulcombe D (2004) RNA silencing in plants. Nature 431:356–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02874
Bhadouriya SL, Mehrotra S, Basantani MK et al (2021) Role of chromatin architecture in plant stress responses: an update. Front Plant Sci 11:2131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.603380
Blevins T, Podicheti R, Mishra V et al (2015) Identification of Pol IV and RDR2-dependent precursors of 24 nt siRNAs guiding de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Elife 4:1–22. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09591
Catoni M, Cortijo S (2018) EpiRILs: lessons from Arabidopsis. In: Mirouze M, Bucher E, Gallusci P (eds) Advances in botanical research, vol 88. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 87–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2018.08.002
Cho J, Benoit M, Catoni M et al (2019) Sensitive detection of pre-integration intermediates of long terminal repeat retrotransposons in crop plants. Nat Plants 5:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0320-9
Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E (1999) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/43657
Daccord N, Celton J-M, Linsmith G et al (2017) High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat Genet 49:1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3886
Dalakouras A, Ganopoulos I (2021) Induction of promoter DNA methylation upon high-pressure spraying of double-stranded RNA in plants. Agronomy 11:789. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040789
Dalakouras A, Papadopoulou KK (2020) Epigenetic modifications: an unexplored facet of exogenous RNA application in plants. Plants 9:673. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060673
Dalakouras A, Vlachostergios D (2021) Epigenetic approaches to crop breeding: current status and perspectives. J Exp Bot 72:5356–5371. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab227
Debladis E, Llauro C, Carpentier MC et al (2017) Detection of active transposable elements in Arabidopsis thaliana using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing technology. BMC Genomics 18:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3753-z
El-Sharkawy I, Liang D, Xu K (2015) Transcriptome analysis of an apple ( Malus × domestica ) yellow fruit somatic mutation identifies a gene network module highly associated with anthocyanin and epigenetic regulation. J Exp Bot 66:7359–7376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv433
Friedrich T, Faivre L, Bäurle I, Schubert D (2019) Chromatin-based mechanisms of temperature memory in plants. Plant Cell Environ 42:762–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13373
Fultz D, Choudury SG, Slotkin RK (2015) Silencing of active transposable elements in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 27:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.027
Gallego-Bartolomé J, Gardiner J, Liu W et al (2018) Targeted DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome using the human TET1 catalytic domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E2125–E2134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716945115
Gallego-Bartolomé J, Liu W, Kuo PH et al (2019) Co-targeting RNA polymerases IV and V promotes efficient de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 176:1068-1082.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.029
Gao Z, Liu H-L, Daxinger L et al (2010) An RNA polymerase II- and AGO4-associated protein acts in RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nature 465:106–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09025
Garg R, Narayana Chevala V, Shankar R, Jain M (2015) Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with gene expression in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response. Sci Rep 5:14922. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14922
Garnett T, Appleby MC, Balmford A et al (2013) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science (80-) 341:33–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485
Henikoff S, Greally JM (2016) Epigenetics, cellular memory and gene regulation. Curr Biol 26:R644–R648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.011
Hu L, Li N, Xu C et al (2014) Mutation of a major CG methylase in rice causes genome-wide hypomethylation, dysregulated genome expression, and seedling lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:10642–10647. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410761111
Hung Y-H, Slotkin RK (2021) The initiation of RNA interference (RNAi) in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 61:102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102014
Johannes F, Colomé-Tatché M (2011) Concerning epigenetics and inbreeding. Nat Rev Genet 12:376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2664-c3
Johannes F, Porcher E, Teixeira FK et al (2009) Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genet 5:e1000530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000530
Johnson LM, Du J, Hale CJ et al (2014) SRA- and SET-domain-containing proteins link RNA polymerase V occupancy to DNA methylation. Nature 507:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12931
Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Rhee Y (2000) Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol Biol 43:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006423110134
Kankel MW, Ramsey DE, Stokes TL et al (2003) Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants. Genetics 163:1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/163.3.1109
Kasai A, Bai S, Li T, Harada T (2011) Graft-transmitted siRNA signal from the root induces visual manifestation of endogenous post-transcriptional gene silencing in the scion. PLoS ONE 6:e16895. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016895
Kasai A, Bai S, Hojo H, Harada T (2016) Epigenome editing of potato by grafting using transgenic tobacco as siRNA donor. PLoS ONE 11:e0161729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161729
Kim J-M, Sasaki T, Ueda M et al (2015) Chromatin changes in response to drought, salinity, heat, and cold stresses in plants. Front Plant Sci 6:114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00114
Kim EY, Wang L, Lei Z et al (2021) Ribosome stalling and SGS3 phase separation prime the epigenetic silencing of transposons. Nat Plants 7:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00867-4
Kooke R, Johannes F, Wardenaar R et al (2015) Epigenetic basis of morphological variation and phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 27:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.133025
Kumar J, Rai KM, Pirseyedi S et al (2020) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression improves Fusarium head blight resistance in durum wheat. Sci Rep 10:17610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73521-2
Lang Z, Wang Y, Tang K et al (2017) Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:E4511–E4519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705233114
Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet 11:204–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2719
Lee JE, Neumann M, Duro DI, Schmid M (2019) CRISPR-based tools for targeted transcriptional and epigenetic regulation in plants. PLoS ONE 14:e0222778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222778
Li Q, Eichten SR, Hermanson PJ et al (2014) genetic perturbation of the maize methylome. Plant Cell 26:4602–4616. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.133140
Li S, Vandivier LE, Tu B et al (2015) Detection of pol IV/RDR2-dependent transcripts at the genomic scale in Arabidopsis reveals features and regulation of sirna biogenesis. Genome Res 25:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.182238.114
Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jackson JP et al (2001) Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science (80-) 292:2077–2080. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059745
Liu R, How-kit A, Stammitti L et al (2015) A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:10804–10809. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503362112
Masuda K, Akagi T, Esumi T, Tao R (2020) Epigenetic flexibility underlies somaclonal sex conversions in hexaploid persimmon. Plant Cell Physiol 61:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcz207
Matzke MA, Mosher RA (2014) RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat Rev Genet 15:394–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3683
Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Bassett A, Baulcombe DC (2011a) Mobile 24 nt small RNAs direct transcriptional gene silencing in the root meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 21:1678–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.065
Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Baulcombe DC (2011b) Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing signals. EMBO J 30:3553–3563. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.274
Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A et al (2010) Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science (80-) 328:872–875. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187959
Molnar A, Melnyk C, Baulcombe DC (2011) Silencing signals in plants: a long journey for small RNAs. Genome Biol 12:215. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-219
Moradpour M, Abdulah SNA (2020) CRISPR/dCas9 platforms in plants: strategies and applications beyond genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J 18:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13232
Nelson GC, Valin H, Sands RD et al (2014) Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:3274–3279. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222465110
Nowicka A, Tokarz B, Zwyrtková J et al (2020) Comparative analysis of epigenetic inhibitors reveals different degrees of interference with transcriptional gene silencing and induction of DNA damage. Plant J 102:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14612
Nuthikattu S, McCue AD, Panda K et al (2013) The initiation of epigenetic silencing of active transposable elements is triggered by RDR6 and 21–22 nucleotide small interfering RNAs. Plant Physiol 162:116–131. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.216481
Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N et al (2015) Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525:533–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15365
Pan C, Sretenovic S, Qi Y (2021) CRISPR/dCas-mediated transcriptional and epigenetic regulation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 60:101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.101980
Papikian A, Liu W, Gallego-Bartolomé J, Jacobsen SE (2019) Site-specific manipulation of Arabidopsis loci using CRISPR–Cas9 SunTag systems. Nat Commun 10:729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08736-7
Reinders J, Paszkowski J (2009) Unlocking the Arabidopsis epigenome. Epigenetics 4:557–563. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.4.8.10347
Reinders J, Wulff BBH, Mirouze M et al (2009) Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes. Genes Dev 23:939–950. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.524609
Roca Paixão JF, Gillet F-X, Ribeiro TP et al (2019) Improved drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/dCas9 fusion with a histone acetyltransferase. Sci Rep 9:8080. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44571-y
Ronemus MJ, Galbiati M, Ticknor C et al (1996) demethylation-induced developmental pleiotropy in Arabidopsis. Science (80-) 273:654–657. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5275.654
Satheesh V, Fan W, Chu J, Cho J (2021) Recent advancement of NGS technologies to detect active transposable elements in plants. Genes Genom 43:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01040-z
Smulders MJM, de Klerk GJ (2011) Epigenetics in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 63:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9531-4
Springer NM, Schmitz RJ (2017) Exploiting induced and natural epigenetic variation for crop improvement. Nat Rev Genet 18:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.45
Stroud H, Ding B, Simon SA et al (2013) Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice. Elife 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00354
Tanenbaum ME, Gilbert LA, Qi LS et al (2014) A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell 159:635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039
Tang D, Gallusci P, Lang Z (2020) Fruit development and epigenetic modifications. New Phytol 228:839–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16724
Tanurdzic M, Vaughn MW, Jiang H et al (2008) Epigenomic consequences of immortalized plant cell suspension culture. PLoS Biol 6:e302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060302
Telias A, Lin-Wang K, Stevenson DE et al (2011) Apple skin patterning is associated with differential expression of MYB10. BMC Plant Biol 11:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-93
Tirnaz S, Batley J (2019) Epigenetics: potentials and challenges in crop breeding. Mol Plant 12:1309–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.09.006
Torti S, Schlesier R, Thümmler A et al (2021) Transient reprogramming of crop plants for agronomic performance. Nat Plants 7:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00851-y
Twaij BM, Jazar ZH, Hasan MN (2020) Trends in the use of tissue culture, applications and future aspects. Int J Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.4081/pb.2020.8385
Vaucheret H (2006) Post-transcriptional small RNA pathways in plants: mechanisms and regulations. Genes Dev 20:759–771. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1410506
Wang F, Axtell MJ (2017) AGO4 is specifically required for heterochromatic siRNA accumulation at Pol V-dependent loci in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 90:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13463
Wendte JM, Pikaard CS (2017) The RNAs of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1860:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.08.004
Wierzbicki AT, Ream TS, Haag JR, Pikaard CS (2009) RNA polymerase V transcription guides ARGONAUTE4 to chromatin. Nat Genet 41:630–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.365
Wu C-T, Morris JR (2001) Genes, genetics, and epigenetics: a correspondence. Science 293:1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5532.1103
Wu R, Wang X, Lin Y et al (2013) Inter-species grafting caused extensive and heritable alterations of DNA methylation in Solanaceae plants. PLoS ONE 8:e61995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061995
Xiao J, Lee U-S, Wagner D (2016) Tug of war: adding and removing histone lysine methylation in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 34:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.08.002
Xu J, Tanino KK, Robinson SJ (2016) Stable epigenetic variants selected from an induced hypomethylated Fragaria vesca population. Front Plant Sci 7:1768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01768
Yamauchi T, Johzuka-Hisatomi Y, Terada R et al (2014) The MET1b gene encoding a maintenance DNA methyltransferase is indispensable for normal development in rice. Plant Mol Biol 85:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-014-0178-9
Zemach A, Kim MY, Hsieh PH et al (2013) The arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell 153:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.033
Zhai J, Bischof S, Wang H et al (2015) A one precursor one siRNA model for pol IV-dependent siRNA biogenesis. Cell 163:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.032
Zhang L, Cheng Z, Qin R et al (2012) Identification and characterization of an epi-allele of FIE1 reveals a regulatory linkage between two epigenetic marks in rice. Plant Cell 24:4407–4421. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.102269
Zhang Y, Fischer M, Colot V, Bossdorf O (2013) Epigenetic variation creates potential for evolution of plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 197:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12010
Zhang L, Yu H, Ma B et al (2017) A natural tandem array alleviates epigenetic repression of IPA1 and leads to superior yielding rice. Nat Commun 8:14789. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14789
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Wuqian Wang for assisting with literature search. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970518, to JC), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB27030209, to JC), 2020 Research Fund of Myongji University (to KDK), National Research Foundation of Korea (2020R1G1A1100757, to KDK) and General Program of Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1470700, to EYK). EYK is the recipient of a President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) young staff fellowship (2021FYB0001) from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EYK drafted the manuscript. KDK and JC edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, E.Y., Kim, K.D. & Cho, J. Harnessing epigenetic variability for crop improvement: current status and future prospects. Genes Genom 44, 259–266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01189-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01189-7