Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and Feasibility of Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in Complicated Colorectal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) involves sharp dissection through the embryological planes. However, it may be associated with high mortalities and morbidities especially in colorectal emergencies. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of CME with CVL in complicated colorectal cancers (CRCs). This was a retrospective study of emergency CRC resection in a tertiary center between March 2016 and November 2018. A total of 46 patients, with a mean age of 51 years, underwent an emergency colectomy for cancer (males, 26 [56.5%]; females, 20 [43.5%]). CME with CVL was performed for all patients. The mean operative time and blood loss were 188 min and 397 mL, respectively. Only five (10.8%) patients presented with burst abdomen, whereas only three (6.5%) presented with anastomotic leakage. The mean length of vascular tie was 8.7 cm, and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was 21.2. Emergency CME with CVL is a safe and feasible technique when performed by a colorectal surgeon and will result in obtaining a superior specimen with a large number of LNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dewulf M, Kalmar A, Vandenberk B, Muysoms F, Defoort B, Claeys D et al (2019) Complete mesocolic excision does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies: a comparative retrospective single-center study. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koh FH, Tan KK (2019) Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: Is it worth it? J Gastrointest Oncol 10:1215–1221

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Weber K (2007) Lymphadenektomie bei tumoren des unteren gastrointestinaltraktes. Chirurg 78:217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W et al (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: Comparison of Japanese D3 resection and european complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Sun CT (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male sigmoid and upper rectal cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1980–1990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E (2012) Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Color Dis 14:1357–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: Complete mesocolic excision and central ligation - Technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 11:354–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tzivanakis A, Moran BJ (2020) Perforated Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 33:247–252

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Malakorn S, Stein SL, Lee JH, You YN (2019) Urgent management of obstructing colorectal cancer: divert, stent, or resect? J Gastrointest Surg 23:425–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mori S, Kita Y, Baba K, Yanagi M, Tanabe K, Uchikado Y et al (2018) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision via mesofascial separation for left-sided colon cancer. Surg Today 48:274–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdelkhalek M, Setit A, Bianco F, Belli A, Denewer A, Youssef TF et al (2018) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in comparison with conventional surgery for patients with colon cancer–the experiences at two centers. Ann Coloproctol 34:180–186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. De Simoni O, Barina A, Sommariva A, Tonello M, Gruppo M, Mattara G et al (2021) Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:881–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramser M, Kwok AMF, Maeda Y, Potter MA (2021) Oncological and clinical outcomes after conventional right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406:2781–2788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertelsen CA, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Jansen JE, Neuenschwander AU, Vilandt J (2011) Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? Colorectal Dis 13:1123–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E (2012) Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis 14:1357–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Biondo S, Gálvez A, Ramírez E, Frago R, Kreisler E (2019) Emergency surgery for obstructing and perforated colon cancer: patterns of recurrence and prognostic factors. Tech Coloproctol 23:1141–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Biondo S, Martí-Ragué J, Kreisler E, Parés D, Martín A, Navarro M et al (2005) A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer. Am J Sur 189:377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen TM, Huang YT, Wang GC (2017) Outcome of colon cancer initially presenting as colon perforation and obstruction. World J Surg Oncol 15:164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zedan A, Elshiekh E, Omar MI, Raafat M, Khallaf SM, Atta H, Hussien MT (2021) Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Int J Surg Oncol 2021:8859879

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang JL, Wei HB, Fang JF, Zheng ZH, Chen TF, Wei B et al (2015) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Int J Surg 23:12–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim IY, Kim BR, Choi EH, Kim YW (2016) Short-term and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision and central ligation. Int J Surg 27:151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Han DP, Lu AG, Feng H, Wang PX, Cao QF, Zong YP et al (2014) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic-assisted right-hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy versus open surgery for colon carcinoma. Surg Today 44:868–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Storli KE, Eide GE (2016) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus open complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer: long-term survival results of a prospective single centre non-randomized study. Dig Surg 33:114–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, Yun SH, Cho YB, Huh JW et al (2018) Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 32:2721–2731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Azin A, Hirpara DH, Draginov A, Khorasani M, Patel SV, O’Brien C et al (2021) Adequacy of lymph node harvest following colectomy for obstructed and nonobstructed colon cancer. J Surg Oncol 123:470–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Becerra AZ, Aquina CT, Hensley BJ, Justiniano CF, Boodry C et al (2017) Emergent colectomy is independently associated with decreased long-term overall survival in colon cancer patients. J Gastrointest Surg 21:543–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Porter GA, Urquhart R, Bu J, Johnson P, Grunfeld E (2011) The impact of audit and feedback on nodal harvest in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 11:2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lindboe CF (2011) Lymph node harvest in colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens: the impact of improved fixation and examination procedures. APMIS 119:347–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siani LM, Garulli G (2017) The importance of the mesofascial interface in complete mesocolic excision. Surgeon 15:240–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Munkedal DLE, West NP, Iversen LH, Hagemann-Madsen R, Quirke P, Laurberg S (2014) Implementation of complete mesocolic excision at a university hospital in Denmark: an audit of consecutive, prospectively collected colon cancer specimens. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Radwan Abdelsabour Torky, Mohamed Abdeltawab, and Ahmed Mubarak Hifni. Data analysis was done by Abadeer Rafaat and Ahmed Abdelmotaleb. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Radwan Abdelsabour Torky, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radwan A. Torky.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torky, R.A., Abdel-Tawab, M., Rafaat, A. et al. Efficacy and Feasibility of Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in Complicated Colorectal Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 14, 312–317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01673-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01673-w

Keywords

Navigation