Therapeutic Antibodies in Stroke

Immunotherapy represents an active area of biomedical research to treat cancer, autoimmune diseases, and neurodegenerative disorders. In stroke, recanalization therapy is effective in reducing brain tissue damage after acute ischemic stroke. However, the narrow time window restricts its application for the majority of stroke patients. There is an urgent need to develop adjuvant therapies such as immunotherapy, stem cell replacement, and neuroprotective drugs. A number of molecules have been targeted for immunotherapy in stroke management, including myelin-associated proteins and their receptors, N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptors, cytokines, and cell adhesion molecules. Both active vaccination and passive antibodies were tested in animal models of acute ischemic stroke. However, the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of immunotherapy are different for each target protein. Blocking myelin-associated proteins may enhance neuroplasticity, whereas blocking adhesion molecules may yield neuroprotection by suppressing the immune response after stroke. Although results from animal studies are encouraging, clinical trials using therapeutic antibodies failed to improve stroke outcome due to severe side effects. It remains a challenge to generate specific therapeutic antibodies with minimal side effects on other organs and systems.


Introduction
Prophylactic vaccination is widely used and is proven effective against infectious diseases. More recently, much attention has been paid to immunotherapy for the treatment of other diseases such as cancer [1], autoimmune diseases [2], and neurodegenerative disorders [3]. Immunotherapy has great potential to be an effective adjuvant therapy. Due to the specificity of the immune response, harnessing the immune system to block specific signaling pathways provides a powerful tool for the treatment of disease.
Stroke is one of the most common causes of death worldwide and is a heavy burden on the health care system. Ischemic strokes constitute the majority of all strokes. Inflammation triggered after stroke is characterized by an orderly sequence of events involving different components of the brain. Right after arterial occlusion, release of reactive oxygen species triggers the coagulation cascade and activates complement, platelet, and endothelial cells. The white blood cell count and cytokines and inflammatory markers are increased within hours, followed by a marked immunodepression within 1-2 days, particularly in large strokes. Such changes in the systemic immunity lead to higher occurrence of infection in respiratory and urinary systems. As the ischemia progresses, toxic molecules such as excessive ATP and neurotransmitters are released into the extracellular space to trigger innate and adaptive immunity. With the increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, autoimmunity is induced against the dead brain cells. Circulating T cells are sensitized to produce antibodies against antigens in central nervous system. Antigenpresenting cells are mobilized from the periphery to the ischemic brain and contribute to the destruction of brain tissues at the site of ischemic lesion. Autoimmunity may have long-term consequences on stroke survivors including dementia and brain atrophy. On the other hand, the immunosuppression after stroke may reduce the autoimmune attach on the brain by limiting the development of T cells. The detailed immunology after stroke was best reviewed in ref [4].
The most effective treatments for acute ischemic stroke are revascularization by thrombolysis, the dissolving of the clot, and embolectomy, the surgical removal of the clot. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a thrombolytic agent approved by the FDA, is widely used to treat acute embolic or thrombotic stroke. However, the narrow therapeutic time window (<4.5 h post-stroke) benefits only a minority of stroke patients. Reperfusion after this time window causes damage to brain tissue as deleterious biochemical events are triggered that antagonize the beneficial effects. Thus, the challenge for reperfusion therapy is to both protect brain tissue and extend the therapeutic time window [5].
Immunotherapy for stroke treatment attracts significant scientific attention. Numerous signaling pathways are altered after stroke insult. Blocking certain deleterious pathways may delay brain tissue damage and even widen the time window for revascularization therapy. Immunotherapy provides a novel type of adjuvant stroke therapy. The interaction of antibodies with cytotoxic molecules and their receptors could rescue cell viability or delay cell death. Current investigations of stroke immunotherapy include active immunization by inoculation with peptides and passive immunization by direct injection of antibody into the animals. Many molecules have been targeted for stroke therapy, and a number of antibodies have been developed. These molecules are primarily on the cell membrane or in the extracellular space where they are accessible to the antibodies. Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) is the most common animal model of focal ischemia. The efficacy of the blocking antibodies is evaluated in either transient or permanent MCAO models. Although most of the antibodies were effective in reducing brain damage in animal models of stroke, clinical trials for several antibodies failed due to poor patient outcomes. Here, we review the current understanding of immunotherapy, particularly the use of therapeutic antibodies, for stroke management.

Myelin-Associated Proteins
Myelin in the adult central nervous system (CNS) contains abundant growth-inhibitory molecules, including proteoglycans, Nogo-A, myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), versican V2, and oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein (Omgp) [6]. Disrupted myelin is often associated with deposits of immunoglobulin and activated complement, which may cause autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis [7].
Nogo-A, a member of the reticulon family, is produced by oligodendrocytes [8] and is a potent inhibitor of axonal remodeling. Nogo-A interacts with the Nogo-66 receptor and inhibits neurite outgrowth after CNS injury [9]. The monoclonal antibody (IN-1) against Nogo-A was generated several years prior to the identification of Nogo-A [10]. Because Nogo-A plays an important role after CNS injury, a number of studies have aimed to block its functions by infusion of antibodies against Nogo-A or the Nogo-66 receptor after stroke.
Immunotherapy against Nogo-A in animal models of stroke was shown to enhance functional recovery by improving neuroplasticity. Application of anti-Nogo-A antibody via intracerebroventricular [11] or intrathecal routes [12] at 1 week after operation could hasten the recovery from neurological damage. In a permanent rat MCAO model, delayed treatment with anti-Nogo-A antibody (9 weeks after operation) enhanced sprouting and midline crossing of corticorubral axons to innervate the deafferented red nucleus [13]. Following MCAO, IN-1-treated animals showed increased dendritic arborization and spine density in the lesioned hemisphere [14]. IN-1 also promoted formation of new efferent cortical projections [15].
As stroke commonly occurs in hypertensive or aging patients, anti-Nogo-A antibodies were tested in animals with hypertension or in aged animals. Again, the antibody exhibited great potential to enhance neuroplasticity after stroke, significant functional improvement was observed in hypertensive rats receiving anti-Nogo-A antibody after permanent MCAO [16]. In aged rats (18 months old), anti-Nogo-A therapy given 1 week after MCAO improved reference memory in the Morris water maze task [17]. Similar to anti-Nogo-A therapy, antibody against the Nogo-66 receptor was proven effective in reducing stroke-induced brain damage. The impaired forelimb function of rats that underwent MCAO was ameliorated after the implantation of a hydrogel carrying polyclonal antibodies against the Nogo-66 receptor. Neurons and neurofibers were also found within the gel providing evidence of neuronal migration and regeneration [18].
In contrast to the promising results of blocking Nogo-A or the Nogo-66 receptor, mice with a Nogo-A deletion displayed increased mortality and exacerbated neurological deficits after transient MCAO. A similar observation was made in rats that received anti-Nogo-A antibody immediately following stroke, indicating that Nogo-A may play an opposite role in cerebral damage during the hyperacute phase of stroke [19]. It is possible that in the hyperacute phase, tissue damage is more prominent than tissue repair. Thus, the time point to block Nogo-A function is critical, antibodies that inhibit Nogo-A function may yield better effect during neural regeneration in the later stages of stroke recovery. It is critical to identify the proper time point for anti-Nogo-A treatment in human patients, as the rodents have a different life span than humans. A human monoclonal anti-Nogo-A antibody (ATI355) from Novartis has been approved for clinical trials to treat acute spinal cord injury (Table 1. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00406016). The phase I clinical trial has been completed and no severe side effects were observed from more than 50 subjects. Thus, this antibody may potentially be used for the treatment of ischemic stroke in the future.
MAG is another molecule found in myelin that can inhibit neurite outgrowth after injury. In a MCAO rat model, both intracerebral and systemic administration of MAG neutralization antibody reduced the lesion area and improved motor function. The effect was attributed not only to the blockade of MAG protein but also to the protection of oligodendrocytes from oxidative stress-induced cell death [20].
Omgp is important for nerve myelination in the CNS. Autoantibody against Omgp is believed to cause multiple sclerosis [21]. Active immunization was applied to test the role of Omgp in stroke progress. Nasal vaccination with Omgp peptides before MCAO induced an anti-inflammatory response against CNS myelin, a process that involves the induction of CD4 + T cells producing IL-10. As a result, the infarct volume decreased and functional recovery was enhanced [22].

NMDA Receptor
Glutamate is a major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. In ischemic stroke, cessation of cerebral blood flow depletes the brain of glucose and oxygen, leading to neuronal membrane depolarization and release of large amount of glutamate into the extracellular space. Glutamate binds to glutamate receptors, such as N -methyl-D -aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors and DL -α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors causing influx of Na + and Ca 2+ ions into the cell. Excessive activation of glutamate receptor can result in cell death. Accordingly, glutamate receptors are a major target for neuroprotection in a wide range of CNS disorders. Extensive studies have been conducted on glutamate receptors to improve stroke therapy.
tPA is a serine protease that converts plasminogen into active plasmin, leading to fibrin blood clot degradation. Endogenous tPA is produced after a thrombus forms. Due to its ability to recanalize cerebral blood vessels, recombinant tPA is used for thrombolysis within 4.5 h after stroke onset. It is the only FDA-approved pharmacological agent for acute ischemic stroke therapy [23]. However, tPA treatment has severe side effects such as cerebral edema and hemorrhage. tPA interacts with and cleaves the GluN1 (NR1) subunit of NMDA receptor, resulting in Ca 2+ influx that activates a cascade of cell death signals [24]. Accordingly, blocking the interaction of tPA with the NMDA receptor would reduce the side effects of tPA treatment. Immunotherapy with antibodies targeting the tPA binding site on the NMDA receptor was able to prevent neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo. Using the adeno-associated virus as a carrier, autoantibodies were generated against the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor in rats. After vaccination, antibodies were able to pass through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reduced total infarct volume by 70 % in a permanent MCAO model [25]. Importantly, the antibodies persisted for over 5 months in the rats, indicating that vaccination can potentially prevent stroke. In a separate study, direct injection of a fragment of the GluN1 subunit prevented tPA cleavage of the NMDA receptor, successfully reducing the infarct volume after permanent MCAO [26].
The NMDA receptor was also targeted for passive immunization to treat ischemic stroke. Antibodies were produced in vitro against the GluN1 subunit and injected into animals after MCAO. The antibodies successfully diffused into the infarct region and reduced the brain tissue injury and BBB leakage in combination with tPA treatment. Importantly, a longer therapeutic time window for tPA thrombolysis was achieved in the animal model [27].
These experiments suggest the possibility of using active immunization against the NMDA receptor as a preventive vaccination and passive immunization to extend the time window for tPA thrombolysis [28]. Unfortunately, immunotherapy targeting NMDA receptors has not been successful in clinical practice. Although a wealth of evidence indicates that blockade of glutamate receptors could lead to dramatic neuroprotection in animal models, clinical trials of glutamate receptor blockers have not achieved therapeutic outcome [29]. A possible reason for this failure could be that the beneficial effects of glutamate receptor block are overcome by the deleterious effects on healthy cells. In patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, autoantibodies against GluN1 subunit of NMDA receptor are associated with a number of psychiatric symptoms within a few days after onset [30]. These antibodies bind, cross-link, and internalize NMDA receptors, leading to a decrease of synaptic NMDA currents [31]. Thus, blocking NMDA receptors indiscriminately may cause severe damage to the healthy neurons in other regions of the brain.

Cell Adhesion Molecules and Cytokines
Inflammation has been suggested to participate in stroke pathophysiology. Inflammatory signaling is triggered immediately following the ischemic attack and plays a dynamic role in all stages of stroke. This process is initiated with an orderly inflammation response that leads to the activation of complement, platelets, and endothelial cells within the injured vasculature. The subsequent release of cytokines leads to leukocytes infiltration through the BBB and contributes to the tissue damage after stroke. Proper modulation of the immune response after stroke insult can help protect the injured tissue and promote functional recovery. Recruitment of leukocytes and platelets to injured cerebral blood vessels is a highly coordinated process that involves various adhesion molecules on the surface of endothelial cells, leukocytes, and platelets. These adhesion molecules include the selectin family, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1, also known as CD54), and β2-integrins. Numerous studies have demonstrated that disruption of leukocyte function yielded beneficial effects on stroke pathology. For example, depletion of neutrophils by an anti-neutrophil monoclonal antibody significantly reduced free radical generation [32] and attenuated brain edema after ischemic reperfusion injury [33]. In this way, immunotherapy could serve a beneficial role by inhibiting leukocyte functions. Neutralization of the adhesion molecules by therapeutic antibodies can disrupt the interaction of leukocytes with the injured vascular wall, thereby reducing leukocyte infiltration. Numerous antibodies have been developed to target these adhesion molecules.
The selectin family is composed of E-, L-, and P-selectin. They are involved in the adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells and subsequent transmigration into the brain parenchyma. Upregulation of E-and P-selectin on the surface of activated endothelial cells occurs soon after ischemic onset [34]. Endothelial selectins bind to leukocytes with low affinity via glycoproteins expressed on leukocytes. Surface expression of P-selectin on platelets and L-selectin on leukocytes also facilitates platelet-leukocyte aggregation.
In a permanent MCAO rat model, pretreatment with monoclonal anti-P-selectin antibody reduced leukocyte infiltration. Regional cerebral blood flow was elevated in association with attenuation of cerebral infarction [35] and brain edema [36]. In a murine transient MCAO model, neutralization of E-selectin with a monoclonal antibody led to increased cerebral blood flow, reduced neutrophil accumulation at the injured site, and improved neuroprotection [37]. Active immunization targeting E-selectin was also effective in stroke management. In spontaneously hypertensive rats, immune tolerance by repeated nasal instillation of E-selectin antigen successfully prevented the development of both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes by suppressed endothelial activation [38,39]. A phase II clinical trial was conducted with E-selectin nasal spray in patients with a stroke history to test the safety and effectiveness of E-selectin in preventing the formation of blood clots that can cause stroke. This trial was terminated ( The effects of blocking L-selectin are different from blocking E-or P-selectin. In a rabbit transient MCAO model, a humanized anti-L-selectin antibody failed to prevent neutrophil migration into the injured site and did not alleviate neuronal damage [40]. However, when used in combination with tPA in a similar animal model, anti-L-selectin antibody demonstrated a moderate reduction of brain damage, which was absent in animals treated with tPA alone [41]. Thrombolysis with tPA alters the coagulation status in stroke patients and could lead to hemorrhage. It is possible that the beneficial effects of blocking L-selectin depend on the altered coagulation environment after tPA treatment. ICAM-1 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is expressed on the surface of endothelial cells. Various cytokines can stimulate the expression of ICAM-1 [42,43]. β2-Integrins are expressed on the surface of leukocytes; ICAM-1 is the ligand for β2-integrins LFA-1 (CD11a/ CD18) and Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18). Interaction between β2integrins (LFA-1 and Mac-1) and ICAM-1 provides a firm adhesion between leukocytes and endothelium [43,44]. In various animal models of transient ischemic stroke, blocking of ICAM-1 with antibodies reduced polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration and neurological damage [45][46][47]. Together with tPA treatment, application of anti-ICAM-1 enhanced the thrombolytic effect and extended the therapeutic window for tPA [48].
Interestingly, anti-ICAM-1 treatment showed beneficial effects in transient ischemic stroke models but not in permanent MCAO models [49]. A commercial murine monoclonal anti-ICAM-1 antibody (Enlimomab) has been used for the treatment of ischemic stroke. However, the phase III clinical trial showed that the fatality rate was significantly higher in the Enlimomab patient group than in the placebo group [50]. The negative effect was apparent on day 5 after treatment. The serious adverse events include fever, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, stroke-related deterioration, cardiac arrest, meningitis, cerebral edema, and intracranial hemorrhage.
Immunoblocking of the β2-integrin Mac-1 effectively alleviated ischemic reperfusion damage in the liver and heart by reducing neutrophil infiltration [51][52][53]. A monoclonal antibody targeting Mac-1 (CD11b) achieved similar effects with decreased intraparenchymal neutrophils after transient ischemia-reperfusion [54,55]. In a rabbit thromboembolic stroke model, monoclonal antibody against CD18 successfully reduced intracranial pressure but had no effect on cerebral blood flow and infarction [56].
The production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines within the CNS are hallmarks of tissue damage following stroke. They are intimately involved in both innate and adaptive immunity at various stages of stroke [4]. IL-8 is a potent chemoattractant for polymorphonuclear neutrophils [57,58] that is upregulated after stroke [59,60]. The rat equivalent of IL-8, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC), can be blocked by antibodies [61]. In a transient ischemic reperfusion stroke model, application of anti-CINC antibodies alleviated cerebral edema and reduced the infarct size 7 days after reperfusion [62].
CD 95L and tumor necrotic factor (TNF) interact with TNF receptor 1 and trigger apoptosis. As members of the cytokine family, they are involved in systematic inflammation. Humanized monoclonal antibodies specific for TNF were used in clinical practice to treat diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease [63]. These antibodies include infliximab (Remicade) from Centocor (Philadelphia, PA, US) and adalimumab (Humira) from Abbott (North Chicago, IL, US). TNF is involved in both innate and adaptive immune response after stroke [4]. TNF was found in the brain 30 min after MCAO [64] and its levels were increased early after transient ischemia attack [65]. Neutralization antibody against TNF was found to ameliorate brain damage in both permanent and reperfusion MCAO models [66,67]. When both TNF and CD95L were blocked by antibodies, an additive effect was observed on the reduction of the infarct volume after transient MCAO [68]. It is worthwhile to investigate whether infliximab or adalimumab could be helpful in stroke management, as they have already been proven safe in clinical practice.

Side Effect, Safety, and Future Perspectives
General side effects could arise from immunotherapy. Constitutional symptoms include transient low-grade fever, malaise, nausea, dyspnea, diarrhea, fatigue, hoarseness, palpitations, and headache. Aseptic meningitis could also occur due to a non-immune response triggered by formation of macro-aggregates or due to local inflammation caused by antibody interaction with endothelial antigens on the meningeal vessels. Other severe side effects include acute renal failure and anaphylaxis. It should be noted that thromboembolic events could occur with the increased plasma viscosity that develops after immunoglobulin infusion [69]. Myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, venous thrombosis, or even secondary stroke might occur. Animal experiments need to be carefully designed and evaluated to fully understand the possible side effects that may arise after immunotherapy.
The failure of clinical trials of Enlimomab provides valuable information on how to apply immunotherapy properly for stroke management. Preclinical studies on anti-ICAM-1 antibody showed beneficial effects in transient ischemic animal models but not in permanent stroke models [45][46][47][48][49]. However, the patients enrolled in the Enlimomab trial may not have reperfusion. Furthermore, Enlimomab is a murine monoclonal antibody, which triggered the patients' own immune responses [70]. Human anti-mouse antibody was found in patients receiving Enlimomab therapy [71], which could lead to an increased infection rate. Patients with fever generally had a poor outcome or died; such outcomes are not oddities in these trails. In animal models, stimulation of the self-immune system was observed with the activation of circulating neutrophilic granulocytes, increased β2-integrin CD11b, and E-and P-selectins. Additionally, ICAM-1 was upregulated by anti-ICAM-1 treatment [72,73]. To avoid the side effects from murine antibodies, humanized monoclonal antibodies were shown to be effective in treating other diseases without severe side effects [63].
Modern technology has greatly improved the production of high quality antibodies, including humanized antibodies, thus reducing the general side effects of immunotherapy. However, attention must be paid to several important factors throughout research for stroke immunotherapy. First, preclinical studies are performed on animals. Because the pathophysiology of stroke in humans and animal models is different, a comparison of the progression of stroke between species would help to improve the outcome of immunotherapy. Second, the target molecule should be chosen carefully. A molecule that is expressed highly in other tissues and has important functions should be targeted with caution, as severe side effects are more likely to occur. A deleterious molecule that is upregulated or expressed exclusively in the infarct region after stroke could be an ideal target for immunotherapy. Third, the stroke development is a dynamic process. Some molecules could play opposite roles during different phases of stroke. For example, blocking Nogo-A may be successful only at a later stage when neural regeneration occurs. Thus, choosing a time point for a particular immunotherapy is critical to avoid side effects. Fourth, because various molecules play different roles in stroke, a combination of multiple antibodies might achieve a better therapeutic outcome. Finally, current recanalization is effective in stroke management. Interaction of immunotherapy with current reperfusion methods needs to be carefully investigated to achieve a synergistic effect while avoiding antagonism.
In summary, numerous signaling pathways are altered after stroke insult. It is critical to determine the relative hierarchical importance, time course, and crosstalk among these signaling pathways to rationally plan targets for immunotherapy and points of intervention.