Skip to main content
Log in

Antibioisis and antixenosis resistance to Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in Moroccan cactus germplasm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wild cochineal, Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell), has become the main pest of the prickly pear [(Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller] cactus crop in most of the Mediterranean countries, including Morocco since 2014. The use of D. opuntiae-resistant cactus ecotypes seems to be one of the most practical management option for the control of this pest. The objectives of this study were to identify the resistant genotypes and to determine the mechanism of resistance in 10 D. opuntiae-resistant cactus genotypes. From O. ficus-indica cochineal resistance screening experiments conducted in the laboratory and in mesh cages, 10 cactus genotypes that had fewer nymphs attached with no further developmental changes in the insect were identified. Studies on resistance mechanism showed that resistant genotypes of O. ficus-indica had significantly fewer D. opuntiae nymphs compared with susceptible genotypes. Genotypes 311 and 322 were the least preferred by D. opuntiae with 24.66 and 30 nymphs found after 72 h of infestation. All resistant genotypes have higher levels of dead nymphs compared with the susceptible control. The difference in the mean number of dead nymphs among the different genotypes tested and the control was highly significant. All nymphs produced on resistant genotypes died at first instar stage, indicating that these genotypes possess antibiosis as a mechanism of resistance. Genotype 295 had the highest number of dead nymphs, indicating a strong effect of antibiosis to D. opuntiae. Our study showed that both categories (antibiosis, antixenosis) play a role in resistance of the Moroccan cactus ecotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves, A. C., Lourenção, A. L., & de Melo, A. M. T. (2005). Resistência de genótipos de aboboreira a Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) Biótipo B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Neotropical Entomology, 34(6), 973–979. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2005000600014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldin, E. L. L., & Beneduzzi, R. A. (2010). Characterization of antibiosis and antixenosis to the whitefly silverleaf Bemisia tabaci B biotype (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae ) in several squash varieties. Journal of Pest Science, 83, 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-010-0289-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, L. R., Santos, D. C., Cavalcanti, V. A. L. B., Gomes, E. W. F., Falcão, H. M., & Da Silva, D. M. P. (2013). Selection of cactus pear clones regarding resistance to carmine cochineal Dactylopius opuntiae (Dactylopiidae). Acta Horticulturae, 995, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2013.995.47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouharroud, R., Amarraque, A., & Qessaoui, R. (2016). First report of the Opuntia cochineal scale Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in Morocco. EPPO Bulletin, 46(2), 308–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouharroud, R., El Aalaoui, M., Boujghagh, M., Hilali, L., El Bouhssini, M., & Sbaghi, M. (2018). New record and predatory activity of Hyperaspis campestris (Herbst 1783) (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae ) on Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera : Dactylopiidae). Entomological News, 128(2), 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boujghagh, M., & Chajia, L. (2001). Le cactus: outil de gestion de la sécheresse dans le Sud Marocain. Terre et Vie, 52, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiacchio, F. P. B. (2008). Incidência da cochonilha do carmim em palma forrageira. Bahia Agricola, 8, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bortoli, S. A., Vacari, A. M., Goulart, R. M., Ferraudo, A. S., & Volpe, H. X. L. (2013). Classification of crucifer cultivars based on the life-history of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). International Journal of Pest Management, 59, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2013.765057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Montano, J., Reese, J. C., Schapaugh, W. T., & Campbell, L. R. (2006). Characterization of antibiosis and Antixenosis to the soybean aphid (Hemiptera : Aphididae ) in several soybean genotypes. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99(5), 1884–1889. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.5.1884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donkin, R. A. (1977). Spanish red, an ethnogeographical study of cochineal and the opuntia cactus. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 67, 1–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrøm, C. T. (2019). Package ‘MESS’ miscellaneous esoteric statistical scripts (0.5.6). https://github.com/ekstroem/MESS BugReports.

  • El Aalaoui, M., Bouharroud, R., Sbaghi, M., El Bouhssini, M., Hilali, L., & Dari, K. (2019a). Comparative toxicity of different chemical and biological insecticides against the scale insect Dactylopius opuntiae and their side effects on the predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 52(1–2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2019.1589909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Aalaoui, M., Bouharroud, R., Sbaghi, M., El Bouhssini, M., & Hilali, L. (2019b). Predatory potential of eleven native Moroccan adult ladybird species on different stages of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). EPPO Bulletin, 49(2), 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathi, S. A. A., & Abedi, A. A. (2014). Ovipositional preference and life history parameters of Lixus incanescens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on selected sugar beet cultivars. International Journal of Pest Management, 60(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2014.974726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitiwy, I., Gebretsadkan, A., & Araya, A. (2016). Management of cochineal (Dactylopius coccus Costa) insect pest through botanical extraction in Tigray, North Ethiopia. Journal of the Drylands, 6(2), 499–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A. A., Menger-Anderson, J., Silverstein, C., Potter, B. D., Macrae, I. V., Hodgson, E. W., & Koch, R. L. (2017). Evidence for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) resistance to Pyrethroid insecticides in the upper Midwestern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 110(5), 2235–2246. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lara, F. M. (1991). Princípios de 360 resistência de plantas a insetos (336p). São Paulo: Ícone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, E. B., Albuquerque, I. C., Brito, C. H., & de Batista, J. L. (2009). Velocidade de dispersão de Dactylopius opuntiae em palma gigante (Opuntia fícus- indica). Engenharia Ambiental, 6, 644–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, E. B., Brito, C. H., Albuquerque, I. C., & de Batista, J. L. (2010). Seleção de genótipos de palma forrageira (Opuntia spp.) e (Nopalea spp.) resistentes à cochomilha-do-carmim (Dactylopius opuntiae Cockerell, 1929) na Paraíba, Brasil. Engenharia Ambiental, 7(1), 204–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. (1969). Cactus-feeding insects and mites. United States National Museum Bulletin, 256, 125–137.

  • MAPM (2008). Action plan of the green Morocco plan 2020. Ministry of Agriculture and Maritime Fisheries. Retrieved from http://www.agriculture.gov.ma/sites/default/files/investors_guide_in_the_agricultural_sector_in_morocco.pdf

  • Mazzeo, G., Nucifora, S., Russo, A., & Suma, P. (2019). Dactylopius opuntiae a new prickly pear cactus pest in the Mediterranean: An overview. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 167, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, Z., Protasov, A., Vanegas-Rico, J. M., Lomeli-Flores, J. R., Suma, P., & Rodríguez-Leyva, E. (2020). Classical and fortuitous biological control of the prickly pear cochineal Dactylopius opuntiae in Israel. Biological Control, 142, 104157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mendiburu, F. (2020). Package ‘agricolae’ statistical procedures for agricultural research (1.3–3). http://tarwi.lamolina.edu.pe/~fmendiburu

  • Mulas, M., D’Hallewin, G., & Canu, D. (1992). Osseervazioni sulla radicazione di cladodi di un anno di Opuntia ficus indica Mill. Rivista di frutticoltura, 10, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, N. (1979). Principles of host-plant resistance to insect pests (386 pp). New York: Osmun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar, D. (2018). R Core Team. 2018. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–137. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.

  • Santos, D. C., Lira, M. A., Farias, I., Dias, F. M., Costa, A. F., Pereira, V. L. A., & Silva, D. M. P. da. (2006). Seleçao de clones de palma forrageira resistentes a cochonilha do carmim Dactylopius sp, emcondiçoes de campo. In Anais da 43a Reuniao Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia. Anais, Joao Pessoa: CD-ROM.

  • Sbaghi, M., Bouharroud, R., Boujghagh, M., & Bouhssini, M. E. L. (2019). Sources de résistance d’Opuntia spp. contre la cochenille à carmin, Dactylopius opuntiae, au Maroc. EPPO Bulletin, 49(3), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schielief, S., Jacob, H., & Hoffmann, W. (2000). Importance of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. for the arid and semi-arid of regions of Morocco. Forage, range land improvement and desertification. In: The IVth international congress on cactus pear and cochineal and the IVth general meeting of the FAO-CACTUSNET. Octobre 22–28, 2000 Hammamet, Tunisia, p. 82.

  • Silva, D. M. P., Houllou-Kido, L. M., Cordeiro Dos Santos, D., Gonçalves Ferreira, R., Felipe Dos Santos, V., Melo Ferreira, W., Silva De Lima, M., Marinho Falcão, H., & De Sena Tabosa, F. (2009). Resistance of in vitro grown forage cactus clones to Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Acta Horticulturae, 811, 299–302. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.811.40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas-Rico, J. M., Lomeli-Flores, J. R., Rodríguez-Leyva, E., Mora-Aguilera, G., & Valdez, J. M. (2010). Enemigos naturales de Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) en Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller en el centro de México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 26(2), 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vasconcelos, A. G. V., de Andrade Lira, M., Bezerra Cavalcanti, V. L., dos Santos, M. V. F., & Willadino, L. (2009). Seleção de clones de palma forrageira resistentes à cochonilha-do-carmim (Dactylopius sp). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38(5), 827–831. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000500007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, B. R., & Webster, J. A. (1999). Economic, environmental, and social benefits of resistance in field crops. RF Nelson memorial symposium (1994: Dallas, Tex.).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Zakaria Kehel, ICARDA Biometrician, for his help with data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayat Akroud.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akroud, H., Sbaghi, M., Bouharroud, R. et al. Antibioisis and antixenosis resistance to Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in Moroccan cactus germplasm. Phytoparasitica 49, 623–631 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00897-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00897-w

Keywords

Navigation