Skip to main content
Log in

Utilization of fMRI with optical amplification to diagnose attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Optics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a serious condition that may affect life and lead to significant disruption of functional and brain pathways and psychological state. It is important to find effective therapeutic strategies to overcome this disease and effective ways to treat it. It is better for patients who suffer from this disease to monitor their psychological and health conditions from an early age. As soon as they suspect the possibility of this disease, they should take the initiative to try to see a physician to diagnose the conditions, and then conduct an appropriate brain examination. Recent studies have indicated that functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which is a special type of magnetic resonance imaging, has an effective role in detecting the disease. It relies on old and familiar electronics as it uses a strong magnetic field and radio waves, and it is increasingly challenged by the push toward stronger magnetic fields and a greater number of channels, which poses major problems for it. These problems can be avoided by using optical techniques. In addition, convolution neural networks (CNNs) are mainly involved in classifying the images captured by fMRI. This approach relies on CNNs for deep feature extraction. An architectural model of a CNN based on residual learning and depth sequencing strategies is proposed in this paper. The proposal consists of 23 layers, and three different algorithms are used to improve performance. A comparison is made between them. They are adaptive momentum (ADAM), stochastic gradient ratios with momentum (SGDM), and an algorithm based on root main square error called (RMSprop), and they are applied on the fMRI dataset. Using these optimization algorithms to classify ADHD cases, it was concluded that the accuracy of ADAM is 95%, SGDM is 96.11%, and RMSprop is 97.78%. The proposed CNN achieves an accuracy of 97.7% compared to the ResNet with 95.83% and the GoogleNet with 91.67%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig.10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Bellec, Y. Benhajali et al., The Neuro Bureau ADHD-200 preprocessed repository. Neuroimage (2016).

  2. G.V. Polanczyk, E.G. Willcutt, G.A. Salum, C. Kieling, L.A. Rohde, ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 43(2), 434–442 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Dey, A.R. Rao, M. Shah, Attributed graph distance measure for automatic detection of attention deficit hyperactive disordered subjects. Front. Neural Circuits 8, 94 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.-W. Chang, C.-C. Ho, J.-H. Chen, ADHD classification by a texture analysis of anatomical brain MRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 66 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.-G. Qiu, Z. Ye, Q.-Y. Li, G.-J. Liu, B. Xie, J. Wang, Changes of brain structure and function in ADHD children. Brain Topogr. 24(3), 243–252 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.L. Danielson et al., State-level estimates of the prevalence of parent-reported ADHD diagnosis and treatment among U.S. children and adolescents, 2016 to 2019. J. Atten. Disord. (2022)

  7. F. Taffoni, D. Formica, P. Saccomandi, G. Di Pino, E. Schena, Optical fiber-based MR-compatible sensors for medical applications: an overview. Sensors (Basel) 13, 14105–14120 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Bagci, A. Simonsen, S. Schmid, L.G. Villanueva, Optical detection of radio waves through a nanomechanical transducer. Nature 507, 81–85 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Su, M. Zervas, C. Furlong, G.S. Fischer, A miniature MRI-compatible fiber-optic force sensor utilizing Fabry–Perot interferometer, in Mems and Nanotechnology (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 131–136

  10. L. Zou, J. Zheng, C. Miao, M.J. Mckeown, Z.J. Wang, 3D CNN based automatic diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using functional and structural MRI. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 5 (2017)

  11. D. Dimond, R. Perry, G. Iaria, S. Bray, Visuospatial short-term memory and dorsal visual gray matter volume. Cortex 113, 184–190 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Kuang, X. Guo, X. An, Y. Zhao, L. He, Discrimination of ADHD based on fMRI data with deep belief network, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatic (2014), pp. 225–232

  13. X. Peng, P. Lin, T. Zhang, J. Wang, Extreme learning machine-based classification of ADHD using brain structural MRI data. PLoS ONE 8(11), 476–479 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B.A. Johnston, B. Mwangi, K. Matthews, D. Coghill, K. Konrad, J.D. Steele, Brainstem abnormalities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder support high accuracy individual diagnostic classification. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(10) (2014).

  15. S.V. Faraone, T. Banaschewski, D. Coghill et al., The world federation of ADHD international consensus statement: 208 evidence-based conclusions about the disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 789–818 (2021)

  16. J. Dolz, C. Desrosiers, I.B. Ayed, 3D fully convolutional networks for subcortical segmentation in MRI: A large-scale study. NeuroImage J. 170, 456–470 (2016).

  17. S. Sarraf, G. Tofighi, Deep learning-based pipeline to recognize Alzheimer’s disease using fMRI data, in Future Technologies Conf. (FTC), San Francisco, CA, USA (2016), pp. 816–820.

  18. C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, V. Vanhoucke, A. Alemi, Inception-v4, inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning, in Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017), pp. 4278–4284.

  19. S. Korolev, A. Safiullin, M. Belyaev, Y. Dodonova, Visual explanations from deep 3D convolutional neural networks for Alzheimer's disease classification. J. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. (2018)

  20. K. Kamnitsas, C. Ledig, V.F.J. Newcombe, J.P. Simpson, A.D. Kane, D.K. Menon, D. Rueckert, B. Glocker, Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. J. Med. Image Anal. 36, 61–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Minz, C. Mahobiya, MR image classification using adaboost for brain tumor type, in IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC) (2017), pp. 701–705

  22. S. Deepak, P.M. Ameer, Brain tumor classification using deep CNN features via transfer learning. Comput. Biol. Med. (2019)

  23. G. Zeng, Y. He, Z. Yu, X. Yang, R. Yang, L. Zhang, Preparation of novel high copper ions removal membranes by embedding organosilane-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 91(8), 2322–2330 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, V. Vanhoucke, A. Alemi, Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Assoc. Adv. Artif. Intell. 4 (2016)

  25. A.R. Raju, P. Suresh, R.R. Rao, Bayesian HCS-based multi-SVNN: A classification approach for brain tumor segmentation and classification using Bayesian fuzzy clustering. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 38, 646–660 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Sert, F. Özyurt, A. Doğantekin, A new approach for brain tumor diagnosis system: Single image super resolution based maximum fuzzy entropy segmentation and convolutional neural network. Med. Hypotheses 133(4) (2019)

  27. S. Das, CNN Architectures: LeNet, AlexNet, VGG, GoogLeNet, ResNet and more. Analytics Vidhya (2017)

  28. G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, K.Q. Weinberger, Densely connected convolutional networks, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2017), pp. 2261–2269.

  29. F. Chollet, Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2017), pp. 1800–1807.

  30. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXivLabs. Cornel University (2015), pp. 770–778

  31. M.-G. Qiu, Z. Ye, Q.-Y. Li, G.-J. Liu, B. Xie, J. Wang, Changes of brain structure and function in ADHD children. Brain Topogr. J. Cereb. Funct. Dyn. 24, 243–252 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Angriman, A. Beggiato, S. Cortese, Anatomical and functional brain imaging in childhood ADHD: Update 2013. Current Develop. Disorders Rep, (Springer International Publishing), 29–40, December (2014).

  33. D. Dai, J. Wang, J. Hua, H. He, Classification of ADHD children through multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6 (2012).

  34. X. Guo, X. An, D. Kuang, Y. Zhao, L. He, ADHD-200 classification based on social network method, in IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC) (2014), pp. 233–240.

  35. D.C. Lohani, B. Rana, ADHD diagnosis using structural brain MRI and personal characteristic data with machine learning framework. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 334 (2023)

  36. X. Lv et al., Background-free dual-mode optical and 13C magnetic resonance imaging in diamond particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 118(21) (2021)

  37. S. Kim et al., Whole-brain mapping of effective connectivity by fMRI with cortex-wide patterned optogenetics. Neuron 111, 1732–1747 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Kleesiek et al., Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping. Neuroimage 129, 460–469 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. C. Acuña, Michael milham et al., The ADHD-200 Consortium: A model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience. 6 (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eman Salah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salah, E., Shokair, M., El-Samie, F.E.A. et al. Utilization of fMRI with optical amplification to diagnose attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Opt (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01485-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01485-3

Keywords

Navigation