A partial skeleton of Septencoracias from the early Eocene London Clay reveals derived features of bee-eaters (Meropidae) in a putative stem group roller (Aves, Coracii)

A partial skeleton of the putative stem group roller Septencoracias is described from the early Eocene London Clay of Walton-on-the-Naze (Essex, UK). With an age of about 55 million years, the bones represent one of the earliest fossil records of a coraciiform bird. The new fossil reveals that the proximal pedal phalanges of the three anterior toes of Septencoracias exhibit markedly widened distal ends. This distinctive trait is not found in other representatives of the Coracii, but occurs in the Meropidae (bee-eaters). The quadrate likewise exhibit a derived characteristic of the Meropidae, and the beak is narrower than in rollers. These previously unnoticed features are of particular interest, because the Meropidae result as the sister taxon of the Coracii in sequence-based analyses. Calibrated molecular data suggest that the divergence between the Coracii and the Meropidae occurred at 55.6 Ma, with the new fossil being only slightly younger than this date. However, phylogenetic analyses recovered Septencoracias within the Coracii, so that the derived features shared with the Meropidae most likely are either plesiomorphic and were lost in the Coracii, or they represent parallelisms that evolved convergently in Septencoracias and the Meropidae. In any case, these traits suggest that Septencoracias differed from extant rollers in its ecological preferences and foraging mode.


Introduction
The coraciiform taxon Coracii includes colourful birds known as rollers. The extant species only occur in the Old World, with true rollers (Coraciidae) being widely distributed across Eurasia, Africa, and Australia, whereas ground rollers (Brachypteraciidae) are confined to Madagascar.
The Coracii were long considered to be closely related to bee-eaters (Meropidae), kingfishers (Alcedinidae), motmots (Momotidae), and todies (Todidae). However, the latter four taxa were traditionally often assigned to a clade Alcediniformes (e.g. Feduccia 1977;Mayr 1998), whereas current molecular analyses suggest a sister group relationship between the Meropidae and the Coracii, with the Alcedinides (Alcedinidae, Momotidae, Todidae) being the sister taxon of the clade including Meropidae and Coracii (Prum et al. 2015;McCullough et al. 2019;Kuhl et al. 2021). An earlier analysis by Hackett et al. (2008) likewise did not support monophyly of the Alcediniformes, but resulted in a sister group relationship between the Meropidae and a clade including the Coracii and the Alcedinides.
The Palaeogene fossil record of rollers is fairly substantial and includes various taxa that are successive sister taxa of the extant species. Most similar to extant Coracii are two species of the taxon Geranopterus, G. alatus, and G. milneedwardsi (Geranopteridae), which occur in late Eocene deposits of the Quercy fissure fillings in France (Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré 2000). Phylogenetic analyses recover Geranopterus as the closest Palaeogene relative of crown group Coracii (Mayr et al. 2004;Clarke et al. 2009). The sister taxon of the clade formed by Geranopterus and crown group Coracii is Paracoracias occidentalis from the North American Green River Formation (Clarke et al. 2009); the exact provenance of the holotype is unknown, but Grande (2013: 243) hypothesised that it stems from the middle Eocene Laney Shale Member. P. occidentalis may therefore be roughly coeval to Eocoracias brachyptera (Eocoraciidae) from the early Eocene (48 million years ago [Ma]) of Messel in Germany, which is known from several complete skeletons (Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré 2000). Current analyses suggest that Eocoracias is the sister taxon of a clade including Paracoracias, Geranopterus, and crown group Coracii (Clarke et al. 2009;Bourdon et al. 2016). A partial skull and associated postcranial bones of an unnamed stem group roller from the London Clay of the Isle of Sheppey (51. 5-53.5 Ma) were furthermore described by Mayr and Walsh (2018).
The earliest diverging stem group rollers belong to the taxon Primobucconidae, which was established for Primobucco mcgrewi from early Eocene (51-52 Ma) layers of the Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation (Mayr et al. 2004;Ksepka and Clarke 2010). Two species of Primobucco, P. perneri and P. frugilegus, also occur in Messel, and a tarsometatarsus of an unnamed putative primobucconid was described from the early Eocene (~51-52 Ma) of France (Mayr et al. 2004). Primobucconids were smaller than the species of Eocoracias, Paracoracias, Geranopterus, and extant Coracii, from which they also differ in some plesiomorphic skeletal characteristics.
Another small, roller-like bird, Septencoracias morsensis from the early Eocene (~54 Ma) Fur Formation in Denmark, was also tentatively assigned to the Primobucconidae (Bourdon et al. 2016). The species is based on a wellpreserved articulated skeleton, which allows, however, the recognition of only a limited amount of skeletal details. A tarsometatarsus from the early Eocene (50.5-52 Ma) of Egem in Belgium was tentatively referred to Septencoracias by Mayr and Smith (2019).
Because rollers today only occur in the Old World, the occurrence of stem group representatives of the Coracii in the Eocene of North America is already remarkably from a biogeographic point of view (Mayr 2009). Even more unexpected would be their recently proposed occurrence in South America, which was based on a putative stem group roller from the early Eocene (52 Ma) of Argentina (Degrange et al. 2021). However and as detailed in the discussion, this species (Ueekenkcoracias tambussiae) is markedly different from stem group rollers, and its assignment to the Coracii is likely to be erroneous.
Here, isolated bones of Septencoracias are described from the early Eocene (54.6-55 Ma) London Clay of Walton-on-the-Naze, Essex, UK. The fossils stem from the collection of the late Paul Bergdahl and were acquired by Senckenberg Research Institute Frankfurt. The bones belong to a single individual and show previously unknown osteological details, which potentially bear on the phylogenetic affinities of this species.
To assess the affinities of the fossil, a phylogenetic analysis of 58 morphological characters was performed (see appendices for character descriptions and matrix). For this analysis, Septencoracias morsensis was scored after the holotype, the new specimen reported in the present study, and a tarsometatarsus described by Mayr and Smith (2019).
In a second analysis, 15 "dummy" characters were added to constrain the topology of the extant taxa according to the results of current molecular analyses, which support a clade including the Meropidae and Coracii (Prum et al. 2015;Kuhl et al. 2021). The characters added to this constrained analysis were scored as "1" for the Meropidae, Coraciidae, and Brachypteraciidae; as "0" for all other extant taxa; and as unknown ("?") for the fossil taxa.
The analyses were run with the heuristic search modus of NONA 2.0 (Goloboff 1993) through the WINCLADA 1.00.08 interface (Nixon 2002), using the commands hold 10000, mult*1000, hold/10, and max*. Bootstrap support values were calculated with 1000 replicates, ten searches holding ten trees per replicate, and TBR branch swapping without max*. Outgroup comparisons were made with the Falconidae. Tree length (L), consistency index (CI), and retention index (RI) were calculated.

Systematic palaeontology
Aves Linnaeus, 1758Coraciiformes Forbes, 1884?Coracii Wetmore and Miller, 1926Septencoracias Bourdon et al., 2016 Emended diagnosis: In addition to the characters listed by Bourdon et al. (2016), the taxon Septencoracias is diagnosed by widened distal sections of the proximal phalanges of the three anterior toes.
Septencoracias cf. morsensis Bourdon et al., 2016 Referred specimen: SMF Av 655: partial skeleton including large portions of the mandible, the left jugal arch, left quadrate, nine vertebrae or fragments thereof, right carpometacarpus distal section of right radius, nearly complete right tibiotarsus, distal section of left tibiotarsus, right fibula, fragment of left trochlea metatarsi IV, and most pedal phalanges of the left foot ( Fig. 1 Fig. 2a-f) lacks the processus orbitalis, but is otherwise complete. The bone corresponds to the quadrate of extant Coracii  in overall proportions, but shows some notable differences. As in the Meropidae (Fig. 2m, n), but unlike in the Coracii and Alcedinides (Alcedinidae, Momotidae, Todidae), the cotyla quadratojugalis is shallow; ventral of it, the tip of the condylus lateralis forms a distinct platform (a shallow cotyla quadratojugalis also occurs in the Trogonidae and the piciform Indicatoridae). The condylus medialis projects ventrally well beyond the condylus pterygoideus; it is, however, rostrocaudally more extensive and ventrally less prominent than in crown group Coracii, Meropidae, and the Alcedinides. The foramen pneumaticum mediale is situated in a ventral position at the base of the processus orbitalis, whereas it is more dorsally located in the Meropidae; the taxa of the Alcedinides lack a foramen pneumaticum mediale (Elzanowski and Boles 2015). Furthermore unlike in the Meropidae, Alcedinides, and Brachypteraciidae but as in the Coraciidae (and most other birds), there are no pneumatic foramina on the caudal surface of the processus oticus. The condylus caudalis (condylus laterocaudalis sensu Elzanowski and Boles 2015) is laterally extensive; this morphology was identified as a coraciiform apomorphy by Elzanowski and Boles (2015). On the processus oticus, capitulum squamosum and capitulum oticum are widely separated by a shallow incisura intercapitularis. On the lateral side of the processus oticus, immediately ventral of the capitulum squamosum, there is a small tubercle (tuberculum subcapitulare of Elzanowski and Boles 2015). As in crown group Coracii and   Mayr and Walsh (2018); surrounding matrix was digitally removed, the dashed line delimits the exposed portion of the bone (the missing part is hidden in matrix or overlain by other bones). h Right quadrate (mirrored) of NMS G.2014.54.1; surrounding matrix was digitally removed. i, j Coracias garrulus (Coraciidae), left quadrate in lateral (i) and caudal (j) view. k, l Atelornis pittoides (Brachypteraciidae), right quadrate (mirrored) in lateral (k) and caudal (l) view. m, n Merops nubicus (Meropidae), left quadrate in lateral (m) and caudal (n) view. o, p Leptosomus discolor (Leptosomidae), left quadrate in lateral (o) and caudal (p) view. q, r Momotus momota (Momotidae), right quadrate (mirrored) in lateral (q) and caudal (r) view. cdc condylus caudalis, cdl condylus lateralis, cdm condylus medialis, cdp condylus pterygoideus, cpo capitulum oticum, cps capitulum squamosum, cqj cotyla quadratojugalis, fpm foramen pneumaticum mediale, pco processus orbitalis, pne pneumatic openings, sic sulcus intercondylaris, tsc tuberculum subcapitulare. Scale bars equal 5 mm Momotidae, but unlike in the Trogonidae, Alcedinidae, and Upupidae, the condylus pterygoideus is not sharply delimited by a circumferential sulcus around its base. In addition to its somewhat smaller size, the quadrate of Septencoracias cf. morsensis from Walton-on-the-Naze is distinguished from the quadrate of an unnamed stem group representative of the Coracii from the London Clay of the Isle of Sheppey (Mayr and Walsh 2018) in that the condylus lateralis is less protruding and the processus mandibularis and the sulcus intercondylaris are mediolaterally narrower (Fig. 2g, h). The fossil also comprises the left jugal arch (Fig. 1b); unlike in the Meropidae, its caudal end is not sharply kinked dorsally.
The long mandible (Figs. 1a, 3a, b) is much narrower mediolaterally than the mandibles of crown group Coracii (Fig. 3c), Eocoracias, Paracoracias, and the Primobucconidae. The pars symphysialis is moderately long and forms a concave trough. Unlike in extant Coracii and Meropidae, the medial surface of the mandibular ramus exhibits a large neurovascular foramen in its midsection (Fig. 3b). The holotype includes a fragment of the portion of left mandibular ramus in dorsal view. h, i S. cf. morsensis, cervical vertebra in dorsal (h) and ventral (i) view. j, k S. cf. morsensis, two thoracic vertebrae in left lateral view. ctc cotyla lateralis, ctl cotyla lateralis, fos fossa on lateral surface of vertebral corpus, fvc fovea costalis, ldg laterally protruding ledge for insertion of musculus adductor mandibulae ossis quadrati, nvf neurovascular foramen, zcd zygapophysis caudalis, zcr zygapophysis cranialis. Scale bars equal 5 mm; same scale for h-k morsensis, distal portion of left tibiotarsus in cranial (q), medial (r), and caudal (s) view. t, u S. cf. morsensis, distal ends of right (t) and left (u) tibiotarsus in cranial view. v-x distal end of right tibiotarsi (cranial view) of v A. pittoides, w E. glaucurus, and x M. apiaster. arf articulation facet for phalanx proximalis digiti majoris, cdl condylus lateralis, cdm condylus medialis, lgp ligamental prominence, ltr lateral tuberositas retinaculi extenori, luv scar for insertion of ligamentum ulnometacarpale ventrale, mtr medial tuberositas retinaculi extensori, ntc notch in cranial margin of sulcus extensorius, omm distal projection formed by os metacarpale minus, pex processus extensorius, pim processus intermetacarpalis, pis processus pisiformis, prj ventral projection of os metacarpale minus, pst pons supratendineus. Scale bars equal 5 mm caudal end of the left mandibular ramus (Fig. 3e, f), which is distinguished from the corresponding portion of the caudal mandible of the Coracii in that there is no clear distinction between the cotyla lateralis and the cotyla caudalis (Fig. 3g). As in extant Coracii, there is a laterally protruding ledge for the insertion of the tendon of musculus adductor mandibulae ossis quadrati.
The specimen includes one nearly complete cervical vertebra as well as fragments of four cervicothoracic vertebrae, three thoracic vertebrae, and one caudal vertebra (Fig. 1e-j). The cervical vertebra (Fig. 3h, i) lacks a bony bridge from the corpus vertebrae to the processus costalis, which is present on at least the 4th to 6th cervical vertebrae of crown group Coracii. Unlike in extant Coracii and other coraciiform birds, the thoracic vertebrae are pleurocoelous, with elongate lateral depressions on the vertebral corpus (Fig. 3j, k).
The right carpometacarpus is complete (Fig. 4a-c). The processus extensorius is of similar shape to that of the Coraciidae (Fig. 4d, e) but less prominent than in the Brachypteraciidae (Fig. 4f); the trochlea carpalis is proportionally larger than in the Coraciidae. Caudal of the processus pisiformis, there is an elongate scar for insertion of ligamentum ulnometacarpale ventrale, which is less developed in extant rollers. The processus intermetacapalis is poorly developed. The proximal end of the os metacarpale minus exhibits a ventral projection, which is damaged in the fossil, but appears to have been less strongly developed than in crown group Coracii. The spatium intermetacarpale is slightly widening distally. The articulation facet for the phalanx proximalis digiti majoris (Fig. 4c) is well-defined and set off from the distal end of the os metacarpale majus by a distinct notch. Unlike in the Meropidae (Fig. 4g) and Alcedinides, however, the main portion of the os metacarpale minus does not project farther distally than the os metacarpale majus. Unlike in extant coraciiform birds, the cranial margin of the distal end of the sulcus extensorius forms a notch (Fig. 4c). On the dorsal surface of the symphysis metacarpalis distalis, there is a sulcus for musculus interosseus dorsalis.
The only other wing bone preserved in the specimen is the distal end of the right radius (Fig. 4h, i). No comparative data on the distal radius are available, but the centrally positioned and tubercle-like ligamental prominence on its ventral surface is better developed than in crown group Coracii.
The right tibiotarsus is nearly complete, but the proximal portion of the bone is damaged (Fig. 4n-p); of the left tibiotarsus, only the distal section is present (Fig. 4qs). On the distal end of the bone, the lateral tuberositas retinaculi extensori forms a prominent, edge-like projection immediately proximal of the condylus lateralis (Fig. 4t, u). A marked tuberositas retinaculi extensori also occurs in crown group Coracii (Fig. 4v, w) and the Alcedinidae, but is less developed in the Meropidae (Fig. 4x). The medial tuberositas retinaculi extensori is likewise prominent, but forms a proximodistally extensive ridge that is situated much farther proximally. The condyles are not as proximodistally elongated as in crown group Coracii, and unlike in the latter, the pons supratendineus is situated proximal of the condyles. The fossil also includes the proximal portion of the right fibula, which does not exhibit features of taxonomic or phylogenetic significance.
Of the tarsometatarsus, only a fragment of the left trochlea metatarsi IV is included in the specimen (Fig. 5b). As in other coraciiform birds, this trochlea has a subcylindrical shape and lacks a plantarly directed flange.
Altogether, eleven pedal phalanges of the left foot are preserved, including two unguals (Fig. 5a, b). As in the holotype of Septencoracias morsensis (Fig. 5c), the first phalanx of the hallux is very long and exceeds the other phalanges in length; the distal end of this phalanx bears a marked ventral sulcus, and the condyle forms two narrow and widely spaced rims. Unlike in the Meropidae (Fig.  5g) and the taxa of the Alcedinides, the proximal end of the first phalanx of the hallux is only slightly mediolaterally widened. The proximal pedal phalanges of the three anterior toes exhibit a distinctive morphology with unusally widened distal ends of proximal (first) phalanges of the three anterior toes. This widening is also present in the second phalanx of the third toe. The proximal end of the first phalanx of the second toe exhibits a sulcus along its plantar surface. The tuberculum extensorium of the second phalanx of the third toe is strongly developed and proximally projected.

Results of the phylogenetic analysis
The primary analysis of the character matrix in the appendix results in five most parsimonious trees (L = 119; CI = 0.52; RI = 0.62), the consensus tree of which is shown in Fig. 6. This analysis supported a clade including Septencoracias and other stem group Coracii, even though this clade was not retained in the bootstrap analysis, and the interrelationships of the taxa within this clade were unresolved.
Six characters were optimised as apomorphies of stem and crown group rollers in the analysis: skull with strongly elongated processus postorbitales (ch. 3); skull with very large foramen for the ramus occipitalis of the arteria ophthalmica externa (ch. 6); os metacarpale minus of carpometacarpus not protruding much farther distally than os metacarpale majus (ch. 36); tibiotarsus, distal end with the lateral tuberositas retinaculi extensori forming a prominent, edge-like projection immediately proximal of the condylus lateralis (ch. 42); tarsometatarsus, foramen The primary analysis supported a clade including the Meropidae, Alcedinidae, Momotidae, and Todidae, which was also obtained in other analyses of morphological data (e.g. Clarke et al. 2009: fig. 9;Bourdon et al. 2016). Based on the results of current molecular analyses, a second analysis was therefore performed that was constrained to a sister group relationship between the Meropidae and the Coracii. This analysis likewise supported a placement of Septencoracias in the Coracii (not shown).

Discussion
An assignment of the fossil from Walton-on-the-Naze to the Coraciiformes (the clade including the Meropidae, Alcedinides, and Coracii) is supported by a ventrally prominent condylus medialis of the quadrate, a ventrally directed projection on the proximal portion of the os metacarpale minus, and a tibiotarsus with a lateral tuberositas retinaculi extensori that forms a prominent, edge-like projection just proximal of the condylus lateralis. The combination of these features is only found in rollers and ground rollers (Coracii).
The new London Clay specimen has the size of an average bee-eater and is smaller than the partial roller skeleton from the Isle of Sheppey, which was reported by Mayr and Walsh (2018). In size and morphology, the fossil closely corresponds to Septencoracias morsensis, which stems from the coeval and geographically proximate Fur Formation. In particular, an assignment to Septencoracias is supported by the unusual widening of the distal ends of the proximal pedal phalanges of the three anterior toes, which does not occur in the Primobucconidae, Eocoracias, Paracoracias, and crown group Coracii. However, the new fossil shows some minor differences in the proportions of the pedal phalanges, which is why a species-level referral to S. morsensis is only tentative (the ratio of carpometacarpus length to the length of the first phalanx of the hallux, for example, is 2.59 in SMF Av 655 but 2.07/2.17 in the S. morsensis holotype).
The present analyses support an assignment of Septencoracias to the Coracii, but the character evidence for this placement is only moderate. Of the six characters that were optimised as apomorphies of stem and crown group rollers, two are unknown for Septencoracias (ch. 3: processus postorbitales strongly elongated; ch. 6: large foramen for the ramus occipitalis of arteria ophthalmica externa). A third character represents a reversal into the plesiomorphic state (ch. 36: os metacarpale minus not exceeding os metacarpale majus). The remaining three characters, which were optimised as synapomorphies of Septencoracias, are a prominent, edge-like lateral tuberositas retinaculi extensori (ch. 42), a large foramen vasculare distale (ch. 47), and a plantarly open canalis interosseus distalis (ch. 48). The latter feature is visible on a tarsometatarsus from the early Eocene of Egem in Belgium, which was tentatively assigned to Septencoracias by Mayr and Smith (2019). Concerning the taxa included in the present analysis, a plantarly open canalis interosseus distalis is only found in the Coracii. However, the presence of a canalis interosseus distalis is plesiomorphic for neornithine birds, and this canal is completely reduced in the Meropidae and Alcedinides so that it actually cannot be determined whether the stem species of these taxa had a plantarly open canal.  Bourdon et al. (2016) noted that "[p]lacement of Septencoracias within the rollers (Coracii) is strongly supported. Septencoracias unambiguously shares with extant and extinct rollers the derived presence of a small depression on the cranial face of humeral head (…); a narrow and elongate brachial fossa of the humerus; a ventrally protruding projection on the ventral side of the proximal end of minor metacarpal (…); a deep dorsal infracotylar fossa on the tarsometatarsus (…); a sharp distal part of medial margin of tarsometatarsal shaft (…); a greatly enlarged distal vascular foramen of tarsometatarsus prolonged by a marked groove" (Bourdon et al. 2016: 6). However, I am unable to comprehend the first of these characters ("small depression on cranial face of humeral head"), and a ventral projection on the minor metacarpal and a sharp distal part of the medial margin of the tarsometatarsal shaft are also present in the Meropidae. The narrow and elongate fossa musculi brachialis is an apomorphy of the Coraciidae and is absent in the Brachypteraciidae and Geranopteridae. The deep infracotylar fossa is a plesiomorphic trait, which is present in the Leptosomidae and Falconidae (as well as numerous other neornithine taxa).
In light of current molecular phylogenies, which support a sister group relationship between the Coracii and the Meropidae (see introduction), it is notable that the new fossil reveals previously unrecognised derived features that are shared with the Meropidae but absent in the Coracii. One of these is a widening of the distal section of the proximal phalanges of the three anterior toes, which to the best of my knowledge is unknown from any avian taxon other than Septencoracias and the Meropidae. As shown by the new fossil, the cotyla quadratojugalis of the quadrate bone of Septencoracias is furthermore shallow, whereas it is cup-like in the Coracii and in the Alcedinides. Also unlike in the Coracii, but as in the Meropidae, the long mandible of Septencoracias is mediolaterally narrow.
Overall, Septencoracias is certainly more similar to rollers than to crown group Meropidae, which are highly specialised birds that predominantly forage on flying hymenopterans. Adaptations to this feeding strategy include a greatly elongated and very narrow beak as well as long distal wing elements that enable a fast flight. However, a roller-like skeletal morphology is likely to be plesiomorphic for the Coraciiformes, because it also occurs in close relatives of coraciiform birds, such as the Leptosomiformes and the piciform Galbulae, as well as in the coraciiform Momotidae (Alcedinides). If the Meropidae are the sister taxon of the Coracii, their stem species therefore probably had a more roller-like body plan.
The Meropidae have no Palaeogene fossil record. Based on calibrated molecular data, the divergence between the Coracii and Meropidae was estimated at 55.6 Ma (52. 7-57.4 Ma) by McCullough et al. (2019). With 54.6-55 million years, the age of the new fossil is only slightly younger than the above mean divergence date and is within the confidence interval of this date. Even though the hypothesis that Septencoracias represents an early stem group representative of the Meropidae that retained plesiomorphic Coracii-like traits is obvious, it gains no support in current parsimony-based analyses. The derived features shared by Septencoracias and the Meropidae are therefore most likely either plesiomorphic and were lost in the Coracii or they represent parallelisms that evolved convergently in Septencoracias and the Meropidae.
The functional significance of the widening of the pedal phalanges in the Meropidae is unknown. Most likely, this unusual feature is related to the syndactyl feet and breeding habits of these birds, in which the proximal phalanges of the toes are firmly linked by connective tissue and the clutches are deposited in self-excavated earth tunnels. However, the pedal phalanges are not widened in other syndactyl birds with similar nesting habits (Alcedinidae, Momotidae, and Todidae), and the adaptive advantage of the widened pedal phalanges of the Meropidae still has to be identified.
In any case, Septencoracias appears to have differed from extant rollers in its ecological preferences and foraging mode. The narrower mandible may indicate a predominantly insectivorous diet, whereas the more broad-billed rollers also take smaller invertebrates. If the widening of the pedal phalanges indicates that Septencoracias was digging burrows for its clutches, it would also have differed in its nesting habits from the species of the Coraciidae, which nest in tree cavities. The breeding biology of the Brachypteraciidae is more varied, and whereas the short-legged ground roller (Brachypteracias leptosomus), which is the sister taxon of other species of the Brachypteraciidae (Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré 2000;Kirchman et al. 2001), likewise nests in tree cavities, other species of the Brachypteraciidae excavate burrows in the ground (Langrand 2001).
It is finally noted that the leg bones of Septencoracias and other stem group Coracii differ markedly from those of the recently described putative stem group roller Ueekenkcoracias tambussiae from the early Eocene of the Argentinean part go Patagonia (Degrange et al. 2021). This species is only known from a rather poorly preserved leg (Fig. 7a), the bones of which are quite different from the corresponding elements of the Coracii, with the tarsometatarsus being notably stouter, the pedal phalanges more robust, and the ungual phalanx of the second toe much larger (the unusually large claw is actually a highly distinctive feature of the species that was not mentioned in its description). With regard to these traits and apart from a proportionally somewhat longer tibiotarsus, Ueekenkcoracias more closely resembles Palaeopsittacus from the early Eocene of Europe ( Fig. 7c; Mayr 2003). The affinities of this latter taxon are not well-constrained, but it is certainly not a representative of the Coraciiformes and likely to be more closely related to taxa of the Strisores, such as the Steatornithidae or Podargidae.
22. Furcula with well-developed apophysis furculae: no (0), yes (1). In the Coraciidae, an apophysis furculae is absent in Eurystomus but present in Coracias; in the Galbulae it is absent in Galbulidae but present in Bucconidae.