Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of an iterative headway-based bus holding strategy with real-time information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In high frequency bus service lines buses often come irregularly at the stops, often in bunches, due to the uncertainty of the passenger demand and behavior and unexpected conditions on the roads. Vehicle holding is a commonly used strategy among a variety of control strategies in transit operation in order to reduce bus bunching and regulate bus headways. This paper investigates a control strategy of holding a group of buses at a single or multiple control point(s). By incorporating any passenger boarding activities during holding, a single control point problem is developed and extended to multiple control points to reduce the variance of headways for the downstream stops. The problem is a non-convex optimization problem with linear constraints that minimizes the total passenger waiting time both on-board and at stops. A heuristic is then developed that is easy and fast to implement, which makes it suitable for real-time implementation. The model is evaluated with a simulation case study by using the real-time bus operation data (i.e., Automatic Vehicle Location and Automatic Passenger Count Data) from the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA). The simulation results show that considering the boarding activities in the total waiting time, our model mitigates the error propagation and maintains steady performance, compared to the common models in the literature, which do not consider boarding while holding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is interesting to note that in 2009, the CTA had a slight drop in bus bunching down to 2.5 % due to budget cuts which resulted in less frequent service.

  2. The parameters were derived from real time bus route operation data provided by the CTA.

  3. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Ed.

References

  • Abkowitz M, Engelstein I (1984) Methods for maintaining transit service regularity. Transp Res Rec 961:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Abkowitz M, Lepofsky M (1990) Implementing headway-based reliability control on transit routes. J Transp Eng 1(7):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abkowitz M, Tozzi T (1986) Transit route characteristics and headway-based reliability control. Transp Res Rec 1078:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett A (1974) On controlling randomness in transit operations. Transp Sci 8(2):102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellei G, Gkoumas K (2009) Threshold- and information-based holding at multiple stops. Intell Transp Syst J 3(3):304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellei G, Gkoumas K (2010) Transit vehicles’ headway distribution and service irregularity. Public Transp 2(4):269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes CE, Saez D, Milla F, Munez A, Riquelme M (2010) Hybrid predictive control for real-time optimization of public transport system’s operations based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 18(5):757–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTAPerformance Metrics (2011) Available at http://www.transitchicago.com/assets/1/performance_metrics/CTA_Company_Wide_KPI_Dec_11.pdf. Last accessed on Jan 5, 2012

  • Daganzo CF (2009) A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: systematic analysis and comparisons. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 43:913–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R, Cipriano A (2009) Real-time control of buses in a transit corridor based on vehicle holding and boarding limits. Transp Res Rec 2090:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R (2012) How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance? Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 46:1202–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Chien S (2001) Improving transit service quality and headway regularity with real time control. Transp Res Rec 1760:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein XJ, Wilson NHM, Bernstein D (2001) The holding problem with real-time information available. Transp Sci 35(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu L, Yang X (2002) Design and implementation of bus-holding control strategies with real-time information. Transp Res Rec 1791:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu L, Liu Q, Kalamai P (2003) Real-time optimization model for dynamic scheduling of transit operations. Transp Res Rec 1857:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman R, Lam T (1974) Trip characteristics of journeys to and from work. In: Transportation and traffic theory, proceedings of the sixth international symposium on transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman M (2001) An analytical stochastic model for the transit vehicle holding problem. Transp Sci 35(3):215–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Ruan M (2009) Probability-based bus headway regularity measure. Intell Transp Syst 3(4):400–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell S, Wilson NHM (1999) Optimal real-time control strategies for rail transit operations during disruption. In: Computer aided systems in public transport. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 471, pp 299–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Oort NV, Wilson NHM, Nes RV (2010) Reliability improvement in short headway transit services. Transp Res Rec 2143:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oort NV, Boterman JW, Nes RV (2012) The impact of scheduling on service reliability: trip-time determination and holding points in long-headway services. Public Transp 4:39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puong A, Wilson NHM (2008) A train holding model for urban rail transit systems. In: Computer aided systems in public transport. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 600, pp 319–337

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shen S, Wilson NHM (2001) An optimal integrated real-time disruption control model for rail transit systems. In: Computer-aided scheduling of public transport. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 505, pp 335–363

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sun A, Hickman M (2008) The holding problem at multiple holding stations. In: Computer-aided systems in public transport, vol 600, pp 339–359. Part III

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo T, Cats O, Burghout W, Koutsopoulos HN (2010) Mesoscopic simulation for transit operations. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 18(6):896–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JK, Wardrop JG (1951) The variation of journey time in central London. Road Research Laboratory Note No. RN/1511/JKT.JGW

  • Turnquist MA (1981) Strategies for improving reliability of bus transit service. Transp Res Rec 818:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Welding PI (1957) The instability of a close-interval service. Oper Res Q 8(3):133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuan Y, Argote J, Daganzo CF (2011) Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: optimal linear control and performance analysis. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 45:1831–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Q., Adida, E. & Lin, J. Implementation of an iterative headway-based bus holding strategy with real-time information. Public Transp 4, 165–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-012-0057-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-012-0057-1

Keywords

Navigation