Skip to main content
Log in

A non-cooperative game-based distributed optimization method for chiller plant control

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems account for about half of the building energy consumption. The optimization methodology access to optimal control strategies of chiller plant has always been of great concern as it significantly contributes to the energy use of the whole HVAC system. Given that conventional centralized optimization methods relying on a central operator may suffer from dimensionality and a tremendous calculation burden, and show poorer flexibility when solving complex optimization issues, in this paper, a novel distributed optimization approach is presented for chiller plant control. In the proposed distributed control scheme, both trade-offs of coupled subsystems and optimal allocation among devices of the same subsystem are considered by developing a double-layer optimization structure. Non-cooperative game is used to mathematically formulate the interaction between controlled components as well as to divide the initial system-scale nonlinear optimization problem into local-scale ones. To solve these tasks, strategy updating mechanisms (PSO and IPM) are utilized. In this way, the approximate global optimal controlled variables of devices in the chiller plant can be obtained in a distributed and local-knowledge-enabled way without neither global information nor the central workstation. Furthermore, the existence and effectiveness of the proposed distributed scheme were verified by simulation case studies. Simulation results indicate that, by using the proposed distributed optimization scheme, a significant energy saving on a typical summer day can be obtained (1809.47 kW·h). The deviation from the central optimal solution is 3.83%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADMM:

alternating direction multiplier method

AGSO:

augmented group search optimization algorithm

ALM:

augmented Lagrangian method

BAS:

building automation system

COP:

coefficients of performance

DCSA:

differential cuckoo search algorithm

DFO:

diffusion optimization problem

DTO:

distributed optimization problem

ESC:

extremum seeking control

GA:

genetic algorithm

HVAC:

heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning

IoT:

Internet of things

IPM:

inter point method

IRBSO:

improved ripple bee swarm optimization algorithm

LRS:

recursive least squares estimation technique

MINLP:

mixed integer nonlinear programming

MM:

manual method

NN:

neural networks

OCL:

optimal chiller loading

P2P:

peer-to-peer

PLR:

partial load rate

PSO:

particle swarm optimization

SA:

simulated annealing algorithm

VAV:

variable air volume

A :

strategy space

D :

set of devices of a subsystem

S :

set of all subsystems

X :

state space

Γ :

system disturbance

C ch :

supply-side generation of chillers (kW)

C u :

demand-side cooling load of users (kW)

\({\underline{C}}\) :

lower limit of capacity (kW)

\({\bar C}\) :

upper limit of capacity (kW)

ChillerCapFTemp :

cooling capacity factor

ChillerEIRFTemp :

energy input to cooling output factor (function of temperature)

ChillerEIRPLR :

energy input to cooling output factor (function of part load ratio)

fit (X i):

fitness function of particle i

gBest :

swarm’s best known position

H :

pump head (m)

{unload}chiller,i :

lower limit of chiller i’s cooling capacity (kW)

\({\overline {load} ^{{\rm{chiller}},i}}\) :

upper limit of chiller i’s cooling capacity (kW)

M :

penalty coefficient

n pump,i :

relative speed of pump i, npump, i ∈ [0,1]

P :

energy consumption (kW·h)

pBest :

particle’s best known position

Q cw :

chilled water flow rate (m3/h)

\({{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\frown$}}\over Q} }_{{\rm{cw}}}}\) :

changes in chilled water flow rate (m3/h)

\({{\tilde Q}_{{\rm{cw}}}}\) :

estimation of chilled water flow rate, m3/h

\({\tilde {\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{Q} }_{CW}}\) :

estimation of changes in chilled water flow rate (m3/h)

\(\underline {{Q_{{\rm{cw}}}}} \) :

lower limit of chilled water flow rate (m3/h)

\(\overline {{Q_{{\rm{cw}}}}} \) :

upper limit of chilled water flow rate (m3/h)

t :

time step

T cond,e :

entering cooling water temperature (°C)

T cw :

chilled water temperature (°C)

T cw,l :

leaving chilled water temperature (°C)

T cw,r :

entering chilled water temperature (°C)

\({{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\frown$}}\over T} }_{{\rm{cw}}}}\) :

changes in chilled water temperature (°C)

\({{\tilde T}_{{\rm{cw}}}}\) :

estimation of chilled water temperature (°C)

\({\tilde {\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{T} }_{CW}}\) :

estimation of changes in chilled water temperature (°C)

\(\underline {{T_{{\rm{cw}}}}} \) :

lower limit of chilled water temperature (°C)

\(\overline {{T_{{\rm{cw}}}}} \) :

upper limit of chilled water temperature (°C)

V control :

controlled variable

V environment :

environment variables

V set :

parameters set by end users

α :

compensation factor

η :

pump efficiency

*:

optimal solution

chiller:

parameters of chiller subsystem

i :

subsystem/device series number

i :

other components except for component i

i, j :

device j of subsystem i

pump:

parameters of pump subsystem

References

  • Asad HS, Yuen RKK, Liu J, Wang J (2019). Adaptive modeling for reliability in optimal control of complex HVAC systems. Building Simulation, 12: 1095–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David T, Rackes A, Waring MS (2017). Alternative ventilation strategies in US offices: Saving energy while enhancing work performance, reducing absenteeism, and considering outdoor pollutant exposure tradeoffs. Building and Environment, 116: 140–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy JA, Murty USR (2007). Graph Theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • BP (2019). BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 68th edn. London: British Petroleum.

    Google Scholar 

  • BP (2020). BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2020), 69th edition. London: British Petroleum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Kim D, Jaramillo R, et al. (2016). A general multi-agent control approach for building energy system optimization. Energy and Buildings, 127: 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan TS, Chang YC, Huang J (2017). Application of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm to the optimization of load distribution for a multiple-type-chiller plant. Building Simulation, 10: 711–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YC (2007). Sequencing of chillers by estimating chiller power consumption using artificial neural networks. Building and Environment, 42: 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chantasiriwan S (2013). Performance of variable-speed centrifugal pump in pump system with static head. International Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 33(1), https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.203.2013.1.203-5073.

  • Chen CL, Chang YC, Chan TS (2014). Applying smart models for energy saving in optimal chiller loading. Energy and Buildings, 68: 364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Yang C, Pan X, et al. (2020). Design and operation optimization of multi-chiller plants based on energy performance simulation. Energy and Buildings, 222: 110100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Y (2016). Studies on decentralized control system of chiller plant. PhD Thesis, Tsinghua University. (in Chinese)

  • Dhingra NK, Khong SZ, Jovanovic MR (2019). The proximal augmented Lagrangian method for nonsmooth composite optimization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 64: 2861–2868.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DOE-2 (1982). DOE-2 Engineers Manual Version 2.1A, LBL-11353.

  • dos Santos Coelho L, Cocco Mariani V (2013). Improved firefly algorithm approach applied to chiller loading for energy conservation. Energy and Buildings, 59: 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos Coelho L, Klein CE, Sabat SL, et al. (2014). Optimal chiller loading for energy conservation using a new differential cuckoo search approach. Energy, 75: 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan C, Yan D, Xiao F, et al. (2021). Advanced data analytics for enhancing building performances: From data-driven to big data-driven approaches. Building Simulation, 14: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991). Game Theory. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grübel J, Kleinert T, Krebs V, et al. (2020). On electricity market equilibria with storage: Modeling, uniqueness, and a distributed ADMM. Computers & Operations Research, 114: 104783.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Yan D, Azar E, et al. (2020). A systematic review of occupant behavior in building energy policy. Building and Environment, 175: 106807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Zuo W, Sohn MD (2016). Amelioration of the cooling load based chiller sequencing control. Applied Energy, 168: 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabari F, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B (2018). Basic open-source nonlinear mixed integer programming based dynamic economic dispatch of multi-chiller plants. In: Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Jabari F (eds), Operation, Planning, and Analysis of Energy Storage Systems in Smart Energy Hubs. Cham: Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing R, Wang M, Zhang R, et al. (2017). A study on energy performance of 30 commercial office buildings in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 144: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur J, Bala A (2019). A hybrid energy management approach for home appliances using climatic forecasting. Building Simulation, 12: 1033–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WS, Chen Y, Kao Y (2011). Optimal chiller loading by differential evolution algorithm for reducing energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 43: 599–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Pan Y, Xu P, et al. (2021a). A decentralized peer-to-peer control scheme for heating and cooling trading in distributed energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285: 124817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang S, Koo C (2021b). A real-time optimal control strategy for multi-zone VAV air-conditioning systems adopting a multi-agent based distributed optimization method. Applied Energy, 287: 116605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Huang G (2019). A hybrid predictive sequencing control for multi-chiller plant with considerations of indoor environment control, energy conservation and economical operation cost. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49: 101616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo CC, Tsai SH, Lin BS (2016). Economic dispatch of chiller plant by improved ripple bee swarm optimization algorithm for saving energy. Applied Thermal Engineering, 100: 1140–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Wang S (2011). Supervisory and optimal control of central chiller plants using simplified adaptive models and genetic algorithm. Applied Energy, 88: 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu B, Li Y, House JM, et al. (2017). Real-time optimization of a chilled water plant with parallel chillers based on extremum seeking control. Applied Energy, 208: 766–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedic A, Olshevsky A (2015). Distributed optimization over time-varying directed graphs. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60: 601–615.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nedic A, Olshevsky A, Shi W (2017). Achieving geometric convergence for distributed optimization over time-varying graphs. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 27: 2597–2633.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nedic A, Liu J (2018). Distributed optimization for control. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 1: 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedic A, Olshevsky A, Rabbat MG (2018). Network topology and communication-computation tradeoffs in decentralized optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE, 106: 953–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parunak HVD (1999). Industrial and practical applications of DAI. In: Weiss G (ed), Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. pp. 337–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu S, Feng F, Li Z, et al. (2019). Data mining based framework to identify rule based operation strategies for buildings with power metering system. Building Simulation, 12: 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan K, Wang S, Gao D, et al. (2016). Development and validation of an effective and robust chiller sequence control strategy using data-driven models. Automation in Construction, 65: 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teimourzadeh H, Jabari F, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B (2020). An augmented group search optimization algorithm for optimal cooling-load dispatch in multi-chiller plants. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 85: 106434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THUBERC (2019). Annual Report on China Building Energy Efficiency. Tsinghua University Building Energy Research Center.

  • Tian Z, Si B, Wu Y, et al. (2019). Multi-objective optimization model predictive dispatch precooling and ceiling fans in office buildings under different summer weather conditions. Building Simulation, 12: 999–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zhang B, Li Q, et al.S (2019). Robust distributed optimization for energy dispatch of multi-stakeholder multiple microgrids under uncertainty. Applied Energy, 255: 113845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yu X, Mu Y, et al. (2020). A distributed Peer-to-Peer energy transaction method for diversified prosumers in Urban Community Microgrid System. Applied Energy, 260: 114327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei E, Ozdaglar A (2012). Distributed alternating direction method of multipliers. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Maui, HI, USA.

  • Wei X, Xu G, Kusiak A (2014). Modeling and optimization of a chiller plant. Energy, 73: 898–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin H, Gan D, Li N, et al. (2013). Virtual power plant-based distributed control strategy for multiple distributed generators. IET Control Theory & Applications, 7: 90–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Zhang J, Liang R (2019). Development of a self-organized network to optimize the data transmission in BECMP based on minimum spanning tree algorithm. Building Simulation, 12: 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Liu Q, Zhao A, et al. (2021). A distributed optimization algorithm for the dynamic hydraulic balance of chilled water pipe network in air-conditioning system. Energy, 223: 120059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan X, Pan Y, Yang J, et al. (2021). Study on the application of reinforcement learning in the operation optimization of HVAC system. Building Simulation, 14: 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2014). Research on models and algorithms for distributed optimization based on the non-cooperative games. PhD Thesis, Zhejiang University. (in Chinese)

  • Zhang J, You K (2020). AsySPA: An exact asynchronous algorithm for convex optimization over digraphs. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65: 2494–2509.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Jing J, Duan M, et al. (2020). Analysis of district cooling system with chilled water thermal storage in hot summer and cold winter area of China. Building Simulation, 13: 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Wang J, Xu M, et al. (2020). An online predictive control method with the temperature based multivariable linear regression model for a typical chiller plant system. Building Simulation, 13: 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang C, Wang S, Shan K (2020a). A risk-based robust optimal chiller sequencing control strategy for energy-efficient operation considering measurement uncertainties. Applied Energy, 280: 115983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang L, Chen X, Guan X (2020b). A decentralized method for energy conservation of an HVAC system. Building Simulation, 13: 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978481). The support provided by China Scholarship Council (No. 202006260140) during a visit to Cardiff University is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiqun Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Pan, Y., Wang, Q. et al. A non-cooperative game-based distributed optimization method for chiller plant control. Build. Simul. 15, 1015–1034 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0869-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0869-5

Keywords

Navigation