Skip to main content
Log in

An action-based Markov chain modeling approach for predicting the window operating behavior in office spaces

  • Research Article
  • Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reliable energy and performance prediction for building design and planning is important for newly-designed or retrofitted buildings. Window operating behavior has an important influence on the ventilation and energy consumption of these buildings under different realistic scenarios. Therefore, quantitatively describing this behavior and constructing a prediction model are important. In this work, an action-based Markov chain modeling approach for predicting window operating behavior in office spaces was proposed. Two summer measurement data (2016 and 2018) were used to verify the accuracy and validity of the modeling approach. The opening rate, outdoor temperature, time distribution, and on-off curve were proposed as four inspection standards. This study also compared the prediction performance between the action-based Markov chain modeling approach with the state-based Markov chain modeling approach, which is the most popular modeling approach to model occupant window operating behavior. This study proved that the yearly variation of occupants’ behavior performed a form of action that remained unchanged during a certain period. Meanwhile, the results also proved that the action-based Markov chain modeling approach can reflect the actual window operating behavior accurately within an open-plan office, which is a beneficial supplement for energy-consumption simulation software in a window-state prediction module. The state-based Markov chain modeling approach showed better stability and accuracy in terms of the opening rate, whereas the action-based Markov chain modeling approach showed good consistency with the measurement data in the on-off curves and in situations with little data. For the on-off curves, the accuracy of action-based modeling approach in the prediction of window open-state is 20% higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly K, Baker L, Brager G (2011). Window use in mixed-mode buildings: A literature review. Centre for the Built Environment.

  • Barthelmes VM, Heo Y, Fabi V, Corgnati SP (2017). Exploration of the Bayesian Network framework for modelling window control behaviour. Building and Environment, 126: 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wilde P (2014). The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation. Automation in Construction, 41: 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Oca S, Hong T (2014). A data-mining approach to discover patterns of window opening and closing behavior in offices. Building and Environment, 82: 726–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Yan D, Li Z, Jin Y, Feng X, Fontenot H (2018). Modeling occupancy and behavior for better building design and operation—A critical review. Building Simulation, 11: 899–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2010). International Energy Outlook 2010. US Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html.

  • Fawcett T (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27: 861–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2013). A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Building and Environment, 70: 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I, Goldstein R, Breslav S, Khan A (2014). Coupling stochastic occupant models to building performance simulation using the discrete event system specification formalism. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldi F, Robinson D (2008). On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants. Building and Environment, 43: 2163–2177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldi F, Robinson D (2009). Interactions with window openings by office occupants. Building and Environment, 44: 2378–2395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkel S, Knapp U, Pfafferott J (2008). Towards a model of user behaviour regarding the manual control of windows in office buildings. Building and Environment, 43: 588–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Yan D, D’Oca S, Chen CF (2017). Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture. Building and Environment, 114: 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Chen Y, Belafi Z, D’Oca S (2018). Occupant behavior models: A critical review of implementation and representation approaches in building performance simulation programs. Building Simulation, 11: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Hong T, Yan D (2014). An insight into actual energy use and its drivers in high-performance buildings. Applied Energy, 131: 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Li J, Fan R, Jia H (2015). Probability of occupant operation of windows during transition seasons in office buildings. Renewable Energy, 73: 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Yu Z, Haghighat F, Zhang G (2019). Development and improvement of occupant behavior models towards realistic building performance simulation: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50: 101685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic R, Grintal E, Wölki D, Frisch J, van Treeck C (2018). Window opening model using deep learning methods. Building and Environment, 145: 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norford LK, Socolow RH, Hsieh ES, Spadaro GV (1994). Two-to-one discrepancy between measured and predicted performance of a ‘low-energy’ office building: Insights from a reconciliation based on the DOE-2 model. Energy and Buildings, 21: 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page J, Robinson D, Morel N, Scartezzini JL (2008). A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence. Energy and Buildings, 40: 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan S, Han Y, Wei S, Wei Y, Xia L, Xie L, Kong X, Yu W (2019). A model based on Gauss Distribution for predicting window behavior in building. Building and Environment, 149: 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parys W, Saelens D, Hens H (2011). Coupling of dynamic building simulation with stochastic modelling of occupant behaviour in offices—A review-based integrated methodology. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira PF, Ramos NMM (2018). Detection of occupant actions in buildings through change point analysis of in situ measurements. Energy and Buildings, 173: 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira PF, Ramos NMM (2019). Occupant behaviour motivations in the residential context—An investigation of variation patterns and seasonality effect. Building and Environment, 148: 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson I, Thomson M, Infield D (2008). A high-resolution domestic building occupancy model for energy demand simulations. Energy and Buildings, 40: 1560–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijal HB, Tuohy P, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Samuel A, Clarke J (2007). Using results from field surveys to predict the effect of open windows on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39: 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijal HB, Tuohy P, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Samuel A, Raja IA, Clarke J (2008). Development of adaptive algorithms for the operation of windows, fans, and doors to predict thermal comfort and energy use in Pakistani buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 114(2): 555–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy PG, Rijal HB, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Samuel A, Clarke JA (2007). Comfort driven adaptive window opening behavior and the influence of building design. In: Proceedings of the 10th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Beijing, China.

  • Tuohy PG, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Rijal HB, Clarke JA (2009). Occupant behavior in naturally ventilated and hybrid buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 115(1): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren PR, Parkins LM (1984). Window-opening behaviour in office buildings. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 5: 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi Y, Yilmaz S, Prakash N, Firth SK, Shimoda Y (2019). A cross analysis of existing methods for modelling household appliance use. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12: 160–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, Hong T, Dong B, Mahdavi A, D’Oca S, Gaetani I, Feng X (2017). IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 156: 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Barrett P (2012). Factors influencing the occupants’ window opening behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 50: 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Liu T, Shi X, Jin X (2018). Case study of window operating behavior patterns in an open-plan office in the summer. Energy and Buildings, 165: 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 51708105).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Liu, T., Yan, D. et al. An action-based Markov chain modeling approach for predicting the window operating behavior in office spaces. Build. Simul. 14, 301–315 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0647-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0647-9

Keywords

Navigation