Skip to main content
Log in

A data-driven model predictive control for lighting system based on historical occupancy in an office building: Methodology development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lighting system accounts for 8% of the total electricity consumption in commercial buildings in the United States and 12% of the total electricity consumption in public buildings globally. This consumption share can be effectively reduced using the demand-response control. The traditional lighting system control method commonly depends on the real-time occupancy data collected using the passive infrared (PIR) sensor. However, the detection inaccuracy of the PIR sensor usually results in false-offs. To diminish the false-error frequency, the existing lighting system control simply deploys a delayed reaction period (e.g., 5 to 20 min), which is not sufficiently accurate for the demand-response operation. Therefore, in this research, a novel data-driven model predictive control (MPC) method that is based on the temporal sequential-based artificial neural network (TS-ANN) is proposed to overcome this challenge using an updated historical occupancy status. Using an office as case study, the proposed model is also compared with the traditional lighting system control method. In the proposed model, the occupancy data was trained to predict the occupancy pattern to improve the control. It was found that the occupancy prediction mainly correlates with the historical occupancy ratio and the time sequential feature. The simulation results indicated that the proposed method achieved higher accuracy (97.4%) and fewer false-offs (from 79.5 with traditional time delay method to 0.6 times per day) are achieved by the MPC model. The proposed TS-ANN-MPC method integrates the analysis of the occupant behavior routine into on-site control and has the potential to further enhance the control performance practice for maximum energy conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghemo C, Blaso L, Pellegrino A (2014). Building automation and control systems: A case study to evaluate the energy and environmental performances of a lighting control system in offices. Automation in Construction, 43: 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araji MT, Darragh SP, Boyer JL (2012). Paradigm in sustainability and environmental design: lighting utilization contributing to surplus-energy office buildings. Leukos, 9: 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccali M, Bonomolo M, Lo Brano V, Ciulla G, Di Dio V, Massaro F, Favuzza S (2019). Energy saving and user satisfaction for a new advanced public lighting system. Energy Conversion and Management, 195: 943–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benya J (2001). Advanced lighting guidelines. New Buildings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottou L (2010). Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In: Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010, pp. 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois D, Reinhart C, MacDonald I (2006). Adding advanced behavioural models in whole building energy simulation: a study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control. Energy and Buildings, 38: 814–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley A, LeNir A (1985). Algorithm 630: BBVSCG–a variable-storage algorithm for function minimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 11: 103–119.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Hong T, Luo X (2018). An agent-based stochastic Occupancy Simulator. Building Simulation, 11: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenaru O, Hanganu CE, Popescu D, Ichim L (2019). Virtual sensor for behavior pattern identification in a smart home application In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC), Marrakesh, Morocco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew I, Karunatilaka D, Tan CP, Kalavally V (2017). Smart lighting: The way forward? Reviewing the past to shape the future. Energy and Buildings, 149: 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker C, Aries M, Kort H, Rosemann A (2017). Occupancy-based lighting control in open-plan office spaces: a state-of-the-art review. Building and Environment, 112: 308–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M-C, Blomsterberg Å (2011). Energy saving potential and strategies for electric lighting in future North European, low energy office buildings: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2572–2582.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2019). Annual Energy Outlook 2019. Available at https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/index.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett T (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27: 861–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galasiu AD, Newsham GR, Suvagau C, Sander DM (2007). Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: A field study. Leukos, 4: 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner M, Dorling S (1998). Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmospheric Environment, 32: 2627–2636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal S, Ingley HA, Barooah P (2013). Occupancy-based zone-climate control for energy-efficient buildings: Complexity vs. performance. Applied Energy, 106: 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo X (2007). Occupancy sensor networks for improved lighting system control. PhD Thesis, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Tiller DK, Henze GP, Waters CE (2010). The performance of occupancy-based lighting control systems: A review. Lighting Research & Technology, 42: 415–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Yan D, D' Oca S, Chen CF (2017). Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture. Building and Environment, 114: 518–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Chen Y, Belafi Z, D’Oca S (2018). Occupant behavior models: A critical review of implementation and representation approaches in building performance simulation programs. Building Simulation, 11: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JD (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9: 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2017a). Energy Efficiency 2017. International Energy Agency. Available at https://www.iea.org/efficiency2017/.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2017b). Energy Technology Perspectives 2017. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM (1996). Artificial neural networks: A tutorial. Computer, 29: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Moon HJ (2018). Case study of an advanced integrated comfort control algorithm with cooling, ventilation, and humidification systems based on occupancy status. Building and Environment, 133: 246–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kang S, Ryu KR, Song G (2019). Real-time occupancy prediction in a large exhibition hall using deep learning approach. Energy and Buildings, 199: 216–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma D, Ba J (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (2017). Occupancy Sensor with Improved Functionality. In: Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok SSK, Lee EWM (2011). A study of the importance of occupancy to building cooling load in prediction by intelligent approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 52: 2555–2564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le QV, Ngiam J, Coates A, Lahiri A, Prochnow B, Ng AY (2011). On optimization methods for deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Jiang Y (2006). Investigation methods of air conditioning energy consumption in residential buildings in summer. Journal of HV&AC, 36(9): 35–37. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DC, Nocedal J (1989). On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming, 45: 503–528.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Magno M, Polonelli T, Benini L, Popovici E (2015). A low cost, highly scalable wireless sensor network solution to achieve smart LED light control for green buildings. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15: 2963–2973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandil C (2006). Light’s labour’s lost: Policies for energy-efficient lighting. Energy World, 343: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniccia D, Tweed A, Bierman A, Von Neida B (2001). The effects of changing occupancy sensor time-out setting on energy savings, lamp cycling and maintenance costs. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 30: 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoor F, Linton D, Loughlin M (2012). Occupancy monitoring using passive rfid technology for efficient building lighting control. In: Proceedings of the 4th International EURASIP Workshop on RFID Technology, Torino, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirakhorli A, Dong B (2016). Occupancy behavior based model predictive control for building indoor climate—A critical review. Energy and Buildings, 129: 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy Z, Yong FY, Frei M, Schlueter A (2015). Occupant centered lighting control for comfort and energy efficient building operation. Energy and Buildings, 94: 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldewurtel F, Sturzenegger D, Morari M (2013). Importance of occupancy information for building climate control. Applied Energy, 101: 521–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2825–2830.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Rysanek A, Nagy Z, Schlüter A (2018). Using machine learning techniques for occupancy-prediction-based cooling control in office buildings. Applied Energy, 211: 1343–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham GN, Nguyen PH, Kwon KR (2019). Brief paper: Combining object detection and hand gesture recognition for automatic lighting system control. Journal of Multimedia Information System, 6: 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power DM (2011). Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2%(1), 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu S, Feng F, Li Z, Yang G, Xu P, Li Z (2019). Data mining based framework to identify rule based operation strategies for buildings with power metering system. Building Simulation, 12: 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman EE, Dittmer AL, Keller JM (1996). Field analysis of occupancy sensor operation: parameters affecting lighting energy savings. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 25: 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein F, Enscoe A (2010). Saving energy with highly-controlled lighting in an open-plan office. Leukos, 7: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart DE (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, Parallel Distributed Processing: I. Foundations. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. 318–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalkoff R (1992). Pattern Classification: Statistical, Structural and Neural Approaches. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabak V, de Vries B (2010). Methods for the prediction of intermediate activities by office occupants. Building and Environment, 45: 1366–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlow RM, Beaman CP, Elmualim AA, Couling K (2014). Simple prompts reduce inadvertent energy consumption from lighting in office buildings. Building and Environment, 81: 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanjiru EM, Zhang L, Xia X (2016). Model predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban households. Applied Energy, 179: 821–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, O’ Brien W, Hong T, Feng X, Burak Gunay H, Tahmasebi F, Mahdavi A (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107: 264–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, Hong T, Dong B, Mahdavi A, D’ Oca S, Gaetani I, Feng X (2017). IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 156: 258–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin C, Dadras S, Huang X, Mei J, Malek H, Cheng Y (2017). Energysaving control strategy for lighting system based on multivariate extremum seeking with Newton algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 142: 504–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Yan D, Hong T, Ren X (2015). Data analysis and stochastic modeling of lighting energy use in large office buildings in China. Energy and Buildings, 86: 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778321): Research on the quantitative description and simulation methodology of occupant behavior in buildings; the Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51521005); also the Tsinghua University tutor research fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Y., Yan, D., Zhang, X. et al. A data-driven model predictive control for lighting system based on historical occupancy in an office building: Methodology development. Build. Simul. 14, 219–235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0638-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0638-x

Keywords

Navigation