Light hydrocarbon geochemistry: insight into oils/condensates families and inferred source rocks of the Woodford–Mississippian tight oil play in North-Central Oklahoma, USA

The Woodford–Mississippian “Commingled Production” is a prolific unconventional hydrocarbon play in Oklahoma, USA. The tight reservoirs feature variations in produced fluid chemistry usually explained by different possible source rocks. Such chemical variations are regularly obtained from bulk, molecular, and isotopic characteristics. In this study, we present a new geochemical investigation of gasoline range hydrocarbons, biomarkers, and diamondoids in oils from Mississippian carbonate and Woodford Shale. A set of oil/condensate samples were examined using high-performance gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The result of the condensates from the Anadarko Basin shows a distinct geochemical fingerprint reflected in light hydrocarbon characterized by heptane star diagrams, convinced by biomarker characteristics and diamantane isomeric distributions. Two possible source rocks were identified, the Woodford Shale and Mississippian mudrocks, with a variable degree of mixing. Thermal maturity based on light hydrocarbon parameters indicates that condensates from the Anadarko Basin are of the highest maturity, followed by “Old” Woodford-sourced oils and central Oklahoma tight oils. These geochemical parameters shed light on petroleum migration within Devonian–Mississippian petroleum systems and mitigate geological risk in exploring and developing petroleum reservoirs.


Introduction
Woodford Shale has not only been proven to be an excellent source rock charging conventional reservoirs in Kansas and Oklahoma (Comer and Hinch 1987;Burruss and Hatch 1989;Philp et al. 1989;Jones and Philp 1990;Comer 1992;Wang and Philp 1997), but also a frontier for unconventional resource play exploration and production. In areas straddling between the basin and shelf, like the Cana-Woodford Play, the Woodford produces wet gas and condensates. The oil has been commingled produced from the Woodford/Mississippian strata since 2010 on the Anadarko Shelf and Cherokee Platform. Many studies suggest that the Woodford Shale accounts for more than 85% of commercial oil produced from conventional reservoirs in Oklahoma and Kansas (Welte et al. 1975;Lewan et al. 1979;Reber 1988;Burruss and Hatch 1989), but few publications have shown strong evidence to prove the oils were actually sourced from the Woodford Shale. Comer and Hinch (1987) recognized expulsion, or primary migration, of oil from the Woodford Shale in Oklahoma by identifying numerous small-scale accumulations of bitumen within mature parts of the Woodford Shale, including fractures, stylolites, burrows, nodules, and sandstone lenses, all of which are completely enclosed in the source rock. Additional evidence to prove the Woodford Shale has generated oil in situ has been described in Cardott (2014a, b), where extracts found in the surface fractures of the Woodford outcrop in the McAlister cemetery quarry and in the Criner Hills were shown to be low-maturity "oil" Edited by Jie Hao (rock extract filled in the fractures) originating from the local Woodford Shale. Oil samples produced from multiple conventional reservoirs of different ages and extracts of possible source rocks indicated that most of the oils were primarily derived from the Woodford Shale in the Anadarko Basin (Jones and Philp 1990). Burruss and Hatch (1989) undertook a detailed geochemical investigation of 104 crude oils and 190 core samples of dark-colored shales from the Anadarko Basin. They identified three oil end members, which generally correlated with the reservoir and source rock age. One oil shared the stable carbon isotope signature and biomarker fingerprints of the Woodford extracts, indicating that it was possibly derived from the Woodford Shale in the deep Anadarko Basin (Burruss and Hatch 1989).
An important factor affecting hydrocarbon richness in Woodford-Mississippian tight play is associated with source rock heterogeneity. The Woodford Shale is an organic-rich source of hydrocarbon that charged Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoirs, together with Mississippian mudrocks such as Caney Shale (Al Atwah et al. 2015Atwah et al. , 2017. Typically, identifying petroleum source rock could be achieved by using a collection of geochemical tools such as molecular and isotopic fingerprints, which include biomarkers together with stable carbon isotopes of saturate and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions (Al Atwah et al. 2017;Wang and Philp 1997). Currently, light hydrocarbon markers remain underutilized in crude oil recovered from Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoirs. Oil-oil correlations, together with hydrocarbon migration and maturity assessment, can be further refined by utilizing the light hydrocarbon markers. Light hydrocarbon geochemistry is an effective tool for refining petroleum systems especially with processes related to petroleum migration and accumulation (Hu et al. 1990;Dai 1993;Hao et al. 1991;Zhang and Lin 1994;Lin and Wilk 1995). Here, we present new geochemical data of light hydrocarbons produced from Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoirs across the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma. Data suggest different sources of hydrocarbons, with various thermal maturity stages. Moreover, these data shed light into factors affecting petroleum accumulation in Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoirs such as water-washing and petroleum mixing.

Geological settings
In the early Paleozoic time, three major tectonic/depositional provinces existed in Oklahoma: the Oklahoma Basin, the southern Oklahoma Aulacogen, and the Ouachita Trough. The Oklahoma Basin was a shelf-like area that received widespread and thick shallow marine carbonates interbedded with thin marine shales and sandstones (Johnson 1989;Northcutt et al. 2001). The southern Oklahoma Aulacogen was the depocenter for the Oklahoma Basin and the precursor of the Anadarko Basin (Johnson 1989;Northcutt et al. 2001). From Silurian to Middle Devonian clean-washed skeletal limestones, argillaceous, and silty carbonates, referred to as the Hunton Group in Oklahoma, were deposited in a shallow marine setting . Epeirogenic Uplifts interrupted deposition resulting in two regional unconformities. In southern Oklahoma, the pre-Woodford-Chattanooga unconformity eroded to the Upper Ordovician and in northern Oklahoma the erosion sculpted out Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician rocks (Kirkland et al. 1992;Fig. 1b). The Nemaha Uplift is a buried range of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains associated with a granite high in the pre-Cambrian basement that extends approximately from Nebraska to Central Oklahoma (Gerhard 2004). The major deformation of the Nemaha Uplift took place in pre-Desmoinesian and post-Mississippian time (Lee 1943;Merriam 1963;Gerhard 2004). The Cherokee platform could be considered as part of the stable shelf area of the Arkoma Basin throughout most of the Woodford deposition (Campbell and Northcutt 2001). In the Late Devonian, the Cherokee Platform was a broad shelf separated from the proto-Anadarko Basin by the paleo-Nemaha Ridge (Northcutt and Campbell 1996;Campbell and Northcutt 2001).
The Late Devonian to Early Mississippian age Woodford Shale is an organic-rich black shale widely distributed over most of Oklahoma including the Anadarko Basin, the Anadarko Shelf, Cherokee Platform, and the Arkoma Basin (Comer and Hinch 1987;Comer 1992). On the Cherokee Platform, the Woodford Shale was deposited on a major regional unconformity developed during the Late Devonian (Amsden 1975). It is conformably overlain by limestone and shale of Early Mississippian Age (Fig. 2). The predominant lithology of the Woodford Shale is black shale along with other common lithologies including chert, siltstone, sandstone, dolostone, and light-colored shale (Amsden 1967;Amsden 1975;Comer 1992). The Woodford Shale in Oklahoma is a typical marine clay-rich siliciclastic shale based on three key characteristics found from previous studies: (1) marine non-calcareous siliceous mudstone (Amsden 1975;Kirkland et al. 1992;Comer 2008;Kvale and Bynum 2014); (2) low-to-moderate sulfur content (Jarvie et al. 2007); and (3) high clay mineral content (Kirkland et al. 1992;Comer 2008;Kvale and Bynum 2014).

Study area and sampling
The study area extends across two major Woodford resource plays, namely Anadarko-Woodford and Nemaha-Woodford (Fig. 1a). Areal coverage includes Dewey, Blaine, Canadian,

R E T R A C T E D A R T I C L E
Garfield, Logan, and Payne counties. From a geological perspective, all counties are located within the Anadarko Basin except for Garfield, Logan, and Payne counties which are part of the shallow Cherokee Platform. The Nemaha Uplift is a major structural feature dividing the Cherokee Platform from the Anadarko Basin province. Crude oil/condensate samples were collected from Mississippian reservoirs, as well as the Woodford Shale strata. A generalized stratigraphic column of the Anadarko Basin is shown in Fig. 2, and major source rocks and all examined crude oils are produced from Devonian-Mississippian petroleum systems. Well-head fluid samples were collected at the separator in 240 ml borosilicate glass bottles and tightly sealed with a PTFE-lined cap. Table 1 lists the 24 crude oil and 5 condensate samples with key bulk characteristics in this study. An aliquot of the crude oil/condensate sample was dissolved in hexane to precipitate asphaltenes; dissolved hydrocarbons in hexane were further fractionated using silica gel column chromatography into saturate, aromatic, and resin fractions. All samples are produced from horizontal wells that have been stimulated with hydraulic fracturing except for the 8 "Old" Woodford-sourced oils (Group-3); therefore, the horizontal targets listed in Table 1 represent the landing zone of the horizontal well and not necessarily the source of the produced oils. Eight "Old" Woodfordsourced oil samples (Group-3), previously produced from vertical wells into conventional reservoirs in Southern Oklahoma and stored in Dr. Philp's laboratory (University of Oklahoma), were also included in the study for comparative purposes.

Whole oil gas chromatography
For whole oil GC analysis, the crude oil sample was diluted into a 1 mg/ml n-hexane solution and analyzed on an Agilent 6890 series gas chromatograph with a split/splitless capillary injection system and a 100 m × 0.25 mm (i.d.) J&W Scientific DB-Petro 122-10A6 fused silica capillary column coated with a 0.5 µm liquid film. The temperature program started with an initial temperature of 40 °C and 1.5 min hold time and increased to 130 °C at a rate of 2 °C per minute and subsequently increased to 300 °C at a rate of 4 °C per minute followed by an isothermal period of 26 min for a total run of 115 min. C 7 light hydrocarbon analysis was performed using the GC data obtained from whole oil/condensates GC analysis stated above. The isolated fractions, saturates, and aromatics, respectively, were analyzed using an Agilent 6890 series gas chromatograph with a splitless capillary injector and a 30 m × 0.25 mm (i.d.) J&W Scientific DB-5 122-5032 fused silica capillary column coated with a 0.25 µm liquid film. The injector was set up in the splitless injection mode, and the temperature was held at 300 °C. The carrier gas was helium (He) with a flow rate of 1.4 ml/min. The temperature program started with an initial temperature of 40 °C held for 1.5 min and increased to 300 °C at a rate of 4 °C per minute followed by an isothermal period of 34 min for a total run time of 100.5 min. The flame ionization detector (FID) temperature was set at 310 °C. n-Alkanes and isoprenoids were identified in each chromatogram by comparing their relative retention times with standards.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
The GC-MS analyses of the branched and cyclic alkanes (B&C) and aromatic fractions were performed on an

R E T R A C T E D A R T I C L E
Agilent 7890A gas chromatography system coupled with an Agilent Technologies 5975C mass selective detector (MSD) using single ion monitoring. The GC used a 60 m × 0.25 mm Agilent/J&W Scientific DB-5 122-5562 fused silica capillary column coated with a 0.25 µm liquid film. The injected volume of branched and cyclic and aromatic fractions was 1 µl per run. The injector temperature was set at 300 °C. The GC temperature program started at 40 °C with 1.5 min hold time and was later increased to 300 °C at a rate of 4 °C per minute and then held constant for 34 min for a total run time of 100.5 min. Samples were run in splitless mode, and helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.4 ml/min. Biomarker compounds were determined from fragmentograms corresponding to each ion using relative retention times and by comparison with published data. For diamondoids analysis in crude oils/condensates, the sample was diluted with pentane in the concentration of 16 mg oil/ml pentane. The pentane was reported to be a good solvent for adamantanes and diamantanes in terms of high solubility and low boiling point (Reiser et al. 1996). The oil solution was well homogenized in ultrasonic bath for at least 1 min. 1 µl of the resulting oil solution was injected to Agilent GC-MS to detect adamantanes and diamantanes using SIM mode and key ion fragments: 135, 136, 149, etc., and 188, 187, 201, etc., respectively. DB-5

R E T R A C T E D A R T I C L E
MS 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 micron in film thickness was used. Temperature program started at 40 °C and hold it for 1.5 min before ramping 4 °C/min to 300 °C, and then held this temperature for 34 min. Compound ratios were calculated directly from peak areas or peak heights of targeted markers and compared with internal standards.

Bulk geochemical parameters
Crude oils exhibit slight differences in bulk parameters that are consistent with the type of fluid, in which the majority of the samples are classified as medium oil. Key bulk parameters of the crude oils are listed in Table 1, including fluid type, API gravity, and SARA (short for saturates, aromatics, resin and asphaltene) component classes. API gravity values ranged from 22.1 to 49.49, as reflected in the fluid type, in which lower API values are associated with heavier black oils and higher API values from light oils. All of the oil samples are dominated by saturate hydrocarbons compared to aromatic, resin, and asphaltenes. Heavier crude oils, such as Winney 1-8H, were higher in asphaltene content relative to the rest of the oil samples. The crude oil bulk characteristic is a useful descriptive source of data with some inherent limits. The dominance of the saturated hydrocarbon is reasonable to be found in thermogenic hydrocarbon expelled from petroleum source rocks. Such enrichment in saturated hydrocarbons is usually observed in naturally produced crude oil (Lewan et al. 2006). However, the source rock of petroleum cannot be determined solely from bulk parameters; therefore, characteristics of molecular fingerprints discussed below can aid to identify hydrocarbon sources.

Source parameters
Heptane (C 7 ) variability reflected the geographic location among the three distinct oil groups. Table 2 lists the ratios used for constructing the oil correlation star diagram (OCSD) and oil transformation star diagram (OTSD) (Halpern 1995). Group-1 samples located within the Anadarko Basin exhibited a unique fingerprint of the C 7 OCSD (Figs. 3, 4). Specifically, these oils are enriched in the 3,3-dimethylpentane isomer relative to the rest of heptane isomers. Similarly, enrichment in 2,2-dimethylpentane and 2,4-dimethylpentane is observed within tight oils located on the Cherokee Platform (Group-2). Additionally, Group-1 condensates varied the most for 2,2-dimethylpentane, followed by 3,3-dimethylpentane isomers (Figs. 3, 4). However, even with those variations, the overall star diagram fingerprint is unique to the condensates (Group-1) from the Anadarko Basin compared to other oil groups (Figs. 3, 4). Group-2 oils located in Cherokee Platform, Central Oklahoma, showed a narrow OCSD pattern, with significant enrichment in 3-ethylpentane (Table 2). Group-3 oils displayed more subtle variability where some oils are enriched in 3,3-dimethylpentane and relatively lower in 2,4-dimethylpentane isomer, while other oils display the opposite trend. The observed variation of star diagram fingerprints across crude oil groups is a function of source rock inherent variation and evaporative fractionation. Mango (1987) reported that light hydrocarbons in crude oil are formed via metal-catalyzed steady-state kinetic reaction of the kerogen. Moreover, it was observed that while the absolute concentration of light hydrocarbons from the same source varied by orders of magnitude, certain ratios of light hydrocarbons kept constant, such as the sum of 2-methylhexane and 2,3-dimethylpentane relative to the sum of 3-methylhexane and 2,4-dimethylpentane (K1) (Mango 1987). To explain the invariance of the C 6 -C 7 hydrocarbons, Mango (1987) postulated that light hydrocarbons originate from a higher saturated hydrocarbon and the presence of metal catalysts will result in a similar reaction rate for homologous series. OCSD parameters are based on branched C 7 alkanes; therefore, those ratios would keep constant observed by Mango (1987). In examined crude oils, the variations in OCSD fingerprints between Group-1 and Group-2 are clearly indicating two different sources of hydrocarbons (Fig. 4), whereas Group-3 presumably is a mix of the two end members or from a third source. Within the Anadarko Basin, a number of source rocks have been studied ranging in age from Cambrian to Pennsylvanian (Al Atwah et al. 2017;Wang and Philp 1997). Observations from light hydrocarbon source parameters are discussed in the biomarker section below.

Alteration assessment
The oil transformation star diagrams (OTSD), a multivariate plot in polar coordinates developed by Halpern based on different ratios of C 4 -C 7 hydrocarbons to characterize secondary alterations of crude oils (Halpern 1995), are illustrated in Fig. 4 with ratios used to construct the diagrams listed in Table 2. Although light hydrocarbons are controlled by the organic matter source, secondary alterations can affect light hydrocarbon distribution (i.e., biodegradation, water-washing, thermal maturity, and evaporation). In all the oil samples, lowest ratio values are observed at TR-6 ranging from 0.01 to 1.09 (Table 2), with Group-1 samples exhibiting the highest TR-1 values compared to the other two groups. Overall, Group-1 and Group-3 showed a relatively similar OTSD pattern maximizing at TR-4 followed by TR-3, whereas Group-2 highest ratio coexists at TR-7 and TR-8 followed by TR-6. The

R E T R A C T E D
A R T I C L E apparent depletion in TR-1 in the oil samples is related to the effect of water-washing, which is characterized by using the ratio of toluene relative to 1,1-dimethylcyclopentane. (Toluene is more water-soluble; therefore, a decreasing trend in TR-1 indicated water-washing (Mango 1997.) From OTSD, it is clear that water-washing effects occurred, but at different magnitudes, Group-2 was severely water-washed, while Group-1 and Group-3 were relatively slightly washed. No crude oil exhibited any evidence of microbial biodegradation as observed from the high values of the transformation values ranging from TR-2 to TR-8 (Table 2). In the Anadarko Basin, variation in toluene abundance has been observed with a uniquely decreasing trend moving away from the basin depocenter toward the shallower shelf area. The low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene and toluene, are the most water-soluble components in crude oils (Price 1976). As oils migrate farther, they contact progressively larger amounts of formation water into which the water-soluble components will partition. There  Fig. 3 Gas chromatogram (C 7 light hydrocarbon range) of typical sample of different groups (compounds identified in the table above)

R E T R A C T E D A R T I C L E
is also the possibility that toluene concentration is related to thermal maturation; however, the trend of toluene concentration versus depth is not strong, a fact shown by the relatively low concentrations of toluene in the central, deep-basin oils from Silurian and Devonian reservoirs and from Pennsylvanian reservoirs. Therefore, such a trend was reported to indicate long-distance migration of hydrocarbons (Burruss and Hatch 1989).

Thermal maturity
Light hydrocarbons are a useful geochemical tool to evaluate thermal maturity. A number of light hydrocarbon-(C 6 -C 7 ) Group-3

R E T R A C T E D
A R T I C L E 1 3 oils exhibit similar abundance between these two isomers (Fig. 6a).

R E T R A C T E D A R T I C L E
and homohopane relative to tricyclic terpanes, together with dominance of C 27 regular sterane relative to the C 29 counterpart (Table 3). These biomarkers signature are diagnostic of a Mississippian-sourced oil and a Mississippian-extracted bitumen (Kim and Philp 2001). Group-2 oils should have had at least Mississippian source contribution, evidenced in the narrow star diagram fingerprint in Fig. 4. Within Group-2 samples, two oils are recovered from the horizontal wells landed in the Woodford Formation including Johnson 1-33H and Matthews 1-33H (Table 1). However, since these oils show a strong Mississippian biomarker characteristic and a Mississippian OCSD imprint, it is likely that the stimulated rock volume has exceeded the Woodford into the Mississippian Formation resulting in a mixing fluid with relatively comparable contributions from the Mississippian and Woodford sources. Diamondoids are rigid fused-ring cycloalkanes with a diamond-like structure that shows high thermal stability   initially (Williams et al. 1986;Wingert 1992;Lin and Wilk 1995;Dahl et al. 2003). Diamondoids are not found in living organisms but have been demonstrated to be synthesized from a wide variety of organic precursors via Lewis acid catalysis (Schleyer 1990;Wingert 1992). Considering their ubiquitous occurrence, even in oils of low thermal maturity, this mode of formation suggests diamondoids form by hydrocarbon rearrangement reactions on acidic clay minerals in petroleum source rocks (Schleyer 1990). Hence, the isomeric distribution of certain diamondoids could be sensitive to the source rock lithology. In particular, the alkylated diamantine infers source rock facies by comparing the relative abundance of three isomers of dimethyldiamantanes to distinguish different kerogen contributions (e.g., II-carbonate, type II marl, and type III) (Schulz et al. 2001). According to ternary plots developed for identifying source rock facies, most of the Group-1 and Group-3 samples plot within marine shale polygon, while Group-2 oils are plotted in between marine shale and carbonates polygon (Fig. 6a). Such observations support biomarker and C7 star diagrams, with Group-1 and Group-3 likely sourced from marine shale of the Woodford Shale Formation, and Group-2 a mixture of the two end members. Unlike biomarkers, diamondoids in crude oils and source rocks are structurally very different from their probable precursors in living organisms. Diamondoids are good thermal maturity indicators for high-maturity samples (over 1.1% Ro) when biomarker thermal maturity indicators already thermally destroyed. Hydrocarbon mixing and extent of cracking are usually accessed by comparing methyldiamantane versus stigmastane (C 29 sterane) biomarker (Dahl et al. 1999). Figure 6b shows the different oil groups and their content of methyldiamondoid versus stigmastane. Group-1 samples are clearly enriched in diamondoids and depleted in stigmastane indicating strong extent of oil cracking, whereas Group-2 oils are depleted in diamondoids which suggest lowmaturity stage without oil cracking yet. Group-3 oils are depleted in diamondoids and rich in stigmastane. Moreover, Group-3 oils plot at the diamondoid baseline, which has been defined from immature rock extracts. This suggests that Group-3 oils were migrated likely from source rocks in deep Anadarko Basin as the source rock was not that mature. From a petroleum systems perspective, such hydrocarbon charge trend coincides with previous studies that postulated that oils in the southern part of Oklahoma are a result of long-distance migration from the depocenter of the Anadarko Basin, whereas oils east of the Nemaha Uplift are a result of localized hydrocarbon charge with no contribution from deep Anadarko (Al Atwah et al. 2017;Wang and Philp 2019). Moreover, this explains the inconsistent signature between the isoheptane ratio and buck crude oil parameters of Group-1 and Group-3 oils, whereas the former suggests highly mature fluids, whereas the latter indicates black oils.

Proposed petroleum system
Based on the results of the oil/condensates family grouping, integration of the Woodford thermal maturity map, and burial and thermal history (Schmoker 1988), it is proposed that there are three petroleum systems in the study area (Fig. 8). The first is in the shallow part of the Anadarko Basin (Group-1), where the averaged measured Ro value of the Woodford Shale is 1.2% (Cardott 2014a, b), which is within the Rc range determined for the condensates based on methyl adamantine index (MAI) values. The Rc from the MAI values is provided in Table 3. Therefore, the Group-1 condensates were generated in situ. The second is in the Nemaha area (Group-2; Logan County and western Payne County), where the average measured Ro value of the Woodford Shale is 0.76%, which is within the Rc range determined for the oils based on methylphenanthrane index (MPI) values. The Rc from the MPI values is provided in Table 3. The oil samples in this system share significant Mississippian and Woodford source signatures and appear to be mixtures of Woodford-and Mississippian-derived oils that have probably been generated in situ. The third petroleum system is in the southern Oklahoma (Group-3; Garvin County); the Rc of oils is 0.81% in average (Table 3). This observation suggests these oils probably migrated short distances through the central Oklahoma faults zone from deeper Woodford Shale in the basin to the reservoirs. Schmoker (1988) proposed the Woodford Shale in Caddo County, Canadian County, and Grady County, Oklahoma ("area 3" in Schmoker's paper) went into the oil window circa 260 Ma (late Permian). This area might be the kitchen for those old Woodford-type oils, which migrated via some faults or other pathways formed during the Ouachita-Marathon orogeny (starting from Middle to Late Pennsylvanian until early Permian). Such type of migration has been previously proposed by Burruss and Hatch (1989) and Jones and Philp (1990) to suggest these oils may have migrated from the more mature parts of the Anadarko Basin in southern Oklahoma.

Conclusions
Light hydrocarbon geochemistry provides an effective tool to elucidate hydrocarbon source, maturity, and secondary alterations within Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoirs across the Anadarko Basin, Anadarko Shelf, and Cherokee Platform of North-Central Oklahoma by the following: 1. Two diagnostic molecular fingerprints for two petroleum source rocks, Mississippian mudrocks and Woodford Shale, based on light hydrocarbons have been captured and further convinced by biomarker and diamondoid evidence; 2. Condensates produced from the Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoir within the Anadarko Basin (Group-1) exhibit a distinct fingerprint and sourced from the Woodford Shale; 3. Tight oil from the Woodford-Mississippian tight reservoir on the Cherokee Platform (east of Nemaha Uplift) (Group-2) exhibits a "mixed source" fingerprint and in situ sourced by Mississippian mudrocks and Woodford Shale with variable contribution; 4. Crude oil sampled from conventional reservoirs in southern Oklahoma (Group-3) was derived from the Woodford Shale of the deep Anadarko Basin via longdistance migration; 5. Thermal maturity based on light hydrocarbon parameters indicates that condensates from the Anadarko Basin (Group-1) are of the highest maturity, followed by "Old" Woodford-sourced oils (Group-3) and central Oklahoma oils (Group-2).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in Group-1 (in-situ) 1.2%Ro for WDFD Rock (Cardott, 2014a) 1.3%Rc for condensates  WDFD-sourced reservoir (Jones & Philp, 1989) 0.79%Rc for conventional oils  0.76%Ro for WDFD Rock (Wang & Philp, 2019)

R E T R A C T E D
A R T I C L E the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.