Skip to main content
Log in

Are romantic orientation and sexual orientation different? Comparisons using explicit and implicit measurements

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research has characterized romantic love as overlapping with but distinct from sexual desire. We explore whether romantic orientation—the preferred gender(s) of romantic partners—also relates to but differs from sexual orientation—the preferred gender(s) of sexual partners. We developed explicit and implicit measures of romantic orientation to examine their associations with explicit and implicit sexual orientation. Further, because sociocultural values have been suggested to influence people’s choice for romantic partners but less so on sexual orientation, we also explored the associations of romantic and sexual orientation with two theoretically related sociocultural values: negative attitudes towards lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals, and traditional Asian values on family continuity. We recruited an online sample of ethnic Chinese heterosexual, bisexual, and gay/lesbian adults and found that after accounting for the statistical overlap between the two explicit constructs, the unique component of each explicit measure related exclusively to its corresponding implicit measure, but not to the other implicit measure. Moreover, implicit romantic orientation linked more strongly to sociocultural values than did implicit sexual orientation. These findings urge for distinguishing romantic orientation from sexual orientation and implicit from explicit processes to fully understand people’s romantic and sexual experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. This study did not measure expectations for future sexual involvement.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Icy Yeung for helping with survey translation.

Funding

This study was supported by a Seed Fund awarded to Wang Ivy Wong at the University of Hong Kong and a funding support from the American Institute of Bisexuality (AIB) awarded to Gu Li. The funding sources have no role in the design, execution, or report of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.L. and W.W.L.S. contributed equally to this study. G.L. and W.I.W. conceived the study; G.L. and W.I.W. designed the study; W.W.L.S. collected the data as part of a Master’s thesis under the supervision of W.I.W.; G.L. and W.W.L.S. analyzed the data with inputs from W.I.W.; G.L. and W.W.L.S. drafted the manuscript. All authors provided critical revisions and approved the final submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wang Ivy Wong.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee in the Department of Psychology at the University of Hong Kong.

Informed Consent

Electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their participation in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Gu Li and Will W. L. Sham contributed equally to this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Sham, W.W.L. & Wong, W.I. Are romantic orientation and sexual orientation different? Comparisons using explicit and implicit measurements. Curr Psychol 42, 24288–24301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03380-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03380-9

Keywords

Navigation