Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding collective guilt: Tolerance for contradiction and state-trait dissociations in perceived overlap between ingroup members

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collective guilt is a group-based emotion that extends from recognizing the ingroup has harmed others, and it is known to be predicted by factors related to the ingroup (e.g., ingroup identification, glorification) and by specific details of the event (e.g., temporal distance, ongoing victimization). The current research tested if differences in ingroup members’ broader ability to handle inconsistent information also contribute to their experience of collective guilt. In three studies, trait variation in tolerance for contradiction positively predicted collective guilt. Because the relationship could not be explained by specific ingroup perceptions, it may be that tolerance for contradiction enables ingroup members to endure the aversive emotional experience of guilt instead of responding defensively. All three studies also provided evidence that the level of overlap ingroup members perceive between the historical perpetrators and the current ingroup represents a defensive reaction to ingroup wrongdoing that contributes to reduced collective guilt, and this reaction is separate from trait-level perceptions of continuity between past and present ingroup members. Perceived overlap between historical perpetrators and the current ingroup may be a valuable measure of defensive responding in future research on collective guilt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This research was approved by Arcadia University’s Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dataset: https://doi.org/10.17632/j6jmgcnzgc.1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, C.M., Goto, N., Tsukamoto, S. et al. Understanding collective guilt: Tolerance for contradiction and state-trait dissociations in perceived overlap between ingroup members. Curr Psychol 41, 1534–1548 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00684-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00684-6

Keywords

Navigation