Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intensity of management resistance: understanding the decline of unionization in the private sector

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IX. Conclusions Although Lipset and Katchanovski present many of the major societal and structural causes that have influenced the decline of private sector unions, they have unfortunately omitted a factor that can account for as much as 40 percent of the decline in private sector union membership, i.e., intensity of management opposition. The managerial incentives to stop unionization are formidable because unions raise wages and reduce profits. Economic reasons for American managers to stop unionization have grown as the wage between union and nonunion workers has widened over the past 40 years especially relative to EU nations. In addition, as managerial accountability to shareholders has risen and pay related to performance has grown, top executives have attempted to raise productivity through high-performance workplace practices or lowering real wages. Since many of these practices rely on top-level executives being able to make decisions on personnel quickly without challenges from employees or due process, they have fought unions more vigorously in order to maintain this discretion over workplace decisions. Although this behavior by management may result in a more efficient allocation of resources from both a micro-and macroeconomic perspective, the losses to society occur in terms of greater income inequality and less employee voice at the workplace and in the political arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addison, John T. and Barry T. Hirsch. “The Economie Effects of Employment Regulation: What Are the Limits?” In Bruce E. Kaufman, ed. Government Regulation of the Employment Relationship. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1997, pp. 125–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Union Effects on Productivity, Profits, and Growth: Has the Long Run Arrived?” Journal of Labor Economics 7 (January 1989): 72–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, John C. and Michael F. Spivey. “The Impact of the WARN Act on Firm Value.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 37 (Fall 1997): 905–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and Robert S. Smith. “Compliance with the Minimum Wage Law.” Journal of Political Economy 87 (April 1979): 333–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, David H. “Outsourcing at Will: Unjust Dismissal Doctrine and the Growth of Temporary Help Employment.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.W7557, Feb 2000.

  • Becker, Brian and Craig Olson. “Labor Relations and Firm Performance.” In Morris Kleiner et al., ed. Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1987, pp. 43–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Unions and Firm Profits.” Industrial Relations 31 (Fall 1992): 395–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, David and Richard B. Freeman. “Unionism in the United States and Other Advanced OECD Countries.” In M. Bognanno and M. M. Kleiner, eds. Labor Market Institutions and the Future of Unions. Oxford: Blackwell Press 1992, pp. 56–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Richard and Karen Roberts. “An Analysis of Labor Standards in the United States and Canada.” Michigan State University Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations Working Paper, January 1997.

  • Bronfenbrenner, Kate. “The Role of Union Strategies in NLRB Certification Elections.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50 (January 1997): 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs. Labor Relations Consultants: Issues, Trends, and Controversies. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations. Fact-Finding Report. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor and Department of Commerce, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Report and Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor and Department of Commerce, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, William N. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Union Certification Elections.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (April 1983): 402–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Wallace N. “The Effectiveness of OSHA Penalties: A Stock Market Based Test.” Industrial Relations 33 (July 1994): 306–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, James N., Elaine Holland, and Patricia Ebener. The Legal and Economic Consequences of Wrongful Termination. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, William. “The Effect of Company Campaigns on Certification Elections: Law and Reality Once Again.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (July 1983): 560–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, Henry. “Union Success in Representation Elections: Why Does Unit Size Matter?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7229, July 1999.

  • Farber, Henry and Alan Krueger. “Union Membership in the United States: The Decline Continues.” In Bruce Kaufman and Morris Kleiner, eds. Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1993, pp. 105–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber Henry and Bruce Western. “Accounting for the Decline of Unions in the Private Sector.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Summer 2001): 459–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. “Spurts in Union Growth: Defining Moments and Social Processes.” In M. Bordo, C. Goldin, and E. White, eds. The Defining Moment. Chicago, Ill.: National Bureau of Economic Research and the University of Chicago, 1998, pp. 265–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Unionism Comes to the Public Sector.” Journal of Economic Literature 24 (March 1986): 41–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Why Are Unions Faring Poorly in NLRB Representation Elections?” In Thomas A. Kochan, ed. Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985, pp. 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and James Medoff. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. and Joel Rogers. What Workers Want. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. and Morris M. Kleiner. “Employer Behavior in the Face of Union Organizing Drives.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 (April 1990): 351–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Do Unions Make Enterprises Insolvent?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52 (July 1999): 510–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - and Cheri Ostroff. “ The Anatomy of Employee Involvement and Its Effects on Firms and Workers.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8050, December 2000.

  • Fortin Nicole and Thomas Lemieux. “Institutional Changes and Rising Wage Inequality: Is There a Linkage?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Spring 1997): 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettman, Julius, Stephen Goldberg, and Jeanne Herman. Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Robert J. “Does the 'New Economy' Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (Fall 2000): 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Winston, Richard D. Morgenstern, and Peter Nelson. “On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Esti-mates.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 (Spring 2000): 297–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, Joni. “Equal Employment Opportunity Law and Firm Profitability.” Journal of Human Resources 26 (Winter 1991): 139–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry T. “Firm Investment Behavior and Collective Bargaining Strategy.” Industrial Relations 31 (Winter 1992): 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Labor Unions and the Economic Performance of Firms. Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Edward Schumacher. “Private Sector Union Density and the Wage Premium: Past, Present, and Future.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Summer 2001): 487–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Bruce. “The Future of U.S. Private Sector Unionism: Did George Barnett Get it Right After All?” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Summer 2001): 433–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Paula E. Stephan.“ The Role of Management Attorneys in Union Organizing Campaigns.” Journal of Labor Research 16 (Fall 1995): 439–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, Morris M. “What Will It Take? Establishing the Economic Costs to Management of Noncompliance with the NLRA.” In S. Friedman, R. Hurd, R. Oswald, and R. Seeber, eds. Restoring the Promise of American Labor Law. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, 1994, pp. 137–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Unionism and Employer Discrimination: An Analysis of 8(a)(3) Violations.” Industrial Relations 23 (Spring 1984): 334–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Hwikwon Ham. “Do Industrial Relations Institutions Affect Economic Efficiency?: Inter-national and U.S. State-level Evidence.” Working Paper Presented at the Conference on “Globalization and Democracy,” University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, November, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz, and Robert B. McKersie. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, John J. Unionization and Deunionization. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaLonde, Robert J. and Bernard D. Meltzer. “Hard Times for Unions: Another Look at the Significance of Employer Illegalities.” University of Chicago Law Review 58 (Summer 1991): 953–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Jonathan. “Carrots and Sticks: Pay, Supervision, and Turnover.” Journal of Labor Economics 5 (October 1987): S136–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Unions and Employment Growth.” Industrial Relations 31 (Winter 1992): 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Martin and Terry Conrow. Confessions of a Union Buster. New York: Crown Publishers, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour and Ivan Katchanovski. “The Future of Private Sector Unions in the U.S.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Spring 2001): 229–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour and Noah Meltz, “Survey.” 1996.

  • Lott, John R., Jr. and Russell D. Roberts. “The Expected Penalty for Committing a Crime: An Analysis of Minimum Wage Violations.” Journal of Human Resources 30 (Spring 1995): 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin, Stephen. “Union Decline in Britain.” Working Paper 455, The Leverhulme Trust, April 2000.

  • McDermott, Robert. Computer-Aided Logic Design. Indianapolis: Howard W. Sams Co., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, David. “British Unions: Dissolutions or Resurgence Revisted.” In Richard Dickens, ed. The State of Working Britain. London: Centre for Economic Performance, 2001, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota AFL-CIO. Workers' Organizing Rights Commission. St. Paul, Minn.: Minnesota AFL-CIO, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Labor Relations Board. Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: NLRB, various years.

  • Perlman, Selig. A Theory of the Labor Movement. New York: Kelley, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasure, Robert and Patrica Greenfield. “Representatives of Their Own Choosing: Finding Workers' Voice in the Legitimacy and Power of their Unions.” In Bruce Kaufman and Morris Kleiner, eds. Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1993, pp. 169–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles C. The Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Albert. “The Effects of Unions on Resource Allocation.” Journal of Law and Economics 6 (October 1963): 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, W. Craig. “Unionization in Canada and the United States: A Tale of Two Countries.” In David Card and Richard Freeman, eds. Small Differences That Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 109–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Paula and Bruce Kaufman. “Factors Leading to a Decline in Union Win Rates: 1973–81.” Indus-trial Relations Research Association Proceedings. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1986, pp. 296–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskind, Ron.“Threat of Cheap Labor Abroad Complicates Decisions to Unionize.” Wall Street Journal, July 1992.

  • Taras, Daphne. “Collective Bargaining Regulation in Canada and the United States: Divergent Cultures, Divergent Outcomes.” In Bruce Kaufman, ed. Government Regulation of the Employment Relationship. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1997, pp. 295–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, John M. Vemon, and Joseph E. Harrington, Jr. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, David. “Implementing Employment Regulation: Insights on the Determinants of Regulatory Performance.” In Bruce Kaufman, ed. Government Regulation of the Employment Relationship. Madison, Wisc: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1997, pp. 429–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleiner, M.M. Intensity of management resistance: understanding the decline of unionization in the private sector. J Labor Res 22, 519–540 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-001-1019-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-001-1019-6

Keywords

Navigation