Skip to main content
Log in

Noise and Health: Review

  • Other Articles
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noise in human societies is unavoidable, but it tends to become a modern epidemic that induces various detrimental effects to several organs and functions in humans. Increased cardiovascular danger, anxiety and sleep disturbance are just few of these effects. It is noteworthy that children, even neonates and their developing organism are especially vulnerable to noise-related health problems. Noise is measured with special noise-meters. These devices express results in decibels by transforming random noise to a continuous sound. This sound is characterized by equivalent acoustic energy to the random noise for a defined time interval. Human auditory apparatus is principally endangered by acute noises but also by chronic noise exposure, in the context of both occupational and recreational activities. Various mechanisms are implicated in the pathogenesis of noise-induced hearing loss that can cause either temporary or permanent damage. Among them, emphasis is given to the impairment by free radicals and inflammatory mediators, to the activation of apoptotic molecular pathways, but also to glutamate excitotoxicity. A hidden hearing loss, synaptopathy, is attributed to the latter. The irreversible nature of hearing loss, as well as the idiosyncratic sensitivity of individuals, imposes the necessity of early diagnosis of auditory impairment by noise. Super high frequency audiograms, otoacoustic emissions and electrophysiological examinations can address diagnosis. Thankfully, there is extensive research on acoustic trauma therapeutic approaches. However, until we succeed in regenerating the sensory organ of hearing, chronic noise-induced hearing loss cannot be treated. Thus, it is fundamental that society protects people from noise, by laws and regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M (2005) The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med 48(6):446–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suvorov G, Denisov E, Antipin V et al (2001) Effects of peak levels and number of impulses to hearing among forge hammering workers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 16:816–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Parkins CW (1991) Measurement of sound. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 24(2):233–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Loudness and Pitch. In: Gelfand S, (ed) (2009) Essentials of Audiology, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, p 92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noise levels and their measurement. In: Gelfand S (ed) (2009) Essentials of Audiology, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 487–488

  6. European Environmental Agency (2002) Reported data on noise exposure covered by Directive 2002/49/EC. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-on-noise-exposure-7

  7. The cochlear amplifier. In: Gelfand S, (ed) (2009) Essentials of Audiology, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ising H, Braun C (2000) Acute and chronic endocrine effects of noise: review of the research conducted at the institute for Water. Soil Air Hygiene Noise Health 2(7):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  9. Expressing sound values in decibels. In: Gelfand S (ed) (2009) Essentials of Audiology, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 27–32

  10. Hahad O, Kröller-Schön S, Daiber A, Münzel T (2019) The Cardiovascular effects of noise. Dtsch Arztebl Int 116(14):245–250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bolm-Audorff U, Hegewald J, Pretzsch A, Freiberg A, Nienhaus A, Seidler A (2020) Occupational noise and hypertension risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(17):6281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roffwarg HP, Muzio JN, Dement WC (1966) Ontogenetic development of the human sleep-dream cycle. Science 152:604–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S (2014) Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 383(9925):1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang L, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Lan Y (2021) Relationship between chronic noise exposure, cognitive impairment, and degenerative dementia: update on the experimental and epidemiological evidence and prospects for further research. J Alzheimers Dis 79(4):1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-201037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards CG, Schwartzbaum JA, Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Feychting M (2006) Exposure to loud noise and risk of acoustic neuroma. Am J Epidemiol 163(4):327–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baliatsas C, van Kamp I, van Poll R, Yzermans J (2016) Health effects from low-frequency noise and infrasound in the general population: is it time to listen? a systematic review of observational studies. Sci Total Environ 1(557–558):163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart CE, Holt AG, Altschuler RA, Cacace AT, Hall CD, Murnane OD, King WM, Akin FW (2020) Effects of Noise Exposure on the Vestibular System: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol 25(11):593919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang YP, Hsu WC, Young YH (2006) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in acute acoustic trauma. Otol Neurotol 27:956–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ando Y, Hattori H (1977) Effects of noise on human placental lactogen (HPL) levels in maternal plasma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84(2):115–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wachman EM, Lahav A (2011) The effects of noise on preterm infants in the NICU. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 96(4):F305–F309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klatte M, Bergström K, Lachmann T (2013) Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front Psychol 30(4):578

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lamotte AS, Essadek A, Shadili G, Perez JM, Raft J (2021) The impact of classroom chatter noise on comprehension: a systematic review. Percept Mot Skills 128(3):1275–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Effects of noise and room acoustics. In: Gelfand S (ed) (2009) Essentials of Audiology, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 459–460

  24. Van Reenen C, Karusseit C (2017) Classroom acoustics as a consideration for inclusive education in South Africa. S Afr J Commun Disord 64(1):e1–e10

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stansfeld S, Clark C (2015) Health effects of noise exposure in children. Curr Environ Health Rep 2(2):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan KH, Jensen EL, Gao D (2018) Pediatric tinnitus: A clinical perspective. Laryngoscope 128(3):727–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts B, Neitzel RL (2019) Noise exposure limit for children in recreational settings: review of available evidence. J Acoust Soc Am 146(5):3922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurabi A, Keithley EM, Housley GD, Ryan AF, Wong AC (2017) Cellular mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 349:129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liberman MC (2016) Noise-induced hearing loss: permanent versus temporary threshold shifts and the effects of hair cell versus neuronal degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol 16(875):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  30. Parker WAE, Parker VL, Parker G, Parker AJ (2020) Acoustic shock: an update review. J Laryngol Otol 2:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  31. Londero A, Charpentier N, Ponsot D, Fournier P, Pezard L, Norena AJ (2017) A case of acoustic shock with post-trauma trigeminal-autonomic activation. Front Neurol 16:420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pierson LL, Gerhardt KJ, Rodriguez GP, Yanke RB (1994) Relationship between outer ear resonance and permanent noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 15:37–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. May JJ, Marvel M, Regan M et al (1990) Noise-induced hearing loss in randomly selected New York dairy farmers. Am J Ind Med 18:333–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McFadden D (1993) A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 68:143–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson DW, Sherman RE (1979) Normal development and ear effect for contralateral acoustic reflex in children six to twelve years old. Dev Med Child Neurol 21:572–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Brask T (1979) The noise protection effect of the stapedius reflex. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 360:116–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J (2018) Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 60(9):e498–e501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Themann CL, Masterson EA (2019) Occupational noise exposure: a review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. J Acoust Soc Am 146(5):3879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Occupational Health and Safety Administration (1983) 1910.95 CFR occupational noise exposure: hearing conservation amendment (final rule). Fed Reg. 1983;48:9738–9785. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/laws-regs/federalregister/1983-03-08.pdf

  40. Le Prell CG, Hammill TL, Murphy WJ (2019) Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials. J Acoust Soc A 146(5):4051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Quirk WS, Seidman MD (1995) Cochlear vascular changes in response to loud noise. Am J Otol 16(3):322–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Housley GD, Morton-Jones R, Vlajkovic SM, Telang RS et al (2013) ATP-gated ion channels mediate adaptation to elevated sound levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:7494–7499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao Y, Yamoah EN, Gillespie PG (1996) Regeneration of broken tip links and restoration of mechanical transduction in hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(26):15469–15474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nordmann AS, Bohne BA, Harding GW (2000) Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 139:13–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zheng G (2012) Hu BH (2012) Cell-cell junctions: a target of acoustic overstimulation in the sensory epithelium of the cochlea. BMC Neurosci 19(13):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fujioka M, Kanzaki S, Okano HJ et al (2006) Proinflammatory cytokines expression in noise-induced damaged cochlea. J Neurosci Res 83(4):575–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fuentes-Santamaría V, Alvarado JC, Melgar-Rojas P, Gabaldón-Ull MC, Miller JM, Juiz JM (2017) The role of glia in the peripheral and central auditory system following noise overexposure: contribution of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta to the pathogenesis of hearing loss. Front Neuroanat 23(11):9

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yang WP, Henderson D, Hu BH, Nicotera TM (2004) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic and necrotic outer hair cells after exposure to different levels of continuous noise. Hear Res 196:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamane H, Nakai Y, Takayama M, Iguchi H, Nakagawa T, Kojima A (1995) Appearance of free radicals in the guinea pig inner ear after noise-induced acoustic trauma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 252:504–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu YM, Li XD, Guo X, Liu B, Lin AH, Rao SQ (2010) Association between polymorphisms in SOD1 and noise-induced hearing loss in Chinese workers. Acta Otolaryngol 130:477–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29(45):14077–14085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Liberman MC, Kujawa SG (2017) Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: manifestations and mechanisms. Hear Res 349:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Furman A (2013) Kujawa S and Liberman C (2013) Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J Neurophysiol 110:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Furness DN, Lawton DM (2003) Comparative distribution of glutamate transporters and receptors in relation to afferent innervation density in the mammalian cochlea. J Neurosci 23:11296–11304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu W, Edin F, Atturo F, Rieger G, Lowenheim H, Senn P, Blumer M, Schrott-Fischer A, Rask Andersen H, Glueckert R (2015) The pre- and post-somatic segments of the human type I spiral ganglion neurons-structural and functional considerations related to cochlear implantation. Neuroscience 284:470–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fernandez KA, Guo D, Micucci S, De Gruttola V, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG (2020) Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy with and without sensory cell loss. Neuroscience 10(427):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Riga M, Korres G, Balatsouras D, Korres S (2010) Screening protocols for the prevention of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: the role of conventional and extended high frequency audiometry may vary according to the years of employment. Med Sci Monit 16(7):CR352–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Job A, Raynal M, Kossowski M et al (2009) Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Hear Res 251:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Abdala C, Visser-Dumont L (2001) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: a tool for hearing assessment and scientific study. Volta Rev 103(4):281–302

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kobel M, Le Prell CG, Liu J et al (2017) Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy: past findings and future studies. Hear Res 349:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sergeyenko Y, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG (2013) Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. J Neurosci 33:13686–13694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Daniel E (2007) Noise and hearing loss: a review. J Sch Health 77(5):225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Themann CL, Suter AH, Stephenson MR (2013) National research agenda for the prevention of occupational hearing loss—Part 1. Sem Hear 34(3):145–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Cederroth CR, Park JS, Basinou V, Weger BD, Tserga E, Sarlus H, Magnusson AK, Kadri N, Gachon F, Canlon B (2019) Circadian regulation of cochlear sensitivity to noise by circulating glucocorticoids. Curr Biol 29(15):2477–2487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Zheng XY et al (1997) The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss. HearRes 104(1–2):191–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Flamme GA, Deiters KK, Tasko SM, Ahroon WA (2017) Acoustic reflexes are common but not pervasive: evidence from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999–2012. Int J Audiol 56(sup1):52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Nadol JB Jr (1988) Innervation densities of inner and outer hair cells of the human organ of Corti. Evidence for auditory neural degeneration in a case of Usher’s syndrome. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 50(6):363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sliwinska-Kowalska M (2011) Contribution of genetic factors to noise induced hearing loss. In Proceedings of 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, July 24–28, London, pp. 1130–1135

  69. OSHA (2002). Standard 1904.10(a) – Recording Criteria for Cases Involving Occupational Hearing Loss, https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table¼STANDARDS&p_id¼10099

  70. Parliament, E.; Ocial Journal of the European Union. Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003: On the Minimum Health and Safety Requirements Regarding the Exposure of Workers to the Risks Arising from Physical Agents (Noise). Ocial Journal of the European Union. 2003. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/82 (accessed on 19 June 2020)

  71. Ward WD, Santi PA, Duvall AJ 3rd, Turner CW (1981) Total energy and critical intensity concepts in noise damage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 90:584–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Omichi R, Shibata SB, Morton CC, Smith RJH (2019) Gene therapy for hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet 28(R1):R65–R79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Effects of noise and hearing conservation. In: Gelfand S (ed) (2009) Essentials of audiology, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 512–517

  74. Liu H, Liu S, Shkel AA, Kim ES (2020) Active noise cancellation with MEMS resonant microphone array. J Microelectromech Syst 29(5):839–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2019) Translating animal models to human therapeutics in noise-induced and age-related hearing loss. Hear Res 377:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Cheng PW, Liu SH, Young YH, Hsu CJ, Lin-Shiau SY (2008) Protection from noise-induced temporary threshold shift by D-methionine is associated with preservation of ATPase activities. Ear Hear 29:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Lindblad AC, Rosenhall U, Olofsson A, Hagerman B (2011) The efficacy of N acetylcysteine to protect the human cochlea from subclinical hearing loss caused by impulse noise: a controlled trial. Noise Health 13:392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Le Prell CG, Hughes LF, Miller JM (2007) Free radical scavengers vitamins A, C, and E plus magnesium reduce noise trauma. Free Radic Biol Med 42:1454–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Suzuki J, Corfas G, Liberman MC (2016) Round-window delivery of neurotrophin 3 regenerates cochlear synapses after acoustic overexposure. Sci Rep 25(6):24907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Han MA, Back SA, Kim HL et al (2015) Therapeutic effect of dexamethasone for noise-induced hearing loss: systemic versus intratympanic injection in mice. Otol Neurotol 36(5):755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Pirvola U, Xing-Qun L, Virkkala J et al (2000) Rescue of hearing, auditory hair cells, and neurons by CEP- 1347/KT7515, an inhibitor of JNK activation. J Neurosci 20:43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Duan M, Agerman K, Ernfors P, Canlon B (2000) Complementary roles of neurotrophin 3 and a N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in the protection of noise and aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:7597–7602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Attias J, Weisz G, Almog S et al (1994) Oral magnesium intake reduces permanent hearing loss induced by noise exposure. Am J Otolaryngol 15:26–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Meltser I, Tahera Y, Simpson E, Hultcrantz M, Charitidi K, Gustafsson JA, Canlon B (2008) Estrogen receptor beta protects against acoustic trauma in mice. J Clin Invest 118(4):1563–1570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhao J, Sun J, Liu Y (2012) Effects of carbogen on cochlear blood flow and hearing function following acute acoustic trauma in guinea pigs. Arch Med Res 43(7):530–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Bayoumy AB, van der Veen EL, van Ooij PAM, Besseling-Hansen FS, Koch DAA, Stegeman I, de Ru JA (2020) Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and corticosteroid therapy in military personnel with acute acoustic trauma. BMJ Mil Health 166(4):243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Goulioumis Anastasios and Athanasopoulos Ioannis had the idea for the article. Goulioumis Anastasios,Gkorpa Magioula and Kourelis Konstantinos performed the literature search and data analysis. Goulioumis Anastasios drafted the work and Goulioumis Anastasios and Athanasopoulos Ioannis revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goulioumis Anastasios.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anastasios, G., Magioula, G., Konstantinos, K. et al. Noise and Health: Review. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 3), 5482–5491 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02797-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02797-1

Keywords

Navigation