Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical analysis head–neck injuries against mine falls using a simplified human model

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fall-related mine fatalities remain one of the most critical threats to the miner’s safety. Recent statistics suggest significant severe injuries from ground falls during mining operations, with head and neck being typically injured organs. The effectiveness of the existing miner’s helmet in protection against ground falls is not known. In this work, we investigate the biomechanical response of the head and neck against the roof falls with and without the helmet. Towards this end, a simplified human finite element model is built. The model response is compared against the relevant experimental data, and the agreement between experiment and model predictions is reasonable. The model is subjected to roof fall with roof velocities of 1, 3, and 6 m/s, and the biomechanical response of the brain and neck is studied. Various helmet configurations consisting of hard and soft layers have been investigated. Our results suggest that existing helmets reduce the strains and stresses in the brain by upto ~59%. On the contrary, the neck forces and moments have increased with helmets by upto ~86%. This is due to the increase in mass of the system due to the addition of the helmet. We also observe that even though stresses in the brain have been reduced with the helmet, the reduction offered by the helmet may not be sufficient to prevent mild TBI. Overall, our results suggest that the role of the miner’s helmet in mitigating ground fall-related head and neck injuries should be critically analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pappas D and Mark C 2012 Roof and rib fall incident trends: a 10-year profile. Trans. Soc. Min. Metall. Explor. 330: 462–478

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haque N, Hughes A, Lim S and Vernon C 2014 Rare earth elements: overview of mining, mineralogy, uses, sustainability and environmental impact. Resources 3(4): 614–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang X, Zhang G, Pan A, Chen F and Zheng C 2016 Protecting the environment and public health from rare earth mining. Earth’s Future 4(11): 532–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L 2014 Towards sustainable rare earth mining: a study of occupational & community health issues. University of British Columbia

  5. Holland M 2020 Reducing the health risks of the copper, rare earth and cobalt industries: Transition to a circular low-carbon economy

  6. Froude M J and Petley D N 2018 Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 18(8): 2161–2181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohler J L 2015 Looking ahead to significant improvements in mining safety and health through innovative research and effective diffusion into the industry. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 25(3): 325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pokhrel L R and Dubey B 2013 Global scenarios of metal mining, environmental repercussions, public policies, and sustainability: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(21): 2352–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris J, Kirsch P, Shi M, Li J, Gagrani A, Krishna E, Tabish A, Arora D, Kothandaraman K and Cliff D 2014 Comparative analysis of coal fatalities in Australia, South Africa, India, China and USA, 2006–2010. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Coal Operators’ Conference, University of Wollongong

  10. Rehman A U, Emad M Z, Khan M U, Saleem M A and Saki S A 2021 Investigation and analysis of fatal accidents reporting practices in the Punjab province of Pakistan and remedial measures. Resour. Policy 73: 102186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farrenkopf M 2019 Accidents and mining: The problem of the risk of explosion in industrial coal mining in global perspective. In: Making Sense of Mining History, Routledge, pp. 193-211

  12. Zhang J, Fu J, Hao H, Fu G, Nie F and Zhang W 2020 Root causes of coal mine accidents: Characteristics of safety culture deficiencies based on accident statistics. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 136: 78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Directorate general of mines safety-Ministry of Labour & Employment-Government of India 2015 Statistics of mines in India Volume-I (Coal). New Delhi, India

  14. West Virginia Office of Miners' Health-Safety and Training, 2017, Report of fatal Investigation: Roof fall. Charleston, WV

  15. Lee K 1998 Biomechanical Response of the Human Body Inside a Military Vehicle Exposed to Mine Explosion. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nilakantan G and Tabiei A 2009 Computational assessment of occupant injury caused by mine blasts underneath infantry vehicles. Int. J. Veh. Struct. Syst. 1(1–3): 50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gayzik F S, Moreno D P, Geer C P, Wuertzer S D, Martin R S and Stitzel J D 2011 Development of a full body CAD dataset for computational modeling: a multi-modality approach. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39(10): 2568–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganpule S, Gu L, Alai A and Chandra N 2012 Role of helmet in the mechanics of shock wave propagation under blast loading conditions. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 15(11): 1233–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao H, Zhang L, Jiang B, Genthikatti V V, Jin X, Zhu F, Makwana R, Gill A, Jandir G and Singh A 2013 Development of a finite element human head model partially validated with thirty five experimental cases. J. Biomech. Eng. 135(11): 111002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foster J K, Kortge J O and Wolanin M J 1977 Hybrid III—a biomechanically-based crash test dummy. SAE Trans. 86: 3268–3283

  21. Nightingale R W, McElhaney J H, Camacho D L, Kleinberger M, Winkelstein B A and Myers B S 1997 The dynamic responses of the cervical spine: buckling, end conditions, and tolerance in compressive impacts. SAE Trans. 106: 3968–3988

  22. Gholampour S, Hajirayat K, Erfanian A, Zali A R and Shakouri E 2017 Investigating the role of helmet layers in reducing the stress applied during head injury using FEM. Int. Clin. Neurosci. J. 4(1): 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.safety-helmet.com/safetyhelmet/mining-helmet.html. Accessed September 2021

  24. http://www.concordhelmet.com/mining-industrial-helmets.html. Accessed September 2021

  25. Fung Y-C 2013 Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moss W C, King M J and Blackman E G 2009 Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(10): 108702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ganpule S, Daphalapurkar N P, Ramesh K T, Knutsen A K, Pham D L, Bayly P V and Prince J L 2017 A three-dimensional computational human head model that captures live human brain dynamics. J. Neurotrauma 34(13): 2154–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Giordano C and Kleiven S 2014 Evaluation of axonal strain as a predictor for mild traumatic brain injuries using finite element modeling. Stapp Car Crash J. 58: 29

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ji S, Zhao W, Ford J C, Beckwith J G, Bolander R P, Greenwald R M, Flashman L A, Paulsen K D and McAllister T W 2015 Group-wise evaluation and comparison of white matter fiber strain and maximum principal strain in sports-related concussion. J. Neurotrauma 32(7): 441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwartz D, Guleyupoglu B, Koya B, Stitzel J D and Gayzik F S 2015 Development of a computationally efficient full human body finite element model. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(sup1): S49–S56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Myers B S and Nightingale R W The dynamics of head and neck impact. In: Proceedings of the 1997 international IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impact, Hanover

  32. Singh A, Ganpule S G, Khan M K and Iqbal M A 2021 Measurement of brain simulant strains in head surrogate under impact loading. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 20(6): 2319–2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blaber J, Adair B and Antoniou A 2015 Ncorr: open-source 2D digital image correlation matlab software. Exp. Mech. 55(6): 1105–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nightingale R W, McElhaney J H, Richardson W J and Myers B S 1996 Dynamic responses of the head and cervical spine to axial impact loading. J. Biomech. 29(3): 307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Camacho D L, Nightingale R W and Myers B S 2001 The influence of surface padding properties on head and neck injury risk. J. Biomech. Eng. 123(5): 432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen W, Hao H, Hughes D, Shi Y, Cui J and Li Z-X 2015 Static and dynamic mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene. Mater. Design 69: 170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pant D C and Pal S 2019 Phase transformation and energy dissipation of porous shape memory alloy structure under blast loading. Mech. Mater. 132: 31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jadischke R, Viano D C, McCarthy J and King A I 2016 The effects of helmet weight on hybrid III head and neck responses by comparing unhelmeted and helmeted impacts. J. Biomech. Eng., 138(10): 101008

  39. Collins C L, Fletcher E N, Fields S K, Kluchurosky L, Rohrkemper M K, Comstock R D and Cantu R C 2014 Neck strength: a protective factor reducing risk for concussion in high school sports. J. Prim. Prev. 35(5): 309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu B C, Ivers R, Norton R, Boufous S, Blows S and Lo S K 2008 Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (1)

  41. Peter K and Krantz G 1985 Head and neck injuries to motorcycle and moped riders—with special regard to the effect of protective helmets. Injury 16(4): 253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Uhrenholt L, Thomsen C K, Hansen K, Boel L W T and Freeman M D 2020 Relationship between head and neck injuries and helmet use in fatal motorcycle and moped crashes in Denmark. Scand. J. Forensic Sci. 26(1): 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kasantikul V, Ouellet J V and Smith T 2003 Head and neck injuries in fatal motorcycle collisions as determined by detailed autopsy. Traffic Inj. Prev. 4(3): 255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldstein J P 1986 The effect of motorcycle helmet use on the probability of fatality and the severity of head and neck injuries: a latent variable framework. Eval. Rev. 10(3): 355–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ooi S, Wong S, Yeap J and Umar R 2011 Relationship between cervical spine injury and helmet use in motorcycle road crashes. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 23(4): 608–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lam C, Wiratama B S, Chang W-H, Chen P-L, Chiu W-T, Saleh W and Pai C-W 2020 Effect of motorcycle helmet types on head injuries: evidence from eight level-I trauma centres in Taiwan. BMC Public Health 20(1): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sarkar S, Peek C and Kraus J F 1995 Fatal injuries in motorcycle riders according to helmet use. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 38(2): 242–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Khor D, Inaba K, Aiolfi A, Delapena S, Benjamin E, Matsushima K, Strumwasser A M and Demetriades D 2017 The impact of helmet use on outcomes after a motorcycle crash. Injury 48(5): 1093–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rice T M, Troszak L, Ouellet J V, Erhardt T, Smith G S and Tsai B-W 2016 Motorcycle helmet use and the risk of head, neck, and fatal injury: Revisiting the Hurt Study. Accident Anal. Prev. 91: 200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yuan W, Diekfuss J A, Barber Foss K D, Dudley J, Leach J, Narad M E, DiCesare C A, Bonnette S, Epstein J and Logan K 2021 High school sports-related concussion and the effect of a jugular vein compression collar: a prospective longitudinal investigation of neuroimaging and neurofunctional outcomes. J. Neurotrauma(ja) 38: 2811–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mannix R, Morriss N J, Conley G M, Meehan W P III, Nedder A, Qiu J, Float J, DiCesare C A and Myer G D 2020 Internal jugular vein compression collar mitigates histopathological alterations after closed head rotational head impact in swine: A pilot study. Neuroscience 437: 132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yuan W, Leach J, Maloney T, Altaye M, Smith D, Gubanich P J, Barber Foss K D, Thomas S, DiCesare C A and Kiefer A W 2017 Neck collar with mild jugular vein compression ameliorates brain activation changes during a working memory task after a season of high school football. J. Neurotrauma 34(16): 2432–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bain A C and Meaney D F 2000 Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 122(6): 615–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang L, Yang K H and King A I 2004 A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 126(2): 226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Bingner R L, Harmel R D and Veith T L 2007 Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50(3): 885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

SG acknowledges financial support from the Department of Science and Technology (DST) under the Grant ECR-2017-000417.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shailesh Ganpule.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1700 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garg, R., Gu, L. & Ganpule, S. Biomechanical analysis head–neck injuries against mine falls using a simplified human model. Sādhanā 47, 266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02028-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02028-5

Keywords

Navigation