Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of SCR injection system parameters on UWS atomization and mixing characteristics at low exhaust temperature

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several models involving spray atomization, wall impingement, evaporation and urea pyrolysis were built through a commercial code to study the influence of parameters of Urea Selective Catalytic Reduction (Urea –SCR) injection system on critical performances at low exhaust temperatures. The spray development, NH3 concentration distribution and wall film thickness have been studied. Results suggest that the wall impingement of the Urea Water Solution (UWS) is more at the temperature of 180°C than at 430°C. Lower temperatures tend to hinder evaporation and pyrolysis. NH3 concentration is uneven at low temperatures and the fuel film generated on the wall is also incomplete. Low temperatures could help injection system with a tilting nozzle raise its injection pressure and accelerate the evaporation and pyrolysis of the droplets. The distribution of spray impingement, however, is narrower and the fuel film thickness on the wall is increased. Smaller injection angle made it easier to expel gas stream and the droplets would then follow the direction of the gas stream. The droplets distribution is therefore more uniform and the spray wall-impingement reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koebel M, Elsener M and Kleemann M 2000 Urea-SCR: A Promising Technique to Reduce NOX Emissions from Automotive Diesel Engines. Catalysis Today 59(3): 335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Han J, Kim E, Lee T, Kim J, Ahn N and Han HS 2011 Urea-SCR Catalysts with Improved Low Temperature Activity. SAE Technical Paper:1315-1321

  3. Johnson T V 2000 Vehicular Emissions in Review. SAE International Journal of Engines 7(3): 1207–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong H, Shuai S and Wang J 2008 Effect of Urea Thermal Decomposition on Diesel NOx-SCR Aftertreatment Systems. SAE Technical Paper:1544

  5. Shi X, Deng J and Wu Z 2013 Effect of Injection Parameter on Spray Characteristics of Urea-SCR System. SAE International Journal of Engines 6(2): 873–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong S J, Lee S J, Kim W S and Lee C B 2005 Simulation on the Optimum Shape and Location of Urea Injector for Urea-SCR System of Heavy-duty Diesel Engine to Prevent NH3 Slip. Powertrain & Fluid Systems Conference:1824-1828

  7. Hua L, Zhao Y G, Hu J, Tao T and Shuai S J 2012 Comparison Between Air-Assisted and Airless Urea Spray for Diesel SCR System by PDA and CFD. SAE Technical Paper:1081

  8. Kawauchi S and Takagi M 2011 Study of Spray Distribution and Evaporation and Thermolysis Process of Reductant in Urea SCR. Journal of the Marine Engineering Society in Japan 46(4): 620–625

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang T J, Baek S W, Lee S Y and Kang D H 2009 Experimental Investigation on Evaporation of Urea-Water-Solution Droplet for SCR Applications. AIChE Journal 55(12): 3267–3276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grout S, Blaisot J B, Pajot K and Osbat G 2013 Experimental Investigation on the Injection of a Urea-Water Solution in Hot Air Stream for the SCR Application: Evaporation and Spray/Wall Interaction. Fuel 106(11): 166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucio P, Gabriele B, Carmine U, Mark M and Francesco B 2015 A Methodology to Investigate the Behaviour of Urea-Water Sprays in High Temperature Air Flow for SCR De-NOx Applications. Fuel 150: 548–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapilan N, Nayak N S, Hindasageri V P and Sadashiva S 2017 An Experimental and Numerical Study on Effects of Exhaust Gas Temperature and Flow Rate on Deposit Formation in Urea-Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) System of Modern Automobiles. Applied Thermal Engineering 111: 1211–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee C 2018 Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Evaporation and Mixture Uniformity of Urea-Water Solution in Selective Catalytic Reduction System. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 60: 210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oh J and Lee K 2014 Spray Characteristics of a Urea Solution Injector and Optimal Mixer Location to Improve Droplet Uniformity and NOX Conversion Efficiency for Selective Catalytic Reduction. Fuel 119: 90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tutuianu M,Bonnel P, Haniu T, Pavlovic J and Ichikawa N 2015 Development of the World-wide harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC) and a possible pathway for its introduction in the European legislation. Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment:61-75

  16. Weltens H, Bressler H, Terres F Neumaier H and Rammoser D 1993 Optimization of catalytic converter gas flow distribution by CFD prediction. SAE Technical Paper:930780

  17. Fischer S, Bitto R, Lauer T, Kreen C and Pessl G 2012 Impact of the Turbulence Model and Numerical Approach on the Prediction of the Ammonia Homogenization in an Automotive SCR System. SAE International Journal of Engines 5(3): 1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Durbin P A 1991 Near-wall turbulence closure modelling without “damping functions.” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 3: 1–13

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yue P, Feng J J, Liu C and Shen J 2004 A Diffuse-interface Method for Simulating Two-phase Flows of Complex Fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 515: 293–317

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Huethorst J A M and Marra J 1991 Motion of Marangoni-contracted Water Drops across Inclined Hydrophilic Surfaces. Langmuir 7: 2756–2763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huh K Y and Gosman A D 1991 A Phenomenological Model of Diesel Spray Atomization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiphase Flows:24-27

  22. Birkhold F 2007 Selektive katalytische reduktion von stickoxiden in kraftfahrzeugen: Untersuchung der einspritzung von harnstoffwasserlösung. Shaker:20-23

  23. Millington R J and Quirk J M 1961 Permeability of Porous Solids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 57: 1200–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Birkhold F 2007 Selektive katalytische reduktion von stickoxiden in kraftfahrzeugen: Untersuchung der einspritzung von harnstoffwasserlösung. Shaker:50-59

  25. Birkhold F, Meingast U, Wassermann P and Deutschmann O 2006 Analysis of the Injection of Urea-water-solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-Systems: Modeling of Two-phase Flow and Spray/Wall0Interaction. SAE Technical Paper:0643

  26. Birkhold F, Meingast U, Wassermann P and Deutschmann O 2007 Modeling and simulation of the injection of urea-water-solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-systems. Applied Catalyst B Environmental 70: 119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Rourke P J and Amsden A A 2000 A Spray/Wall Interaction Submodel for the KIVA-3 Wall Film Model. SAE Technical Paper:0271

  28. Kalb T 2001 Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum benachbarten Tropfenaufprall auf feste Wände. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology:36-49

  29. Kaviani M 1991 Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media. Mechanical Engineering Series:25-34

  30. VDI-Wärmeatlas 1994 Berechnungsblätter für den Wärmeübergang. Siebte, erweiterte Auflage, VDI-Verlag:89-93

  31. Spray Module 2014 AVL documentation. AVL FIRE:236-248

  32. Li X, Qin Y, Jing W, Tong J, Lewen Zhan Z, Zheng J and Chen T 2016 Effects of Wall Temperature and Oil Film on the Process of a Gasoline Spray After Wall Impingement. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology) 49(11): 1196–1202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201166]; The Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PAPD]; The Transformation Foundation of scientific and technological achievements in Jiangsu Province [BA2016096].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hekun Jia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, H., Zhou, Z., Yin, B. et al. Effects of SCR injection system parameters on UWS atomization and mixing characteristics at low exhaust temperature. Sādhanā 46, 238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01745-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01745-7

Keywords

Navigation