Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Dietary Factors on the Relief of Bowel Dysfunction Among Patients with Rectal Cancer After the Sphincter-Saving Surgery—A Prospective Cohort Study

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims at exploring the impact of dietary intake on the relief of bowel dysfunction among patients with rectal cancer after the sphincter-saving surgery.

Methods

A prospective cohort design was used. A total of 299 patients were followed up at a tertiary hospital in East China between April 2020 and July 2021. Postoperative food intake was assessed with a food frequency questionnaire, and bowel dysfunction was assessed with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s bowel function scale. The generalized estimating equation and the generalized additive mixed model were used to analyze the collected data.

Results

The average daily intake of livestock and poultry meats and dairy products during the first 6 months after sphincter-saving surgery was significantly associated with the relief of bowel dysfunction. Bowel dysfunction was relieved most quickly among patients who consumed 40.81 to 59.1 g/d of livestock and poultry meat during the first 3 months after surgery. Bowel dysfunction improved more slowly during the first 6 months after surgery among patients who consumed greater than 107.11 g/d dairy products than among patients who consumed 0 g/d dairy products.

Conclusion

The impact of dietary factors on bowel dysfunction observed in this study added to the limited evidence about the specific effects of consuming foods and nutrients on defecation dysfunction, and these results provided a theoretical basis for the use of dietary modification programs aimed at relieving bowel dysfunction as soon as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the protection of patients’ privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerommataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA-A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou LG, et al. International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(3):300–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Croese AD, Lonie JM, Trollope AF, Vangaveti VN, Ho YH. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome and systematic review of risk factors. Int J Surg. 2018;56:234–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(10):1377–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen TYT, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, Kranenbarg EMK, Laurberg S, et al. Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14(2):106–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pappou EP, Temple LK, Patil S, et al. Quality of life and function after rectal cancer surgery with and without sphincter preservation. Front Oncol. 2020;12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.944843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Landers M, McCarthy G, Savage E. Bowel symptom experiences and management following sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: a qualitative perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(3):293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2011.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikoletti S, Young J, Levitt M, et al. Bowel problems, self-care practices, and information needs of colorectal cancer survivors at 6 to 24 months after sphincter-saving surgery. Cancer Nurs. 2008;31(5):389–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000305759.043571b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor C, Bradshaw E. Holistic assessment of anterior resection syndrome. Gastrointest Nurs. 2015;13(3):18–24. https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2015.13.3.18.

  10. Landers M, Savage E, McCarthy G, et al. Self-care strategies for the management of bowel symptoms following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(6):e105–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landers M, McCarthy G, Livingstone V, Savage E. Patients’ bowel symptom experiences and self-care strategies following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(15–16):2343–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun V, Grant M, Wendel CS, et al. Dietary and behavioral adjustments to manage bowel dysfunction after surgery in long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4317–24. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4731-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bour MJ, Beijer S, Winkels RM, et al. Dietary changes and dietary supplement use, and underlying motives for these habits reported by colorectal cancer survivors of the Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-Term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(2):286–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515001798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yin LS, Fan L, Tan RF, et al. Bowel symptoms and self-care strategies of survivors in the process of restoration after low anterior resection of rectal cancer. BMC Surg. 2018;18(35):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0368-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(7):1353–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0942-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao-ting HOU, Dong PANG, Qian LU, et al. Reliability and validity of the MSKCC bowel function instrument in a sample of Chinese rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery. Chin J Nurs. 2014;49(12):1453.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Niu JX.Diet quality and associated factors among patients with coronary heart disease. Dissertation, Peking Union Medical College; 2008.

  18. Lai XB, Wong FKY, Ching SSY. Review of bowel dysfunction of rectal cancer patients during the first five years after sphincter-preserving surgery: a population in need of nursing attention. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(5):681–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2013.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pi YN. Anorectal function and its influencing factors in patients with middle and low rectal cancer before and after surgery-a prospective study. Dissertation, Peking Union Medical College, 2014.

  20. Pu Y. Retrospective analysis and prospective cohort study of low anterior excision syndrome after anus preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dissertation, Third Military Medical University, 2017.

  21. Hansen JL, Bliss DZ, Peden-McAlpine C. Diet strategies used by women to manage fecal incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006;33(1):52–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00152192-200601000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Croswell EM, Bliss DZ, Savik K. Diet and eating pattern modifications used by community-living adults to manage their fecal incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010;37(6):677–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181feb017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lauti M, Scott D, Thompson-Fawcett MW. Fibre supplementation in addition to loperamide for faecal incontinence in adults: a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:553–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Howlett JF, Betteridge VA, Champ M, et al. The definition of dietary fiber—discussions at the ninth vahouny fibers symposium: building scientific agreement. Food Nutri Res. 2013;54(1):105–10. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v54i0.5750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The statistical methods were conducted under the help of two statisticians. One was Dr. Gao Jian from Zhongshan Hospital and another on was Dr. Luo Jian Feng from Fudan University.

Funding

Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences,22HGXKTD006,FuXin Nursing Foundation of University,FNF201921.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LW was mainly in charge of the conceptualization, data curation, and writing—original draft preparation parts. XHO was responsible for the conceptualization and methodology and writing—original draft preparation parts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai Ou Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study protocol was established according to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Institutional Review Boards of Nursing School of University (approval no. #TYSQ2019-6–01), and all patients had provided informed consent in this study.

Consent for Publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 1, 2, and 3.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Xia, H.O. The Impact of Dietary Factors on the Relief of Bowel Dysfunction Among Patients with Rectal Cancer After the Sphincter-Saving Surgery—A Prospective Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Canc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-023-00997-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-023-00997-2

Keywords

Navigation