Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comment on “Can Quantitative Pupillometry be used to Screen for Elevated Intracranial Pressure? A Retrospective Cohort Study”

  • Letters to the editor
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Response to Letter To The Editor to this article was published on 27 June 2022

The Original work to this article was published on 23 May 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Pansell J, Hack R, Rudberg P, Bell M, Cooray C. Can quantitative pupillometry be used to screen for elevated intracranial pressure? A retrospective cohort study. Neurocrit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01518-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Begg CB. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 1987;6(4):411–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alberg AJ, Park JW, Hager BW, Brock MV, Diener-West M. The use of “overall accuracy” to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 Pt 1):460–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30091.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bours MJ. Bayes’ rule in diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;131:158–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No source of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Maas: conception of the letter, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the letter. Naidech: interpretation of data, editing/revising the letter for content. Batra: interpretation of data, editing/revising the letter for content. Chou: interpretation of data, editing/revising the letter for content. Bleck: interpretation of data, editing/revising the letter for content. All authors provided final approval for publication and agree to be accountable for the contents.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew B. Maas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maas, M.B., Naidech, A.M., Batra, A. et al. Comment on “Can Quantitative Pupillometry be used to Screen for Elevated Intracranial Pressure? A Retrospective Cohort Study”. Neurocrit Care 37, 597–598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01549-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01549-5

Navigation