Abstract
Background
Unenhanced low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (CT KUB) is the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality in the assessment of suspected renal colic. As the radiation dose is not negligible, it is important to monitor the diagnostic yield of CT KUBs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CT KUB studies performed for suspected renal colic in patients presenting to the emergency department.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of 500 patients who underwent CT KUB for suspected renal colic over a seven month period from June 2019 to January 2020. Clinical information and imaging was reviewed for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Forty-nine percent of patients in the series were female (248/500) and the mean age was 45. The positivity rate for obstructing ureteral calculus was 34% (169/500). Concerningly, there was a significantly lower positivity rate in females compared to males (19% versus 48%; p < 0.0001) which raises the issue of unnecessary radiation exposure to this cohort. In the 200 female patients who were negative for obstructing urolithiasis, the mean age was 43. Females also had a significantly higher rate of negative CT KUB (62% versus 37%; p < 0.0001) where no underlying alternative pathology was diagnosed.
Conclusions
Women are less likely than men to have obstructing urolithiasis on CT KUB for suspected renal colic. This difference is not accounted for by a higher rate of alternative diagnoses among female patients. The findings of this study should prompt clinicians to exercise caution when considering this imaging modality in this patient cohort.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available upon request to the lead author.
Abbreviations
- CT KUB:
-
Computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder
- PACS:
-
National picture archiving and communication system
- mSv:
-
Millisieverts
References
Li JK, Teoh JY, Ng CF (2019) Updates in endourological management of urolithiasis. Int J Urol 26(2):172–183
Sorokin I et al (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35(9):1301–1320
Corbo J, Wang J (2019) Kidney and Ureteral Stones. Emerg Med Clin North Am 37(4):637–648
Ray AA et al (2010) Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology 76(2):295–300
Luyckx F (2015) Who wants to go further has to know the past: A comment upon: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis-R. Smith-Bindman et al. N Engl J Med 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1100–1110. World J Urol 33(10):1371–2
Urology EAO (2020) Urolithiasis Guidelines. Accessed Dec 2021
Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int J Urol 10(6):287–292
Dalrymple NC et al (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159(3):735–740
Chowdhury FU et al (2007) Unenhanced multidetector CT (CT KUB) in the initial imaging of suspected acute renal colic: evaluating a new service. Clin Radiol 62(10):970–977
Spielmann AL et al (2002) Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(5):1058–1062
Weinrich JM et al (2018) Low-Dose CT for Evaluation of Suspected Urolithiasis: Diagnostic Yield for Assessment of Alternative Diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(3):557–563
Mahadevappa M (2021) Computed tomography dose. Radiology Info. Available from: https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray. Accessed 13 Mar 2021
Lescay HA, Jiang J, Tuma F (2021) Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Ureter, in StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL)
Burgher A et al (2004) Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol 18(6):534–539
Assimos D et al (2016) Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART I J Urol 196(4):1153–1160
Blachar A et al (2006) Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 3(11):851–859
Patatas K et al (2012) Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service. Br J Radiol 85(1016):1118–1122
Sarofim M, Teo A, Wilson R (2016) Management of alternative pathology detected using CT KUB in suspected ureteric colic. Int J Surg 32:179–182
Khan N et al (2012) Has the significance of incidental findings on unenhanced computed tomography for urolithiasis been overestimated? A retrospective review of over 800 patients. Arab J Urol 10(2):149–154
Khadra MH et al (2000) A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol 163(2):524–527
Luchs JS et al (2002) Utility of hematuria testing in patients with suspected renal colic: correlation with unenhanced helical CT results. Urology 59(6):839–842
Kobayashi T et al (2003) Impact of date of onset on the absence of hematuria in patients with acute renal colic. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1093–1096
Gómez Rivas J et al (2020) Undergraduate Education for Urology in Europe. Where Do We Stand? Eur Urol 78(3):381–384
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T Anderson: manuscript writing and data collection; C Hopper: data collection, E MacCraith: statistical analysis, manuscript writing; A McCabe: manuscript writing; CP Shortt: project development, manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
No financial disclaimers or conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, T., Hopper, C., MacCraith, E. et al. Assessment of clinically significant urolithiasis positivity rate using CT KUB for suspected renal colic. Ir J Med Sci 193, 1009–1013 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03477-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03477-5