Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confined masonry as practical seismic construction alternative–the experience from the 2014 Cephalonia Earthquake

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During August 1953 three strong earthquakes of magnitude ranging from 6.3 to 7.2 shook the Ionian Island of Cephalonia (Kefalonia), Greece, and destroyed almost the entire building stock of the Island which consisted primarily of traditional unreinforced masonry (URM) houses. The authorities went on to restructuring of the building stock, using a structural system that is most like what is known today as confined masonry. They designed about 14 types of one- to two-storey buildings providing the engineers with detailed construction plans. These buildings are known as “Arogi” buildings (Arogi in Greek meaning Aid). On the 24th of January and 3rd of February 2014, two earthquakes of magnitude 6.1 and 6.0 struck the island, causing significant soil damages, developing excessively high ground accelerations. Surprisingly, no damage was reported in the “Arogi” buildings. The seismic behavior of the buildings is examined by FEM linear analysis and it is compared to that of URM structures. Computed results illustrate that the displacements of identical URM buildings would be about twice the magnitudes observed in the corresponding “Arogi” ones, with the implication that the earthquake sequence of 2014 would have caused critical damage should the type of structure be of the URM type. Furthermore, it is illustrated that this low cost alternative method of construction is a very effective means of producing earthquake resilient structures, whereas further reduction of seismic displacement may be achieved in the order of 50% with commensurate effects on damage potential, when reinforced slabs are used to replace the timber roofs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scordilis E M, Karakaisis G F, Karakostas B G, Panagiotopoulos D G, Comninakis P E, Papazachos B C. Evidence for Transform Faulting in the Ionian Sea: the Cephalonia Island Earthquake Sequence of 1983. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1985, 123(3): 388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Louvari E, Kiratzi A A, Papazachos B C. The CTF and its extension to western Lefkada Island. Tectonophysics, 1999, 308: 223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sachpazi M, Hirn A, Clément C, Haslinger F, Laigle M, Kissling E, Charvis P, Hello Y, Lépine J C, Sapin M, Ansorge J. Western Hellenic subduction and Cephalonia Transform: local earthquakes and plate transport and strain. Tectonophysics, 2000, 319(4): 301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pérouse E, Chamot-Rooke N, Rabaute A, Briole P, Jouanne F, Georgiev I, Dimitrov D. Bridging onshore and offshore present-day kinematics of central and eastern Mediterranean: Implications for crustal dynamics and mantle flow. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2012, 13(9): 371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganas A, Elias P, Bozionelos G, Papathanassiou G, Avallone A, Papastergios A, Valkaniotis S, Parcharidis I, Briole P. Coseismic deformation, field observations and seismic fault of the 17 November 2015M = 6.5, Lefkada Island, Greece earthquake. Tectonophysics, 2016, 687: 210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papaioannou Chr. Report of Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake EngineeringResearch and Technical Institute, Strong Ground Motion Of The February 3, 2014 (in Greek)

  7. Karastathis V K, Mouzakiotis E, Ganas A, Papadopoulos G A. High-precision relocation of seismic sequences above a dipping Moho: the case of the January–February 2014 seismic sequence on Cephalonia island (Greece). Solid Earth, 2015, 6(1): 173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boncori MJ P, Papoutsis I, Pezzo G, Tolomei C, Atzori S, Ganas A, Karastathis V, Salvi S, Kontoes C, Antonioli A. Multiple SAR Techniques. Seismological Research Letters, 2015, 86(1): 124–137

  9. Valkaniotis S, Ganas A, Papathanassiou G, Papanikolaou M. Field observations of geological effects triggered by the January–February 2014 Cephalonia (Ionian Sea, Greece) earthquakes. Tectonophysics, 2014, 630: 150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Papathanassiou G, Ganas A, Valkaniotis S. Recurrent liquefactioninduced failures triggered by 2014 Cephalonia, Greece earthquakes: Spatial distribution and quantitative analysis of liquefaction potential. Engineering Geology, 2016, 200: 18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlatos D. 1988, Coram Populo, Editor Municipality of Argostoli, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tomaževic M, Klemenc I. Seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26 (10): 1059–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Astroza M, Moroni O, Salinas C. Seismic behavior qualification methodology for confined masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 1123–1124

    Google Scholar 

  14. Astroza M, Moroni O, Brzev S, Tanner J. Seismic performance of engineered masonry buildings in the 2010 Maule Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 2012, 28(S1 No. S1): S385–S406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brzev S N. Earthquake-resistant confined masonry construction, national information center of earthquake engineering. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karantoni F B, Fardis MN, Vintzileou E, Harisis A. Effectiveness of Seismic Strengthening Interventions. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Preservation of the Architectural Heritage, Rome, 1993, 549–556

    Google Scholar 

  17. EN 1996–1-1, 2005. Eurocode 6: Design of Masonry Structures- Part 1–1: General Rules for Reinforced and Unreinforced. Masonry Structures. Europ. Comm. for Standardization: Brussels

  18. EN 1998–3:2020:E. Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of Buildings, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization. Brussels

  19. Theodoulidis N, Karakostas Ch, Lekidis V, Makra K, Margaris B, Morfidis K, Papaioannou Ch, Rovithis E, Salonikios T, Savvaidis A. The Cephalonia, Greece, January 26 (M6.1) and February 3, 2014 (M6.0) earthquakes: near-fault ground motion and effects on soil and structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 14(1): 1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures, New York: Mc Graw Hill, 1975

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Karantoni F, Papadopoulos M, Pantazopoulou S J. Simple seismic assessment of traditional unreinforced masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2016, 10(8): 1055–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Karantoni F.V., Pantazopoulou S. J. Criteria guiding seismic upgrading of traditional masonry buildings. In: Proceedings 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Vancouver, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pardalopoulos S, Pantazopoulou S J, Ignatakis Ch. 2016, “Practical seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry historical buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 2016, 11(2): 195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marques R, Lourenço P B. Possibilities and comparison of structural component models for the seismic assessment of modern unreinforced masonry buildings. Computers & Structures, 2011, 89(21–22): 2079–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Page A W. The biaxial compressive strength of brick masonry. Proceedings- Institution of Civil Engineers, 1981, 71(Part 2): 893–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Page A W. The strength of brick masonry under biaxial tensioncompression. Int J of Mason Constr, 1983, 3(1): 26–31

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ganz H R, Thurlimann B. Test on the biaxial strength of masonry. Report No. 7502–3 Institute of Structural Engineering, Zurich, 1982

  28. Mann W, Müller H. Nachrechnung der Wandversuche mit einem erweiterten Schubbruchmodell unter Berücksichtigung der Spannungen in den Stossfugen, Anlage 2 zum Forschungsbericht: Untersuchungen zum Tragverhalten von Mauerwersbauten unter Erdbebeneinwirkung, T.H. Darmstadt, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lourenço P B, Rots J G. A multi-surface model for the analysis of masonry structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1997, 123 (7): 660–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ottosen N. A failure criterion for concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1977, 103(4): 527–535

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grünthal G. European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  32. Karantoni F, Tsionis G, Lyrantzaki F, Fardis M N. Seismic Fragility of regular masonry buildings for in-plane and out-of-plane failure. Earthquakes and Structures, 2014, 6(6): 689–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marques R, Lourenço P B. Unreinforced and confined masonry buildings in seismic regions: Validation of macro-element models and cost analysis. Engineering Structures, 2014, 64: 52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sotirios Valkaniotis for providing Fig. 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Rio Achaia, 26504, Greece

    Fillitsa Karantoni

  2. The Lassonde Faculty of Engineering, Deptartment of Civil Engineering, York University, Toronto, M3J 1P3, Canada

    Stavroula Pantazopoulou

  3. Institute of Geodynamics, National Observatory of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Athanasios Ganas

Authors
  1. Fillitsa Karantoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stavroula Pantazopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Athanasios Ganas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fillitsa Karantoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karantoni, F., Pantazopoulou, S. & Ganas, A. Confined masonry as practical seismic construction alternative–the experience from the 2014 Cephalonia Earthquake. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 12, 270–290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0390-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0390-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation