Abstract
Anterior mediastinal procedures are increasingly being performed using robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). While both approaches have shown superior outcomes compared to open surgery, their comparative benefits are not as distinct. The aim of this retrospective study was to bridge this knowledge gap using a multicenter dataset. Patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery for anterior mediastinal disease between 2015 and 2022 were deemed eligible. The study participants were grouped based on whether a robot was used or not, and perioperative outcomes were compared. To mitigate selection bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting (ITPW) was applied using the propensity score. The final analysis included 312 patients (RATS = 120; VATS = 192). Following the application of IPTW, RATS was found to be associated with a longer operating time (215.3 versus 139.31 min, P < 0.001), fewer days with a chest tube (1.96 versus 2.61 days, P = 0.047), and a shorter hospital stay (3.03 versus 3.91 days, P = 0.041) compared to VATS. Subgroup analyses indicated that the benefit of RATS in reducing the length of hospital stay was particularly pronounced in patients with tumors larger than 6 cm (mean difference [MD] = – 2.28 days, P = 0.033), those diagnosed with myasthenia gravis (MD = – 3.84 days, P = 0.002), and those who underwent a trans-subxiphoid surgical approach (MD = – 0.81 days, P = 0.04). Both VATS and RATS are safe and effective approaches for treating anterior mediastinal disease. However, RATS holds distinct advantages over VATS including shorter hospital stays and reduced chest tube drainage periods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Seo Y-J, Christian-Miller N, Aguayo E, Sanaiha Y, Benharash P, Yanagawa J (2022) National use and short-term outcomes of video and robot-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomies. Annals Thorac Surg 113:230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.02.003
Kamel MK, Villena-Vargas J, Rahouma M, Lee B, Harrison S, Stiles BM, Abdelrahman AM, Altorki NK, Port JL (2019) National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic resection of thymic tumours in the United States: a propensity matching comparison with open and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 56:762–769. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz111
Yang C-FJ, Hurd J, Shah SA, Liou D, Wang H, Backhus LM, Lui NS, D’Amico TA, Shrager JB, Berry MF (2020) A national analysis of open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I to III thymoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 160:555-567.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.114
Seong YW, Kang CH, Choi J-W, Kim H-S, Jeon JH, Park IK, Kim YT (2014) Early clinical outcomes of robot-assisted surgery for anterior mediastinal mass: its superiority over a conventional sternotomy approach evaluated by propensity score matching. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 45:e68–e73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt557
Ye B, Tantai J-C, Li W, Ge X-X, Feng J, Cheng M, Zhao H (2013) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of Masaoka stage I thymoma. World J Surg Oncol 11:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-157
Rückert JC, Swierzy M, Ismail M (2011) Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:673–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.042
Ochi T, Suzuki H, Hirai Y, Yamanaka T, Matsumoto H, Kaiho T, Inage T, Ito T, Tanaka K, Sakairi Y (2023) Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal lesions. J Thorac Dis 15:384
Li R, Ma Z, Qu C, Qiu J, Wang K, Yue W, Tian H (2022) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal masses in patients with different body mass index ranges: a population-based study. Front Surg 9:963335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.963335
Chendaer N, Jiang N, Hao Y, Zhao Y, Li G, Zhang W, Peng C (2023) A propensity score-matching analysis: robotic thymectomy through the subxiphoid has advantages over video-assisted thymectomy surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 33:859–865
Li X-K, Xu Y, Cong Z-Z, Zhou H, Wu W-J, Shen Y (2020) Comparison of the progression-free survival between robot-assisted thymectomy and video-assisted thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity score matching study. J Thorac Dis 12:4033
Qian L, Chen X, Huang J, Lin H, Mao F, Zhao X, Luo Q, Ding Z (2017) A comparison of three approaches for the treatment of early-stage thymomas: robot-assisted thoracic surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and median sternotomy. J Thorac Dis 9:1997
Şehitogullari A, Nasır A, Anbar R, Erdem K, Bilgin C (2020) Comparison of perioperative outcomes of videothoracoscopy and robotic surgical techniques in thymoma. Asian J Surg 43:244–250
Suda T, Sugimura H, Tochii D, Kihara M, Hattori Y (2012) Single-port thymectomy through an infrasternal approach. Annals Thorac Surg 93:334–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.047
Chiu C-H, Chao Y-K, Liu Y-H (2018) Subxiphoid approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an update. J Thorac Dis 10: S1662 https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.01
Li M, Xu L, Li L, Dai Q, Xu D (2022) The early perioperative outcomes of subxiphoid approach versus lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymic tumors: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendoscop Adv Surg Techn 32:256–264. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0036
Kido T, Hazama K, Inoue Y, Tanaka Y, Takao T (1999) Resection of anterior mediastinal masses through an infrasternal approach. Annals Thorac Surg 67:263265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01210-7
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to Intuitive Surgical Sarl (Taiwan branch) for their support and collaborative assistance in project administration
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (grant number NSTC 112-2314-B-182A-116-MY3) and the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou (grant number NMRPG3N6201).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors provided conceptualization and provided the data for analysis. YKC wrote the main manuscript and prepared figures and tables. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Yin-Kai Chao has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical Sarl (Taiwan Branch) for his speaking engagements and educational contributions. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chao, YK., Lee, JY., Lu, HI. et al. Robot-assisted surgery outperforms video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal disease: a multi-institutional study. J Robotic Surg 18, 21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01745-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01745-1