Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the Xi robotic platform for familial adenomatous polyposis with ultra-low rectal cancer: exploration of minimally invasive and refined therapies

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When a familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patient’s rectal polyp undergoes malignant transformation, the surgeon needs to consider how to balance the quality of surgery with the patient’s quality of life. Here, we present a case of robotic surgery in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis and ultra-low rectal cancer. Fiberoptic colonoscopy found that hundreds of polyp-like bulges were diffusely distributed throughout the colon, and a malignant mass was found at the end of the rectum. The patient underwent total colectomy with abdominoperineal extended radical resection for rectal cancer using the Xi robotic platform. The patient recovered well in the postoperative period. The ileostomy was well used. And the patient was in good health and metastasis free at 9 months postoperatively. We identified total colectomy combined with extended radical rectal resection under the assistance of the da Vinci robot platform is of great benefit to the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and information are saved in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, and the information is true, credible and available. The datasets is availability from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rhodes M, Bradburn DM (1992) Overview of screening and management of familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 33(1):125–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Parascandola SA, Horsey ML, Hota S, Paull JO, Graham A, Pudalov N et al (2021) The robotic colorectal experience: an outcomes and learning curve analysis of 502 patients. Colorectal Dis 23:226–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aliyev V, Goksel S, Bakir B, Guven K, Asoglu O (2021) Sphincter-saving robotic total mesorectal excision provides better mesorectal specimen and good oncological local control compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in male patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Surg Technol Int 38:160–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu Y, Xiong H, Chen Y, Liu Z, Jiang Z, Huang R et al (2021) Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer. Sci Rep 11(1):9338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Nam BH et al (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(2):243–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin SD, Clark SK, Tekkis PP, Ciclitira PJ, Nicholls RJ (2008) Review article: restorative proctocolectomy, indications, management of complications and follow-up–a guide for gastroenterologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27(10):895–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campos FG, Real Martinez CA, Monteiro de Camargo MG, Cesconetto DM, Nahas SC, Cecconello I (2018) Laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(1):47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X (2021) Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Quezada-Diaz F, Tchack M, Pappou E, Wei IH, Smith JJ et al (2019) Use of the Xi robotic platform for total abdominal colectomy: a step forward in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 33(3):966–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aliyev V, Arslan NC, Goksoy B, Guven K, Goksel S, Asoglu O (2022) Is robotic da Vinci Xi® superior to the da Vinci Si® for sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision? Outcomes in 150 mid-low rectal cancer patients. J Robot Surg 16(6):1339–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the approved guidelines. The patient provided written informed consent.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Operative procedure, material preparation and data collection were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HX and JW, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingchao Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, H., Wang, J., Hu, H. et al. Application of the Xi robotic platform for familial adenomatous polyposis with ultra-low rectal cancer: exploration of minimally invasive and refined therapies. J Robotic Surg 17, 1843–1846 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01587-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01587-x

Keywords

Navigation