Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Six Noninvasive Methods for the Detection of Fibrosis in Chinese Patients with Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in the world, and liver fibrosis has been proven to be associated with liver disease related events and total mortality. Several noninvasive methods have been developed, but whether those methods are suitable for the detection of fibrosis in Chinese patients with obesity and NAFLD has not been completely elucidated. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), modified aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (m-APRI), BARD (BARD (BMI (body mass index) > 28 = 1 point, AAR (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) > 0.8 = 2 points, DM (diabetes mellitus) = 1 point)), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and shear wave elastography (SWE) in the evaluation of the degree of liver fibrosis in Chinese patients with obesity and NAFLD.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study consisted of 100 patients. The accuracy of FIB-4, APRI, m-APRI, BARD, NFS, and SWE in the assessment of significant or advanced liver fibrosis in Chinese patients with obesity and NAFLD was compared.

Results

Weight and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were independent risk factors for liver fibrosis. SWE, APRI, and m-APRI had significant efficiency in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in patients with obesity and NAFLD. APRI and SWE were superior to the other methods in the diagnosis of significant and advanced liver fibrosis in patients with obesity and NAFLD. APRI and SWE showed no statistically significant difference in diagnostic efficiency.

Conclusions

Weight and ALT are independent risk factors for liver fibrosis progression in NAFLD patients. SWE and APRI have predictive value for significant and advanced fibrosis of NAFLD in Chinese patients with obesity.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang DQ, El-Serag HB, Loomba R. Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(4):223–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li J, Zou B, Yeo YH, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and outcome of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Asia, 1999–2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(5):389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(2):389-397.e310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petta S, Wai-Sun Wong V, Bugianesi E, et al. Impact of obesity and alanine aminotransferase levels on the diagnostic accuracy for advanced liver fibrosis of noninvasive tools in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(6):916–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joo SK, Kim W, Kim D, et al. Steatosis severity affects the diagnostic performances of noninvasive fibrosis tests in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2018;38(2):331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alkayyali T, Qutranji L, Kaya E, et al. Clinical utility of noninvasive scores in assessing advanced hepatic fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study in biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Diabetol. 2020;57(5):613–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alkhouri N, McCullough AJ. Noninvasive diagnosis of NASH and liver fibrosis within the spectrum of NAFLD. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012;8(10):661–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Du X, Zhou HX, Zhang SQ, et al. A comparative study of the metabolic effects of LSG and LRYGB in Chinese diabetes patients with BMI<35 kg/m(2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):189–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43(6):1317–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45(4):846–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38(2):518–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison SA, Oliver D, Arnold HL, et al. Development and validation of a simple NAFLD clinical scoring system for identifying patients without advanced disease. Gut. 2008;57(10):1441–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang C, Seah JJ, Tan CK, et al. Modified AST to platelet ratio index improves APRI and better predicts advanced fibrosis and liver cirrhosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021;45(4):101528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhala N, Angulo P, van der Poorten D, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis: an international collaborative study. Hepatology. 2011;54(4):1208–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chitturi S, Wong VW, Chan WK, et al. The Asia-Pacific Working Party on Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease guidelines 2017-Part 2: management and special groups. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(1):86–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li G, Zhang X, Lin H, et al. Non-invasive tests of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(5):532–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu SY, Wong VW, Wong SK, et al. A prospective 5-year study on the use of transient elastography to monitor the improvement of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease following bariatric surgery. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ooi GJ, Mgaieth S, Eslick GD, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: non-invasive detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related fibrosis in the obese. Obes Rev. 2018;19(2):281–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Campos-Murguía A, Ruiz-Margáin A, González-Regueiro JA, et al. Clinical assessment and management of liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(39):5919–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang JD, Abdelmalek MF, Pang H, et al. Gender and menopause impact severity of fibrosis among patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2014;59(4):1406–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou YJ, Ye FZ, Li YY, et al. Individualized risk prediction of significant fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using a novel nomogram. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019;7(8):1124–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Polyzos SA, Slavakis A, Koumerkeridis G, et al. Noninvasive liver fibrosis tests in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an external validation cohort. Horm Metab Res. 2019;51(2):134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bruce M, Kolokythas O, Ferraioli G, et al. Limitations and artifacts in shear-wave elastography of the liver. Biomed Eng Lett. 2017;7(2):81–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brener S. Transient elastography for assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015;15(18):1–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jamialahmadi T, Nematy M, Jangjoo A, et al. Measurement of liver stiffness with 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in bariatric surgery candidates reveals acceptable diagnostic yield compared to liver biopsy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2585–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502613), Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2014SZ0002-5), Xindu Social Science and Technology Development Project (20160740401), and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2022YFS0167).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao Du.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Weight and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were independent risk factors for liver fibrosis.

• APRI and SWE were superior to the other methods in the diagnosis of significant and advanced liver fibrosis in patients with obesity and NAFLD.

• APRI and SWE showed no statistically significant difference in diagnostic efficiency.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, G., Yang, Jc., Zhang, Gx. et al. Evaluation of Six Noninvasive Methods for the Detection of Fibrosis in Chinese Patients with Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. OBES SURG 32, 3619–3626 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06251-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06251-1

Keywords

Navigation