Skip to main content
Log in

The clinical impact of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with a biatrial orthotopic heart transplant

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we aim to elucidate the clinical impact and long-term course of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), taking into account its dynamic nature, after biatrial orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). All consecutive adult patients undergoing biatrial OHT (1984–2017) with an available follow-up echocardiogram were included. Mixed-models were used to model the evolution of TR. The mixed-model was inserted into a Cox model in order to address the association of the dynamic TR with mortality. In total, 572 patients were included (median age: 50 years, males: 74.9%). Approximately 32% of patients had moderate-to-severe TR immediately after surgery. However, this declined to 11% on 5 years and 9% on 10 years after surgery, adjusted for survival bias. Pre-implant mechanical support was associated with less TR during follow-up, whereas concurrent LV dysfunction was significantly associated with more TR during follow-up. Survival at 1, 5, 10, 20 years was 97% ± 1%, 88% ± 1%, 66% ± 2% and 23% ± 2%, respectively. The presence of moderate-to-severe TR during follow-up was associated with higher mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI (1.02–1.12), p = 0.006). The course of TR was positively correlated with the course of creatinine (R = 0.45). TR during follow-up is significantly associated with higher mortality and worse renal function. Nevertheless, probability of TR is the highest immediately after OHT and decreases thereafter. Therefore, it may be reasonable to refrain from surgical intervention for TR during earlier phase after OHT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wong RC, Abrahams Z, Hanna M, Pangrace J, Gonzalez-Stawinski G, Starling R, Taylor D. Tricuspid regurgitation after cardiac transplantation: an old problem revisited. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008; 27(3): 247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Simone R, Lange R, Sack RU, Mehmanesh H, Hagl S. Atrioventricular valve insufficiency and atrial geometry after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60(6): 1686–1693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz TM, Burgess MI, Rahman AN, Campbell CS, Deiraniya AK, Yonan NA. Risk factors for tricuspid valve regurgitation after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68(4): 1247–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caliskan K, Strachinaru M, Soliman OI. Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients with Heart Transplant. In: Soliman OI, ten Cate FJ, Practical Manual of Tricuspid Valve Diseases. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018: 49–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Wartig M, Tesan S, Gäbel J, Jeppsson A, Selimovic N, Holmberg E, Dellgren G. Tricuspid regurgitation influences outcome after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33(8): 829–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun JP, Niu J, Banbury MK, Zhou L, Taylor DO, Starling RC, Garcia MJ, Stewart WJ, Thomas JD. Influence of different implantation techniques on long-term survival after orthotopic heart transplantation: an echocardiographic study. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26(12): 1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lower RR, Shumway NE. Studies on orthotopic homotransplantation of the canine heart. Surg Forum 1960; 11: 18–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsiatis AA, Davidian M. Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an overview. Stat Sin 2004; 14(3): 809–834

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewen MK, Bryg RJ, Miller LW, Williams GA, Labovitz AJ. Tricuspid regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59(15): 1371–1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatia SJ, Kirshenbaum JM, Shemin RJ, Cohn LH, Collins JJ, Di Sesa VJ, Young PJ, Mudge GH Jr, Sutton MG. Time course of resolution of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular remodeling after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1987; 76(4): 819–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hausen B, Albes JM, Rohde R, Demertzis S, Mügge A, Schäfers HJ. Tricuspid valve regurgitation attributable to endomyocardial biopsies and rejection in heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59(5): 1134–1140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zijderhand CF, Veen KM, Caliskan K, Schoonen T, Mokhles MM, Bekkers JA, Manintveld OC, Constantinescu AA, Brugts JJ, Bogers AJJC, Takkenberg JJM. Biatrial vs. bicaval orthotopic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110(2): 684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atluri P, Fairman AS, MacArthur JW, Goldstone AB, Cohen JE, Howard JL, Zalewski CM, Shudo Y, Woo YJ. Continuous flow left ventricular assist device implant significantly improves pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular contractility, and tricuspid valve competence. J Card Surg 2013; 28(6): 770–775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Berger Y, Har Zahav Y, Kassif Y, Kogan A, Kuperstein R, Freimark D, Lavee J. Tricuspid valve regurgitation after orthotopic heart transplantation: prevalence and etiology. J Transplant 2012; 2012: 120702

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zijlstra LE, Constantinescu AA, Manintveld O, Birim O, Hesselink DA, van Thiel R, van Domburg R, Balk AH, Caliskan K. Improved long-term survival in Dutch heart transplant patients despite increasing donor age: the Rotterdam experience. Transpl Int 2015; 28(8): 962–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson CA, Shernan SK, Leacche M, Rawn JD, Paul S, Mihaljevic T, Jarcho JA, Stevenson LW, Fang JC, Lewis EF, Couper GS, Mudge GH, Byrne JG. Severity of intraoperative tricuspid regurgitation predicts poor late survival following cardiac transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78(5): 1635–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aziz TM, Saad RA, Burgess MI, Campbell CS, Yonan NA. Clinical significance of tricuspid valve dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2002; 21(10): 1101–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeevanandam V, Russell H, Mather P, Furukawa S, Anderson A, Raman J. Donor tricuspid annuloplasty during orthotopic heart transplantation: long-term results of a prospective controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(6): 2089–2095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maeder MT, Holst DP, Kaye DM. Tricuspid regurgitation contributes to renal dysfunction in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail 2008; 14(10): 824–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Agricola E, Marini C, Stella S, Monello A, Fisicaro A, Tufaro V, Slavich M, Oppizzi M, Castiglioni A, Cappelletti A, Margonato A. Effects of functional tricuspid regurgitation on renal function and long-term prognosis in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2017; 18(2): 60–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karam N, Braun D, Mehr M, Orban M, Stocker TJ, Deseive S, Orban M, Hagl C, Näbauer M, Massberg S, Hausleiter J. Impact of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair for severe tricuspid regurgitation on kidney and liver function. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12(15): 1413–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alharethi R, Bader F, Kfoury AG, Hammond ME, Karwande SV, Gilbert EM, Doty DB, Hagan ME, Thomas H, Renlund DG. Tricuspid valve replacement after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25(1): 48–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Filsoufi F, Salzberg SP, Anderson CA, Couper GS, Cohn LH, Adams DH. Optimal surgical management of severe tricuspid regurgitation in cardiac transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25(3): 289–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Solomon NA, McGiven J, Chen XZ, Alison PM, Graham KJ, Gibbs H. Biatrial or bicaval technique for orthotopic heart transplantation: which is better? Heart Lung Circ 2004; 13(4): 389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadir Caliskan.

Ethics declarations

Kevin M. Veen, Grigorios Papageorgiou, Casper F. Zijderhand, Mostafa M. Mokhles, Jasper J. Brugts, Olivier C. Manintveld, Alina A. Constantinescu, Jos A. Bekkers, Johanna J.M. Takkenberg, Ad J.J.C. Bogers, and Caliskan Kadir declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000(s). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veen, K.M., Papageorgiou, G., Zijderhand, C.F. et al. The clinical impact of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with a biatrial orthotopic heart transplant. Front. Med. 17, 527–533 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-022-0967-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-022-0967-5

Keywords

Navigation