Influence of Cutting Parameters and Tool Wear on the Surface Integrity of Cobalt-Based Stellite 6 Alloy When Machined Under a Dry Cutting Environment

The efficiency of a machining process can be measured by evaluating the quality of the machined surface and the tool wear rate. The research reported herein is mainly focused on the effect of cutting parameters and tool wear on the machined surface defects, surface roughness, deformation layer and residual stresses when dry milling Stellite 6, deposited by overlay on a carbon steel surface. The results showed that under the selected cutting conditions, abrasion, diffusion, peeling, chipping and breakage were the main tool wear mechanisms presented. Also the feed rate was the primary factor affecting the tool wear with an influence of 83%. With regard to the influence of cutting parameters on the surface roughness, the primary factors were feed rate and cutting speed with 57 and 38%, respectively. In addition, in general, as tool wear increased, the surface roughness increased and the deformation layer was found to be influenced more by the cutting parameters rather than the tool wear. Compressive residual stresses were observed in the un-machined surface, and when machining longer than 5 min, residual stress changed 100% from compression to tension. Finally, results showed that micro-crack initiation was the main mechanism for chip formation.


Introduction
Cobalt-based alloys, also named ''Stellite,'' have a wide range of applications due to their higher melting temperature, superior thermal fatigue resistance, weldability, high-temperature corrosion and oxidation resistance, and wear resistance.Some of the applications are in jet engine, turbines, space vehicles, rocket motors, nuclear reactors, power plants and chemical equipment, electronics and medical devices (Ref 1, 2).
One way to increase the product life of components subjected to aggressive environments (i.e., erosive wear) involves the deposition of a surface layer of Stellite on a steel substrate.This process can be conducted by fusion welding techniques such as gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and plasma transferred arc (PTA) (Ref 3).As these surface engineering processes only partially fulfill the demands for tolerances and surface quality, a finishing process to smooth the surface is essential, where in this case electro-discharged machining (EDM) or conventional grinding process is often used.For more complex geometries, the high-speed machining (HSM) method tends to be the preferred option due to economic factors (e.g., absence of electrodes and burning time) (Ref 4).
Milling experiments on cast Stellite 12 showed that CBN tools are suitable as a cutting tool material as it combines high hardness, relatively high toughness and chemical stability (Ref 4).Inserts made of SiC-whisker-reinforced ceramics and tungsten carbides proved to be inappropriate for milling at high cutting speeds.Only inserts with a metal binder phase and a high percentage of CBN were convincing because of their better performance regarding tool life.It was also shown that the size, the type and the composition of the carbide phases and the percentage of martensite in the steel had a great effect on the toolÕs life and its performance (Ref 5).The mechanisms most commonly used to explain the wear of carbide and PCBN tools included abrasion, adhesion, diffusion and chemical wear (Ref 6).Bagci et al. (Ref 7) studied the milling surface roughness of Stellite 6 cobalt-based alloy using PVD TiN-coated carbide tools, and Benghersallah et al. (Ref 8) examined the dry milling machinability of Stellite 6 alloy layers using tools with five different multilayer coatings.Both groups found that when using a cutting speed between 120 and 230 m/min, a radial depth of cut of 3 mm, an axial depth of cut of 0.3 and 0.067 mm/tooth for the feed, the tool life was in general within 2 min when considering a maximum wear of VB = 0.3 mm as the tool life criterion.It was also found that chipping, notching and cracking took place during the course of the tool wear.These researchers also concluded that the AlTiN nanocrystalline coating was the most efficient when using high-speed (190 m/min) and dry cutting conditions.
The effect of milling parameters on the tool wear of physical vapor deposition TiN/TiCN/TiAlC coated and uncoated inserts was examined by Aykut et al. (Ref 9).The results showed that the end of the tool life was caused more frequently by chipping, cracking and breakage of the edge (rather than regular tool wear) when compared with the turning and drilling processes.Ozturk et al. (Ref 10) examined the machinability of Stellite 6 coating material when using a turning process and whisker-reinforced ceramics and tungsten carbide as cutting tools.The results showed that the quality of the machined surface when using a whisker-reinforced ceramic insert was much better when compared with the results obtained when using a tungsten carbide tool.It was also reported that a surface roughness of 1.8-5.1 lm could be acquired when using a whisker-reinforced ceramic cutting tool under the optimal combination of cutting parameters (50 m/min, 0.1 mm/rev and a depth of cut of 0.25 mm).
An investigation on the milling of cast and deposited Stellite 12 with different milling tools was carried out by Danny et al. (Ref 4).The results showed that the highest value of tool life was reached when using cutting speeds of 150 m/min or higher, especially when using CBN tools with double negative angles.Also a bigger tool life was obtained when milling cast Stellite when compared with PTA-welded Stellite.The authors attributed this result to the differences in the microstructures between the cast and the PTA-welded material.The results also showed that the depth of the hardening zone was 0.14 mm, and the top layer showed a rise in hardness of up to 700 HV 5 and partially even up to 750 HV 5 .This increase in hardness caused outbreaks of the cutting edge and had an extremely negative effect on tool life.Finally, it was concluded that milling of Stellite 12 with CBN under high-speed cutting conditions is possible.
Finally, Shao et al. (Ref 11) investigated the machinability of Stellite 12 alloys during a turning process when using uncoated carbide tools under the dry cutting condition.The results showed that TiAlN-coated carbide tools in general demonstrated a good machining performance at low levels of cutting speed and loads; however, it is not recommended for relatively heavy cutting loads; also built-up-edge formation was found under some cutting conditions, that excessive tool flank typically resulted in tool breakage at the cutting edge of the uncoated tools and also that at low cutting speeds, abrasive and adhesive wear were often observed while diffusion, chipping and chemical wear occurred at higher cutting speeds.
Most of the aforementioned researchers have focused their studies on the machinability of wrought or cast Stellite 12 alloys using coated and/or uncoated carbide tools where the investigations were mainly focused toward the analysis of the tool life and tool wear for turning processes.In order to fill the knowledge gap related to the milling of Stellite 6 coatings, a novel study related to chip formation mechanism has been undertaken as well as a study relating the influence of cutting parameters and tool wear on the quality of the machined surface to establish the optimal parameters for the efficient and economic machining of this alloy.Samples of carbon steel with dimensions of 70 9 40 9 15 mm coated with a multiple layer of Stellite 6, with a thickness of 6 mm, were selected for the experiment.The Stellite multiple layers were deposited by the gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) technique.The composition and physical and mechanical properties of this Stellite 6 alloy coating are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.Figure 1 shows the microstructure of the Stellite 6 coating.

Cutting Tool
A HERTEL TM 16-mm-diameter TiAlN carbide-coated end mill with 4 flutes and a tool rake angle of 8°, tool nose radius

Experimental Setup
The Taguchi method was used as the design of experiments.A L 9 (3 3 ) orthogonal array was selected which corresponds to 3 parameters with 3 levels each as shown in Table 3. Table 4 shows the combination of cutting parameters for each of the trials.The values of the cutting parameters were recommended by the tool supplier based on the tool-workpiece hardness combination.The radial depth of cut was kept constant at 8 mm.The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to obtain each cutting parameterÕs contribution on the tool wear and the surface roughness.A Beavermill MK2 NC milling machine was selected to conduct the down-milling experiments under a dry cutting condition.It must be highlighted that a new tool was used for each of the trials.

Surface Roughness and Tool Wear Measurements
Once the machining process was concluded, the surface roughness was measured across the tool feed direction using a Mitutoyo Surftest SV-2000 equipment following the ASME B46.1 standard (Ref 12).The cutoff length was set at 17.5 mm which included 5 readings.The roughness was measured after cutting the first 140 mm. Figure 2 shows a schematic drawing of the cutting process.
The flank wear VB max was measured using a Mitutoyo vision measuring machine following the ISO 8688-2:1989 standard (Ref 13).Each cutting flute was marked and measured, and an average was reported.SEM and EDS were used for tool wear analysis.To aid the level of accuracy, the surface roughness and tool wear were measured twice during the cutting process.The first measurement was taken after cutting the first 140 mm, which consisted of a 16 mm width (2 passes of 8 mm in radial depth of cut) with a length of 70 mm.The second measurement was taken at the end of the cutting process (cutting length L = 400 mm).Tool wear land was examined on the Olympus GX51 metallurgical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-3700N and SU 6600).

Metallographic Analysis
Metallographic preparation for workpiece, tool and deformed layer samples was conducted following the ISO 4499-2 standard (Ref 14), and the etching of the samples was conducted following the ISO 21608 standard (Ref 15).Hardness tests were performed based on the ISO 6507-1 standard (Ref 16) using a Mitutoyo MVK-G1 hardness-testing unit at a load of 200 g and a 15-s delay.

Residual Stress Measurements
Residual stresses were measured before and after the machining process using the incremental hole-drilling technique (Ref 17, 18) and following ASTM E837-08 standard (Ref 19).In this case, a 062UL strain gauge rosette (three grids) was selected.Measurements were recorded every 0.1 mm in depth until reaching a maximum depth of 1 mm from the machined surface.Hole-Drilling Residual Stresses Calculation Program (version 3.21) software was used to convert the strain values into residual stress values.It must be highlighted that the residual stresses were measured twice in each trial: The first measurement was taken on the un-machined surface (as received condition) and the second measurement after the milling process was concluded.A Milling Guide system Model RS-200 was used to drill the hole at the center of the strain gauge (see Fig. 3).

Analysis of Chips and Deformed Machine Layer
After completing the milling process under the combination of cutting parameters specified in Table 4, samples of chips were collected in order to analyze the chip formation mechanisms.For this analysis, a metallographic preparation was conducted following the ISO 4499-2 standard (Ref 14) and the etching of the samples was conducted following the ISO 21608 standard (Ref 15).An Olympus GX51 metallurgical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-3700N and SU 6600) were used to collect the images.The same standards and image analysis were used for the machined deformed layer study.

Results and Discussion
Figure 4 shows the micro-hardness profile of the Stellite 6 cross-sectional area.When analyzing Fig. 4, it is observed that the highest value of hardness is located at the surface of the coated layer of Stellite 6 where the value of hardness reached 690 HV 0.2 decreasing gradually to 360 HV 0.2 toward the Stellite-steel interface.This significant decrease in hardness near the interface is due to the change in microstructure and chemical composition as a consequence of the chemical metallurgy effect during the welding process for the development of the Stellite coating.As can be observed in Fig. 4, the grain size of the cobalt matrix near the interface is much coarser than that in the un-machined surface.On the other hand, the number of carbides near the interface is significantly less than in the un-machined surface.Figure 5 also shows that the content of Co, Cr, Mn and W decreases from the un-machined surface toward the Stellite-steel interface.

Influence of Cutting Parameters on Tool Wear
3.1.1S/N Ratio for Tool Wear.To obtain the optimal combination of cutting parameter that guarantees a small tool wear (which is reflected on a longer tool life) and small value of roughness, when machining Stellite 6, the S/N ratio was calculated based on the smaller-the-better characteristic, as shown in Eq 1: where y i is the observed data and n is the number of observations.
Table 5 shows the experimental results for tool wear VB max and the corresponding S/N ratio for each trial.The mean S/N response value and S/N response graph for each level of parameter are shown in Table 6 and Fig. 6.When analyzing Fig. 6, it is observed that factor B (feed rate) has the highest difference between maximum and minimum values (9.08) and as a consequence of the major impact on the tool wear, followed by factor A (cutting speed) and factor C (axial depth of cut) with values of 3.18 and 2.05, respectively.Also, in general it is observed that tool wear increases when feed rate and axial depth of cut are increased and the cutting speed is decreased.
Figure 6 also shows when analyzing the S/N ratio that the optimal combination of cutting parameters to achieve a small tool wear (longer tool life) is obtained when using level 3 of factor A (cutting speed), level 1 of factor B (feed rate) and level 1 of factor C (axial depth of cut).Consequently, the optimum cutting conditions for a small tool wear are 40 m/min, 25 mm/ min and 0.5 mm for the axial depth of cut.This value of 40 m/ min is 75-100% higher than the value reported by previous researcher (Ref 20), representing savings in costs as machining time decreases when increasing the cutting speed.3.1.2Analysis of Variance for Tool Wear.As previously mentioned, the S/N ratio with a smaller-the-better formula was used to identify the optimal cutting conditions for a small value of tool wear.With ANOVA (Table 7), the percentage of contribution of each cutting parameter on the tool wear VB max is almost 83% for feed rate, followed by the cutting speed and the axial depth of cut with 9 and 4% of influence, respectively.

Tool Wear and the Mechanisms
Figure 7 shows optical images of tool wear at different stages in the cutting process when using a cutting speed of 30 m/min, feed rate of 25 mm/min and an axial depth of cut of 1.5 mm.Further results obtained through SEM observations and EDS analysis corroborate that abrasion, coating peeling, cutting edge chipping and breakage were the main tool wear patterns present when milling Stellite 6 alloy under the different cutting conditions.Figure 8 shows these results for Trial 4 (30 m/min, 25 mm/min and 1.5 mm as axial depth of cut).As observed, the abrasion mechanisms were developed on the toolÕs nose and flank edge after cutting for a short period of time (t < 2.8 min), showing a smooth surface appearance (Fig. 8a).This type of tool wear was mainly caused by the   combination effect of the cutting parameters (low value of feed rate) and the chemical elements that diffused between the Stellite 6 coating and the tool.EDS analysis (Fig. 8c) shows the proofs of the presence of the diffusion wear mechanism, where the C and Cr elements of the Stellite have diffused into the cutting tool (Fig. 8b) and Co and W elements of the tool have diffused into the Stellite (Table 8).
Hard carbides (Fig. 1) and inclusions located in the Stellite coating were also responsible for the abrasive mechanism, and this is commented further on in this research (Fig. 10b and Table 9).It must be highlighted that in previous research (Ref 11), a high quantity of Cr element was also observed in the tool wear area, where diffusion wear occurred on the rake and the flank faces of the tool when turning Stellite 12 alloy.Unexpectedly, the proof of the diffusion of Fe of the workpiece into the tool was not found in this study as well as in ShaoÕs study (Ref 11). Figure 9 shows results from Trial 6 (30 m/min, 150 mm/ min, 1.0 mm) where the presence of micro-breakage and microchipping wear mechanism was obtained just after 30 s of cutting, as a consequence of increasing the feed rate 500% (from 25 to 150 mm/min).These results are compared to results shown in Fig. 8, where no micro-breakage and micro-chipping were found.The micro-breakage or micro-chipping probably produced a macro-breakage (Fig. 9c).There were also insignificant adhesions (Fig. 9d) on the tool wear land; however, it must be highlighted that in general this adhesion mechanism was not present under the values and combination of cutting parameters used in this study.

Influence of Cutting Parameters and Tool Wear on Surface Integrity
As shown in Fig. 10(a), in general, the Stellite matrix near the clusters of the carbides was often torn up during the cutting process.The grooves on the machined surface were formed either by the worn tool or by the presence of carbides in the matrix (Fig. 1 and 10a), and micro-pits remained on the machined surface as a consequence of the carbides being pulled out (Fig. 10a).The protuberances on the machined surface were mainly due to embedment of the chips and the inclusion of carbides in the Stellite coating material.Micro-cracks were formed around the inclusions during the removal process of the matrix (Fig. 10b).Table 9 shows the chemical composition of the inclusion shown in Fig. 10(b).The tool trail and the material plastic deformation (swelling) effect due to the plastic side flow at the tool edge resulted in the obvious marks on the machined surface (Fig. 10c).Another defect on the machined surface was induced by the chatter mechanisms during the cutting process, as shown in Fig. 10(d).Previous research has shown similar behavior when machining cobalt-based alloys (Ref 21).
Figure 11 shows the appearance of the machined surface for three different cutting conditions.When analyzing this figure, it is observed that feed rate and cutting speed both have a significant effect on the machined surface defects.As shown in Fig. 11(a), the machined surface showed a more deteriorated aspect when compared with the machined surface shown in Fig. 11(b), where an increase of 100% of the cutting speed was    trial.The mean S/N response value and S/N response graph for each level of parameter are shown in Table 11 and Fig. 12, respectively.As observed in Table 10, Trial 7 had the lowest value of surface roughness and the highest S/N ratio, which matches to the smaller-the-better characteristic.According to Table 11 and Fig. 12, factor B (feed rate) has the highest difference between maximum and minimum values (10.47) followed by factor A (cutting speed) and factor C (axial depth of cut) with 8.55 and 0.77, respectively.Therefore, the feed rate and the cutting speed are the two factors with significant influence on the surface roughness.This result is consistent with previous research (Ref 22).

Analysis of
Variance for Surface Roughness.Table 12 shows the ANOVA data for the surface roughness.As observed, the interaction between the S/N and the axial depth of cut does not produce a significant level of contribution (0.3%) within the reliability interval of 95%.In other words, axial depth of cut has no effect on S/N ratio.However, a significant correlation between the S/N and the feed rate and the cutting speed was observed.Also, the feed rate has a contribution 57% and the cutting speed 38%.From Fig. 12, it is observed that level 3 of factor A (cutting speed), level 1 of factor B (feed rate) and level 1 of factor C (axial depth of cut) produced the lowest value of surface roughness when analyzing the S/N ratio.Consequently, the optimum combination of cutting parameters for a low value of roughness is 40 m/min, 25 mm/min and 0.5 mm for the axial depth of cut.The surface roughness value obtained under these cutting conditions should be less than 0.35 lm which belongs to the value obtained for Trial 7 (40 m/min, 25 mm/min and 1.0 mm as axial depth of cut).This value of roughness is much lower than the result obtained by Ozturk (Ref 10) where a value of 1.8-5.1 lm was achieved when milling submerged arc-welded Stellite 6 coating using 50 m/min, 0.1 mm/rev and depth of cut of 0.25 mm with whisker-reinforced ceramic cutting tool.

The Effect of Tool Wear on the Machined Surface and Its Surface Roughness
The effect of tool wear on the surface roughness is shown in Fig. 13, where it is observed how, in general, the roughness increases when tool wear is increased until the failure criteria VB max = 0.5 mm are reached.However, further SEM tests were conducted on the machined surface, where results showed that in general the machined surface presented different types of defects, such as matrix tearing, micro-pits, grooves and scratches.It must be highlighted that these defects were more significant when the tool presented higher wear.Figure 14 shows an example of this result when increasing the tool wear.As observed, the severity of the defects increased at the final stage of the cutting process where the tool wear reached a value higher than 0.9 mm, and as a consequence, tool flank wear, radial wear, chipping and breakage were very severe.Also, as the tool has lost its normal cutting ability, the cutting tool has torn the material rather than producing a clean cut of the Stellite developing pressing and matrix tearing on the machined surface; however, in some cases, the value of surface roughness decreased with the increase in tool wear (also shown in Fig. 13), and this phenomenon is due to the pressing and extrusion effect of the over worn tool cutting edge against the material removed.See Fig. 14(b) and (c).

The Effect of Tool Wear on the Deformation Layer
The deformation layer of the machined surface was analyzed at the first stage of the cutting process (L = 70 mm) and at the end of the cutting process (L = 400 mm). Figure 15 shows an example of the details of the deformed layer when cutting under specific cutting conditions.For all of the machined Stellite samples, the distance from the machined surface toward the Stellite-steel interface is in the range of 1.8-3.8mm.
As observed from Fig. 15, no grain fracture or refinement was revealed during the cutting process; however, a larger grain elongation was present, especially when the tool reached a high value of wear (Fig. 15b).It was also observed that the cutting parameters had a significant effect on the depth of the deformation layer.This is explained in Fig. 16, where the depth of deformation layer increased almost 100%, from 79 to 154 lm, corresponding to Trial 1 (low combination of cutting parameters, Fig. 16a) and Trial 9 (high combination of cutting parameters, Fig. 16b), respectively.It was also observed that in general when using a low combination of cutting parameter, the depth of deformation layer slightly increased with an increase in tool wear, as reported in Fig. 16(a); however, a defined pattern could not be established when using a higher combination of cutting parameters (Trial 9, Fig. 16b).This result is probably due to a tempering effect from the cutting heat (Ref 23) which has a softening effect on the machined surface/subsurface when the value of tool wear is large enough.Figure 15(c) shows a detail of the machined surface where a change in color was observed due to cutting heat (area inside dash contour lines).

Effect of Cutting Parameters and Tool Wear on the Residual Stress
The influence of the cutting parameters on the residual stress is shown in Fig. 17.As observed, compressive residual stresses  were generally found to be present in the Stellite layer before conducting the milling process (un-machined condition).These compressive stresses were probably introduced in the Stellite coating as a consequence of a grinding process that was conducted in order to smooth the surface after the welding process (it must be highlighted that samples were provided under this condition).As observed from Fig. 17 in general, a decrease of 65-90% in the compressive stresses was obtained after cutting a length of 70 mm at low speeds ( £ 30 m/min, Fig. 17(a) and (b) machined surface).However, when cutting conditions were increased (cutting speed > 30 m/min), such as for Trial 9 (Fig. 17c), the residual stresses changed 100% from compressive to tensile when cutting the same length of cut (L = 70 mm).This result is probably attributed to the high cutting temperature involved in the process due to the dry cutting environment that was used and due to the low thermal diffusivity of the Stellite 6 (14.82W/m) (Ref 23). Figure 18 shows an example on how the cutting time and, as a consequence, the tool wear affect the residual stresses.When analyzing Fig. 18, it is observed that the value and the depth of the compressive residual stresses significantly decreased when cutting for a short period of time (t = 1.8 min).As observed, the stresses decreased after conducting the milling process in 54% (from À550 to À300 MPa) in Y direction and in 25% (from À470 to À120 MPa) in X direction.Figure 18 also shows how the residual stresses changed completely from compression to tension after machining for a period of 5.3 min where the tool wear increased 80% (from 0.69 to 1.24 mm).As previously mentioned, these results are attributed to the high cutting temperature involved in the process due to the fact that a dry cutting environment was used and due to the low thermal diffusivity of the Stellite 6 (14.82W/m) (Ref 23).

Influence of Cutting Parameters on the Chip Formation and Morphology
Figure 19 shows few examples of the chips collected after the machining process under different cutting conditions.Figure 19(a) highlights that the flow type and the saw-toothed type morphology can be formed in the same chip at the same time.The saw-toothed or serrated shape chip is similar to the chip formed when machining, for example, nickel-based hardfacing layers (Ref 24), in which the formation mechanism is partial fracture due to the existence of precipitates and carbides in the matrix.As seen in Fig. 1, the typical microstructure of the Stellite 6 alloy consists of a-Co (Corich matrix) dendrites surrounded by lamellar mixture of the Co-rich phase and carbide phase.During the machining process, these carbides and the inclusions in the Stellite coating are the sources of crack initiation; therefore, in most of the cases, micro-crack initiation and its propagation are the main mechanism of chip formation for the saw-toothed type morphology.As shown in Fig. 19(b), the cracks highlighted in the image were mostly generated near the Co-rich phases and carbide phases (Stellite coating, Fig. 1).It was also observed that the material deformation inside the chip is non-uniform and the underside of the chip experienced obvious deformation, while the material in the saw tooth only experienced a slight deformation (Fig. 19b).Due to the dynamic behavior of the cracks, the shape and size of the saw tooth were quite different, as shown in Fig. 19(c).Adiabatic shear is another mechanism of chip formation for the saw-toothed type, and as shown in Fig. 19(d), an adiabatic shear zone was found when using higher values of cutting speed and feed rate (40 m/min, 75 mm/ min).As observed, in the adiabatic shear zone, the grain suffered from severe deformation and the shear cracks were generally formed near the adiabatic shear zone.It is worth emphasizing that, at present, the authors are not aware of studies related to chip formation mechanisms when machining cobalt or Stellite alloys; therefore, this also makes a new and relevant contribution in the area related to the dynamic behavior of the cracks and adiabatic shear behavior mechanisms of chip formation when machining this alloy.

Conclusions
• Milling of weld-deposited Stellite 6 under selected cutting conditions has shown that the feed rate is the main factor affecting the tool wear and the surface roughness with a contribution of 83 and 57%, respectively.• The main tool wear mechanisms present in the process were abrasion at low cutting speed ( £ 30 m/min) and coating peeling, chipping, diffusion and breakage for higher cutting speeds (>30 m/min).These later tool wear mechanisms were responsible for the tearing of the material removed producing pressing and matrix tearing on the machined surface affecting its roughness.• The optimum combination of cutting parameters to obtain a minimum roughness and tool wear is 40 m/min, 25 mm/ min and 0.5 mm for the axial depth of cut.• The cutting parameters had a greater influence on the deformation layer compared to the tool wear; however, an increase in this last one produced elongation of the grains near the machined surface.Finally, when the cutting time was increased (>5 min), the original compressive stresses were converted 100% into tensile stresses.• The depth of deformation layer ranged from 75 to 150 lm where a softening layer was generated on the machined surfaces/subsurfaces for most of the cutting tests but vanished when cutting speed and feed rate increased to 40 m/min and 150 mm/min.• The chips presented a flow type and saw-toothed type morphology, and in most of the cases, micro-crack initiation and its propagation were the main mechanisms of chip formation for the saw-toothed type morphology.The adiabatic shear zone was found when using higher feed rate (75 mm/min) and cutting speed (40 m/min).

Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 EDS analysis along the cross-sectional area of the sample near the Stellite-steel interface

Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Mean S/N response graph for tool wear

Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Abrasion mechanism presented on the tool nose and detail of the diffusion mechanism (after etched) for Trial 4 (30 m/min, 25 mm/min and 1.5 mm of axial depth of cut).(a) ToolÕs nose (t < 2.8 min), (b) detail of toolÕs nose area where abrasion mechanism was present, (c) EDS for (b) and (d) cutting edge (flank)

Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Example of coating peeling, chipping and breakage on the cutting edge and wear land appeared in a cutting tool after 30 s of cutting.Trial 6 (30 m/min, 150 mm/min, 1.0 mm).(a) Coating peeling, (b) micro-breakage and micro-chipping, (c) crack and (d) macro-breakage

Fig. 12
Fig. 12 Mean S/N response graph for surface roughness Fig. 13 Effect of tool wear on the machined surface roughness (Trial 4: 30 m/min, 25 mm/min and 1.5 mm as axial depth of cut)

Table 2
Physical and mechanical properties of Stellite 6 alloy

Table 3
Cutting parameters and their levels selected for the study

Table 6
Mean S/N response table for tool wear VB max

Table 7
ANOVA data for the tool wear 316-Volume 26(1) January 2017Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

Table 8
Comparison of the chemical elements present in the tool wear land and the new tool matrix

Table 9
Chemical composition (wt.%) for the inclusion shown in Fig.10(b) Table 10 shows the experimental results for surface roughness and the corresponding S/N ratio for each

Table 10
Experimental results for surface roughness and S/N ratio

Table 11
Mean S/N response for surface roughness Ra

Table 12 ANOVA
data for the surface roughness