Skip to main content
Log in

Timing After Neoadjuvant Therapy Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy: a Propensity Score–Matched Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Currently most surgeons allow 6–12 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy prior to recommending esophagectomy. Given that complete pathologic response correlates to improved survival, some have advocated a longer interval should be entertained to increase the pathologic response. The impact of an expanded neoadjuvant therapy-surgery timing is not currently well understood.

Methods

Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. Patients were divided into 3-time intervals: < 6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, and > 3 months.

Results

We identified 9256 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. There were 7858 (84.9%) males and 1398 (15.1%) females with a median age of 62. The median lymph nodes harvested decreased as timing increased (p < 0.001) and mean lymph nodes positive decreased as timing increased, p = 0.01. The complete response rate also increased as timing increased, p < 0.001. However, this improvement in pathologic complete response did not translate into an increase in median survival. Ninety-day mortality increased as the timing from neoadjuvant therapy increased: 6.4%, 7.9%, and 10.2%, respectively, p = 0.002.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrates that patients who have a prolonged neoadjuvant therapy- esophagectomy interval will have a substantial increase in 90-day mortality. While there was an increase in pathologic complete response rates, this did not translate into an improvement in survival. The current recommendations of a neoadjuvant therapy-surgery timing of 6–12 weeks should remain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubecz A, Gall I, Solymosi N et al. Temporal trends in long-term survival and cure rates in esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: 443-447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13: 194-227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer.[see comment]. New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 355: 11-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 2074-2084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shridhar R, Almhanna K, Meredith KL et al. Radiation therapy and esophageal cancer. Cancer Control 2013; 20: 97-110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 681-692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meredith KL, Weber JM, Turaga KK et al. Pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy is the major determinant of survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 1159-1167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tiesi G, Park W, Gunder M et al. Long-term survival based on pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer. J Surg Res 2017; 216: 65-72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Purwar P, Bambarkar S, Jiwnani S et al. Multimodality management of esophageal cancer. Indian J Surg 2014; 76: 494-503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Biere S, Van Berge Henegouwen M, Maas K, al. e. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; May:379(9829): 1887-1892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikebe M, Morita M, Yamamoto M, Toh Y. Neoadjuvant therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the impact on surgical management. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64: 386-394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 4274-4281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oppedijk V, van der Gaast A, van Lanschot JJ et al. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 385-391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tripp P, Malhotra HK, Javle M et al. Cardiac function after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: comparison of heart dose-volume histogram parameters to multiple gated acquisition scan changes. Dis Esophagus 2005; 18: 400-405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lund M, Alexandersson von Döbeln G, Nilsson M et al. Effects on heart function of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction - a prospective cohort pilot study within a randomized clinical trial. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10: 16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui Z, Tian Y, He B et al. Associated factors of radiation pneumonitis induced by precise radiotherapy in 186 elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 16646-16651.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao Y, Chen L, Zhang S et al. Predictive factors for acute radiation pneumonitis in postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy of esophageal cancer. Thorac Cancer 2015; 6: 49-57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaikh T, Ruth K, Scott WJ et al. Increased time from neoadjuvant chemoradiation to surgery is associated with higher pathologic complete response rates in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99: 270-276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin Q, Xu H, Liu J et al. Does timing of esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation affect outcomes? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 59: 11-18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Markar SR, Johar A, Maisey N et al. Complications during neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis following surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2018;31(5).

  22. Franko J, McAvoy S. Timing of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment in squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery 2018; 164: 455-459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shapiro J, van Hagen P, Lingsma HF et al. Prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increases histopathological response without affecting survival in patients with esophageal or junctional cancer. Ann Surg 2014; 260: 807-813; discussion 813-804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruol A, Rizzetto C, Castoro C et al. Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: does delayed surgery have an impact on outcome? Ann Surg 2010; 252: 788-796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiu CH, Chao YK, Chang HK et al. Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: does delayed surgery impact outcome? Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 4245-4251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Taylor Maramara: concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and final approval. Ravi Shridhar: concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and final approval. Paige Blinn: concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and final approval. Jamie Huston: data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, manuscript revision and final approval. Kenneth Meredith: concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Meredith.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maramara, T., Shridhar, R., Blinn, P. et al. Timing After Neoadjuvant Therapy Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy: a Propensity Score–Matched Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 2342–2351 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05851-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05851-1

Keywords

Navigation