Skip to main content
Log in

Segmental Duodenal Resections: Toward Defining Indications, Complexity, and Coding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Segmental resections of the duodenum are uncommonly performed and are technically challenging due to intimate relationships with the biliary tree, pancreas, and superior mesenteric vessels. The objective of this study was to assess indications, operative strategy, and outcomes of duodenal resections and to advocate that this form of resection deserves its own unique Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and Relative Value Unit (RVU) structure.

Methods

Patients undergoing isolated and partial duodenal resection from 2008-2023 at University of Tennessee Health Science Center affiliated hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Factors examined included clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, operative time, and technique, 90-day morbidity and mortality, and pathologic and survival outcomes.

Results

Thirty-one patients were identified with majority female and a median age of 61. Diagnostic studies included computed tomography and upper (including push) endoscopy. Reconstruction most often involved side-to-side duodenojejunostomy following distal duodenal resection. Intraoperative evaluation (IOE) of the biliary tree was utilized to assess and protect pancreaticobiliary structures in eleven patients. Median operative time was 206 min, increasing to 236 min when IOE was necessary. Procedure-related morbidity was 23% with one 90-day mortality. Median postoperative length of stay was 9 days. Pathology included benign adenoma, adenocarcinoma, GIST, neuroendocrine neoplasms, and erosive metastatic deposit.

Conclusion

Duodenal resections can be effectively employed to safely address diverse pathologies. These procedures are characterized by long operative times, extended hospital stays, and an incidence of postoperative complications that mimics that of pancreatic resection. This work highlights the need for modification to the CPT system to accurately define these distinct procedures for future research endeavors and development of a more accurate valuation unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material. Raw data that suport the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bakaeen FG, Murr MM, Sarr MG, et al. What prognostic factors are important in duodenal adenocarcinoma? Arch Surg. Jun 2000;135(6):635-41; discussion 641-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.6.635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cloyd JM, Norton JA, Visser BC, Poultsides GA. Does the extent of resection impact survival for duodenal adenocarcinoma? Analysis of 1,611 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. Feb 2015;22(2):573-80. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4020-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaklamanos IG, Bathe OF, Franceschi D, Camarda C, Levi J, Livingstone AS. Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. Jan 2000;179(1):37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00269-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou B, Zhang M, Wu J, Yan S, Zhou J, Zheng S. Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local resection in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum. World J Surg Oncol. Aug 2013;11:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanco-Fernandez G, Rojas-Holguin A, De-Armas-Conde N, Gallarin-Salamanca I, Lopez-Guerra D, Jaen-Torrejimeno I. Side-to-side duodenojejunostomy after resection of third and fourth duodenal portions with pancreatic preservation. Updat Surg. Dec 2020;72(4):1105-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00823-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dorcaratto D, Heneghan HM, Fiore B, et al. Segmental duodenal resection: indications, surgical techniques and postoperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 2015;19(4):736-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2744-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell WK, Thomas PF, Zaitoun AM, Brooks AJ, Lobo DN. Pancreas preserving distal duodenectomy: A versatile operation for a range of infra-papillary pathologies. World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21 2017;23(23):4252-4261. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4252

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourgouin S, Hornez E, Guiramand J, et al. Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): arguments for conservative surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 2013;17(3):482-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2075-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Molina FJ, Mateo-Vallejo F, Franco-Osorio Jde D, Esteban-Ramos JL, Rivero-Henandez I. Surgical approach for tumours of the third and fourth part of the duodenum. Distal pancreas-sparing duodenectomy. Int J Surg. Jun 2015;18:143-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Golhar A, Mangla V, Mehrotra S, Lalwani S, Mehta N, Nundy S. Limited distal duodenal resection: Surgical approach and outcomes. A case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). Jun 2018;30:36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakr A, Emile SH, Abdallah E, Thabet W, Khafagy W. Predictive Factors for Small Intestinal and Colonic Anastomotic Leak: a Multivariate Analysis. Indian J Surg. Dec 2017;79(6):555-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1556-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. Jul 2006;244(1):10-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Penumadu P, Barreto SG, Goel M, Shrikhande SV. Pancreatoduodenectomy - preventing complications. Indian J Surg Oncol. Mar 2015;6(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-013-0286-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim MJ, Choi SB, Han HJ, et al. Clinicopathological analysis and survival outcome of duodenal adenocarcinoma. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. May 2014;30(5):254-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2013.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun H, Liu Y, Lv L, Li J, Liao X, Gong W. Prognostic Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Duodenal Adenocarcinoma With Survival: A Retrospective Study. Front Oncol 2021;11:795891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.795891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Burch J, Ahmad I. Gastrointestinal Stromal Cancer. StatPearls. 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chok AY, Koh YX, Ow MY, Allen JC, Jr., Goh BK. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. Oct 2014;21(11):3429-38. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3788-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Onkendi EO, Boostrom SY, Sarr MG, et al. 15-year experience with surgical treatment of duodenal carcinoma: a comparison of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal carcinomas. J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 2012;16(4):682-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1808-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spalding DR, Isla AM, Thompson JN, Williamson RC. Pancreas-sparing distal duodenectomy for infrapapillary neoplasms. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. Mar 2007;89(2):130-5. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X155815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Otani K, Ishihara S, Nozawa H, et al. A retrospective study of laparoscopic surgery for small bowel obstruction. Ann Med Surg (Lond). Apr 2017;16:34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Al Abbas AI, Wang C, Hamad AB, et al. Mentorship and formal robotic proficiency skills curriculum improve subsequent generations’ learning curve for the robotic distal pancreatectomy. HPB. Dec 2021;23(12):1849-55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DP and SB: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing and editing of the final manuscript. AA: writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Devanshi D. Patel MD or Stephen W. Behrman MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, D.D., Abdulkarim, A.B. & Behrman, S.W. Segmental Duodenal Resections: Toward Defining Indications, Complexity, and Coding. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 2373–2379 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05837-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05837-z

Keywords

Navigation