Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing Conduit Ischemia and Anastomotic Leaks in Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Six Principles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is an accepted approach for distal esophageal (DE) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. Its reported weaknesses are limited loco-regional resection and high anastomotic leak rates. We have used laparoscopic assistance to perform a THE (LapTHE) as our preferred method of resection for GEJ and DE cancers for over 20 years. Our unique approach and experience may provide technical insights and perhaps superior outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed all patients who underwent LapTHE for DE and GEJ malignancy over 10 years (2011–2020). We included 6 principles in our approach: (1) minimize dissection trauma using laparoscopy; (2) routine Kocher maneuver; (3) division of lesser sac adhesions exposing the entire gastroepiploic arcade; (4) gaining excess conduit mobility, allowing resection of proximal stomach, and performing the anastomosis with a well perfused stomach; (5) stapled side-to-side anastomosis; and (6) routine feeding jejunostomy and early oral diet.

Results

One hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The median number of lymph nodes procured was 19 (range 5–49). Negative margins were achieved in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 98–100%). Median hospital stay was 7 days. Overall major complication rate was 24% (17–32%), 90-day mortality was 2.0% (0.4–5.8%), and reoperation was 5.4% (2.4–10%). Three patients (2.0%, 0.4–5.8%) developed anastomotic leaks. Median follow-up was 901 days (range 52–5240). Nine patients (6.1%, 2.8–11%) developed anastomotic strictures.

Conclusions

Routine use of LapTHE for DE and GEJ cancers and inclusion of these six operative principles allow for a low rate of anastomotic complications relative to national benchmarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haisley KR, Abdelmoaty WF, Dunst CM. Laparoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Invasive Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2021;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04506-4

  2. Borggreve AS, Kingma BF, Domrachev SA, et al. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in the era of multimodality management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Published online 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13677

  3. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: Clinical experience and refinements. In: Annals of Surgery. Vol 230. ; 1999. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199909000-00012

  4. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: Changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814697f2

  5. Orringer MB. Transhiatal Esophagectomy: How I Teach It. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2016;102(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.044

  6. Hulscher JBF, Tijssen JGP, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: A meta-analysis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2001;72(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02570-4

  7. Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM. Use of Pedicled Omentum in Esophagogastric Anastomosis for Prevention of Anastomotic Leak. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2006;82(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.101

  8. Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2013;95(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.045

  9. Kawoosa NU, Dar AM, Sharma ML, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: Experience from a single tertiary care institution. World J Surg. 2011;35(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1020-z

  10. Grotenhuis BA, van Heijl M, Zehetner J, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer: Extended or regional lymphadenectomy? In: Annals of Surgery. Vol 252. ; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fcd730

  11. Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, Huang XB, Wang JS. Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2011;149(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.08.005

  12. Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: An analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2013;96(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.119

  13. Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Exploratory analysis of JCOG9907. Ann Surg. 2017;265(6). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001828

  14. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Blackstone EH, et al. Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2016;29(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12540

  15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

  16. Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2015;262(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098

  17. Weijs TJ, Seesing MFJ, van Rossum PSN, et al. Internal and External Validation of a multivariable Model to Define Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia After Esophagectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2016;20(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3083-5

  18. Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611

  19. Dresner SM, Lamb PJ, Wayman J, Hayes N, Griffin SM. Benign anastomotic stricture following transthoracic subtotal oesophagectomy and stapled oesophago-gastrostomy: risk factors and management. British Journal of Surgery. 2002;87(3). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01383-24.x

  20. Kochman ML, McClave SA, Boyce HW. The refractory and the recurrent esophageal stricture: A definition [5]. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.050

  21. van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, et al. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(22). https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1112088

  22. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial. Ann Surg. Published online 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171

  23. van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031

  24. Michalinos A, Antoniou SA, Ntourakis D, et al. Gastric ischemic preconditioning may reduce the incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2020;33(10). https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaa010

  25. Heger P, Blank S, Diener MK, et al. Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2017;21(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3416-z

  26. Akiyama S, Ito S, Sekiguchi H, et al. Preoperative embolization of gastric arteries for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 1996;120(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80075-4

  27. Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(13). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x

  28. Nguyen NT, Nguyen XMT, Reavis KM, Elliott C, Masoomi H, Stamos MJ. Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2083-5

  29. Köhler H, Jansen-Winkeln B, Maktabi M, et al. Evaluation of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for the measurement of ischemic conditioning effects of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06675-4

  30. Li Q, He X, Wang Y, Liu H, Xu D, Guo F. Review of spectral imaging technology in biomedical engineering: achievements and challenges. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(10). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.18.10.100901

  31. Jansen SM, de Bruin DM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Optical techniques for perfusion monitoring of the gastric tube after esophagectomy: A review of technologies and thresholds. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2018;31(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dox161

  32. Morse C, Predina J, Lockard T. Near-Infrared Perfusion During Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov. Published online October 29, 2020.

  33. Patel Y, Alaichi J. NIF-Guided RAMIE Using ICG Versus OTE Feasibility RCT (RAMIE vs OTE). ClinicalTrials.gov. Published online June 25, 2021.

  34. Kenichi Nakamura 1 KS 1, HA 2, SS 1, MN 1, KK 1, SK 1, KI 1, IU. Impact of the Kocher maneuver on anastomotic leak after esophagogastrostomy in combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy. Fujita Med J . 2019;5(2):36–44.

  35. Ribet M, Debrueres B, Lecomte-Houcke M. Resection for advanced cancer of the thoracic esophagus: Cervical or thoracic anastomosis? Late results of a prospective randomized study. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1992;103(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(19)34963-3

  36. Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21510

  37. Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TCK, Hop WCJ, Wijnhoven BPL, de Jonge J. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822676a9

  38. Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young JEM. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2001;14(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00187.x

  39. Huang C, Xu X, Zhuang B, et al. A comparison of cervical delta-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1097-4

  40. Toh Y, Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, et al. The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. Surg Today. 2009;39(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3827-2

  41. Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Pairolero PC. Esophagogastrectomy: The influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2005;9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.025

  42. Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2005;129(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024

  43. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side- to-side stapled anastomosis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2000;119(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70183-8

  44. Collard JM. The Stomach as an Esophageal Substitute after Total or Subtotal Esophagectomy. Comparison between the Gastric Tube and the Whole Stomach. Catholic University of Louvain; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, et al. Cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis: Technique and initial experience. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(SUPPL.3). https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.02.06

  46. Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, Zhang K, Chen LQ. Linear Stapled Esophagogastrostomy is more Effective than Hand-Sewn or Circular Stapler in Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture: A Comparative Clinical Study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2011;15(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1490-1

  47. Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg. 2013;37(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1932-x

  48. Furukawa Y, Hanyu N, Hirai K, et al. Usefulness of automatic triangular anastomosis for esophageal cancer surgery using a linear stapler (TA-30). Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;11(2).

  49. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008

  50. Kingma BF, Steenhagen E, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Nutritional aspects of enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24827

  51. Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Allen MS, et al. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2010;37(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.034

  52. Weijs TJ, van Eden HWJ, Ruurda JP, et al. Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.06.73

  53. D’Journo XB, Ouattara M, Loundou A, et al. Prognostic impact of weight loss in 1-year survivors after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2012;25(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01282.x

  54. Martin L, Lagergren P. Long-term weight change after oesophageal cancer surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 2009;96(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6723

  55. Weijs TJ, Berkelmans GHK, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, et al. Immediate Postoperative Oral Nutrition Following Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Clinical Trial. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Vol 102. ; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.067

  56. Chen R, Yin W, Gao H, Zhang H, Huang Y. The effects of early enteral nutrition on the nutritional statuses, gastrointestinal functions, and inflammatory responses of gastrointestinal tumor patients. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(6).

  57. Watson M, Trufan S, Benbow JH, Gower NL, Hill J, Salo JC. Jejunostomy at the time of esophagectomy is associated with improved short-term perioperative outcomes: Analysis of the NSQIP database. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11(2). https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2020.02.06

  58. Giwa F, Salami A, Abioye AI. Hospital esophagectomy volume and postoperative length of stay: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2018;215(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.022

  59. Puccetti F, Wijnhoven BPL, Kuppusamy M, Hubka M, Low DE. Impact of standardized clinical pathways on esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2022;35(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doab027

  60. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182590603

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Matias E. Czerwonko, Farhood Farjah & Brant K. Oelschlager

Authors
  1. Matias E. Czerwonko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farhood Farjah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brant K. Oelschlager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matias E. Czerwonko.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 334 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czerwonko, M.E., Farjah, F. & Oelschlager, B.K. Reducing Conduit Ischemia and Anastomotic Leaks in Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Six Principles. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 2316–2324 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05835-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05835-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation