Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intensive Systematic “Train-the-Trainer” Course as an Effective Strategy to Improve Detection of Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

To improve the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC), a train-the-trainer (TTT) course was developed. This trial aimed to investigate whether TTT courses from trained trainers could improve trainees’ EGC detection.

Methods

In this multi-center, retrospective study, the training was carried out 8 times in one year. Clinical records one year before (“2016”), during (“2017”), and after (“2018”) the course were collected. The primary endpoint was the improvement of EGC detection rate after TTT courses.

Results

Twenty-four trainees from 17 hospitals were included in this study. A total of 123,416 esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 65,570 colonoscopy procedures were analyzed. The early gastric cancer detection rate (EDR) was 0.101% in 2016, which significantly increased to 0.338% in 2018 (p = 0.015). The early gastric cancer ratio (ECR, ratio of newly detected EGCs to all newly detected gastric cancers) in 2016 was 8.440%, which consistently increased to 11.853% and 19.778% in 2017 and 2018 (p = 0.006), respectively. In contrast, the advanced gastric cancer detection rate (ADR) was similar before, during, or after the course (p = 0.987). The 3-year EDR, ECR, and ADR in esophageal and colorectal cancer were not significantly different.

Conclusions

The systematic training course can improve EGC detection rate and may be an effective educational strategy to reduce gastrointestinal cancers mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

EGC :

Early gastric cancer

TTT :

Train-the-trainer

NBI :

Narrow-band imaging

EGD :

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

EDR :

Early cancer detection rate

ECR :

Early cancer ratio

ADR :

Advanced cancer detection rate

BLI :

Blue laser imaging

IEE :

Image-enhanced endoscopy

CE :

Chromoendoscopy

ME :

Magnifying endoscopy

AI :

Artificial intelligence

CAD :

Computer-aided diagnosis

GI :

Gastrointestinal

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2018;68:394–424.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leung WK, Wu MS, Kakugawa Y, Kim JJ, Yeoh KG, Goh KL, et al. Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. The Lancet Oncology. 2008;9:279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi IJ, Lee JH, Kim YI, Kim CG, Cho SJ, Lee JY, et al. Long-term outcome comparison of endoscopic resection and surgery in early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indication for endoscopic resection. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2015;81:333–41.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanabe S, Hirabayashi S, Oda I, Ono H, Nashimoto A, Isobe Y, et al. Gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection in Japan from 2004 through 2006: JGCA nationwide registry conducted in 2013. Gastric cancer. 2017;20:834–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kato M, Kaise M, Yonezawa J, Toyoizumi H, Yoshimura N, Yoshida Y, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging achieves superior accuracy in the differential diagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified with white-light endoscopy: a prospective study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2010;72:523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ezoe Y, Muto M, Uedo N, Doyama H, Yao K, Oda I, et al. Magnifying narrowband imaging is more accurate than conventional white-light imaging in diagnosis of gastric mucosal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:2017–25.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Osawa H, Yamamoto H. Present and future status of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and blue laser imaging technology. Digestive endoscopy. 2014;26 Suppl 1:105–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dohi O, Yagi N, Naito Y, Fukui A, Gen Y, Iwai N, et al. Blue laser imaging-bright improves the real-time detection rate of early gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2019;89:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaguchi D, Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Ono S, Niimi K, Mochizuki S, et al. Evaluation of image-enhanced endoscopic technology using advanced diagnostic endoscopy for the detection of early gastric cancer: a pilot study. Endoscopy international open. 2017;5:E825–e33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen D, Wu L, Li Y, Zhang J, Liu J, Huang L, et al. Comparing blind spots of unsedated ultrafine, sedated, and unsedated conventional gastroscopy with and without artificial intelligence: a prospective, single-blind, 3-parallel-group, randomized, single-center trial. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2020;91:332–9.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu L, Zhou W, Wan X, Zhang J, Shen L, Hu S, et al. A deep neural network improves endoscopic detection of early gastric cancer without blind spots. Endoscopy. 2019;51:522–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanesaka T, Lee TC, Uedo N, Lin K-P, Chen H-Z, Lee J-Y, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for identifying and delineating early gastric cancers in magnifying narrow-band imaging. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2018;87:1339–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirasawa T, Aoyama K, Tanimoto T, et al. Application of artificial intelligence using a convolutional neural network for detecting gastric cancer in endoscopic images. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu Y, Wang QC, Xu MD, et al. Application of convolutional neural network in the diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer based on conventional endoscopy. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2019;89:806–15.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamazato T, Oyama T, Yoshida T, Baba Y, Yamanouchi K, Ishii Y, et al. Two Years Intensive Training in Endoscopic Diagnosis Facilitates Detection of Early Gastric Cancer. Internal Medicine.2012;51:1461–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mabe K, Yao K, Nojima M, et al. An educational intervention to improve the endoscopist’s ability to correctly diagnose small gastric lesions using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging. Annals of Gastroenterology. 2014;27:149–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yao K, Uedo N, Muto M, Tanuma T, Kato M. et al. Development of an E-learning System for the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: An International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ebiomedicine. 2016;9:AB327–AB.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Annals of Gastroenterology. 2013;26:11–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagahama T, Yao K, Imamura K, Kojima T, Ohtsu K, Chuman K,et al. Diagnostic performance of conventional endoscopy in the identification of submucosal invasion by early gastric cancer: the “non-extension sign” as a simple diagnostic marker. Gastric cancer.20:304–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao K, Uedo N, Muto M, Ishikawa H. Development of an e-learning system for teaching endoscopists how to diagnose early gastric cancer: basic principles for improving early detection. Gastric cancer. 2017;20:28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horiguchi N, Tahara T, Kawamura T, Okubo M, Tahara S, Nagasaka M, et al. A Comparative Study of White Light Endoscopy, Chromoendoscopy and Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging in the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer after Helicobacter pylori Eradication. Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD. 2017;26:357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hosokawa O, Hattori M, Douden K, Hayashi H, Kaizaki Y. et al. Difference in accuracy between gastroscopy and colonoscopy for detection of cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:442–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JM, Huo SM, Lee HH, Lee BI, Song HJ, Choi MG. Longer Observation Time Increases Proportion of Neoplasms Detected by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:460–9.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere appreciation to following participating endoscopists and their effort with data recording and IEE images providing: Dr. Wen Jing, Dr. Qiao Weiguang, Dr. Yuan Xiaogang, Dr. Lin Jianjiao, Dr. Wang Zhenggen, Dr. Pan Zhaojie, Dr. Ma Yuqian, Dr. Fu Meili, Dr. Zhang Yan, Dr. Li Kuangyi, Dr. Lei Haoqiang, Dr. Han Yanfeng, Dr. Tan Xiaojun, Dr. Chen Muwei, Dr. Yang Wei, Dr. Liu Wenting, Dr. Chen Shuxian, Dr. Zhu Haishan, Dr. Shen Bingzhen, Dr. He Junhui, Dr. Fu Ya, Dr. Luo Xiaobei, Dr. Zou Xiaoli, Dr. Zhang Qingfei, and Dr. Shen Yanhua.

Funding

This work was supported by the Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project (2022A1515011477, 2020A1414010265, 2017B020209003), the President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (No.2018C2025), Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund (202102020163).This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Funds of China (12026605) and we would like to acknowledge Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou for its support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LXB was involved in the conception and design; analysis and interpretation of the data and drafting of the article. KY was involved in the conception and design of the study; and critical revision of the article. LX, LBT, ZCJ, and WJH was involved in interpretation of the data and drafting of the article. HSL, CZY, LAM, and HY were involved in the systematic training; analysis and interpretation of the data. LZH was involved in statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. LSD was involved in conception and design of the study; and critical revision of the article. HZL was involved in the conception and design; analysis and interpretation of the data, and revision of the article. All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and final approved the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Side Liu or Zelong Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4165 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 20 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, X., Yao, K., Lin, X. et al. Intensive Systematic “Train-the-Trainer” Course as an Effective Strategy to Improve Detection of Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 1303–1312 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05640-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05640-w

Keywords

Navigation