Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of Intraoperative Pyloric Drainage on Delayed Gastric Emptying Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative pyloric drainage in esophagectomy may reduce delayed gastric emptying (DGE) but is associated with risk of biliary reflux and other complications. Existing evidence is heterogenous. Hence, this meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes of intraoperative pyloric drainage versus no intervention in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane were searched from inception up to July 2022. Exclusion criteria were lack of objective evidence (e.g., symptoms of nausea or vomiting) of DGE. The primary outcome was incidence of DGE. Secondary outcomes were incidence of pulmonary complications, bile reflux, anastomotic leak, operative time, and mortality.

Results

There were nine studies including 1164 patients (pyloric drainage n = 656, no intervention n = 508). Intraoperative pyloric drainage included pyloroplasty (n = 166 (25.3%)), pyloromyotomy (n = 214 (32.6%)), botulinum toxin injection (n = 168 (25.6%)), and pyloric dilatation (n = 108 (16.5%)). Pyloric drainage is associated with reduced DGE (odds ratio (OR): 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39–0.74, I2 = 50%). There was no significant difference in incidence of pulmonary complications (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51–1.08; I2 = 0%), biliary reflux (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.80–2.54, I2 = 0%), anastomotic leak (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.48–1.29; I2 = 0%), operative time (MD: + 22.16 min, 95% CI: − 13.27–57.59 min; I2 = 76%), and mortality (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.48–2.64, I2 = 0%) between the pyloric drainage and no intervention groups.

Conclusions

Pyloric drainage in esophagectomy reduces DGE but has similar post-operative outcomes. Further prospective studies should be carried out to compare various pyloric drainage techniques and its use in esophagectomy, especially minimally-invasive esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data collected for this study were obtained from published articles. Requests may be made to the corresponding author for data collected.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, and Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kato H and Nakajima M. Treatments for esophageal cancer: a review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;61:330-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuwano H, Nishimura Y, Oyama T, Kato H, Kitagawa Y, Kusano M, Shimada H, Takiuchi H, Toh Y, Doki Y, Naomoto Y, Matsubara H, Miyazaki T, Muto M, and Yanagisawa A. Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Carcinoma of the Esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 2015;12:1-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sohda M and Kuwano H. Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer Treatment. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;23:1-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Postlethwait RW. Complications and deaths after operations for esophageal carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;85:827-31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tam PC, Fok M, and Wong J. Reexploration for complications after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:1122-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng B, Tan QY, Jiang YG, Zhao YP, Zhou JH, Chen GC, and Wang RW. Prevention of early delayed gastric emptying after high-level esophagogastrostomy by "pyloric digital fracture". World J Surg 2010;34:2837-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fok M, Cheng SW, and Wong J. Pyloroplasty versus no drainage in gastric replacement of the esophagus. Am J Surg 1991;162:447-52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart CL, Wilson L, Hamm A, Bartsch C, Boniface M, Gleisner A, Mitchell JD, Weyant MJ, Meguid R, Gajdos C, Edil BH, and McCarter M. Is Chemical Pyloroplasty Necessary for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:1414-1418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Konradsson M and Nilsson M. Delayed emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:S835-s844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Kim SK, Kang KW, and Zo JI. Intrathoracic gastric emptying of solid food after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:443-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, Miller JD, and Bennett WF. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 2002;19:160-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boshier PR, Adam ME, Doran S, Muthuswamy K, and Hanna GB. Effects of intraoperative pyloric stretch procedure on outcomes after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2018;31:

  14. Palmes D, Weilinghoff M, Colombo-Benkmann M, Senninger N, and Bruewer M. Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2007;392:135-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaur P and Swanson SJ. Should we continue to drain the pylorus in patients undergoing an esophagectomy? Dis Esophagus 2014;27:568-73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arya S, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, and Hanna GB. The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Diseases of the Esophagus 2015;28:326-335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Konradsson M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bruns C, Chaudry MA, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, Darling GE, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Gutschow CA, van Hillegersberg R, Hofstetter W, Hölscher AH, Kitagawa Y, van Lanschot JJB, Lindblad M, Ferri LE, Low DE, Luyer MDP, Ndegwa N, Mercer S, Moorthy K, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Nieuwehuijzen GAP, Pattyn P, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, Räsänen J, Schneider PM, Schröder W, Sgromo B, Van Veer H, Wijnhoven BPL, and Nilsson M. Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process. Dis Esophagus 2020;33:

  18. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, and Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj 2019;366:l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, and Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, and Watanabe N. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:7-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, and Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj 2003;327:557-60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nienhüser H, Heger P, Crnovrsanin N, Schaible A, Sisic L, Fuchs HF, Berlth F, Grimminger PP, Nickel F, Billeter AT, Probst P, Müller-Stich BP, and Schmidt T. Mechanical stretching and chemical pyloroplasty to prevent delayed gastric emptying after esophageal cancer resection-a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus 2022;

  24. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Canon CL, Dhawan R, and Eloubeidi MA. Is botulinum toxin injection of the pylorus during Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy the optimal drainage strategy? Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2009;137:565-572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kao CH, Chen CY, Chen CL, Wang SJ, and Yeh SH. Gastric emptying of the intrathoracic stomach as oesophageal replacement for oesophageal carcinomas. Nucl Med Commun 1994;15:152-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohajeri G, Tabatabaei SA, Hashemi SM, and Hemmati H. Comparison of pyloromyotomy, pyloric buginage, and intact pylorus on gastric drainage in gastric pull-up surgery after esophagectomy. J Res Med Sci 2016;21:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tham JC, Nixon M, Ariyarathenam AV, Humphreys L, Berrisford R, Wheatley T, and Sanders G. Intraoperative pyloric botulinum toxin injection during Ivor-Lewis gastroesophagectomy to prevent delayed gastric emptying. Dis Esophagus 2019;32:

  28. Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, and van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2011;28:29-35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dubois A, Weise VK, and Kopin IJ. Postoperative ileus in the rat: physiopathology, etiology and treatment. Ann Surg 1973;178:781-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Antonoff MB, Puri V, Meyers BF, Baumgartner K, Bell JM, Broderick S, Krupnick AS, Kreisel D, Patterson GA, and Crabtree TD. Comparison of pyloric intervention strategies at the time of esophagectomy: is more better? Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1950–7; discussion 1657–8.

  31. Sutcliffe RP, Forshaw MJ, Tandon R, Rohatgi A, Strauss DC, Botha AJ, and Mason RC. Anastomotic strictures and delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: incidence, risk factors and management. Dis Esophagus 2008;21:712-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin JT, Federico JA, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, and Fabian T. Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: a single center's experience with botulinum toxin. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1708–13; discussion 1713–4.

  33. Boshier P, Huddy J, Zaninotto G, and Hanna G. Dumping syndrome after esophagectomy: A systematic reviewof the literature. Diseases of the Esophagus 2016;29:104A.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, and Kestens PJ. The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ. Ann Surg 1998;227:33-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hill AD, Walsh TN, Hamilton D, Freyne P, O'Hare N, Byrne PJ, and Hennessy TP. Erythromycin improves emptying of the denervated stomach after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:879-81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bemelman WA, Brummelkamp WH, and Bartelsman JF. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the pylorus after esophagogastrostomy without a drainage procedure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:424-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khan OA, Manners J, Rengarajan A, and Dunning J. Does pyloroplasty following esophagectomy improve early clinical outcomes? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:247-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang YQ, Ye WW, Lu T, Zhang WM, and Xu Y. Application of mechanical dilatation of the pyloric sphincter in esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2004;12:19-22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim JH, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Kim SK, and Zo JI. Balloon dilatation of the pylorus for delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:1105-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bemelman WA, Taat CW, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ, and Obertop H. Delayed postoperative emptying after esophageal resection is dependent on the size of the gastric substitute. J Am Coll Surg 1995;180:461-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Akkerman RD, Haverkamp L, van Hillegersberg R, and Ruurda JP. Surgical techniques to prevent delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric interposition: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:1512-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee JI, Choi S, and Sung J. A flow visualization model of gastric emptying in the intrathoracic stomach after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:1039-45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leppink J, Winston K, and O'Sullivan P. Statistical significance does not imply a real effect. Perspect Med Educ 2016;5:122-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Morita M, Nakanoko T, Fujinaka Y, Kubo N, Yamashita N, Yoshinaga K, Saeki H, Emi Y, Kakeji Y, Shirabe K, and Maehara Y. In-hospital mortality after a surgical resection for esophageal cancer: analyses of the associated factors and historical changes. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:1757-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, and Sun W. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Prasad P, Wallace L, Navidi M, and Phillips AW. Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy: A systematic review and evaluation of benchmarking parameters. Surgery 2022;171:1247-1256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Giugliano DN, Berger AC, Meidl H, Pucci MJ, Rosato EL, Keith SW, Evans NR, and Palazzo F. Do intraoperative pyloric interventions predict the need for postoperative endoscopic interventions after minimally invasive esophagectomy? Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen NT, Dholakia C, Nguyen XM, and Reavis K. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy without pyloroplasty: analysis of 109 cases. Am Surg 2010;76:1135-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nobel T, Tan KS, Barbetta A, Adusumilli P, Bains M, Bott M, Jones D, and Molena D. Does pyloric drainage have a role in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy? Surg Endosc 2019;33:3218-3227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AMO contributed to study concept and design; LJH, ADRN, and KSC contributed to systematic review of literature and drafting of manuscript; all authors did critical review of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aung Myint Oo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the author.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jing Hong Loo and Aubrey Ding Rui Ng are co-first authors.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 140 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loo, J.H., Ng, A.D.R., Chan, K.S. et al. Outcomes of Intraoperative Pyloric Drainage on Delayed Gastric Emptying Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 823–835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05573-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05573-w

Keywords

Navigation