Skip to main content
Log in

Ulcer Scarring in the Gastric Conduit Is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for AL.

Methods

Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between 2009 and 2019 (N = 346) and those between 2020 and 2022 (N = 17) were enrolled in the study to identify the risk factors for AL and the study to assess the association between the risk factors and blood flow in the gastric conduit evaluated by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, respectively.

Results

AL occurred in 17 out of 346 patients (4.9%). Peptic or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcer scars were independently associated with AL (OR 6.872, 95% CI 2.112–22.365) in addition to diabetes mellitus. The ulcer scars in the anterior/posterior gastric wall were more frequently observed in patients with AL than in those without AL (75.0% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.042). The median flow velocity of ICG fluorescence in the gastric conduits with the scars was significantly lower than in those without the scars (1.17 cm/s vs. 2.23 cm/s, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Peptic or ESD ulcer scarring is a risk factor for AL after esophagectomy in addition to diabetes mellitus. The scars in the anterior/posterior gastric wall are significantly associated with AL, impairing blood flow of the gastric conduit. Preventive interventions and careful postoperative management should be provided to minimize the risk and severity of AL in patients with these risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah MA, Kennedy EB, Catenacci DV, Deighton DC, Goodman KA, Malhotra NK, Willett C, Stiles B, Sharma P, Tang L, Wijnhoven BPL, Hofstetter WL. Treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:2677–2694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P, Busch OR, van Lanschot JJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2010;251:1064–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1919–1926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saeki H, Tsutsumi S, Tajiri H, Yukaya T, Tsutsumi R, Nishimura S, Nakaji Y, Kudou K, Akiyama S, Kasagi Y, Nakanishi R, Nakashima Y, Sugiyama M, Ohgaki K, Sonoda H, Oki E, Maehara Y. Prognostic significance of postoperative complications after curative resection for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg 2017;265:527–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goense L, van Dijk WA, Govaert JA, van Rossum PS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Hospital costs of complications after esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:696–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugawara K, Yagi K, Aikou S, Yamashita H, Seto Y. Impacts of complications after esophageal cancer surgery on health-related quality of life and nutritional status. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022 Jul 4. Epub ahead of print.

  8. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parekh K, Iannettoni MD. Complications of esophageal resection and reconstruction. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;19:79–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074–2084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gronnier C, Tréchot B, Duhamel A, Mabrut JY, Bail JP, Carrere N, Lefevre JH, Brigand C, Vaillant JC, Adham M, Msika S, Demartines N, El Nakadi I, Piessen G, Meunier B, Collet D, Mariette C; FREGAT Working Group-FRENCH-AFC, Luc G, Cabau M, Jougon J, Badic B, Lozach P, Cappeliez S, Lebreton G, Alves A, Flamein R, Pezet D, Pipitone F, Iuga BS, Contival N, Pappalardo E, Mantziari S, Hec F, Vanderbeken M, Tessier W, Briez N, Fredon F, Gainant A, Mathonnet M, Bigourdan JM, Mezoughi S, Ducerf C, Baulieux J, Pasquer A, Baraket O, Poncet G, Vaudoyer D, Enfer J, Villeneuve L, Glehen O, Coste T, Fabre JM, Marchal F, Frisoni R, Ayav A, Brunaud L, Bresler L, Cohen C, Aze O, Venissac N, Pop D, Mouroux J, Donici I, Prudhomme M, Felli E, Lisunfui S, Seman M, Petit GG, Karoui M, Tresallet C, Ménégaux F, Hannoun L, Malgras B, Lantuas D, Pautrat K, Pocard M, Valleur P. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer resection: results of a European multicenter study. Ann Surg 2014; 260:764–770.

  12. Kumagai K, Rouvelas I, Tsai JA, Mariosa D, Klevebro F, Lindblad M, Ye W, Lundell L, Nilsson M. Meta-analysis of postoperative morbidity and perioperative mortality in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers. Br J Surg 2014;101:321–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, Tomita N, Nakagoe T, Shimada M, Sugihara K, Mori M. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg 2014;260:259–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang C, Yao H, Huang Q, Lu H, Xu M, Wu J. A novel nomogram to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients after oesophagectomy. BMC Surg 2020;20:64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Goense L, van Rossum PS, Tromp M, Joore HC, van Dijk D, Kroese AC, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage and pneumonia after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gooszen JAH, Goense L, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2018;105:552–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Voeten DM, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, Wilschut JA, Ferri LE, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI; Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) Group. Overall volume trends in esophageal cancer surgery results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Ann Surg 2021;274:449–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang AC. Centralizing esophagectomy to Improve outcomes and enhance clinical research: Invited expert review. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:916–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lam A, Fleischer B, Alverdy J. The biology of anastomotic healing-the unknown overwhelms the known. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2160–2166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Ninomiya Y, Yatabe K, Higuchi T, Yamamoto M, Kanamori K, Tajima K. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for evaluating blood flow in the reconstructed conduit after esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 2022;52:369–376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ignacio de Ulíbarri J, González-Madroño A, de Villar NG, González P, González B, Mancha A, Rodríguez F, Fernández G. CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp 2005;20:38–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1984;85:1001–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling G, Davies A, D'Journo XB, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Hardwick R, Hoelscher A, Hofstetter W, Jobe B, Kitagawa Y, Law S, Mariette C, Maynard N, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Pera M, Pramesh CS, Puig S, Reynolds JV, Schroeder W, Smithers M, Wijnhoven BPL. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2019;269:291–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds). International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016.

  25. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer 2021;24:1–21.

  26. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Oguma J, Kazuno A, Yamazaki Y, Ninomiya Y, Ochiai H, Tachimori Y. Blood flow speed of the gastric conduit assessed by indocyanine green fluorescence: New predictive evaluation of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Medicine 2016;95:e4386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kakeji Y, Takahashi A, Udagawa H, Unno M, Endo I, Kunisaki C, Taketomi A, Tangoku A, Masaki T, Marubashi S, Yoshida K, Gotoh M, Konno H, Miyata H, Seto Y; National Clinical Database. Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: Report of National Clinical database 2011-2016. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2018;2:37–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida N, Yamamoto H, Baba H, Miyata H, Watanabe M, Toh Y, Matsubara H, Kakeji Y, Seto Y. Can minimally invasive esophagectomy replace open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer? Latest analysis of 24,233 esophagectomies from the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Surg 2020;272:118–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fransen LFC, Berkelmans GHK, Asti E, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Berlth F, Bonavina L, Brown A, Bruns C, van Daele E, Gisbertz SS, Grimminger PP, Gutschow CA, Hannink G, Hölscher AH, Kauppi J, Lagarde SM, Mercer S, Moons J, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Palazzo F, Pattyn P, Raptis DA, Räsanen J, Rosato EL, Rouvelas I, Schmidt HM, Schneider PM, Schröder W, van der Sluis PC, Wijnhoven BPL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP; EsoBenchmark Collaborative. The effect of postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy on long-term survival: an international multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg 2021;274:e1129–e1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao L, Zhao G, Li J, Qu B, Shi S, Feng X, Feng H, Jiang J, Xue Q, He J. Calcification of arteries supplying the gastric tube increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:3551–3562.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Maruyama S, Okamura A, Kanie Y, Sakamoto K, Fujiwara D, Kanamori J, Imamura Y, Watanabe M. Influence of damaged stomach on anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:7240–7246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ito R, Kadota T, Murano T, Yoda Y, Hori K, Minamide T, Sato D, Yamamoto Y, Takashima K, Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, Yano T. Clinical features and risk factors of gastric cancer detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy in esophageal cancer patients. Esophagus 2021;18:621–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van de Ven SEM, Falger JM, Verhoeven RHA, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Spaander MCW, Bruno MJ, Koch AD. Increased risk of second primary tumours in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide study in a Western population. United European Gastroenterol J 2021;9:497–506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg 1978;188:606–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rau W, Hohaus C, Jessen E. A differential approach to form and site of peptic ulcer. Sci Rep 2019;9:8683.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Liebermann-Meffert DMI, Meier R, Siewert JR. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1110–1115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Takeda FR, Cecconello I, Szachnowicz S, Tacconi MR, Gama-Rodrigues J. Anatomic study of gastric vascularization and its relationship to cervical gastroplasty. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:132–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumagai Y, Hatano S, Sobajima J, Ishiguro T, Fukuchi M, Ishibashi KI, Mochiki E, Nakajima Y, Ishida H. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography of the reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy: Efficacy of the 90-second rule. Dis Esophagus 2018;31:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Ninomiya Y, Oguma J, Kazuno A, Yatabe K, Higuchi T, Yamamoto M. Association between indocyanine green fluorescence blood flow speed in the gastric conduit wall and superior mesenteric artery calcification: predictive significance for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Esophagus 2021;18:248–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen L, Liu F, Wang K, Zou W. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:1635–1640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pierie JP, de Graaf PW, van Vroonhoven TJ, Obertop H. The vascularization of a gastric tube as a substitute for the esophagus is affected by its diameter. Dis Esophagus 1998;11:231–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heger P, Blank S, Diener MK, Ulrich A, Schmidt T, Büchler MW, Mihaljevic AL. Gastric preconditioning in advance of esophageal resection-systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1523–1532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Veen AV, Schiffmann LM, de Groot EM, Bartella I, de Jong PA, Borggreve AS, Brosens LAA, Santos DPD, Fuchs H, Ruurda JP, Bruns CJ, van Hillegersberg R, Schröder W. The ISCON-trial protocol: laparoscopic ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and arterial calcifications. BMC Cancer 2022;22:144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D. Motegi: protocol/project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing.

H. Ichikawa: protocol/project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and editing.

T. Bamba: data collection and management, manuscript editing.

Y. Muneoka: data collection and analysis, manuscript editing.

Y. Kano: data collection and management, manuscript editing.

K. Usui: data collection and management, manuscript editing.

T. Hanyu: data collection and management, manuscript editing.

T. Ishikawa: data management and analysis, manuscript editing.

Y. Hirose: data interpretation, manuscript editing.

K. Miura: data interpretation, manuscript editing.

Y. Tajima: data interpretation, manuscript editing.

Y. Shimada: protocol/project development, manuscript editing.

J. Sakata: protocol/project development, manuscript editing.

S. Nakagawa: data collection and management, manuscript editing, supervision of the study.

S. Kosugi: data collection and management, manuscript editing, supervision of the study.

T. Wakai: protocol/project development, manuscript editing, supervision of the study.

All the authors revised the manuscript critically for content and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Ichikawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of Niigata University (#2020–0106). The need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective observational nature of the study, and brief information on this study was disclosed on the Niigata University website to ensure patients had an opportunity to refuse their participation in the study (opt-out method).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 31 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motegi, D., Ichikawa, H., Bamba, T. et al. Ulcer Scarring in the Gastric Conduit Is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 250–261 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05545-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05545-0

Keywords

Navigation