Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomy of the Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries to Promote Safer Hepatic Vein-Guided Liver Resection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

In laparoscopic anatomic liver resection, an increasingly common procedure, the hepatic vein-guided approach is widely used although the hepatic vein tributaries can be a major source of bleeding in the event of inadvertent injury. This report describes the anatomy of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) including its tributaries based on reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images and provides anatomic data to enable safe middle hepatic vein-guided liver resection.

Methods

Following simulation modeling of the hepatic vasculatures, reconstructed MHV data was pooled from 35 healthy liver donors. Yields of the MHV tributaries were analyzed to enable MHV-guided liver resection.

Results

A total of 252 tributaries were identified in the 35 donors. The MHV yielded fewer tributaries from its anterior and posterior aspects than from its right-side and left-side aspects (40 [15.9%], 13 [5.2%], 93 [36.9%], and 106 [42.1%], respectively). The MHV tributaries from the anterior and posterior aspects were smaller in diameter than those from the right-side and left-side aspects (median, 3.0, 2.0, 4.8, and 4.0 mm, respectively).

Discussion

Our simulation revealed that MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect poses a lower risk of injury to the MHV tributaries compared to dissection from either lateral aspect. In addition, MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect allows for safer identification and isolation of the thick MHV tributaries originating from the lateral aspects. Ideally, the anterior or posterior aspect of the MHV should be accessed and exposed before the lateral aspects are dissected to minimize the risk of MHV tributary injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monden K, Alconchel F, Berardi G, et al. Landmarks and techniques to perform minimally invasive liver surgery: A systematic review with a focus on hepatic outflow. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021.

  2. Okuda Y, Honda G, Kurata M, et al. Dorsal approach to the middle hepatic vein in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219(2):e1-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rotellar F, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, et al. Caudal approach to the middle hepatic vein as a resection pathway in difficult major hepatectomies under laparoscopic approach. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122(7):1426-1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogiso S, Okuno M, Shindoh J, et al. Conceptual framework of middle hepatic vein anatomy as a roadmap for safe right hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21(1):43-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiguchi G, Sugioka A, Kato Y, et al. Use of the inter-Laennec approach for laparoscopic anatomical right posterior sectionectomy in semi-prone position. Surg Oncol 2019; 29:140-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogiso S, Seo S, Ishii T, et al. Middle hepatic vein branch-guided approach for laparoscopic resection of liver segment 8 is simple, reliable, and reproducible. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27(13):5195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogiso S, Seo S, Ishii T, et al. Transfissural approach for laparoscopic resection of a deep segment 8 lesion in contact with the hepatocaval confluence. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 15(1):229.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Monden K, Sadamori H, Hioki M, et al. Consideration of cranial approach to major hepatic veins in laparoscopic anatomic liver resection of segment 8. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 231(4):498-499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, et al. How has virtual hepatectomy changed the practice of liver surgery?: Experience of 1194 virtual hepatectomy before liver resection and living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2018; 268(1):127-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Araki K, Conrad C, Ogiso S, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218(2):e37-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monden K, Sadamori H, Hioki M, et al. Cranial approach to the left hepatic vein in laparoscopic anatomic liver resections of segment 2 and segment 3. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohshima S. Volume analyzer SYNAPSE VINCENT for liver analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014; 21(4):235-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. IHPBA TCot. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. Vol. 2. HPB, 2000. pp. 333–339.

  14. Aoki T, Koizumi T, Mansour DA, et al. Ultrasound-guided preoperative positive percutaneous indocyanine green fluorescence staining for laparoscopic anatomical liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230(3):e7-e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyata A, Ishizawa T, Tani K, et al. Reappraisal of a dye-staining technique for anatomic hepatectomy by the concomitant use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221(2):e27-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishino H, Hatano E, Seo S, et al. Real-time navigation for liver surgery using projection mapping with indocyanine green fluorescence: Development of the novel medical imaging projection system. Ann Surg 2018; 267(6):1134-1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogiso S, Seo S, Okumura S, et al. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy using the extrahepatic Glissonean approach: A secure option for achieving a negative margin for lesions with ductal extension. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26(6):1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berardi G, Igarashi K, Li CJ, et al. Parenchymal sparing anatomical liver resections with full laparoscopic approach: Description of technique and short-term results. Ann Surg 2019; 273(4):785-791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuda Y, Honda G, Kobayashi S, et al. Intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach to segment 7 from the dorsal side during laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy of the cranial part of the right liver. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226(2):e1-e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Egger ME, Gottumukkala V, Wilks JA, et al. Anesthetic and operative considerations for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 2016; 161(5):1191-1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi S, Honda G, Kurata M, et al. An experimental study on the relationship among airway pressure, pneumoperitoneum pressure, and central venous pressure in pure laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann Surg 2016; 263(6):1159-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Man K, Fan ST, Ng IO, et al. Prospective evaluation of Pringle maneuver in hepatectomy for liver tumors by a randomized study. Ann Surg 1997; 226(6):704-11; discussion 711-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Seo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(WMV 26.1 mb)

ESM 2

(WMV 25.1 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogiso, S., Seo, S., Ishii, T. et al. Anatomy of the Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries to Promote Safer Hepatic Vein-Guided Liver Resection. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 122–127 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05074-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05074-2

Keywords

Navigation