Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The value of whole-tumor histogram and texture analysis based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the discrimination of breast fibroepithelial lesions: corresponds to clinical management decisions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative parameters extracted from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in distinguishing fibroepithelial tumors using whole-tumor histogram and texture analysis.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 66 female patients with single phyllodes tumor (PT) and 29 female patients with single fibroadenoma (FA) who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. By independently performing whole-tumor histogram and texture analysis based on ADC maps, two radiologists extracted seven histogram parameters and four texture parameters. The extracted parameters were compared using univariate analysis to determine their ability to distinguish FAs from PTs, benign PTs from FAs, as well as benign PTs from borderline and malignant PTs.

Results

When FAs and PTs were compared, ADC_skewness values of PTs were significantly lower than those of FAs (p < 0.05), whereas other significant extracted parameter values of PTs were significantly higher than those of FAs (p ≤ 0.001); the area under the curve of significant parameters combined was 0.936. Regarding the differences between FAs and benign PTs, ADC_SD, ADC_95th percentile and ADC_kurtosis of FAs were significantly lower than those of benign PT group, and ADC_skewness was higher than that of benign PT group (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, ADC_SD, ADC_95th percentile and all texture parameters are significantly higher in the borderline and malignant PT group than in FA and benign PT group (p < 0.05). In addition, ADC_kurtosis of malignant PT group was significantly lower than that of borderline PT group (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

The extracted whole-tumor histogram and texture features of ADC maps can improve differential diagnosis of breast fibroepithelial tumors and contribute to optimal selection for clinical management of patients with fibroepithelial tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li JJX, Tse GM. Core needle biopsy diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast: a diagnostic challenge. Pathology. 2020;52(6):627–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2020.06.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tan PH. Fibroepithelial lesions revisited: implications for diagnosis and management. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(Suppl 1):15–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0583-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tumours. WCoTIB. Classification of Tumours. In: Breast tumours. 2019.

  4. Tan BY, Tan PH. A diagnostic approach to fibroepithelial breast lesions. Surg Pathol Clin. 2018;11(1):17–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2017.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Liso E, Bottosso M, Lo Mele M, et al. Prognostic factors in phyllodes tumours of the breast: retrospective study on 166 consecutive cases. ESMO Open. 2020;5(5):e000843. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000843.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between MR findings and histologic grade. Radiology. 2006;241(3):702–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mangi AA, Smith BL, Gadd MA, Tanabe KK, Ott MJ, Souba WW. Surgical management of phyllodes tumors. Arch Surg. 1999;134(5):487–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liew KW, Siti Zubaidah S, Doreen L. Malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: A single institution experience. Med J Malaysia. 2018;73(5):297–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamitani T, Matsuo Y, Yabuuchi H, et al. Differentiation between benign phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas of the breast on MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(8):1344–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mai H, Mao Y, Dong T, et al. The utility of texture analysis based on breast magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating phyllodes tumors from fibroadenomas. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Jiang N, Zhang C, Luo X, Zhong P, Fang J. Value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis in the differential diagnosis of benign and borderline/malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. Cancer Imaging. 2021;21(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00398-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Y, Tang W-J, Kong Q-C, et al. Can whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis be helpful to evaluate breast phyllode tumor grades? Eur J Radiol. 2019;114:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie T, Zhao Q, Fu C, et al. Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(5):2535–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5804-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun K, Zhu H, Chai W, et al. Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06365-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ditsatham C, Chongruksut W. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: diagnosis, management and outcome during a 10-year experience. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:7805–11. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S215039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. local recurrence of benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1263–75. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07134-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Yang C, Pfeifer JD, et al. Histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and proteomics characteristics of low-grade phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma: more similarities than differences. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020;6:27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-0169-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Barth RJ. Borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors: how often do they locally recur and is there anything we can do about it? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(7):1973–5. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07278-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsian S, Giannakopoulos NV, Rahbar H, Rendi MH, Chai X, Partridge SC. Diffusion-weighted imaging reflects variable cellularity and stromal density present in breast fibroadenomas. Clin Imaging. 2016;40(5):1047–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuhua Yan.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There was no funding obtained for this retrospective analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Chai, W., Sun, K. et al. The value of whole-tumor histogram and texture analysis based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the discrimination of breast fibroepithelial lesions: corresponds to clinical management decisions. Jpn J Radiol 40, 1263–1271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01304-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01304-y

Keywords

Navigation