Field and management factors can reduce potato early blight severity - An observational study on farms combined with �eld trials in southern Sweden

Abstract

pesticides by 50 % and to achieve that for potato early blight, studies of factors linked to IPM, including the importance of soil, plant and management factors for early blight disease development are of great importance.Late blight treatment is the main reason for the high amounts of pesticides being used in potato production (Haverkort et al., 2008), but also early blight is currently demanding many treatments to be controlled.There are multiple prognosis systems for potato early blight being developed, most of them are only based on weather conditions and plant-age (Meno et al., 2022) but it would be beneficial if field soil specific parameters would also be taken into consideration in these models to create more accurate simulations.Mineral nutrients are important for plant resistance to pathogens even if there are contradicting reports on the effect of nutrients on plant disease (Dordas 2008) that need to be further elucidated.The effect may depend on the type of pathogen, since obligate pathogens may increase disease severity at high nitrogen levels, while disease caused by facultative pathogens usually decrease at high N levels (Dordas 2008).Since nutrients are important for both plants and microorganisms many interactions between plant and soil factors may occur and the effect of a specific nutrient can vary in different environments (Dordas, 2008, Huber et al., 2012;, Tripathi et al., 2022).Low nitrogen levels are reported to increase severity of early blight disease in potato (Jindo et al., 2021).However, the effect of other nutrients on potato early blight does not seem to be well investigated.Starch potatoes are harvested later in the season and with a longer growth period than table potatoes and therefore more prone to early blight infection in Sweden.Starch potato farmers in southern Sweden started to notice an increase of early blight infection around the season of 2017.This was probably due to an increased incidence of fungicide resistance to the most used fungicides available (Mostafanezhad et al., 2021;Odilbekov et al., 2019).This gave rise to awareness of early blight in Sweden and was partly the reason for the initiation of this study.This investigation was designed as an observational study of commercial farms representing the starch potato production area in Sweden in 2019, 2020 and 2021.The hypothesis of this study, based on the large variations in disease observed by farmers and advisors, was that the severity of infection depends on specific field, soil, plant, and crop management factors.The reason for the large field variation in early blight severity in Sweden is mostly unknown and we aimed to unravel factors that are most important for the disease development.
To experimentally confirm an observation in the farmer study, field trials were performed in 2021 and 2022.Ladders of three different levels of potassium fertilization were applied for both fungicide treated and untreated plots to study the effect on early blight disease.The main question for the study was: are there any soil, plant or crop management parameters that we can observe or control in order to customize and calibrate the disease control management towards more field specific IPM strategies?

Observational study
Over three seasons, 2019, 2020 and 2021, a total of 52 unique fields were included in this observational study (Fig 1).The fields were situated in southern Sweden where starch potato is grown for "Sveriges Stärkelseproducenter förening", SSF (Fig 1).The fields were chosen to represent the different conditions in the area (e.g., crop rotation, soil type, farmer-and advisor perceived infection pressure) of potato starch primary production.It was also of importance to select farms where the farmers were interested in participating in the study and ready to collaborate, since it required them to sacrifice time to manage an untreated plot and fill out a survey.Table 1 gives an overview on what data that was collected from each field: soil analysis, leaf analysis and the specific management strategies at each farm.

Field plots
The 24 m x 24 m (24 m is the width of a standard tractor sprayer) plot untreated against early blight was located inside the field to avoid edge effects.All other management of the fields were left untouched and would follow the general management strategy by each farmer.

Soil analysis
To get an indication of the soil type and fertility (Table 1), soil samples were taken at the beginning of September by using a soil drill at a depth of 5-25 cm inside of the furrow where the tubers grow.Around twenty subsamples from the soil drill were taken from different spots in the field plots in a "W" pattern with an estimated total volume of one liter, and then pooled and mixed in a plastic bag.The soil in the sealed plastic bag was stored in room temperature, dark until analysis the next day.The soil was delivered to Eurofins in Vä, Kristianstad Sweden, and analyzed in their laboratory (Eurofins, 2021).Accreditation and methods for soil analysis can be found in the supplementary materials Table 1.

Leaf analysis
Leaf samples representing plant nutrient content of the field plots (Table 1) were collected in the middle of August.The collection technique followed the instructions from Yara Megalab TM for whole potato leaf analysis (Yara, 2022).The fourth fully developed leaf was picked.In total, twenty leaves from each untreated plot were picked.The leaf samples were put in paper envelopes and mailed the same day as the collection to Yara Analytical Services in Pocklington, UK, that carried out the analyses.

Disease assessment
The levels of disease and defoliation were evaluated twice during the season, in the middle of August and at the beginning of September.The level of early blight infection was visually scored according to Duarte et al., (2013).The scoring numbers (0-100) are defined as the percentage of the green foliage covered by dark early blight spots.The level of defoliation was scored as a percentage of the green biomass that had turned brown or fallen off from the plant.Both the disease levels in the untreated plot and in the surrounding field were evaluated, and so was the level of defoliation.This was performed to see if the fungicide management strategy used by the farmer had any effect on the disease.The surrounding fields were fungicide treated at most farms and never showed high levels of infection.For the result section in this paper the disease severity data (percent infection) from the untreated plots from the second scoring, at the beginning of September, was used.The infection in mid-August had not yet reached a point where larger differences could be seen among the fields.

Farm management form
After each field season the farmers were asked to fill out a form containing information about their management.The following information was collected for each field: Planting date, emergence date 50 %, i.e. when 50 % of the plants had emerged, cultivar, seed tuber certification and/or treatment, irrigation type and amount, the number of potato free years and details about their historical crop rotation the last five years, soil management, fertilizing schedule and amounts, yield and finally their own reflections of their disease levels.

Potassium field trials
Preliminary data from the first two seasons of the farmer study showed that low potassium levels in leaves correlated with high early blight infection.Therefore, to confirm these results, potassium field trials were performed in 2021 and 2022.The trials were located at two separate sites per season, 2021: Nymö (N 56.024848, W 14.335998) and Gärds Köpinge (55.947479, 14.182357), 2022: Åsums boställe (55.958602,14.151002) and Lyngby gård (55.886097,14.143463).The sites were chosen due to their low levels of potassium available in the soil to be able to create deficiencies at low potassium application rates.The trial was designed with four completely randomized blocks.Each plot consisted of 18 square meters of plants, except for the trial at Åsums boställe, where the plots had a size of 15,75 square meters due to lack of space.Each plot contained five rows where the three middle rows were evaluated for disease progression, defoliation, leaf potassium concentration and tuber-and starch yield.Three different levels of potassium fertilization were applied in both untreated and fungicide treated plots (Table 3).Fungicides were applied following a full dose recommendation with four treatments and two weeks interval with start in mid-July.The fungicide products Narita (0,4 L/ha) and Propulse (0,45 L/ha) were alternated.Standard late blight (Revus/RanmanTop alternated every week starting in mid-June) and insecticide treatments were conducted.A tractor sprayer (Lechler IDKT Purple 0,25) with a flat fan nozzle with medium droplet size was used with 300 L liquid/ha at 3 Bar.The starch cultivar Kuras was used in all field trials and seed tubers were obtained from Lyckeby SSF.The trials were, except for potassium, fertilized and managed following standard recommendations by the Swedish Rural Economy and Agricultural Societies in the starch potato growing area in southern Sweden.The planting row distance was 75 cm with 38 cm in between the plants for all trials.All infection that occurred in the trials was natural.

Potassium fertilization
The experimental fields were fertilized before planting with a later (end of June) additional N fertilization and weekly Mn treatments.For 2021 137 kg/ha N, 63 kg/ha P and 50 kg/ha Mg and for 2022 200 kg/ha N, 63 kg/ha P and 50 kg/ha Mg were added in total, in the form of Axan Ns 27-4, MAP NP 12-23 and Kiserit.The potassium fertilizer (potassium sulphate) was applied by hand individually for each plot to be able to adjust the levels.In the first year, 2021, a potassium ladder was designed according to the soil analysis results with three steps (Table 3).The middle level, K2, was following the recommended fertilization for the field, and the low level, K1, contained 100 kg K/ha less than K2, and the high level, K3, contained 100 kg K/ha more.Since the potassium leaf analysis for 2021 did not show the depletion that was aimed for (see Results), the ladders were changed for the 2022 season.For 2022 the ladder was designed so that the low level, K1, had no potassium fertilization at all and the highest level, K3, was following the recommended level and the middle step, K2, was in between zero and the recommended value (Table 3).

Potassium leaf analysis
The leaf analysis was performed on September 6th in 2021 and on August 25th for 2022, following the same method as for the leaf analysis in the observational study, section 2.1.3.It was planned for a later analysis in 2022 as well but due to early defoliation caused by potassium deficiency the later analysis was not possible.Ten leaves from each block were picked.Block 1 and 2, and 3 and 4 were pooled, respectively, to 20 leaves each giving two replicates for each treatment in 2021.In 2022, twenty leaves were collected from each of block 1, 2 and 3 giving three replicates.Results are presented in Table 3.

Disease assessment
The level of early blight disease and defoliation was visually scored weekly as in section 2.1.4.The disease scoring data was used to calculate the relative area under disease progress curve, rAUDPC (Shaner & Finney, 1977).The defoliation data was used to calculate the area under the defoliation curve, rAUC, in a similar way.The visual scoring was carried out weekly during the season, but since the disease in the different fields progressed very differently both in the two years and at the different sites, the exact dates for the calculations differed over the seasons and fields.For the 2021 trials, the calculations were done from 9th of August to 13th of September for both rAUDPC and rAUC at both sites.For 2022 at the Lyngby gård trial site rAUDPC was calculated from 18th of July to 22nd of August and rAUC from 8th of August to 5th of September.For the second trial site in 2022, Åsums boställe, both rAUDPC and rAUC was calculated from 9th of August to 12th of September.Thus, Lyngby gård had to be evaluated during a different period than the other sites, due to a very early onset of infection and an earlier defoliation.Disease assessment data is presented in Table 4a and b.

Yield and starch measurements
The yield from each plot was measured at harvest and the starch content of the tubers was calculated following the standard method set by the International Starch Institute Denmark (1986).The yield and starch data are presented in Table 4a and b.

Statistical analysis
For data analysis and creation of most graphs, the language R was used with R studio as an interface (Version 1.1.456 -© 2009-2018 RStudio, Inc.).Some graphs were made with MS Excel.To investigate how the rate of infection (as a percentage) was influenced by the measured soil, leaf and farm management parameters in the observational study of the farms, we first performed Spearman correlations between infection rate and all parameters for i) soil measures, ii) leaf measures and iii) farm management parameters.All field plots were considered as independent samples.Second, to test whether selected parameters that correlated with infection rate in the initial tests also had an effect when year of study was taken into account or occasionally the combined effect of two parameters was taken into account, we performed analyses of variances (Anovas).These models included the fixed factors selected parameter(s), year and their interactions.Type II sums of squares were used and normality of residuals were tested with Shapiro-Wilk normality test.Correlation plots were created using the corrplot (Wei & Simko, 2021) package, cor.mtest.The ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016) package was used for the plots.The leaflet package (© 2014-2016 RStudio, Inc.) was used to create the map.To test whether potassium fertilization level affected the dependent variables: Infection rate (rAUDPC), defoliation rate (rAUC), yield, starch content and starch yield in the field trials, a series of analyses of variances (Anovas) where performed for each of the dependent variables.rAUDPC and rAUC were logtransformed.Data from each of the two years were analysed in separate models because of the difference in design between the years.The models included the fixed factors treatment (potassium treatment K1-3 for each of fungicide treated and control plots), block nested within field site and the interaction between treatment and field site.Type II sums of squares were used.Post-hoc tests were performed to test treatment differences using estimated marginal means with Tukey's method.Normality of residuals were tested with Shapiro-Wilk normality test.The packages used for statistical analyses were: car (Fox and Weisberg 2019), emmeans (Lenth, 2022) and stats (R core team, 2022).

Observational study
An overview of the investigated parameters in the observational study is presented in Table 1.Several measured parameters showed very high variation among the investigated farmer's fields indicated by large differences between min and max values and high CV-values.For example, the soil parameters K-AL, K/Mg, Ca-AL, and the leaf parameter copper all had a CV higher than 60 %.However, several other parameters showed much lower variation.The soil parameters pH and sand content together with the leaf parameters boron, phosphorous and nitrogen content all had CV-values lower than 20 %.   2).However, that seemed to be mainly the case in sandy soils where a negative correlation was observed all three years (Fig 5).Testing the combined effects of potassium content of sand content as a categorical factor either above or below 80 % across years showed a significant interaction between leaf potassium content, sand content category and year (Table 2).There is also a three-way interaction to be found (Table 2), showing that in years with higher infection pressure the effect of potassium content on infection matters on heavier soils as well.There is a marginally non-significant correlation to be found between leaf potassium content and soil sand content (Df = 1, F = 3.99, p = 0.0529) and this correlation would much likely be stronger if the fields were not soil type precisely fertilized directly to not cause depletion in potato., where lighter soils tend to be lower in Cu (Anova: Leaf Cu content effect on sand content; F=39.5, Df =1, p < 0.0001).Leaf phosphorus and nitrogen content showed no significant correlation with the infection rate and is therefore not analysed in separate models involving year.Positive correlations between the leaf analysis and infection rate were found for boron and magnesium (Fig 2b), suggesting that these micro nutrients may also have some importance.However, the effect on infection may also be indirect as magnesium content in the leaf had a strong negative correlation with potassium (Fig 2b).

Management 3.1.4.1 Cultivar resistance
The form the farmers filled in gave information on what starch potato cultivar that was used in the plots, but since most farmers were growing the same cultivar, Kuras (67 %), and the distribution of other cultivars were not even (Dartiest 10 %, Saprodi 8 %, Avenue 6 %, Maxim 4 %, Stratos 2 %, Maxim 2 %, N/A 2 %), this study did not give enough input data on cultivar resistance to disease in order to draw any conclusions.Visual inspection of the effect of crop rotation on infection rate in relation to the two most significant parameters influencing infection (sand content and leaf potassium content) suggested that longer crop rotations (>8 years) never gave rise to very high early blight infection rates (Fig 7a and b).The other factors, soil composition and potassium, seemed to be of bigger importance though.There is a lack of data points from farms with a crop rotation of 6-8 years, which makes it difficult to test the effect of crop rotation statistically.However, the results suggest that there is a weak significant correlation between short crop rotation and high infection rate (Anova: Crop rotation effect on infection: F = 6.30,Df =1, p = 0.0158).

Planting date and emergence date
There was no significant correlation between the planting date or emergence date and severity of early blight infection.

Furrowing
Since A. solani is a soil pathogen and mostly spreads directly from the soil to the lower foliage on the potato plant, management strategies such as late furrowing could potentially help spread the spores to the foliage.However, there was no correlation between late furrowing and early blight infection.

Seed tuber
The farmers gave information about seed tuber treatment and certification level of tubers planted in the fields.None of these seed tuber parameters seemed to correlate with the early blight infection rate.

Irrigation
There was no significant correlation between total volume of irrigation and early blight infection rate.However, farms that lacked any irrigation system had lower early blight infection.These farms also had heavier soils (lower sand content) that were less prone to early blight infection (see section 3.1.2).The type of irrigation used by the farmers were mostly water canon (85 %) and therefore no conclusion on the effect of irrigation type can be drawn.

Yield
The tuber yield data that was collected in the survey was not complete.Not all farmers filled it out and for those who did, it was based on estimates and guesses.Therefore, the yield data was excluded from the results.

Potassium field trials
In the potassium field trials the effect from different levels of potassium fertilization (Table 2) on the rate of early blight infection was evaluated.Higher level of potassium fertilization resulted in lower rate of early blight infection (Table 3a and 3, Fig 8).However, in 2021, the significant effect of treatment (Df=5, F=47.2, p < 0.0001) was only due to a difference between fungicide treated and untreated but no significant effect of potassium fertilizer (Table 3a).The lower levels of fertilizer did not lead to potassium deficiency and the leaf potassium concentrations were all above 2 % (Table 2) this year.Fungicides reduced the infection rate significantly (Table 3a).In 2022, when the ladder used started at zero K added for K1, we obtained large differences in leaf K concentrations and there was a significant effect of fertilizer level on the early blight infection rate (Table 3b, Df=5, F=53.6, p < 0.0001).There was also a significant effect of potassium on the starch yield.There is a known connection between the tuber starch content and amount of potassium fertilizer where a higher potassium fertilization tends to give a lower starch content.This effect was not significant for our trials when all treatments were pooled for both sites but since the effect on tuber yield was positive with a higher K fertilization, the overall starch yield was affected by the potassium fertilization levels (Table 4a and 4b).In figure 8 the levels of leaf potassium are compared with the 'relative infection rate' instead, where the relative infection is calculated by dividing the rAUDPC value with the lowest rAUDPC value scored, within untreated or fungicide treated plots, at each specific site and year.These figures show that there is a seasonal difference but more importantly that there is a relationship between the leaf potassium content and early blight infection rate.The effect is most clear in the untreated plants.Fungicide treated plots (relative to best treatment) 2021 2022 4. Discussion We found large variation in early blight infection rates among 51 investigated farmer's fields in southern Sweden over three years.We also found large variation in several soil and plant parameters analyzed that could explain some of the variation in infection rate.Soil sand content and leaf potassium concentration were clearly negatively associated with higher early blight infection rates.The effect of potassium was confirmed in field trials where we found that low levels of potassium fertilization, leading to deficiencies at the end of the season, resulted in significantly higher infection.Also, other parameters, e.g.leaf copper content and soil phosphorous levels and crop rotation may be associated with infection rate but need further studies to be confirmed.

Soil composition
Our results indicate that the sand and clay content of the soil is important for the risk of severe early blight infection.To explain that we suggest two different hypotheses that may be linked with each other.The first is that plants in a lighter soil will more easily experience drought stress and nutrient depletion because the soil cannot hold as much water and nutrients will easily leak out leading to deficiencies.Secondly, heavier soils have different soil microbiome composition, a composition that could offer more competition with A. solani from other microorganisms.Thereby, the survival of A. solani could be affected and result in decreasing soil inoculum concentration or reduce the sporulation rate of the pathogen.Future studies to test these hypotheses would be of importance.Another soil factor that requires some explanation is the P-AL content.This parameter shows how much phosphorus that is available in the soil for the plant to take up, and there was a positive correlation between P-AL and early blight infection.However, P-AL also correlated with the sand content so that heavier soils appeared to have less P-AL (Table 2).By consulting agronomic experts we hypothesize that farms with lighter soils in a historical perspective have had a need of animals at the farm to achieve and maintain fertile soils with positive economic results.These farms have most likely used more manure in their fertilization strategy leading to higher P-AL.The P-AL values on some of the farms with light soils were extremely high and those values would not be preferred by the farmer but is most probably a result of having lots of manure at the farm to use (Liu et al., 2012).Thus, it cannot be concluded from this study if the soil available phosphorus has anything to do with the severeness of infection, or if the P-AL parameter is just linked to higher use of manure on sandy soils.

Leaf nutrient components
The supply of nutrients affects the plants resistance to pests and pathogens (Huber et al., 2012) and therefore leaf nutrient parameters were studied.The leaf analysis was conducted in the middle of August for all three seasons included in this study.The sampling date is later than what is usually done to correct deficiencies in potato production, but since this was an observational study, we did not want to fertilize to support the plants, and it was decided that a later sampling would give more information about deficiencies related to early blight.There is most probably a correlation between nitrogen content and early blight infection (Dordas, 2008), but we did not find any significant effect in our study.This might be explained by the intense nitrogen fertilization strategy that is practiced in most farms.Most plots had a good nitrogen value, and no deficiencies were observed (Table 1).However, in many fields the potassium levels were lower than what would be recommended, which might explain why a deficiency related infection could be seen.Further, the negative correlation between leaf potassium and infection was mainly found on sandy soil, which is not surprising since sandy soils often are inherently low in K (Zörb et al., 2014).Amtmann et al., (2008) states that K application is beneficial for plant defense against most fungal diseases.This has been explained by the effect K has on primary metabolism by helping to synthesize high molecular weight compounds that is reducing the concentrations of low molecular weight compounds that are feeding the pathogens (Römheld & Kirkby, 2010).According to Huber et al., (2012) potassium addition is only effective in disease control if there is a deficiency in the plant, and is related to the metabolic functions of K, and several other biochemical and physiological processes (Amtmann et al., 2008;Dordas, 2008).This agrees with the results in our potassium field trials where increased infection rates were only found at low potassium levels in the leaves, i.e. below 2 %.Higher potassium levels than 2 % did not lower the infection rate.However, in a review by Jindo et al., (2021) potassium was not considered as important for early blight infection in potato, but it does not seem to be well investigated and further research is needed for clarification.Blachinski et al., (1996) reported no effect from potassium foliar treatment in lowering early blight infection rate, however the K depletion was not as high in their fields as it was in our study.On the other hand, they mention that the developmental stage of the potato plant is related to the potassium leaf content and could therefore influence the amount of early blight infection, since the disease is related to senescence.We could not find any relationship between the planting or emergence date and potassium leaf levels in our study.In some cases, it has been observed that potassium deficient plants were less infested by insects and necrotrophic pathogens (Amtmann et al., 2008).This was explained by the fact that potassium deficiencies may induce the jasmonate signaling network (Armengaud et al., 2004) that classically is supposed to trigger defense responses to insects and necrotrophic pathogens, while salicylic acid signaling is important for defense against biotrophic pathogens.A. solani is a necrotrophic pathogen and according to this potato plants should be more resistant at lower potassium levels.However, that seem to be different in different plant species.Brouwer et al., (2020), reported that in potato instead an intact salicylic acid signaling is required for defense against A. solani and that has also earlier been reported in tomato (Sarkar et al., 2017).Thus, a possible increase in jasmonic acid levels at low potassium level does not contradict our results.Potassium also influences potato starch content.A too high potassium fertilization may reduce the dry matter starch content (Miča, 1988) and potassium can also affect the physiochemical properties of the starch (Zhang et al., 2018).But the effect on the decreasing starch content is cancelled out by a higher tuber yield, making the effect less relevant.It is also mentioned by Miča (1988) that this phenomenon might be explained by errors in the methods of how to measure starch content.If the starch content calculation is done on dry or fresh weight the results differ, meaning that it might not be that the actual starch content in the tuber goes down, rather the water content of the tuber goes up as a result of higher K, giving false values on starch content when using fresh weight calculations.In this study no effect on starch yield from potassium was observed and the physiochemical properties of the starch were not evaluated.Since increased infection rate of early blight only seem to happen when there is a clear depletion of potassium, and no further correlations with infection and higher potassium fertilization levels that are exceeding the depletion threshold, the conclusion would be that if the recommended potassium fertilization guidelines are followed, nor infection or starch yield will be affected.Micronutrients Many of the nutrients are correlated with each other which can be explained by two factors.First, a richer soil will have more micronutrients in general to supply the crop (Montgomery et al., 2022).Secondly, a farmer that is careful with micronutrient fertilization will make sure that there are enough of all micronutrient components available for the plants (these fertilizers are often sold as mixes with many micronutrient components).There were positive correlations between infection and boron and magnesium, and high magnesium content is correlating with low potassium.A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that Mg ions and K ions are competing in the uptake of the plant (Senbayram et al., 2015;Taiz & Zeiger, 2002;Tränkner et al., 2018).High levels of Mg also compete with the uptake of Ca which also may increase the rate of disease (Huber & Jones, 2013).Boron on the other hand is not taken up in its ionic form (Taiz & Zeiger, 2002), and is the least understood plant micronutrient.Still, it is the most widespread micronutrient deficiency in the world (Dordas, 2008) and we have no explanation for the correlation with infection rate.The negative correlation between copper and infection might be explained by the leaf copper content being related to the soil composition, i.e., sandy soils generally led to lower copper values.Copper also has a role in plant defense against pests as it is important for detoxification of oxygen radicals and hydrogen peroxide (Huber et al., 2012).According to the leaf analysis, a copper value below 7 ppm would indicate a deficiency (Yara, 2022) and in most cases field plots with high infection had lower than 7 ppm copper (Fig 6).

Seasonal differences
The seasonal weather difference is the single most important factor when it comes to disease severity, however it is also one of the factors that we cannot control (Meno et al, 2022).Work on decision support systems for early blight in Sweden is ongoing and as a part of an integrated pest management strategy these interpretations of weather data and the direct weather effect on disease is of great importance to include in the farm strategies when reliable models are available.Weather models were not evaluated in this study, but the differences in observed infection rates over the three seasons indicate that the seasonal weather parameters are of great influence.In 2020 the total precipitation was higher than in 2019 and 2021 but most of that rain came early in the season.In 2019 there was more rain in July than the other two years which might have facilitated sporulation.This may explain the general higher infection rate in 2019 and 2020 compared to 2021.However, to draw conclusions about weather data and its influence on infection of early blight more specific studies must be carried out.

Management strategies
Of the management strategies that were evaluated in this study, seed tuber treatment, irrigation, cultivar, planting date and emergence date and crop rotation, there was only an indication that the crop rotation affected the infection rate.Early blight is a soil borne pathogen, hence the survival rate in the soil is an important factor related directly to the amount of infection (Suganthi et al., 2020).In Fig 7b it appears that farms with a longer crop rotation, also seem to have heavier soils.This is most probably due to heavier soils being better at delivering economic advantageous yields for other crops in between the potato, and further the farmers are not pushed to have short time in between their potato years.Since the economic calculations are most crucial for the survival of a farm it is hard to find farms with long potato rotation on lighter soils, and vice versa.It can be assumed from the graphs that four-year (or shorter) crop rotation is not making a big difference on the amount of infection.It would be of interest to find the point in crop rotation years where soil borne infection seems to decrease, and this breaking point is most likely different for heavy and light soils.
Fig 1 Map presenting the geographical location in southern Sweden of all untreated farm plots for all three years (2019-2021) with a color scale indicating the severeness of early blight infection (%) 3.1.1Soil and leaf analyses The relationship between early blight infection rate and leaf potassium content in soils with sand 299 content above and below 80 % 300 301

Year Fig 6
Fig 6 Relation between copper content in leaves and early blight infection rate, sand content in different colorThere was a significant negative correlation between the leaf copper content and infection rate in the initial analysis(Fig 2b, Fig 6).However, when taking year into account the effect of copper was marginally non-significant (Anova: Leaf Cu content effect on infection: F = 3.8, Df = 1, p = 0.056 ; Year: F = 5.8, Df = 2, p = 0.0059; Interaction: F = 0.22, Df = 2, p = 0.80).Copper content is also related to the soil sand content(Fig 6), where lighter soils tend to be lower in Cu (Anova: Leaf Cu content effect on sand content; F=39.5, Df =1, p < 0.0001).Leaf phosphorus and nitrogen content showed no significant correlation with the infection rate and is therefore not analysed in separate models involving year.Positive correlations between the leaf analysis and infection rate were found for boron and magnesium (Fig2b), suggesting that these micro nutrients may also have some importance.However, the effect on infection may also be indirect as magnesium content in the leaf had a strong negative correlation with potassium (Fig2b).3.1.4Management 3.1.4.1 Cultivar resistanceThe form the farmers filled in gave information on what starch potato cultivar that was used in the plots, but since most farmers were growing the same cultivar, Kuras (67 %), and the distribution of other cultivars were not even (Dartiest 10 %, Saprodi 8 %, Avenue 6 %, Maxim 4 %, Stratos 2 %, Maxim 2 %, N/A 2 %), this study did not give enough input data on cultivar resistance to disease in order to draw any conclusions.3.1.4.2 SeasonFor early blight, as for many other plant diseases, the seasonal disease pressure may largely vary.The average infection rate was lower in 2021 than in2019 and 2020 (Fig 3b).
Fig 6 Relation between copper content in leaves and early blight infection rate, sand content in different colorThere was a significant negative correlation between the leaf copper content and infection rate in the initial analysis(Fig 2b, Fig 6).However, when taking year into account the effect of copper was marginally non-significant (Anova: Leaf Cu content effect on infection: F = 3.8, Df = 1, p = 0.056 ; Year: F = 5.8, Df = 2, p = 0.0059; Interaction: F = 0.22, Df = 2, p = 0.80).Copper content is also related to the soil sand content(Fig 6), where lighter soils tend to be lower in Cu (Anova: Leaf Cu content effect on sand content; F=39.5, Df =1, p < 0.0001).Leaf phosphorus and nitrogen content showed no significant correlation with the infection rate and is therefore not analysed in separate models involving year.Positive correlations between the leaf analysis and infection rate were found for boron and magnesium (Fig2b), suggesting that these micro nutrients may also have some importance.However, the effect on infection may also be indirect as magnesium content in the leaf had a strong negative correlation with potassium (Fig2b).3.1.4Management 3.1.4.1 Cultivar resistanceThe form the farmers filled in gave information on what starch potato cultivar that was used in the plots, but since most farmers were growing the same cultivar, Kuras (67 %), and the distribution of other cultivars were not even (Dartiest 10 %, Saprodi 8 %, Avenue 6 %, Maxim 4 %, Stratos 2 %, Maxim 2 %, N/A 2 %), this study did not give enough input data on cultivar resistance to disease in order to draw any conclusions.3.1.4.2 SeasonFor early blight, as for many other plant diseases, the seasonal disease pressure may largely vary.The average infection rate was lower in 2021 than in2019 and 2020 (Fig 3b).
Fig 8 Graph showing the relationship between the leaf potassium content (%) and the relative infection rate of early blight

Table 1
Overview of descriptive statistics for measured parameters in farmers field plots from the observational study 2019-2021.

Table 2
Anovas for early blight infection rate in potato fields 2019-2021 as an effect of selected soil and 302 leaf parameters and their interactions with year and each other 303

Table 3
Soil potassium (K-AL) analysis before planting and application of fertilizers.Level of K (potassium sulphate) fertilizer applied and resulting leaf potassium content (September 6th in 2021 and 25th of August 2022) in the four field trials 2021-2022.

Table 4a
Infection rate (rAUDPC), defoliation rate (rAUC) and yield data, compared between untreated and fungicide treated plots with three different levels of potassium fertilization (K1-3, where 1 is the lowest) at two field trial sites in 2021.

Table 4b
Infection rate (rAUDPC), defoliation rate (rAUC) and yield data, compared between untreated and fungicide treated plots with three different levels of potassium fertilization (K1-3, where 1 is the lowest) at two field trial sites in 2022.