Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enriching Professional Learning Networks: A Framework for Identification, Reflection, and Intention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many educators in the 21st century utilize social media platforms to enrich professional learning networks (PLNs). PLNs are uniquely personalized networks that can support participatory and continuous learning. Social media services can mediate professional engagements with a wide variety of people, spaces and tools that might not otherwise be available. Teachers who once might have had access to only a handful of colleagues can now employ Facebook, Twitter and other mediums to learn from peers across the globe at any time. However, educators face numerous challenges building and enhancing their PLNs for professional growth. To support educators in the development of their PLNs, we present a framework for PLN enrichment. Rooted in our research and experiences with PLNs, this flexible framework is designed to help educators reflect upon how they might continuously improve their PLN experiences and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, B. (2015). The dynamic duo of professional learning = collaboration and technology. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(4), 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group. (2014). Teachers know best: Teachers’ views on professional development. Retrieved from: http://collegeready.gatesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Gates-PDMarketResearch-Dec5.pdf.

  • Carpenter, J. P. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ micro-blogging: professional development via Twitter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: a survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707–728. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.939294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. P., & Linton, J. N. (2016). Edcamp unconferences: Educators’ perspectives on an untraditional professional learning experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 97–108. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the U.S. & abroad (technical report). Oxford, OH: Learning Forward; Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

  • Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Boston, MA: Heath & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279–303. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robinson, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45–60. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Advance online publication. Review of Educational Research. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (2016). The power of mindful learning. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: a sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzat, U. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 results. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en#page1.

  • Rentner, D. S., Kober, N., & Frizzel, M. (2016). Listen to us: Teacher views and voices [report]. Center for Education Progress. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=1456#sthash.ULhb9iBQ.dpuf.

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K., & Han, Y. K. (2013). Oteanline cher collaboration: A case study of voluntary collaboration in a teacher-created online community. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 10(2).

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: an alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 328–369. doi:10.3102/0091732X07308968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 133–138. doi:10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T. (2013). Beyond school walls: teachers’ use of professional learning networks to receive help on a global scale. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1(3), 270–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: professional learning networks for whole teachers. Computers & Education, 102(1), 15–34. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014). Improving teacher feedback during active learning effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 772–809. doi:10.3102/0002831214531322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). #TwitterforTeachers: the implications of twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel G. Krutka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krutka, D.G., Carpenter, J.P. & Trust, T. Enriching Professional Learning Networks: A Framework for Identification, Reflection, and Intention. TechTrends 61, 246–252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0141-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0141-5

Keywords

Navigation