Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health in the Urban Environment: A Qualitative Review of the Brighton and Hove WHO Healthy City Program

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phase IV of the WHO European Region’s Healthy Cities Program ended in December 2008. This article presents the findings from a recently completed review of Brighton and Hove’s Healthy City Program which aimed to scope whether added value had accrued from the city’s role as a WHO Healthy City during phase IV. In contrast to most other evaluations of healthy cities, this review adopted a qualitative approach representing an appraisal of the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Program from the internal viewpoint of its local stakeholders. In addition to documentary analysis and a facilitated workshop, a series of in-depth interviews (N = 27) were conducted with stakeholders from the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership representing each of the sectors reflected in the Local Strategic Partnership (public, statutory, elected, community and voluntary, neighborhood and communities, business). The key findings of the review are presented in a way which reflects the three key areas of the review including (1) the healthy cities approach, (2) participation in phase IV of the WHO Healthy Cities Program, and (3) the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership. These findings are discussed, and recommendations for action at local, national, and European levels are proposed. In particular, we argue that there is an urgent need to develop a suitable monitoring and evaluation system for the WHO Healthy Cities Program with appropriate indicators that are meaningful and relevant to local stakeholders. Moreover, it would be important for any such system to capitalize on the benefits that qualitative methodologies can offer alongside more traditional quantitative indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Project Advisory Group consisted of the Healthy City manager, the vice-chair of the Healthy City Partnership, and the IHDRC research team.

References

  1. UNFPA. State of the world’s population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. Geneva: United Nations Population Fund; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moore M, Gould P, Keary B. Global urbanisation and impact on health international. Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2003; 206(4–5) :269-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organisation. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baum F, Jolley G, Hichs R, et al. What makes for sustainable healthy cities initiatives?—a review of the evidence from Noarlunga, Australia after 18 years. Health Promot Int. 2006; 21(4): 259-265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. White K. The Sage dictionary of health and society. Sage: London; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Leeuw E. The Sane Revolution—health promotion: backgrounds, scope, prospects. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen A. The ‘healthy’ city, expertise, and the regulation of space. Health Place. 1996; 2(3): 157-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kickbusch I. Healthy cities: a working project and a growing movement. Health Promot. 1989; 4(2): 77-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashton J, Grey P, Barnard K. Healthy cities: WHO’s new public health initiative. Health Promot. 2006; 1(3): 319-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Leeuw E. Global and local (glocal) health: the WHO healthy cities programme. Global Change and Human Health. 2001; 21: 34-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. WHO Healthy Cities Project Phase III: 1998–2002 the requirements and the designation process for WHO project cities. Copenhagen: WHO; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle Y, Brunning D, Cryer C, et al. Healthy cities indicators: analysis of data from cities across Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies JK, Sherriff NS, Hall C. Review of Brighton and Hove Healthy City Programme Phase IV. Brighton: University of Brighton; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. Phase IV (2003–2008) of the WHO Healthy Cities Network in Europe: goals and requirements. Copenhagen: WHO; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Leeuw E, Skovgaard T. Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: problems with evidence generation and application. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61: 1331-1341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organisation. Analysis of base-line healthy cities indicators by the National Institute of Public Health Denmark. Copenhagen: WHO; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill M, Simard P. Choosing indicators to evaluate healthy cities projects: a political task. Health Promot Int. 2006; 21(2): 145-152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hancock T. The healthy city from concept to application: implications for research. In: Davies JK, Kelly MP, eds. Healthy cities: research and practice. London: Routledge; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsouros A. World Health Organisation Healthy Cities Project: a project becomes a movement (review of progress 1987 to 1990). Copenhagen: World Health Organisation/FADL; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brighton & Hove City Council. Brighton and Hove Local Area Agreement 2008–11. Brighton: B&H City Council; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carlisle F. Health promotion, advocacy and health inequalities: a conceptual framework. Health Promot Int. 2008; 15(4): 369-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organisation. What is the healthy cities approach? Copenhagen: WHO; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Halling C, Ostergren P. Helsingborg WHO European Healthy Cities Network: evaluation of the membership of the municipality of Helsingborg. Lund: Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Lund; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson A, Lupton D. The New Public Health. Health and self in the age of risk. London: Allen and Unwin; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Brighton and Hove Healthy City Partnership and all of the stakeholders who took part in the review and in particular Terry Blair-Stevens for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper. We are also grateful to the Brighton and Hove City Teaching Primary Care Trust for commissioning and funding this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel Sherriff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, C., Davies, J.K. & Sherriff, N. Health in the Urban Environment: A Qualitative Review of the Brighton and Hove WHO Healthy City Program. J Urban Health 87, 8–28 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9387-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9387-y

Keywords

Navigation